How many more must die for the throne? or How to combat FUD! - Part 2 - Update 1 (Wherein Tradical Responds to Smith)
+ JMJ A reader by the handle of Smith offered a solution to the discussion between Murrax and myself (link). Here is his first claim ... The dispute between you and Murrax lies in the fact that your Decision Tree leaves out an ESSENTIAL element of St. Thomas' doctrine on true obedience.He defines Human Positive Law as "an ordinance of reason, for the common good, promulgated by a legitimate authority". (I-II Q.90, a4).You have completely left out the REASON part. I believe that he is correct, I missed this. However, I don't think it means what he thinks it means as he assumes that 'ordinance of reason' means a rational order. Which is why he makes the following assertion. St. Thomas very clearly teaches that, if an authority, even legitimate, gives an order that is obviously irrational , it is NOT A REAL LAW, and need not be obeyed. This is firstly because irrationality itself takes a command outside of the definition of law, and secondly because obeying irr...