Skip to main content

Steve Skojec: New Legislation Claims UFO Threat Increasing - And Only Some Have Known Human Origin (Updated)

 +
JMJ

 

 When Steve Skojec sold 1P5, I subscribed to his post 1P5 newsletter. I had suspected that, from some of his writing, Skojec was experiencing a crisis of Faith. In other words, that he was losing the faith. I was not incorrect and [since then] I've noticed him go off in various directions. 

Recently, I came across his responses to people who challenged his opinion on the existence of "Aliens", meaning other species.  Frankly, some of the arguments that were advanced by his opponents were simply expositions of ignorance, which Skojec treated as such.  [I found a note of derision in his responses but that may have been unintended.]

Moving on ...

Here's a screen shot from the latest bit that arrived in my inbox.


There is a lot of language around the world that makes you want to 'sit up and take notice'.  However, I think we need to dig a little deeper into some sub-surface issues.

The first is trust.  Ultimately, if you want to believe something you are trusting another human, your own senses [or an] ability to test a hypothesis.  For example, I have never seen an electron, but I trust a scientist that they exist.  I have never seen a miracle, but I trust the people who examined the facts that they occurred. When you read a Catholic Bible you are trusting the translators, authors and ultimately God.

This is one of the reasons why I am careful (ie. allergic) to conspiracy theories, they erode trust with offering nothing substantial in exchange.  In the long chain of events this leads to anarchy.

Moving on ...

The second facet I want to explore is the concept of 'Aliens'.  I'm not talking about the Hollywood versions that burst from the chests of hapless explorers.  I'm am talking about beings that are not human and have intelligence. First, lets set aside the science fiction versions of aliens!  

Why?  

Because they are too limiting, are based on either humans or spiritual beings and the result of fiction.  Second, lets focus on what 'types' of alien intelligence that we are interested. Those that are superior to humans, either technologically or inherently. 

Technologically, we are on the grounds of significant conspiracy theory. Suffice to say that any intelligent beings in this category have to abide by the laws of reality. Gravity, space, time etc. 

Moving on ...

In the Catholic Teaching we know of three other groups that are intelligent and fit this description: God, Angels and Demons.  While God is obviously in a class by Himself, Angels and Demons originated as a single group - Angels.  There was a test that a portion of the Angels failed and because of their nature became the intransigent enemies of God and as a result the human race. So lets be clear, as Catholics we believe that we are not alone in the Universe.  There are beings that wish us well and wish us harm.

How do we "know" this?  

Well first of all we have the accounts of miracles, super-natural events, that have taken place over the ages.  There are some that are more recent and have been examined using more modern technology. Suffice to say there have been reliable witnesses of events that run counter to the natural order.  Think St. Joseph of Cupertino (defying gravity), St. Francis Xavier (cures etc).  These events were witnessed and examined with the tools available at the time and defied nature.

Then we can examine apparitions and the miracles that accompanied them - such as Lourdes and Fatima. Again, the simple drying of soaked ground in Fatima without vaporizing the people is a proof that something outside of nature occurred.

Then think about demonic possessions.

Once again, set aside the Hollywood depictions.  The reality is far terrifying and yet it provides evidence of intelligent beings who are definitely superior to humans and have powers that are far beyond us. If necessary just read some approved accounts from Catholic exorcists.

Now let's turn back to the article that started this think about what it said and not what is implied.  The government of the USA is distinguishing between UFOs / UAPs that are of human origin and those that are not. 

What does that leave us with?

  1. God, 
  2. Angels, 
  3. Fallen-Angels, 
  4. Natural Phenomena 
  5. and Other.

Although the arguments put forward by Skojec's interlocutors weren't well formed, to ignore the first 3 because of a lack of trust is just as fallacious as ignoring the final two.  

As I understand it, the proof of intelligent species that inhabited other parts of the Universe does not challenge my Catholic Faith.  After all, they would be another order of creation, different from the Angels et al, but similar in that they are intelligent  However, if verifiable proof were provided, it would challenge my faith in the physicists and mathematicians who delve into the fundamental aspects of creation and have concluded that [an intelligent species travelling to earth] is impossible.

 [Update for clarification: The distances between Earth and other habitable planets is vast 4.2 light years to Proxima B in the Alpha Centauri solar system. The time required to reach Proxima B with current tech is measured in thousands of years. Some physicists have proposed a way of warping space - however there is a hitch: "Alcubierre’s method of compressing spacetime had one problem: it requires negative energy or negative mass."(earthsky) or according to one theory vast amounts of energey - equivalent to hundreds of times the mass of Jupiter - in a 100m radius spacecraft (PhysicsWorld). So let's set aside science fiction and untenable science theories.  IF there were intelligent beings on Proxima B and IF they decided to visit Earth over other closer planets for some strange reason - they would have needed to start their journey thousands of years ago.  The question then becomes why would they?  At the time they would have left Proxima B, there would be no evidence of technology to make Earth standout for such an investment. Numberically the chance of this happening is really, really, really small.  However, as Catholics we believe that Faster-Than-Light is possible.  It is called the Speed of Thought and that is how fast beings with an angelic nature move.  It is also, according to Catholic Doctrine, how fast the resurrected just will be able to move (NewAdvent).]

