Skip to main content

The Gas That Drives the Car- Motivating the 4 Temperaments

Most people are familiar with the 4 temperaments
At the risk of oversimplification, here is a brief overview

Sanguine - tending to be happy and carefree, socially outgoing, can have strong emotions but they get over it fast, sometimes needs help staying on track
Choleric - strong drive, task oriented, often likes to be in charge, strong emotions often tending to anger, strong sense of justice
Melancholic- introspective, natural tendency to contemplation and prayer, tendency to see the negative, strong emotions that run deep, introvert, does not want to be the center of attention yet sensitive to slights, real or perceived, - sympathetic to the needs of others
Phlegmatic- calm, easygoing, emotions are light and easily gotten over, sometimes needs help getting motivated

We all have a tendency to one or a combination of these temperaments.

Another book treated of the temperaments in a slightly different manner;
it classified the temperaments as sanguine, choleric or melancholic and gave each a "hot" or "cold" quality. (the "cold" sanguine being what would otherwise be called the phlegmatic)

So for instance, the "hot" sanguine is more of a Tigger personality, whereas the "cold" sanguine is Pooh bear.

A "hot" choleric would be more loud, center of attention leader type, whereas a "cold" choleric would be a quiet, calculating strategist type of leader

The "hot" melancholic,likewise, would have a lot more to deal with emotionally than the "cold" melancholic

Any book on the 4 temperaments usually has tips on raising and motivating children and this could be applied to any person who wishes to pursue their own goals;

Sanguines typically are gung ho to get going, but need more direction on how to stay on track and persevere
Cholerics need to see the fairness and justice in how they are treated. If they can see the good sense behind a course of action they will be more likely to cooperate
Melancholics need to be guided gently, with encouragement
Phlegmatics are typically slow to start, and need help and encouragement to keep going

It occurred to me that this might be why some people find a certain book or program great while another might be turned off. Sometimes it's not the ideas themselves but the presentation of those ideas that makes all the difference. Some writers just "click" with us more than others.

Another element to motivation would be whether the person is male or female. Men seem to take the "boot camp" type of "in your face" exercise programs in stride and while there are programs for women like that, I have yet to meet a woman who likes that approach.
My daughters used to take Taek Won Do. Emphasis on "used to". Needless to say, their teacher's well meant intentions to motivate by intimidation backfired.
More recently, I have seen for myself that some motivational books can be interesting, informative and chock full of good advice, but just a bit "off putting".
Realizing that gender and temperament can play a role in motivating can be helpful in "interpreting" a book. Sometimes the message is great. We just need to reword it to ourselves so that we can use it to our advantage.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Count Capponi - RIP

+ JMJ I had heard of Count Capponi over the years and was happy to hear a voice crying in the wilderness. I suspect that his conscience was clearer than many. This part of the article caught my attention: Capponi defended the right of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre to continue his work without the label “schismatic,” which term Capponi rejected, saying: “You cannot apply the standards of the new code of canon law and the mentality of the old code. According to the new code, Lefebvre could do what he did with a Catholic intention, and he did what he did in ‘sincerity’ and invoked the ‘state of emergency’ argument, which the new code permits. You might not like the new code, but it’s what governs the Church.” I know a few people who tried to stir up a fuss when the SSPX cited the New Code in one of the documents with Rome.  Yet, the truth is what it is --- the New Code was promulgated by a reigning Pope and flawed as it is ... there are some benefits to its liberality. ...

Is it sinful to attend the Novus Ordo (New Mass) - Is it Sinful to Not Attend the Novus Ordo on Sunday?

+ JMJ A non-SSPX Catholic is upset over the SSPX statements on not attending the Novus Ordo Missae. Ladies and gentlemen, what the SSPX, or at least its website editor, is advocating is a mortal sin against the Third Commandment.  Unless the priest deviates from the language of the Sacramentary, the consecration, and thus the rest of Mass is to be considered valid.  No one may elect not to attend Mass simply because abuses are occurring therein.  Might I suggest that such absenteeism is its own abuse?  The Third Commandment binds under mortal sin.  Father So-And-So from the SSPX has no authority whatsoever to excuse attendance at Mass, be that Mass ever so unpalatable. Source:Restore DC Catholicism Well, this is interesting. First why does the SSPX issue this statement? Because it is sinful to put your faith in danger by attending a protestant service.  It is likewise dangerous to put your faith in danger by attending a protestantized ma...

Those who return to the past are not outside the Church - Rorate Caeli

+ JMJ I had been thinking about putting together a post explaining some of the history of how the SSPX has arrived at its current position. Now I see that Rorate has posted a translated editorial that shows the roots of the SSPX principles. In reading these words, I see patterns and themes that were put forward by Archbishop Lefebvre decades ago. Perhaps his sight was clearer than most. P^3

Fr. Burfitt on Fr. Pfeiffer's Attempted Consecration

 + JMJ   Amidst the shadows cast by the publication of Traditionis Custodes, I am working on a map of the 'resistance' splinters to put their reaction in contrast with that of the SSPX.  In the midst of this, I just came across Fr. Burfitt letter on the attempted consecration. Breaking it down (see below)  items 2 and 3 are key.  Just as the consecrating bishop is 'doubtful', even if he hadn't muffed the first attempt, Fr. Pfeiffer remain doubtful and therefore this impacts those men is attempts to 'ordain'. There were rumours that Fr. Pfeiffer was seeking episcopal consecration for years as he cast about for various bishops (also doubtful) to help him achieve this goal. I wonder how he convinced the 'doubtful' bishop to provide (twice) the doubtful consecration. What a mess!  This creates a danger to the souls of his followers and wonder where it will end. Will he go full sede and have himself 'elected' pontiff as others have done before him...

SSPX Transfers

+ JMJ Eponymous flow posted the following list of transfers etc. Source: http://eponymousflower.blogspot.com/2020/04/castling-of-leadership-at-sspx.html The departures Bishop Bernard Fellay, the third Superior General until 2018, leaves the General House in Menzingen and moves to the Seminary of St. Thomas Aquinas in the USA. Bishop Bernard Tissier de Mallerais, suffering from ill health, is being referred to the Seminary of St. Pius X in Ecene as a retreat. Fr. Christian Thouvenot, until now Secretary General of the General House, becomes a professor at the seminary in Ecene. Fr. Franz Schmidberger, until now Rector at the Seminary of the Heart of Jesus in Zaitzkofen, moves to the district of Germany. Fr. Jürgen Wegner, until now district superior of the DISTRICT USA, moves to the district of Austria. Fr. Philippe Brunet, until now Superior of the Autonomous House of Spain-Portugal, becomes professor at the Seminary U.L.F. and co-saviour of La Reja in...