Skip to main content

FSSPX.News: Press Review: Traditionis Custodes in the Context of the Current Crisis (1)

 +
JMJ

 The SSPX has published what appears to be the first of several press reviewss on TC.

So for the record!


P^#


Courtesy of FSSPX.News


Press Review: Traditionis Custodes in the Context of the Current Crisis (1)

October 10, 2021
Source: fsspx.news

There have been many comments on and analyses of the motu proprio Traditionis Custodes this summer. All place Francis’s decision to limit the celebration of the traditional Mass as much as possible in the context of the crisis which is currently shaking the Church, but with very different perspectives.

Questioning the Hermeneutics of Continuity

In Le Figaro of August 14, Cardinal Robert Sarah, former prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments - without ever citing the name of the Pope - sees in the motu proprio a questioning of what he calls “the credibility of the Church.”

In reality, it is mainly a questioning of the “hermeneutics of continuity” advocated by Benedict XVI and the coexistence of the two rites desired by Summorum Pontificum.

The Guinean prelate writes: “Beyond the quarrel of the rites, it is the credibility of the Church which is at stake. If it affirms the continuity between what is commonly called the Mass of St. Pius V and the mass of Paul VI, then the Church must be able to organize their peaceful coexistence and their mutual enrichment.

“If one were to radically exclude the other, if they were to be declared irreconcilable, then a rupture and a change of direction would be implicitly recognized. But then the Church could no longer offer the world that sacred continuity which alone can bring peace.”

“By maintaining a liturgical war within her, the Church loses her credibility and becomes deaf to the call of men. Liturgical peace is the sign of the peace that the Church can bring to the world.”

“So the issue is much more serious than a simple question of discipline. If she had to demand a reversal of her faith or her liturgy, how would the Church dare to address the world? Her sole legitimacy is her consistency in her continuity.”

“In addition, if the bishops, who are responsible for the coexistence and mutual enrichment of the two liturgical forms, do not exercise their authority in this regard, they risk no longer appearing as shepherds, guardians of the faith that they have received and the sheep entrusted to them, but as political leaders: commissioners of the ideology of the moment rather than guardians of perennial tradition. They risk losing the confidence of men of good will.”

“A father cannot introduce distrust and division among his faithful children. He cannot humiliate some by pitting them against others. He cannot put aside some of his priests. The peace and unity that the Church claims to offer the world must first be experienced within the Church.”

“In liturgical matters, neither pastoral violence nor partisan ideology has ever produced fruits of unity. The suffering of the faithful and the expectations of the world are too great to take these dead end roads. No one is superfluous in the Church of God!”

Paradoxically, Cardinal Sarah pleads for the coexistence of the two rites in the name of the unity that according to him “the hermeneutics of continuity” must be allowed to obtain, while Pope Francis rejects this coexistence in the name of the unity that submission to the conciliar magisterium - and to him alone - is supposed to procure.

A Civil War in the Church

In the Italian newspaper Il Foglio of August 5 appeared a letter from a group of lay people to the Pope. This open letter, using the title of Andrea Riccardi's latest book, La Chiesa brucia, [The Church is Burning. Crisis and the future of Christianity, published in Italian by Tempi nuovi, in April 2021. Editor's note], wants to highlight the deep distress in the Church. Transformed - say the authors of the letter - into a “field hospital” through the many injuries it caused. They denounce the failure of the “exit,” Church, so vaunted by Francis.

This letter recalls various more or less recent situations: from the lack of response to the cardinals who questioned Pope Francis about Amoris lætitia to the story of Enzo Bianchi [founder of the ecumenical community of Bose. Editor's note], who seemed to be one of the Pope’s favorites, including the ousting of many other personalities, such as Cardinals Pell, Sarah, and Burke.

The letter ends with a bitter observation: we are faced with a climate “which has become heavy, almost unbreathable,” and “the mother Church seems more and more as a stepmother who imposes anathemas, excommunications, and [political] police stations, at a continuous pace.”