Last thought for today, it seems prideful that humans can write off Natural Phenomena with such ease.  The universe is more complex and each new discovery simply removes another veil showing even more complexity beneath the already complex nature of creation.

So ... that's my thoughts on Skojec's article.

P^3


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Comparision of the Tridentine, Cranmer and Novus Ordo Masses

+ JMJ I downloaded the comparison that was linked in the previous article on the mass (here) . ... a very good reference! P^3 From: Whispers of Restoration (available at this link) . CHARTING LITURGICAL CHANGE Comparing the 1962 Ordinary of the Roman Mass to changes made during the Anglican Schism; Compared in turn to changes adopted in the creation of Pope Paul VI’s Mass in 1969 The chart on the reverse is a concise comparison of certain ritual differences between three historical rites for the celebration of the Catholic Mass Vetus Ordo: “Old Order,” the Roman Rite of Mass as contained in the 1962 Missal, often referred to as the “Traditional Latin Mass.”The Ordinary of this Mass is that of Pope St. Pius V (1570) following the Council of Trent (1545-63), hence the occasional moniker “Tridentine Mass.” However, Trent only consolidated and codified the Roman Rite already in use at that time; its essential form dates to Pope St. Gregory the Great (+604), in whose time the R...

SSPX and the Resistance - A Comparison Of Ecclesiology

Shining the light of Church Teaching on the doctrinal positions of the SSPX and the Resistance. Principles are guides used to aid in decision making.  It stands to reason that bad principles will lead to bad decisions. The recent interactions between Rome and the SSPX has challenged a number of closely held cultural assumptions of people in both sides of the disagreement. This has resulted in cultural skirmishes in both Rome and the SSPX. Since it is the smaller of the two, the skirmishes have been more evident within the SSPX.  The cultural fault-line that Bishop Fellay crossed appears to be linked to two points of Catholic Doctrine: Ecclesiology and Obedience.  The cultural difference of view points is strong enough that it has resulted in the expulsion of a number of members.  It should also be noted that some other priests expelled since the beginning of the latest interactions (starting in 2000) held the same view points and have joined with the l...

If Pope Francis is bad - what about Pope St. John Paul II et al?

+ JMJ So here we are on the apparent cusp of yet another post conciliar Papal canonization. This time we have Pope's John-Paul I and Paul VI canonizations to 'look forward' to. This follows, obviously, on the heels of Pope St. John Paul II's canonization? So the first question that I usually encounter is: How is it possible, keeping in mind the doctrine on infallibility of canonizations (note doctrine not dogma), that Pope St. John Paul II is a Saint? First, what does it mean???  According to the doctrine of dogmatic facts - it is the universal opinion of Theologians that canonizations are infallible.  It means that they enjoy the beatific vision.  ... that's it.  That is the doctrine and it is at the level of universal opinion of theologians.  It is called a 'dogmatic fact'. That they made mistakes is obvious.  That the miracles seem to not be very miraculous is also a bit of an issue. Here's something to consider: The rush that surrou...

Spiritual Journey Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre - Extracts

+ JMJ I have posted these two chapters to provide context for the quote of: It is, therefore, a strict duty for every priest wanting to remain Catholic to separate himself from this Conciliar Church for as long as it does not rediscover the Tradition of the Church and of the Catholic Faith. P^3 Courtesy of SSPX.ca Chapter II The Perfections of God We ought to remember during this entire contemplation of God that we must apply all that is said of God to Our Lord Jesus Christ, Who is God. We cannot separate Jesus Christ from God. We cannot separate the Christian religion from Jesus Christ, Who is God, and we must affirm and believe that only the Catholic religion is the Christian religion. These affirmations have, as a result, inescapable conclusions that no ecclesiastic authority can contest: outside of Jesus Christ and the Catholic religion, that is, outsi...

Dogmas of the Catholic Faith (de fide) - Expanded Listing: Answer for Reader

 + JMJ  A reader asked the following question in the 2015 version of the article on the Dogmas of the Catholic Faith (link) : 117: "In the state of fallen nature it is morally impossible for man without Supernatural Revelation, to know easily, with absolute certainty and without admixture of error, all religious and moral truths of the natural order." Where can you find this in the documents of the Church? ( Link to comment )  Here's the reference from Ott: The citation that Ott provided was Denzinger 1786 and the source document is Dogmatic Consitution Concerning the Faith from the First Vatican Council (Papal Encyclicals - link) : Chapter 2 On Revelation, Article 3: It is indeed thanks to this divine revelation , that those matters concerning God, which are not of themselves beyond the scope of human reason, can, even in the present state of the human race, be known by everyone, without difficulty, with firm certitude and with no intermingling of error. Here's ...