Skip to main content

The Gas That Drives the Car- Motivating the 4 Temperaments

Most people are familiar with the 4 temperaments
At the risk of oversimplification, here is a brief overview

Sanguine - tending to be happy and carefree, socially outgoing, can have strong emotions but they get over it fast, sometimes needs help staying on track
Choleric - strong drive, task oriented, often likes to be in charge, strong emotions often tending to anger, strong sense of justice
Melancholic- introspective, natural tendency to contemplation and prayer, tendency to see the negative, strong emotions that run deep, introvert, does not want to be the center of attention yet sensitive to slights, real or perceived, - sympathetic to the needs of others
Phlegmatic- calm, easygoing, emotions are light and easily gotten over, sometimes needs help getting motivated

We all have a tendency to one or a combination of these temperaments.

Another book treated of the temperaments in a slightly different manner;
it classified the temperaments as sanguine, choleric or melancholic and gave each a "hot" or "cold" quality. (the "cold" sanguine being what would otherwise be called the phlegmatic)

So for instance, the "hot" sanguine is more of a Tigger personality, whereas the "cold" sanguine is Pooh bear.

A "hot" choleric would be more loud, center of attention leader type, whereas a "cold" choleric would be a quiet, calculating strategist type of leader

The "hot" melancholic,likewise, would have a lot more to deal with emotionally than the "cold" melancholic

Any book on the 4 temperaments usually has tips on raising and motivating children and this could be applied to any person who wishes to pursue their own goals;

Sanguines typically are gung ho to get going, but need more direction on how to stay on track and persevere
Cholerics need to see the fairness and justice in how they are treated. If they can see the good sense behind a course of action they will be more likely to cooperate
Melancholics need to be guided gently, with encouragement
Phlegmatics are typically slow to start, and need help and encouragement to keep going

It occurred to me that this might be why some people find a certain book or program great while another might be turned off. Sometimes it's not the ideas themselves but the presentation of those ideas that makes all the difference. Some writers just "click" with us more than others.

Another element to motivation would be whether the person is male or female. Men seem to take the "boot camp" type of "in your face" exercise programs in stride and while there are programs for women like that, I have yet to meet a woman who likes that approach.
My daughters used to take Taek Won Do. Emphasis on "used to". Needless to say, their teacher's well meant intentions to motivate by intimidation backfired.
More recently, I have seen for myself that some motivational books can be interesting, informative and chock full of good advice, but just a bit "off putting".
Realizing that gender and temperament can play a role in motivating can be helpful in "interpreting" a book. Sometimes the message is great. We just need to reword it to ourselves so that we can use it to our advantage.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Comparision of the Tridentine, Cranmer and Novus Ordo Masses

+ JMJ I downloaded the comparison that was linked in the previous article on the mass (here) . ... a very good reference! P^3 From: Whispers of Restoration (available at this link) . CHARTING LITURGICAL CHANGE Comparing the 1962 Ordinary of the Roman Mass to changes made during the Anglican Schism; Compared in turn to changes adopted in the creation of Pope Paul VI’s Mass in 1969 The chart on the reverse is a concise comparison of certain ritual differences between three historical rites for the celebration of the Catholic Mass Vetus Ordo: “Old Order,” the Roman Rite of Mass as contained in the 1962 Missal, often referred to as the “Traditional Latin Mass.”The Ordinary of this Mass is that of Pope St. Pius V (1570) following the Council of Trent (1545-63), hence the occasional moniker “Tridentine Mass.” However, Trent only consolidated and codified the Roman Rite already in use at that time; its essential form dates to Pope St. Gregory the Great (+604), in whose time the R...

SSPX and the Resistance - A Comparison Of Ecclesiology

Shining the light of Church Teaching on the doctrinal positions of the SSPX and the Resistance. Principles are guides used to aid in decision making.  It stands to reason that bad principles will lead to bad decisions. The recent interactions between Rome and the SSPX has challenged a number of closely held cultural assumptions of people in both sides of the disagreement. This has resulted in cultural skirmishes in both Rome and the SSPX. Since it is the smaller of the two, the skirmishes have been more evident within the SSPX.  The cultural fault-line that Bishop Fellay crossed appears to be linked to two points of Catholic Doctrine: Ecclesiology and Obedience.  The cultural difference of view points is strong enough that it has resulted in the expulsion of a number of members.  It should also be noted that some other priests expelled since the beginning of the latest interactions (starting in 2000) held the same view points and have joined with the l...

If Pope Francis is bad - what about Pope St. John Paul II et al?

+ JMJ So here we are on the apparent cusp of yet another post conciliar Papal canonization. This time we have Pope's John-Paul I and Paul VI canonizations to 'look forward' to. This follows, obviously, on the heels of Pope St. John Paul II's canonization? So the first question that I usually encounter is: How is it possible, keeping in mind the doctrine on infallibility of canonizations (note doctrine not dogma), that Pope St. John Paul II is a Saint? First, what does it mean???  According to the doctrine of dogmatic facts - it is the universal opinion of Theologians that canonizations are infallible.  It means that they enjoy the beatific vision.  ... that's it.  That is the doctrine and it is at the level of universal opinion of theologians.  It is called a 'dogmatic fact'. That they made mistakes is obvious.  That the miracles seem to not be very miraculous is also a bit of an issue. Here's something to consider: The rush that surrou...

Spiritual Journey Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre - Extracts

+ JMJ I have posted these two chapters to provide context for the quote of: It is, therefore, a strict duty for every priest wanting to remain Catholic to separate himself from this Conciliar Church for as long as it does not rediscover the Tradition of the Church and of the Catholic Faith. P^3 Courtesy of SSPX.ca Chapter II The Perfections of God We ought to remember during this entire contemplation of God that we must apply all that is said of God to Our Lord Jesus Christ, Who is God. We cannot separate Jesus Christ from God. We cannot separate the Christian religion from Jesus Christ, Who is God, and we must affirm and believe that only the Catholic religion is the Christian religion. These affirmations have, as a result, inescapable conclusions that no ecclesiastic authority can contest: outside of Jesus Christ and the Catholic religion, that is, outsi...

Dogmas of the Catholic Faith (de fide) - Expanded Listing: Answer for Reader

 + JMJ  A reader asked the following question in the 2015 version of the article on the Dogmas of the Catholic Faith (link) : 117: "In the state of fallen nature it is morally impossible for man without Supernatural Revelation, to know easily, with absolute certainty and without admixture of error, all religious and moral truths of the natural order." Where can you find this in the documents of the Church? ( Link to comment )  Here's the reference from Ott: The citation that Ott provided was Denzinger 1786 and the source document is Dogmatic Consitution Concerning the Faith from the First Vatican Council (Papal Encyclicals - link) : Chapter 2 On Revelation, Article 3: It is indeed thanks to this divine revelation , that those matters concerning God, which are not of themselves beyond the scope of human reason, can, even in the present state of the human race, be known by everyone, without difficulty, with firm certitude and with no intermingling of error. Here's ...