Skip to main content

Remember this day March 25, 1991 - The Death of Archbishop Lefebvre

+
JMJ

This is the day, 25 years ago, that Archbishop Lefebvre passed on to his eternal reward.

I know that he has as many (perhaps even more) critics than admirers.  For example I still remember Fr. Paul Nicholson's screed in which he shouted from the top of his webpage: "To die excommunicated - how horrible".

I'll leave aside Fr. Nicholson's ignorance on the matter as in the grand scheme of things, his impact on the life of the Mystical Body of Christ, which IS the Roman Catholic Church is no greater than that of Michael Voris etc.

Archbishop Lefebvre and the work he founded (ie Fraternal Society of St. Pius X) have had a significant impact.

Let us list of few from greatest to smallest:

  1. Consistent and constant Catholic perspective on the crisis of the Church from the halls of the Second Vatican Council to the Synod on the Family (and beyond!)
  2. Summorum Pontificum and Universae Ecclesiae: By which the restoration of the sacramental life of the Church was begun.
  3. Removal of the 'excommunications' the served as an epithet against all Traditional Catholics
  4. Generation of numerous Traditional Catholic Orders: FSSP et al.
  5. Refuge in the tempest that shakes the Church of Christ to its foundations.
This is a work that continues in spite of attacks and even stupidity of some former members.

The man who founded this work, implanted his character and culture on it, that can be summed up on one word:

Missionary


Think of this and pray for the Church as you wend you way to the Liturgical Function this afternoon.

Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre requiescat in pace, your work continues!

P^3

Attached below are the memories of a priest I know well, who has laboured long in Canada.  Worthy memories!

Courtesy of SSPX.ca





Archbishop Lefebvre's 25th anniversary

March 25, 2016 
March 25 1991 – March 25, 2016: already 25 years since Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, the founder of the Society of Saint Pius X, passed away to his eternal reward!  I can still remember the day when the Archbishop left us as if it was yesterday.  So, on the occasion of that anniversary please allow me to recall some personal memories.

News of the Archbishop's passing

Being involved in the apostolate of the Society of St. Pius X in Canada since my ordination in 1988, I was taking care of my duties as a priest on Palm Sunday March 24, 1991.  After the Blessing of Palms and Mass in Calgary in the morning, I flew to Edmonton for an afternoon Mass.  Then, in the evening, after flying back from Edmonton to Calgary, I decided to stop by our church to check the answering machine.  Over the past days, we had received some alarming reports on the health condition of Archbishop Lefebvre, who had been admitted to the hospital in Martigny, Switzerland.  But on that Sunday night, there was a message on the answering machine, coming from one of our good friends, Michael, who said that he heard that the Archbishop had a heart attack and was on life support.  After listening to that alarming message, I drove back to the trailer that used to be the home of the SSPX priests in Calgary.  As I drove into the yard, I remember that there was snow on the ground.  Shortly after, Martin came to see me from across the yard.  He was to give me the sad news that he just received, that is to say that Archbishop Lefebvre had passed away.  Both of us stayed silent, as we could not find words to express our emotions. 
On the following day, I flew back to Winnipeg, and it was decided that the three priests from St. Raphael priory, Frs. Violette, Castel and myself would go to attend the ceremony of the funeral, to be held in Ecône on the Tuesday after Easter.  Meanwhile, we had to complete the ceremonies of Holy Week in the chapels of the SSPX across Western Canada.  On that Good Friday, I flew to Vancouver, to take care of the liturgical functions in Langley and Nanaimo.  Then, on Easter Sunday evening, I was bound on a flight from Vancouver to London Heathrow, then connecting to Geneva, where I took the train for Martigny.

Attending the Funeral in Ecône

When I reached Ecône, I went immediately to the chapel Notre-Dame-des-Champs (Our Lady of the Fields) where the Archbishop was laying in state.  Later on, in the evening, the body of the Archbishop was moved to the main chapel of the seminary, to allow more priests and seminarians to keep watch over their spiritual father.  The wake lasted for the whole night, in great silence, only interrupted by the singing of the whole office of the dead done by three different scholas. Then, in the morning, there was a Solemn Pontifical Mass of Requiem, celebrated by Bishop Tissier de Mallerais, with a sermon given by Fr. Schmidberger, then superior general of the SSPX.  What was really striking during the funeral of Archbishop Lefebvre, was the great atmosphere of peace found among the spiritual children of the founder of the Society.  Sure, we were sad because we had lost our spiritual father, but our hearts were at peace, because we knew that he had done his duty, by transmitting all the means necessary for the making of priests, especially four young bishops that have been travelling the world since, to administer the sacraments of Confirmation and of the Holy Orders. 

"He loved the Church too much"

The words that he pronounced on the day of the 1988 episcopal consecration had become reality: “Tradidi quod et accepi” - “I have transmitted what myself had received”.  He spent his whole life to transmit, to pass on the treasure that he had received from his parents, priests, bishops who had been his mentors during the early years of his life.  As said Bishop Tissier de Mallerais in a recent interview on “La Porte Latine”, the French website of the SSPX: “The matter of all his life [Archbishop Lefebvre] was to render to God love for love: from the day of his priestly vocation when he was 17 years old, up to his last day, when he died as excommunicated.  Cardinal Oddi, who knew him quite well, said about him: “he loved the Church too much!”.  That is to say, he pushed his love of the Church and of Our Lord to the extreme by being exposed to the most grievous ecclesiastical penalties, suspension and excommunication, in order to rescue the priesthood and the permanency of the holy sacrifice of the Mass within the Church.  By doing so, he followed his Divine Master: “but God, (who is rich in mercy,) for his exceeding charity wherewith he loved us” (Ephesians II, 4).”

