Skip to main content

Rorate: SYNOD BATTLES: Blackmail, Veiled Schism Threats, the Kasperization of the German Church, and the Destruction of Marriage - Document and Analysis

+
JMJ

Rorate has released the following translation of a document released by the German Bishops.

As this crisis of the Church proceeds, the lines are becoming clearer and clearer.

While the Theological lines were crossed at the Second Vatican Council, the Moral lines are being crossed at the 'Synods' and put into practice in the Government of the Church (see CFNEWS article)

Pray, for the Faith of many in the Church will be tried by this new scandal.

P^3

Source

SYNOD BATTLES: Blackmail, Veiled Schism Threats, the Kasperization of the German Church, and the Destruction of Marriage - Document and Analysis


1. DOCUMENT

Zentralkomitee der deutschen Katholiken (Central Committee of the German Catholics)
Saturday, May 9, 2015
To Build Bridges between Teaching and the Reality of Life – Family and Church in the World of Today


Plenary Assembly on May 8 and 9, 2015 in Würzburg [Germany]
Declaration of the Zentralkomitee der deutschen Katholiken (Central Committee of the German Catholics) in preparation for the XIV Ordinary General Assembly of the Synod of Bishops in the Vatican [October] 2015

 The Central Committee of the German Catholics (ZdK) [Rorate note: the oldest, main and most influential group of German Catholics, founded in 1848 and responsible for the famous Katholikentage, Catholic Days] welcomes the call of Pope Francis to all the faithful to make a statement about the situation of the family in the Church and in the world of today. The world-wide reactions to this call will have to be put together during the General Assembly of the Synod of Bishops in the fall of 2015. The ZdK is aware of the universal Church's understanding of the context for the discussion of the topic and pays special attention to its own regional considerations.

[…]

With the following four central messages, the ZdK would like to make a contribution to the debate, in light of the preparation of the consultations for the XIV General Assembly of the Synod of Bishops; it would thus like to invite a discussion about its following statements and to seek allies for the upcoming challenges.

1)      We regard the sacramental marriage as the model for a life-long bond as a promise for a successful life with the help of God. We confess this to be the model of life and we encourage couples to make such a marital promise and to found a family. At the same time, we respect other forms of cohabitation in which important values are realized: reliable responsibility for one another; fidelity in that relationship; and a commitment to walk together the path [sic].

2)      As a church in the world, the ZdK works in a special way for a strengthening and for a promotion of marriage and the family in our society and in the state. By family, we mean also the different non-marital forms of reliably lived partnerships and of generational responsibility which make a large contribution to the societal solidarity and which ought to be treated justly.

3)      The Church's teaching has to be further developed with the help of a dialogue with the faithful, and with an attentiveness to their respective life realities. As a church which is attentive to men, their sorrows and hopes, we are called to engage with confidence the given society of today with all its manifold, socially accepted forms of living, and to become ourselves bridge-builders between practice and teaching.

4)      In our church [in Germany], we support a strong pastoral care for marriage and the family, which needs, locally, a convincing personal offer [of specific and special care], also in changing pastoral structures.

In detail, this means that:

[…]
In other forms of communal living, as well, there are to be found values which signify a marriage as a covenant between God and men: an unbreakable [sic] “yes” to the other person, the constant readiness to reconcile, as well as the perspective upon a fruitful relationship in exchanging the gifts of different persons.
These forms of living and family [also] have to be honored, even if they are not to be found in the form of the sacramental marriage. We think here of enduring partnerships [cohabitation], civil marriages, as well as civilly registered partnerships [i.e., homosexual unions].

It is important to respect that which people are able to contribute to their relationships. We need to change our point of view, departing from always looking at that which is missing, and moving, instead, toward an attentiveness to other very different forms of living together and the values that are lived in them. […]

We notice a tension and often a large discrepancy between the statements of the Magisterium about marriage and the family, and, on the other hand, the life realities of the faithful which are characterized by a plurality of family forms. […]
It is necessary to build bridges between the teaching of the Church about marriage and the family and the current life realities of the faithful, namely with the help of:
[…]
-                    a respect for the cohabitation in loyal, non-marital partnerships;
[…]
-                    a re-evaluation of the methods of artificial birth control, since in no other area of life can there be found a similarly large discrepancy between the Magisterium and the personal conscientious decisions made in daily life, also by most faithful Catholics;
-                    a further development of liturgical forms, especially of blessings for same-sex partnerships, new partnerships of divorcees, and for important life-changing decisions [?] within families;
[...]
-                    an integration into the life of the Church of spouses who now live in a second marriage after a divorce, and also their admittance to the Sacraments after a sound decision of conscience;
-                    the unconditional acceptance of the cohabitation of loyal same-sex partnerships, and a clear attitude opposed to those current exclusions and devaluations of homosexual persons;
[…]

Concretely, this means for our church [...]
-        to perceive the pastoral change that Pope Francis has called for, both as an encouragement and as a chance for the Bishops' Conferences to develop pastoral walking paths concerning marriage and the family which are appropriate and theologically responsible. When Pope Francis asked all Catholics, women and men alike, to make proposals concerning the “vocation and mission of the family in the Church and in the world of today,” he entered a courageous path. The XIV General Assembly of the Synod of Bishops – to be held in October of 2015 in Rome – explicitly is to include therein the Sense of Faith of the whole People of God. Now it is the task of the Bishops to adopt and follow up on this Sensus Fidelium. As the voice of the German female and male Catholics, the ZdK assimilates the intention of Pope Francis and wants to contribute, so as to lay a foundation for a fruitful debate. It is now important to be able to build bridges between the teaching of the Church on marriage and the family, and the current life realities of the faithful.

