Skip to main content

Is Hell Empty or Full?

Image
By
+
JMJ

I had some time this morning so I've pulled together some more articles (kind-of a house cleaning).

In the course of the article on evil, I came across this youtube by Bishop Barron. Skip ahead to 5:15 and you'll hear the Bishop Barron accepts Von Balthasar's theory of universal salvation. Which is inconsistent with Catholic Truth (ie if it ain't heresy in the formal sense, it really casts a blind eye on the scriptures and logic).


So, Bishop Barron is pretty clear - he believes that it is possible that all may be saved.

This article on Commonweal (ie Liberal / Modernist) echoes Bishop Barron.  However, you have to have a pretty strong confirmation bias to ignore the following the demonstrate that this theory (already condemned) is pretty hard (read: IMPOSSIBLE) to reconcile with the following:
  • The Demons (ie Fallen Angels) are in Hell. 
  • Logically we can conclude (as many theologians have) that Judas is in hell. Otherwise Matthew 26:24 does not make sense.
  • Kinda hard to believe no one is in hell when you have these words for OLJC: "Then he shall say to them also that shall be on his left hand: Depart from me, you cursed, into everlasting fire which was prepared for the devil and his angels." (Matthew 25: 41)
Kinda hard to believe in universal salvation eh?

So, in order to believe with the Catholic Church, you have to believe that there are souls as well as fallen angels (ie demons) inhabiting that place.

You can also believe that while not empty, it isn't full, there's always room for one more.

I've noticed this same confirmation bias in a number of modern Catholics. They seem to have a difficulty dealing with harsh realities.

Once Catholics start to understand and adhere to the basic tents of the Catholic Faith, then we'll start emerging from this crisis.

The last things are a good spot to start:

Death
Judgement
Heaven
Hell

P^3







Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Catholic Church and the Rule of Law- Part II: Dr. John Lamont

By
+ JMJ This is the second article from Dr. Lamont from his lecture given in May 2014. P^3 Source Part A: Society of St. Hugh of Cluny Source Part B: Society of St. Hugh of Cluny 8 May2014 The Catholic Church and the Rule of Law- Part II By John Lamont To understand how the Jesuit conception of obedience departed from earlier conceptions, it is helpful to compare it with the teaching of St. Thomas on obedience. The fundamental difference between the two is that St. Thomas considers the proper object of obedience to be the precept of the superior (2a2ae q. 104 a. 2 co., ad 3). Obedience that seeks to forestall the expressed will of the superior does not bear on what the superior wants or thinks in general, but only on what the superior intends to command. St. Ignatius’s lowest degree of obedience, which he does not consider to be virtuous, is thus what St. Thomas considers to be the only form of obedience. St. Thomas holds that St. Ignatius’s alleged higher forms of o...
Post a Comment
Read more

Open Letter to Cardinal Gantin - July 6, 1988

By
There has been some discussion (read lots) about the term 'Conciliar Church'. I have posted this letter written by the Superior General and District Superiors of the SSPX after the 1988 Consecrations. Of particular interest is that the 'Conciliar Church' being referred to as a system. My paraphrase would be that the SSPX regards the 'conciliar Church' as an error within the Church. Source Open Letter to Cardinal Gantin Prefect of the Congregation for Bishops
Post a Comment
Read more

Morning and Evening and other sundry Prayers

By
+ JMJ Along the theme of P^3 (Prayer, Penance, Patience), and for my own reference ... here is a collection of Morning and Evening prayers from the Ideal Daily Missal along with some additional prayers. In this crisis of the Church, I do not think it is possible to do too much prayer, penance and have patience. P^3
Post a Comment
Read more

Rome and the SSPX - Version 2026 Part 6b: Principles and Rules for Surviving this Crisis of the Catholic Church (Principle 1)

By
 + JMJ Principle 1: Realize that something is amiss in the Catholic Church The world in which I had my Traditional Awakening, is one in which practically anything pre-Conciliar such as liturgy, doctrinc, and even dogmas are either suppressed, ignored or re-framed to be acceptable to the ‘world’. What is more, the people adhering to these pre-conciliar teachings and liturgy are persecuted by other members of the Catholic Church. The things that non-Trads say about Trads can be quite extreme. For example, accusations against Traditionalists include that they are: A revival of the Jansenists (link) , Schismatics, Heretics, Uncharitable, Lefebrists Radicals Integrists When one group of Catholics is persecuted by the others for simply wanting to live as Catholics before them did for generations … well something is wrong. Further, we need to realize that when what was previously condemned is now promoted and what was previously promoted as the trut...
Post a Comment
Read more

Forget the Reformation - It is time for Abrogation - Louie Verrecchio

By
Mr. Verrecchio has pointed out one solution to this crisis that is a dream of many Traditional Catholics of my acquaintance: The complete obliteration of the Novus Ordo Missae. If this were to occur, undoubtedly a revolt would occur within the Church, but the battle lines would be much clearer.  I assume that a lot of material heretics would make the transition to being formal heretics. P^3 Prayer Penance Patience Courtesy of Louie Verrecchio A recent article by Fr. Thomas Kocik on the New Liturgical Movement website,  Reforming the Irreformable? , is getting some well-deserved attention in traditional circles. (Do yourself a favor and read it in its entirety if you haven’t already.)
Post a Comment
Read more