Skip to main content

St. Francis Xavier - Part 1: Introduction and First Steps

 +
JMJ

 

 

Since the Second Vatican Council, the Catholic Church has been in the icy grips of self-skepticism (doubt) and self-cynicism (disbelief).  This extends to the claims of the supernatural, I suppose, because this runs counter to the modernist belief that religion emanates from within humans and therefore miracles didn't really happen.

 It is truly a matter of wonder that one man in the short space of ten years (6 May, 1542 - 2 December, 1552) could have visited so many countries, traversed so many seas, preached the Gospel to so many nations, and converted so many infidels. The incomparable apostolic zeal which animated him, and the stupendous miracles which God wrought through him, explain this marvel, which has no equal elsewhere. The list of the principal miracles may be found in the Bull of canonization. St. Francis Xavier is considered the greatest missionary since the time of the Apostles, and the zeal he displayed, the wonderful miracles he performed, and the great number of souls he brought to the light of true Faith, entitle him to this distinction. He was canonized with St. Ignatius in 1622, although on account of the death of Gregory XV, the Bull of canonization was not published until the following year. (Source: Catholic Encyclopedia - Newadvent)

The body of the saint is still enshrined at Goa in the church which formerly belonged to the Society. In 1614 by order of Claudius Acquaviva, General of the Society of Jesus, the right arm was severed at the elbow and conveyed to Rome, where the present altar was erected to receive it in the church of the Gesu.

The fore-arm was brought to Canada on a tour in 2017 and several friends and myself went to the Cathedral to venerate the relic.

Unfortunately, I was unable to find a copy of the Bull of Canonization online, but did find the following reference:

This Bull,*bearing date the sixth of August, in the year 1623, is an Epitome and Panegyrick of the miraculous life of the Saint. It is there said, That the new Apostle of the Indies has spiritually receiv'd the Blessing which God vouchsafed to the Patriarch Abraham, that he was the Father of many Nations; and that he saw his Children in Jesus Christ multiply'd beyond the Stars of Heaven, and the Sands of the Sea. That, for the rest, his Apostleship has had the signs of a Divine Vocation, such as are the gift of Tongues, the gift of Prophecy, the gift of Miracles, with the Evangelical virtues in all perfection.

The Bull reports almost all the Miracles, which we have seen in his Life; particularly, the Resurrections of the Dead; and amongst other miraculous Cures, which were wrought after his decease, it observes those of Gonsal∣vo Fernandz, Mary Diaz, and Emanuel Rodriguez (Source: The Life of St. Francis Xavier)

 In addition the wiki article cited the following miracles:

  • Francis lies on the ground with his arms and legs tied, but the cords break miraculously.
  • He lifts a sick man who dies after receiving communion but is freed from fever.
  • He resuscitates a boy who died in a well at Cape Comorin.
  • He cures miraculously a man full of sores.
  • He resuscitates three persons: a man who was buried at Coulao; a boy about to be buried at Multao; and a child.
  • He takes money from his empty pockets and gives it to a Portuguese at Malyapore.
  • A miraculous cure.
  • A crab restores his crucifix which had fallen into the sea.
  • Francis kneels down and on his shoulders there rests a child whom he restores to health.
  • He cures a mute or unable to speak and paralytic man in Amanguchi.
  • He cures a deaf Japanese person.
  • He cures a religious in the college of St. Paul.
  • Due to the lack of water, he sweetens the seawater during a voyage.
  • Francis levitates as he distributes communion in the College of St. Paul.

 While, in the face of modern medicine, people may feel that cures don't count as miracles. However that was not the case in that time.  Also, levitation is definitely not something that can be discounted - especially if noted by a number of witnesses, as I assume occurred in the College of St. Paul.

Next up is the 'Modern Opinions and Controversies'.

P^3

Outline

  1. Intro & First Step- Catholic Encyclopedia, Bull of Canonization
  2. Modern Opinions and Controversies
  3. St. Francis Xavier: A Saint for Today!


Sources

Catholic Encyclopedia

https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/

https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Catholic_Encyclopedia_(1913)

http://www.therealpresence.org/archives/Miracles/Miracles_005.htm

https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo/A28873.0001.001/1:10?rgn=div1;view=fulltext

https://www.gutenberg.org/files/59723/59723-0.txt

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_Xavier

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is it sinful to attend the Novus Ordo (New Mass) - Is it Sinful to Not Attend the Novus Ordo on Sunday?

+ JMJ A non-SSPX Catholic is upset over the SSPX statements on not attending the Novus Ordo Missae. Ladies and gentlemen, what the SSPX, or at least its website editor, is advocating is a mortal sin against the Third Commandment.  Unless the priest deviates from the language of the Sacramentary, the consecration, and thus the rest of Mass is to be considered valid.  No one may elect not to attend Mass simply because abuses are occurring therein.  Might I suggest that such absenteeism is its own abuse?  The Third Commandment binds under mortal sin.  Father So-And-So from the SSPX has no authority whatsoever to excuse attendance at Mass, be that Mass ever so unpalatable. Source:Restore DC Catholicism Well, this is interesting. First why does the SSPX issue this statement? Because it is sinful to put your faith in danger by attending a protestant service.  It is likewise dangerous to put your faith in danger by attending a protestantized mass (ie the Novus Ordo Missae

Morning and Evening and other sundry Prayers

+ JMJ Along the theme of P^3 (Prayer, Penance, Patience), and for my own reference ... here is a collection of Morning and Evening prayers from the Ideal Daily Missal along with some additional prayers. In this crisis of the Church, I do not think it is possible to do too much prayer, penance and have patience. P^3

Fr. Burfitt on Fr. Pfeiffer's Attempted Consecration

 + JMJ   Amidst the shadows cast by the publication of Traditionis Custodes, I am working on a map of the 'resistance' splinters to put their reaction in contrast with that of the SSPX.  In the midst of this, I just came across Fr. Burfitt letter on the attempted consecration. Breaking it down (see below)  items 2 and 3 are key.  Just as the consecrating bishop is 'doubtful', even if he hadn't muffed the first attempt, Fr. Pfeiffer remain doubtful and therefore this impacts those men is attempts to 'ordain'. There were rumours that Fr. Pfeiffer was seeking episcopal consecration for years as he cast about for various bishops (also doubtful) to help him achieve this goal. I wonder how he convinced the 'doubtful' bishop to provide (twice) the doubtful consecration. What a mess!  This creates a danger to the souls of his followers and wonder where it will end. Will he go full sede and have himself 'elected' pontiff as others have done before him

Regarding Post: Fr. Joseph Pfeiffer no longer ... now Bishop Joseph Pfeiffer (Can't see this being a problem...)

 + JMJ   I've been watching the popularity of the post about Fr. Pfeiffer's attempted episcopal consecration and its continued top listing on the 'popular posts' list at the bottom of posts.  After some thought, I decided that I don't want to be responsible for anyone joining Fr. Pfeiffer's 'group', however unlikely that would be at this time. So I have reverted the article to the draft state. If anyone wants it reinstated, I would ask that they comment on this post with a rationale for reinstatement. P^3

The Vatican and SSPX – An Organizational Culture Perspective

Introduction The recent and continuing interactions between the Vatican and the SSPX have been a great opportunity for prayer and reflection.  The basis for the disagreement is theological and not liturgical. As noted by Dr. Lamont (2012), the SSPX theological position on the four key controversial aspects of the Second Vatican Council are base on prior theological work that resulted from relevant magisterial pronouncements.  So it is difficult to understand the apparent rejection of the theological position of the SSPX.