The authors of the letter ask the Pope to put an end “to this civil war in the Church, as a father who looks after the good of all his children, and not as the head of a clerical current which seems to want to use his monarchical authority, until the end, often beyond the limits of canon law, to achieve a personal ideological agenda.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Father, Should I Attend That Mass?" Advice on Attending Non-SSPX Latin Masses

 + JMJ I see that the 'resistors' are in a tizzy because Fr. Robinson used them as an example instead of the sedevacantists. What is interesting is that you can apply the exact same reasons against going to a sede mass as that of the 'resistors'. Namely: On the other extreme are those situations where an SSPX priest knows that a certain non-SSPX traditionalist venue is a grave danger to the faith . Frankly, most, if not all, of the Resistance Masses would fall into this category. In many cases, the behavior of these priests has been and continues to be scandalous, by their (A) spirit, their (B) preaching, and their indiscriminate conferral of the (C) priesthood and (D) episcopacy. To attend a Mass with such ongoing scandals poses a serious danger to the souls of the faithful. Yep, looking at A,B,C and D the shoe fits. On this basis the "resistors" = "sedevacantists". P^3 Courtesy of SSPX.org   A companion article to a recent "Questions with ...

Correcting Caricatures of the SSPX

 + JMJ Introduction First, a little background on the FSSP St. John Vianney Chapel in Mission Hill Kansas.  After the 1988 consecrations and the foundation of the FSSP there was a consistent trend of Dioceses allowing the SSPX to run chapels and churches near SSPX locations. As with any 'organizational change' there were those who didn't agree with the change and no longer sought the sacraments from the SSPX. I heard from friends that in that era there was a lot of anger and tension (on both sides) between the St. Mary's SSPX and Mission Hill FSSP.  Second, there have been caricatures of the SSPX position (some are evident below) in which personal opinions of SSPX priests and laity are taken as the official position or conflated with those of sedevacantists or 'resistance'. Recent Perspectives of the SSPX Position In the shadow of the consecrations a fever pitch accusations and opinions how surfaced - many of which include caricatures of the SSPX positions, of w...

SSPX: Why Is the SSPX So Criticized?

 + JMJ As long as you are ok with what happens in other Catholic Churches, Traditional Catholics will be left 'alone'.  This is a paraphrase of words spoken by an Archbishop to Traditional Catholics (with a sprinkling of SSPX) who had requested the Traditional Latin Mass under Summorum Pontificum. This reflects that attitude of the Church towards anyone who takes issue with some of the ambiguities of Vatican II and the post-conciliar magisterium.  If you reject the papacy but are ok with V2, the New Mass, and what Rome has stated since 1965 - then you are welcome. Question some of the more abiguous statements and ask for Rome to realise that a circle is not a square - then you are in for a world of hurt. This is where the SSPX exists and has existed from almost its very first moments. Pointing out contradictions with previous magisterium is not acceptable - under any condition. Why? Because it will cause the whole V2 house of cards to fall. I guess only when the contradic...

Stories: Early Days of Tradition Part 8 - Convention Centre Chapel

 + JMJ I came to Tradition a few years after they had bought a chapel. My wife told me of the earlier years when Fr. Normandin would come to town and Mass would be held in a room at the convention centre.  He'd start by blessing the room and then proceed with Mass. This went on for a while before the one of the faithful found a small hall that would suit just fine. They pooled their money and bought the building.  Then came the work as the retiree's refinished the floor, setup the sactuary. Oh, did I mention that I heard that the hall had been used by a motorcycle gang? The floor needed a lot of work.  I remember seeing pictures of the founders working to make the hall into a fitting place for the Sacrifice of the Mass. That little chapel would be a refuge like many others serviced by Fr. Normandin.  From Thunderbay, Ontrario to Nanaimo, British Columbia - the SSPX chapels are all the results of Fr. Normandin's missionary work in those desperate times. Without h...

How many more must die for the throne? or How to combat FUD!

 + JMJ How many more must die for the throne? (Movie Quote: Prince Caspian) The Spread of Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt I've seen a lot of FUD spreading across the intergnat on various stats etc.   So let's put this in context ... especially the perspective of those people in positions of authority who need to make decisions to protect the lives of their citizens. Yep, this is going to be that type of post.  Like it or not the leaders of our governments have their authority from God.  So, as Catholics should know, you need to have a very good reason to deliberately disobey the orders of their superiors. This is basic St. Thomas Aquinas ... so don't blame me for discussing things from a Catholic perspective. The leaders of our countries have taken action to protect the vulnerable of our countries.   As much as the young and not-so-young may whine and complain - I have to ask how many more of our elderly have to die? What the armchair virologists and ec...