Skip to main content

Is Hell Empty or Full?

Image
By
+
JMJ

I had some time this morning so I've pulled together some more articles (kind-of a house cleaning).

In the course of the article on evil, I came across this youtube by Bishop Barron. Skip ahead to 5:15 and you'll hear the Bishop Barron accepts Von Balthasar's theory of universal salvation. Which is inconsistent with Catholic Truth (ie if it ain't heresy in the formal sense, it really casts a blind eye on the scriptures and logic).


So, Bishop Barron is pretty clear - he believes that it is possible that all may be saved.

This article on Commonweal (ie Liberal / Modernist) echoes Bishop Barron.  However, you have to have a pretty strong confirmation bias to ignore the following the demonstrate that this theory (already condemned) is pretty hard (read: IMPOSSIBLE) to reconcile with the following:
  • The Demons (ie Fallen Angels) are in Hell. 
  • Logically we can conclude (as many theologians have) that Judas is in hell. Otherwise Matthew 26:24 does not make sense.
  • Kinda hard to believe no one is in hell when you have these words for OLJC: "Then he shall say to them also that shall be on his left hand: Depart from me, you cursed, into everlasting fire which was prepared for the devil and his angels." (Matthew 25: 41)
Kinda hard to believe in universal salvation eh?

So, in order to believe with the Catholic Church, you have to believe that there are souls as well as fallen angels (ie demons) inhabiting that place.

You can also believe that while not empty, it isn't full, there's always room for one more.

I've noticed this same confirmation bias in a number of modern Catholics. They seem to have a difficulty dealing with harsh realities.

Once Catholics start to understand and adhere to the basic tents of the Catholic Faith, then we'll start emerging from this crisis.

The last things are a good spot to start:

Death
Judgement
Heaven
Hell

P^3







Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sedevacantism and Heresy

By
+ JMJ I've observed three core reactions during this crisis of the Catholic Church. The Pope can't be wrong, therefore this is the New Springtime The Pope is infallible in certain conditions and there is a problem with many things that have been said, done and written, during and after the Second Vatican Council (even in the Council doc). The Pope can't be wrong, this stuff is wrong, therefore he isn't Pope. Of course there are a spectrum of responses in between, but these are the key elements. The 1st group holds the words of the Pope et al as impeccable. Here, let me get you a Koran to kiss... The 3rd group holds that they've all been heretics and lost their office.  There is also a spectrum within this group.   One answer is that they are very poor judges of heresy.  The link below provides some reasoned thought that, I'm happy to say, is completely consistent with Church Teaching. Canon law blog: Its not impossible just very diff...
4 comments
Read more

What does it mean "I'm a Traditional Catholic"?

By
+ JMJ I was visiting with a friend the other day when he said: "I'm a traditionalist". This surprised me because, while I could imagine him saying he was a "conservative or faithful Catholic", I didn't really think that the "traditionalist" label would stick. This got me to to thinking about what it means, or should mean when a person shakes you hand and says: "Hi, I'm a Traditional Catholic".
Post a Comment
Read more

Rome and SSPX - Version 2026 Part 2

By
 + JMJ Part 2 Detailed Synopsis and Timeline (ChatGPT) At this point, I took the shortcut of uploading all of my previous links and the latest SSPX and Rome links to ChatGPT. This way we’ll see how ChatGPT interprets the world as presented on the internet. P^3 Briefing Memo Subject: Rome–SSPX Relations and Planned Episcopal Consecrations (July 1, 2026) Prepared for: Ecclesial / Academic / Media Briefing Date: February 2026 Issue Overview The Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) has announced its intention to consecrate new bishops on July 1, 2026 , potentially without a papal mandate . The Holy See has acknowledged ongoing talks with the SSPX and stated its desire to avoid rupture, but has not granted approval nor outlined canonical consequences. The situation revives unresolved tensions dating to 1988 and raises questions about schism, authority, and doctrinal continuity. Background Founded in 1970 by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, the SSPX seeks to preserve pre-Vat...
Post a Comment
Read more

Schism

By
There is some question as to whether the Pope can be in actual schism as per the Cardinal Torquemada: Citing the doctrine of Pope Innocent III, Torquemada further teaches:  "Thus it is that Pope Innocent III states [De Consuetudine] that, it is necessary to obey the Pope in all things as long as he, himself, does not go against the universal customs of the Church, but should he go against the universal customs of the Church, 'he need not be followed' . . . " [Cited from A Theological Vindication of Roman Catholic Traditionalism, Father Paul Kramer, B.Ph., S.T.D., M. Div. (2nd edition, St. Francis Press, India) p. 29. The full quotation from Cardinal Torquemada reads, "By disobedience, the Pope can separate himself from Christ despite the fact that he is head of the Church, for above all, the unity of the Church is dependent on its relationship with Christ. The Pope can separate himself from Christ either by disobeying the law of Christ, or by commanding som...
Post a Comment
Read more