Skip to main content

St. Francis Xavier - Part 1: Introduction and First Steps

 +
JMJ

 

 

Since the Second Vatican Council, the Catholic Church has been in the icy grips of self-skepticism (doubt) and self-cynicism (disbelief).  This extends to the claims of the supernatural, I suppose, because this runs counter to the modernist belief that religion emanates from within humans and therefore miracles didn't really happen.

 It is truly a matter of wonder that one man in the short space of ten years (6 May, 1542 - 2 December, 1552) could have visited so many countries, traversed so many seas, preached the Gospel to so many nations, and converted so many infidels. The incomparable apostolic zeal which animated him, and the stupendous miracles which God wrought through him, explain this marvel, which has no equal elsewhere. The list of the principal miracles may be found in the Bull of canonization. St. Francis Xavier is considered the greatest missionary since the time of the Apostles, and the zeal he displayed, the wonderful miracles he performed, and the great number of souls he brought to the light of true Faith, entitle him to this distinction. He was canonized with St. Ignatius in 1622, although on account of the death of Gregory XV, the Bull of canonization was not published until the following year. (Source: Catholic Encyclopedia - Newadvent)

The body of the saint is still enshrined at Goa in the church which formerly belonged to the Society. In 1614 by order of Claudius Acquaviva, General of the Society of Jesus, the right arm was severed at the elbow and conveyed to Rome, where the present altar was erected to receive it in the church of the Gesu.

The fore-arm was brought to Canada on a tour in 2017 and several friends and myself went to the Cathedral to venerate the relic.

Unfortunately, I was unable to find a copy of the Bull of Canonization online, but did find the following reference:

This Bull,*bearing date the sixth of August, in the year 1623, is an Epitome and Panegyrick of the miraculous life of the Saint. It is there said, That the new Apostle of the Indies has spiritually receiv'd the Blessing which God vouchsafed to the Patriarch Abraham, that he was the Father of many Nations; and that he saw his Children in Jesus Christ multiply'd beyond the Stars of Heaven, and the Sands of the Sea. That, for the rest, his Apostleship has had the signs of a Divine Vocation, such as are the gift of Tongues, the gift of Prophecy, the gift of Miracles, with the Evangelical virtues in all perfection.

The Bull reports almost all the Miracles, which we have seen in his Life; particularly, the Resurrections of the Dead; and amongst other miraculous Cures, which were wrought after his decease, it observes those of Gonsal∣vo Fernandz, Mary Diaz, and Emanuel Rodriguez (Source: The Life of St. Francis Xavier)

 In addition the wiki article cited the following miracles:

  • Francis lies on the ground with his arms and legs tied, but the cords break miraculously.
  • He lifts a sick man who dies after receiving communion but is freed from fever.
  • He resuscitates a boy who died in a well at Cape Comorin.
  • He cures miraculously a man full of sores.
  • He resuscitates three persons: a man who was buried at Coulao; a boy about to be buried at Multao; and a child.
  • He takes money from his empty pockets and gives it to a Portuguese at Malyapore.
  • A miraculous cure.
  • A crab restores his crucifix which had fallen into the sea.
  • Francis kneels down and on his shoulders there rests a child whom he restores to health.
  • He cures a mute or unable to speak and paralytic man in Amanguchi.
  • He cures a deaf Japanese person.
  • He cures a religious in the college of St. Paul.
  • Due to the lack of water, he sweetens the seawater during a voyage.
  • Francis levitates as he distributes communion in the College of St. Paul.

 While, in the face of modern medicine, people may feel that cures don't count as miracles. However that was not the case in that time.  Also, levitation is definitely not something that can be discounted - especially if noted by a number of witnesses, as I assume occurred in the College of St. Paul.

Next up is the 'Modern Opinions and Controversies'.

P^3

Outline

  1. Intro & First Step- Catholic Encyclopedia, Bull of Canonization
  2. Modern Opinions and Controversies
  3. St. Francis Xavier: A Saint for Today!


