Skip to main content

Remember this day March 25, 1991 - The Death of Archbishop Lefebvre

+
JMJ

This is the day, 25 years ago, that Archbishop Lefebvre passed on to his eternal reward.

I know that he has as many (perhaps even more) critics than admirers.  For example I still remember Fr. Paul Nicholson's screed in which he shouted from the top of his webpage: "To die excommunicated - how horrible".

I'll leave aside Fr. Nicholson's ignorance on the matter as in the grand scheme of things, his impact on the life of the Mystical Body of Christ, which IS the Roman Catholic Church is no greater than that of Michael Voris etc.

Archbishop Lefebvre and the work he founded (ie Fraternal Society of St. Pius X) have had a significant impact.

Let us list of few from greatest to smallest:

  1. Consistent and constant Catholic perspective on the crisis of the Church from the halls of the Second Vatican Council to the Synod on the Family (and beyond!)
  2. Summorum Pontificum and Universae Ecclesiae: By which the restoration of the sacramental life of the Church was begun.
  3. Removal of the 'excommunications' the served as an epithet against all Traditional Catholics
  4. Generation of numerous Traditional Catholic Orders: FSSP et al.
  5. Refuge in the tempest that shakes the Church of Christ to its foundations.
This is a work that continues in spite of attacks and even stupidity of some former members.

The man who founded this work, implanted his character and culture on it, that can be summed up on one word:

Missionary


Think of this and pray for the Church as you wend you way to the Liturgical Function this afternoon.

Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre requiescat in pace, your work continues!

P^3

Attached below are the memories of a priest I know well, who has laboured long in Canada.  Worthy memories!

Courtesy of SSPX.ca





Archbishop Lefebvre's 25th anniversary

March 25, 2016 
March 25 1991 – March 25, 2016: already 25 years since Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, the founder of the Society of Saint Pius X, passed away to his eternal reward!  I can still remember the day when the Archbishop left us as if it was yesterday.  So, on the occasion of that anniversary please allow me to recall some personal memories.

News of the Archbishop's passing

Being involved in the apostolate of the Society of St. Pius X in Canada since my ordination in 1988, I was taking care of my duties as a priest on Palm Sunday March 24, 1991.  After the Blessing of Palms and Mass in Calgary in the morning, I flew to Edmonton for an afternoon Mass.  Then, in the evening, after flying back from Edmonton to Calgary, I decided to stop by our church to check the answering machine.  Over the past days, we had received some alarming reports on the health condition of Archbishop Lefebvre, who had been admitted to the hospital in Martigny, Switzerland.  But on that Sunday night, there was a message on the answering machine, coming from one of our good friends, Michael, who said that he heard that the Archbishop had a heart attack and was on life support.  After listening to that alarming message, I drove back to the trailer that used to be the home of the SSPX priests in Calgary.  As I drove into the yard, I remember that there was snow on the ground.  Shortly after, Martin came to see me from across the yard.  He was to give me the sad news that he just received, that is to say that Archbishop Lefebvre had passed away.  Both of us stayed silent, as we could not find words to express our emotions. 
On the following day, I flew back to Winnipeg, and it was decided that the three priests from St. Raphael priory, Frs. Violette, Castel and myself would go to attend the ceremony of the funeral, to be held in Ecône on the Tuesday after Easter.  Meanwhile, we had to complete the ceremonies of Holy Week in the chapels of the SSPX across Western Canada.  On that Good Friday, I flew to Vancouver, to take care of the liturgical functions in Langley and Nanaimo.  Then, on Easter Sunday evening, I was bound on a flight from Vancouver to London Heathrow, then connecting to Geneva, where I took the train for Martigny.

Attending the Funeral in Ecône

When I reached Ecône, I went immediately to the chapel Notre-Dame-des-Champs (Our Lady of the Fields) where the Archbishop was laying in state.  Later on, in the evening, the body of the Archbishop was moved to the main chapel of the seminary, to allow more priests and seminarians to keep watch over their spiritual father.  The wake lasted for the whole night, in great silence, only interrupted by the singing of the whole office of the dead done by three different scholas. Then, in the morning, there was a Solemn Pontifical Mass of Requiem, celebrated by Bishop Tissier de Mallerais, with a sermon given by Fr. Schmidberger, then superior general of the SSPX.  What was really striking during the funeral of Archbishop Lefebvre, was the great atmosphere of peace found among the spiritual children of the founder of the Society.  Sure, we were sad because we had lost our spiritual father, but our hearts were at peace, because we knew that he had done his duty, by transmitting all the means necessary for the making of priests, especially four young bishops that have been travelling the world since, to administer the sacraments of Confirmation and of the Holy Orders. 

"He loved the Church too much"

The words that he pronounced on the day of the 1988 episcopal consecration had become reality: “Tradidi quod et accepi” - “I have transmitted what myself had received”.  He spent his whole life to transmit, to pass on the treasure that he had received from his parents, priests, bishops who had been his mentors during the early years of his life.  As said Bishop Tissier de Mallerais in a recent interview on “La Porte Latine”, the French website of the SSPX: “The matter of all his life [Archbishop Lefebvre] was to render to God love for love: from the day of his priestly vocation when he was 17 years old, up to his last day, when he died as excommunicated.  Cardinal Oddi, who knew him quite well, said about him: “he loved the Church too much!”.  That is to say, he pushed his love of the Church and of Our Lord to the extreme by being exposed to the most grievous ecclesiastical penalties, suspension and excommunication, in order to rescue the priesthood and the permanency of the holy sacrifice of the Mass within the Church.  By doing so, he followed his Divine Master: “but God, (who is rich in mercy,) for his exceeding charity wherewith he loved us” (Ephesians II, 4).”

