Skip to main content

FSSPX.News: Press Review: Traditionis Custodes in the Context of the Current Crisis (1)

 +
JMJ

 The SSPX has published what appears to be the first of several press reviewss on TC.

So for the record!


P^#


Courtesy of FSSPX.News


Press Review: Traditionis Custodes in the Context of the Current Crisis (1)

October 10, 2021
Source: fsspx.news

There have been many comments on and analyses of the motu proprio Traditionis Custodes this summer. All place Francis’s decision to limit the celebration of the traditional Mass as much as possible in the context of the crisis which is currently shaking the Church, but with very different perspectives.

Questioning the Hermeneutics of Continuity

In Le Figaro of August 14, Cardinal Robert Sarah, former prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments - without ever citing the name of the Pope - sees in the motu proprio a questioning of what he calls “the credibility of the Church.”

In reality, it is mainly a questioning of the “hermeneutics of continuity” advocated by Benedict XVI and the coexistence of the two rites desired by Summorum Pontificum.

The Guinean prelate writes: “Beyond the quarrel of the rites, it is the credibility of the Church which is at stake. If it affirms the continuity between what is commonly called the Mass of St. Pius V and the mass of Paul VI, then the Church must be able to organize their peaceful coexistence and their mutual enrichment.

“If one were to radically exclude the other, if they were to be declared irreconcilable, then a rupture and a change of direction would be implicitly recognized. But then the Church could no longer offer the world that sacred continuity which alone can bring peace.”

“By maintaining a liturgical war within her, the Church loses her credibility and becomes deaf to the call of men. Liturgical peace is the sign of the peace that the Church can bring to the world.”

“So the issue is much more serious than a simple question of discipline. If she had to demand a reversal of her faith or her liturgy, how would the Church dare to address the world? Her sole legitimacy is her consistency in her continuity.”

“In addition, if the bishops, who are responsible for the coexistence and mutual enrichment of the two liturgical forms, do not exercise their authority in this regard, they risk no longer appearing as shepherds, guardians of the faith that they have received and the sheep entrusted to them, but as political leaders: commissioners of the ideology of the moment rather than guardians of perennial tradition. They risk losing the confidence of men of good will.”

“A father cannot introduce distrust and division among his faithful children. He cannot humiliate some by pitting them against others. He cannot put aside some of his priests. The peace and unity that the Church claims to offer the world must first be experienced within the Church.”

“In liturgical matters, neither pastoral violence nor partisan ideology has ever produced fruits of unity. The suffering of the faithful and the expectations of the world are too great to take these dead end roads. No one is superfluous in the Church of God!”

Paradoxically, Cardinal Sarah pleads for the coexistence of the two rites in the name of the unity that according to him “the hermeneutics of continuity” must be allowed to obtain, while Pope Francis rejects this coexistence in the name of the unity that submission to the conciliar magisterium - and to him alone - is supposed to procure.

A Civil War in the Church

In the Italian newspaper Il Foglio of August 5 appeared a letter from a group of lay people to the Pope. This open letter, using the title of Andrea Riccardi's latest book, La Chiesa brucia, [The Church is Burning. Crisis and the future of Christianity, published in Italian by Tempi nuovi, in April 2021. Editor's note], wants to highlight the deep distress in the Church. Transformed - say the authors of the letter - into a “field hospital” through the many injuries it caused. They denounce the failure of the “exit,” Church, so vaunted by Francis.

This letter recalls various more or less recent situations: from the lack of response to the cardinals who questioned Pope Francis about Amoris lætitia to the story of Enzo Bianchi [founder of the ecumenical community of Bose. Editor's note], who seemed to be one of the Pope’s favorites, including the ousting of many other personalities, such as Cardinals Pell, Sarah, and Burke.

The letter ends with a bitter observation: we are faced with a climate “which has become heavy, almost unbreathable,” and “the mother Church seems more and more as a stepmother who imposes anathemas, excommunications, and [political] police stations, at a continuous pace.”

The authors of the letter ask the Pope to put an end “to this civil war in the Church, as a father who looks after the good of all his children, and not as the head of a clerical current which seems to want to use his monarchical authority, until the end, often beyond the limits of canon law, to achieve a personal ideological agenda.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is Tradition?