Sources

Catholic Encyclopedia

https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/

https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Catholic_Encyclopedia_(1913)

http://www.therealpresence.org/archives/Miracles/Miracles_005.htm

https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo/A28873.0001.001/1:10?rgn=div1;view=fulltext

https://www.gutenberg.org/files/59723/59723-0.txt

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_Xavier

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Communiqué on the Meeting between Cardinal Ladaria and Fr. Pagliarani

+ JMJ I suspect that the 'resistance' will be freaking out about this ... but as with the Archbishop, when Rome calls ... they go ... even if just to let them know (again) why they do what they do. Concerning the alleged 'sell-out' I have this to say: I should update the meme ... with 2017, 18 etc. The 'resistors' should stop and think a little: We are in the 18th year of the latest sell-out frenzy. So we're still waiting. Try and reconcile the 'resistance' positions with the Catholic Faith. If it doesn't objectively sync up - admit that you're wrong and take appropriate action. I have also attached some commentary from CFN. P^3 Courtesy of FSSPX.news Courtesy of Catholic Family News Communiqué on the Meeting between Cardinal Ladaria and Fr. Pagliarani November 24, 2018 By Eucharistic Crusade The Palace of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith i...

"Father, Should I Attend That Mass?" Advice on Attending Non-SSPX Latin Masses

 + JMJ I see that the 'resistors' are in a tizzy because Fr. Robinson used them as an example instead of the sedevacantists. What is interesting is that you can apply the exact same reasons against going to a sede mass as that of the 'resistors'. Namely: On the other extreme are those situations where an SSPX priest knows that a certain non-SSPX traditionalist venue is a grave danger to the faith . Frankly, most, if not all, of the Resistance Masses would fall into this category. In many cases, the behavior of these priests has been and continues to be scandalous, by their (A) spirit, their (B) preaching, and their indiscriminate conferral of the (C) priesthood and (D) episcopacy. To attend a Mass with such ongoing scandals poses a serious danger to the souls of the faithful. Yep, looking at A,B,C and D the shoe fits. On this basis the "resistors" = "sedevacantists". P^3 Courtesy of SSPX.org   A companion article to a recent "Questions with ...

Morning and Evening and other sundry Prayers

+ JMJ Along the theme of P^3 (Prayer, Penance, Patience), and for my own reference ... here is a collection of Morning and Evening prayers from the Ideal Daily Missal along with some additional prayers. In this crisis of the Church, I do not think it is possible to do too much prayer, penance and have patience. P^3

Open Letter to Cardinal Gantin - July 6, 1988

There has been some discussion (read lots) about the term 'Conciliar Church'. I have posted this letter written by the Superior General and District Superiors of the SSPX after the 1988 Consecrations. Of particular interest is that the 'Conciliar Church' being referred to as a system. My paraphrase would be that the SSPX regards the 'conciliar Church' as an error within the Church. Source Open Letter to Cardinal Gantin Prefect of the Congregation for Bishops

The Catholic Church and the Rule of Law- Part II: Dr. John Lamont

+ JMJ This is the second article from Dr. Lamont from his lecture given in May 2014. P^3 Source Part A: Society of St. Hugh of Cluny Source Part B: Society of St. Hugh of Cluny 8 May2014 The Catholic Church and the Rule of Law- Part II By John Lamont To understand how the Jesuit conception of obedience departed from earlier conceptions, it is helpful to compare it with the teaching of St. Thomas on obedience. The fundamental difference between the two is that St. Thomas considers the proper object of obedience to be the precept of the superior (2a2ae q. 104 a. 2 co., ad 3). Obedience that seeks to forestall the expressed will of the superior does not bear on what the superior wants or thinks in general, but only on what the superior intends to command. St. Ignatius’s lowest degree of obedience, which he does not consider to be virtuous, is thus what St. Thomas considers to be the only form of obedience. St. Thomas holds that St. Ignatius’s alleged higher forms of o...