The disciple was not above the master

Now, it just happens that the 25th anniversary of the death of Archbishop Lefebvre falls on Good Friday, the day of the Passion, the supreme sacrifice of Our Lord on Calvary.  The disciple was not above the master. Like his Master, he was condemned by the high priest to the sacrifice of his honour and reputation, some kind of condemnation to a spiritual death, the penalty of excommunication.
But we know that Easter Sunday follows Good Friday.  Let us pray that the sacrifice of our good Archbishop Lefebvre will bear fruit for the resurrection of the splendour of the whole Church, that is to say the re-flourishing of perennial Tradition and of the Mass of all times.
Now, as news is coming from Rome that a unilateral recognition of the Society of Saint Pius X may be in the agenda of the near future, let us not forget all the good work of the SSPX that Rome is bound to recognise as we are without any change, is due principally to its solid foundation, thanks to our dear Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre!
Fr. Dominique Boulet SSPX

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is Tradition?

 + JMJ What Is Tradition? The basic premise, from my perspective, is that what was taught before cannot be contradicted by the 'present' magisterium, only deepened and expanded upon. I recall the Roman theologians called the SSPX protestants while the SSPX called them modernists.  I believe this was all surrounding the concept of Traditon. SSPX's Understanding of Tradition One accusation made against the SSPX is that they don't have a correct understanding of 'Tradition'.  This is how the SSPX understands Tradition: I finally profess that Tradition is not a dead memory, but the living transmission of the doctrine received from the Apostles. It remains living, in distinction to Revelation, which is closed. It is so both in the activity of the Magisterium of the Teaching Church and in the profession of Faith of the Church Taught, of which the sentire cum Ecclesia is the result of the teaching of the Magisterium. Tradition may be called ‘living’, not in the sense t...

SSPX.ca: What is the position of the SSPX on Vatican II???

 + JMJ With all the mis-information about the SSPX rejecting the Second Vatican Council, I thought it would be useful to publish an article that focuses on the real issues that the SSPX has identified. Update: Why Did the SSPX Consecrate Bishops? ( Neither Schismatic, Nor Disobedient link ) In the linked document the SSPX outlined the key motivation and core issues with Vatican II and the post-conciliar magisterium (see above link for full document): 4. The Society Acted Precisely Because of the State of Necessity in Which the Faith Finds Itself  In the present situation of the Church, if the Society of Saint Pius X had not carried out the consecrations of July 1st, it would have found itself facing an inevitable alternative: either to disappear gradually, or to accept, at least in fact, the new liturgy as well as the false doctrines of Vatican II and the post-council. Without the consecrations of July 1st, the Fraternity would have found itself, in a few years, without bishop...

Thoughts on: Finding Common Ground Between Rome and the SSPX

 + JMJ In the ramp up to the consecrations the noise floor in the intergnat grew to a constant din.  This was one of the few the peeped its signal over the noise. https://crisismagazine.com/opinion/finding-common-ground-between-rome-and-the-sspx The key issue is contained in this paragraph: In the lead-up to the planned July 1, 2026, episcopal consecrations,  the SSPX rejected Rome’s offer  of doctrinal dialogue on the grounds that “we both know in advance that we cannot agree doctrinally, particularly regarding the fundamental orientations adopted since the Second Vatican Council.” Fr. Pagliarani also said that his previous attempt at dialogue in 2019 was shut down by Rome because of an assumed irreconcilability. It seems that, from the Society’s perspective, and perhaps from Rome’s too, their positions are incompatible. If memory serves, Rome killed any opportunity for an open discussion by stating that Vatican II was not up for debate. So it was a still-birth and ...

Thoughts on the Thoughts of a former SSPX priest

 + JMJ Well Gary Campbell, former SSPX Priest and now laicised has posted a new article on WherePeterIs. https://wherepeteris.com/thoughts-of-a-former-sspx-priest-on-the-july-1-consecrations/ These words stuck out: Heck, they have built a five-star hotel, wine bar, and Walmart on the opposite bank of the Rubicon! They are not in danger of entering a state of schism, for they are  already  in a state of schism. I believe he doth protest too much. All the actual facts indicate that the SSPX was not in a state of schism before July 1st and an examination of the decree of excommunication highlights the either ineptitude of those in charge or a desire to leave the barn door open. The chasm between an act of disobedience and act of schism remains just what is has always been - an inconvenient barrier that person(s) in Rome seek to bridge but appear incapable of succeeding. The SSPX re-stated that they recognize the Pope as the Vicar of Christ and feel obliged by conscience...

The News is an Addiction ...

 + JMJ People seem to be mesmerised by train wrecks.   They just can't turn away as the disaster creeps forward along train tracks towards the crossing where a car, truck, bus, trailer awaits its destruction. Trads have been watching the train wreck that is this crisis of the Catholic Church for decades. The trade war between the Canada and the US has reminded me that the news is addictive.   The first time I was addicted what from 2009 to  2014 when I was closely following the Rome / SSPX discussions.  I was at work watching a live-stream as Bishop Fellay disappeared into the Vatican. The lead-up to this moment had been intense as the 'resistance' got freaked out and the cultural cracks between doctrine and conspiracy theory widened. In the decade since then other things have emerged, wars, rumours of wars, conspiracies, celebrity Catholics etc. Now we have a new addiction and its name is Trump. Lately, no matter how much I try, I find myself wonderin...