The disciple was not above the master

Now, it just happens that the 25th anniversary of the death of Archbishop Lefebvre falls on Good Friday, the day of the Passion, the supreme sacrifice of Our Lord on Calvary.  The disciple was not above the master. Like his Master, he was condemned by the high priest to the sacrifice of his honour and reputation, some kind of condemnation to a spiritual death, the penalty of excommunication.
But we know that Easter Sunday follows Good Friday.  Let us pray that the sacrifice of our good Archbishop Lefebvre will bear fruit for the resurrection of the splendour of the whole Church, that is to say the re-flourishing of perennial Tradition and of the Mass of all times.
Now, as news is coming from Rome that a unilateral recognition of the Society of Saint Pius X may be in the agenda of the near future, let us not forget all the good work of the SSPX that Rome is bound to recognise as we are without any change, is due principally to its solid foundation, thanks to our dear Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre!
Fr. Dominique Boulet SSPX

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Comparision of the Tridentine, Cranmer and Novus Ordo Masses

+ JMJ I downloaded the comparison that was linked in the previous article on the mass (here) . ... a very good reference! P^3 From: Whispers of Restoration (available at this link) . CHARTING LITURGICAL CHANGE Comparing the 1962 Ordinary of the Roman Mass to changes made during the Anglican Schism; Compared in turn to changes adopted in the creation of Pope Paul VI’s Mass in 1969 The chart on the reverse is a concise comparison of certain ritual differences between three historical rites for the celebration of the Catholic Mass Vetus Ordo: “Old Order,” the Roman Rite of Mass as contained in the 1962 Missal, often referred to as the “Traditional Latin Mass.”The Ordinary of this Mass is that of Pope St. Pius V (1570) following the Council of Trent (1545-63), hence the occasional moniker “Tridentine Mass.” However, Trent only consolidated and codified the Roman Rite already in use at that time; its essential form dates to Pope St. Gregory the Great (+604), in whose time the R...

SSPX and the Resistance - A Comparison Of Ecclesiology

Shining the light of Church Teaching on the doctrinal positions of the SSPX and the Resistance. Principles are guides used to aid in decision making.  It stands to reason that bad principles will lead to bad decisions. The recent interactions between Rome and the SSPX has challenged a number of closely held cultural assumptions of people in both sides of the disagreement. This has resulted in cultural skirmishes in both Rome and the SSPX. Since it is the smaller of the two, the skirmishes have been more evident within the SSPX.  The cultural fault-line that Bishop Fellay crossed appears to be linked to two points of Catholic Doctrine: Ecclesiology and Obedience.  The cultural difference of view points is strong enough that it has resulted in the expulsion of a number of members.  It should also be noted that some other priests expelled since the beginning of the latest interactions (starting in 2000) held the same view points and have joined with the l...

If Pope Francis is bad - what about Pope St. John Paul II et al?

+ JMJ So here we are on the apparent cusp of yet another post conciliar Papal canonization. This time we have Pope's John-Paul I and Paul VI canonizations to 'look forward' to. This follows, obviously, on the heels of Pope St. John Paul II's canonization? So the first question that I usually encounter is: How is it possible, keeping in mind the doctrine on infallibility of canonizations (note doctrine not dogma), that Pope St. John Paul II is a Saint? First, what does it mean???  According to the doctrine of dogmatic facts - it is the universal opinion of Theologians that canonizations are infallible.  It means that they enjoy the beatific vision.  ... that's it.  That is the doctrine and it is at the level of universal opinion of theologians.  It is called a 'dogmatic fact'. That they made mistakes is obvious.  That the miracles seem to not be very miraculous is also a bit of an issue. Here's something to consider: The rush that surrou...

Spiritual Journey Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre - Extracts

+ JMJ I have posted these two chapters to provide context for the quote of: It is, therefore, a strict duty for every priest wanting to remain Catholic to separate himself from this Conciliar Church for as long as it does not rediscover the Tradition of the Church and of the Catholic Faith. P^3 Courtesy of SSPX.ca Chapter II The Perfections of God We ought to remember during this entire contemplation of God that we must apply all that is said of God to Our Lord Jesus Christ, Who is God. We cannot separate Jesus Christ from God. We cannot separate the Christian religion from Jesus Christ, Who is God, and we must affirm and believe that only the Catholic religion is the Christian religion. These affirmations have, as a result, inescapable conclusions that no ecclesiastic authority can contest: outside of Jesus Christ and the Catholic religion, that is, outsi...

Dogmas of the Catholic Faith (de fide) - Expanded Listing: Answer for Reader

 + JMJ  A reader asked the following question in the 2015 version of the article on the Dogmas of the Catholic Faith (link) : 117: "In the state of fallen nature it is morally impossible for man without Supernatural Revelation, to know easily, with absolute certainty and without admixture of error, all religious and moral truths of the natural order." Where can you find this in the documents of the Church? ( Link to comment )  Here's the reference from Ott: The citation that Ott provided was Denzinger 1786 and the source document is Dogmatic Consitution Concerning the Faith from the First Vatican Council (Papal Encyclicals - link) : Chapter 2 On Revelation, Article 3: It is indeed thanks to this divine revelation , that those matters concerning God, which are not of themselves beyond the scope of human reason, can, even in the present state of the human race, be known by everyone, without difficulty, with firm certitude and with no intermingling of error. Here's ...