 + JMJ What Is Tradition? The basic premise, from my perspective, is that what was taught before cannot be contradicted by the 'present' magisterium, only deepened and expanded upon. I recall the Roman theologians called the SSPX protestants while the SSPX called them modernists.  I believe this was all surrounding the concept of Traditon. SSPX's Understanding of Tradition One accusation made against the SSPX is that they don't have a correct understanding of 'Tradition'.  This is how the SSPX understands Tradition: I finally profess that Tradition is not a dead memory, but the living transmission of the doctrine received from the Apostles. It remains living, in distinction to Revelation, which is closed. It is so both in the activity of the Magisterium of the Teaching Church and in the profession of Faith of the Church Taught, of which the sentire cum Ecclesia is the result of the teaching of the Magisterium. Tradition may be called ‘living’, not in the sense t...

SSPX.ca: What is the position of the SSPX on Vatican II???

 + JMJ With all the mis-information about the SSPX rejecting the Second Vatican Council, I thought it would be useful to publish an article that focuses on the real issues that the SSPX has identified. Update: Why Did the SSPX Consecrate Bishops? ( Neither Schismatic, Nor Disobedient link ) In the linked document the SSPX outlined the key motivation and core issues with Vatican II and the post-conciliar magisterium (see above link for full document): 4. The Society Acted Precisely Because of the State of Necessity in Which the Faith Finds Itself  In the present situation of the Church, if the Society of Saint Pius X had not carried out the consecrations of July 1st, it would have found itself facing an inevitable alternative: either to disappear gradually, or to accept, at least in fact, the new liturgy as well as the false doctrines of Vatican II and the post-council. Without the consecrations of July 1st, the Fraternity would have found itself, in a few years, without bishop...

Thoughts on: Finding Common Ground Between Rome and the SSPX

 + JMJ In the ramp up to the consecrations the noise floor in the intergnat grew to a constant din.  This was one of the few the peeped its signal over the noise. https://crisismagazine.com/opinion/finding-common-ground-between-rome-and-the-sspx The key issue is contained in this paragraph: In the lead-up to the planned July 1, 2026, episcopal consecrations,  the SSPX rejected Rome’s offer  of doctrinal dialogue on the grounds that “we both know in advance that we cannot agree doctrinally, particularly regarding the fundamental orientations adopted since the Second Vatican Council.” Fr. Pagliarani also said that his previous attempt at dialogue in 2019 was shut down by Rome because of an assumed irreconcilability. It seems that, from the Society’s perspective, and perhaps from Rome’s too, their positions are incompatible. If memory serves, Rome killed any opportunity for an open discussion by stating that Vatican II was not up for debate. So it was a still-birth and ...

Thoughts on the Thoughts of a former SSPX priest

 + JMJ Well Gary Campbell, former SSPX Priest and now laicised has posted a new article on WherePeterIs. https://wherepeteris.com/thoughts-of-a-former-sspx-priest-on-the-july-1-consecrations/ These words stuck out: Heck, they have built a five-star hotel, wine bar, and Walmart on the opposite bank of the Rubicon! They are not in danger of entering a state of schism, for they are  already  in a state of schism. I believe he doth protest too much. All the actual facts indicate that the SSPX was not in a state of schism before July 1st and an examination of the decree of excommunication highlights the either ineptitude of those in charge or a desire to leave the barn door open. The chasm between an act of disobedience and act of schism remains just what is has always been - an inconvenient barrier that person(s) in Rome seek to bridge but appear incapable of succeeding. The SSPX re-stated that they recognize the Pope as the Vicar of Christ and feel obliged by conscience...

The News is an Addiction ...

 + JMJ People seem to be mesmerised by train wrecks.   They just can't turn away as the disaster creeps forward along train tracks towards the crossing where a car, truck, bus, trailer awaits its destruction. Trads have been watching the train wreck that is this crisis of the Catholic Church for decades. The trade war between the Canada and the US has reminded me that the news is addictive.   The first time I was addicted what from 2009 to  2014 when I was closely following the Rome / SSPX discussions.  I was at work watching a live-stream as Bishop Fellay disappeared into the Vatican. The lead-up to this moment had been intense as the 'resistance' got freaked out and the cultural cracks between doctrine and conspiracy theory widened. In the decade since then other things have emerged, wars, rumours of wars, conspiracies, celebrity Catholics etc. Now we have a new addiction and its name is Trump. Lately, no matter how much I try, I find myself wonderin...