Passed by the General Assembly of the ZdK on 9 May, 2015
__________________________
2. ANALYSIS

Is the ZdK Already Planning Ahead for the Time After the Synod?
Mathias von Gersdorff
Tuesday, May 12, 2015

The recent statement by the “Central Committee of the German Catholics” (ZdK) concerning the the Family Synod in the Vatican in October of 2015 raises many questions.

This daring statement contains the request for the blessing of same-sex partnerships, for a moral approval of artificial contraceptives, and for a reevaluation of non-marital partnerships and more. 

With its claims, the “Central Committee” goes now much further than that which Cardinal Walter Kasper had proposed in his speech to the Consistory at the beginning of 2014. Kasper had “only” proposed to admit remarried divorcees to Holy Communion, and this under certain conditions.

The speech of Kasper was taken as an occasion by left-wing Catholics to demand the abandonment altogether of the Catholic teaching on marriage and sexuality.

But the statement of the ZdK came at a very awkward time.

Since the (small) Synod of October, 2014, there has arisen a substantial resistance against these liberal claims.

Numerous Cardinals and Bishops from all over the world have raised their voices,  in order to defend the Catholic teaching.


In the meantime, nearly all delegations of the Bishops' Conferences for the Synod in October have now been selected. None is as liberal as the German. None, except the German, supports unanimously the ideas of Cardinal Kasper concerning the pastoral approach to remarried divorcees.

This way, the German delegation has maneuvered itself into isolation.

In many countries, the disapproving criticism towards Germany grows. One accuses Marx and Co of stubbornness and a deficient Catholicity.

Then, just in this very moment, the ZdK comes along and adds to it [the provocation]: with grave consequences for the reputation of the German Catholicism in the world now.

At least in the current situation, such claims are raised that are not attainable.

As a final point, on 9 May 2015 at a conference [in Rome] for defenders of life, Cardinal Pell made it clear that the [upcoming advisory] Synod is not at all able [or allowed] to change Catholic Doctrine.

Therefore, it is fatal that some German Bishops are still making promises that they cannot keep. The last time, it was Bishop Franz-Josef Bode, one of the Germa n delegates, who did just that.

In view of this background, the recent statement of the ZdK seems to be almost a kind of blackmail as well as an invitation to schism.

Under theses circumstances, it would be desirable for a German Bishop to go now into the public and speak a word of orientation. [From the Mathias von Gersdorff Blog]

_____________
[Rorate translations by Dr Maike Hickson]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Rome,the SSPX and this time of Crisis - Updated

+ JMJ Obviously there's lots of events right now. First we have the April 1st - I almost thought it was April Fools - meeting between Pope Francis and Bishop Fellay.  Nothing really news worthy as this is a natural progression as Rome appears to be considering fulfilling Archbishop Lefebvre's wish to 'accept us as we are'. Second we have the April 8th publication of what will be a verbose exhortation of the Synod of the Family. I'm willing to bet that the Pope will give with one hand (unilateral regularization of SSPX) and take with the other (ambiguous document that opens the flood gates of sin further). Much to pray for. P^3

A Reply to Martin Blackshaw’s FLAWED Remnant article titled: FLAWED: SSPX Advice on Abortion-tainted Vaccines

 + JMJ    An article has appeared in the Remnant (link to article) and I am afraid that there are a number of flaws in it that need to be addressed. The author, Martin Blackshaw, believes that both the Church and the SSPX are misapplying the principle of Moral Theology called 'Cooperation In Evil'.  Unfortunately, Mr. Blackshaw rests most of his arguments on citing authors that support his position, without considering the possibility that they are wrong. This highlights a key factor in this crisis: ignorance of the faith and its application . I don't am not singling out Mr. Blackshaw for this criticism, I have observed that it applies to laity and religious, superior and subject a like.  No one seems immune in this enduring crisis, myself included.  I further believe that this ignorance is why so many Catholics, both traditional and non, rely on their gut feeling or "Catholic conscience" for charting their way through this crisis of the faith.  While...

The Vatican and SSPX – An Organizational Culture Perspective

Introduction The recent and continuing interactions between the Vatican and the SSPX have been a great opportunity for prayer and reflection.  The basis for the disagreement is theological and not liturgical. As noted by Dr. Lamont (2012), the SSPX theological position on the four key controversial aspects of the Second Vatican Council are base on prior theological work that resulted from relevant magisterial pronouncements.  So it is difficult to understand the apparent rejection of the theological position of the SSPX.

If Pope Francis is bad - what about Pope St. John Paul II et al?

+ JMJ So here we are on the apparent cusp of yet another post conciliar Papal canonization. This time we have Pope's John-Paul I and Paul VI canonizations to 'look forward' to. This follows, obviously, on the heels of Pope St. John Paul II's canonization? So the first question that I usually encounter is: How is it possible, keeping in mind the doctrine on infallibility of canonizations (note doctrine not dogma), that Pope St. John Paul II is a Saint? First, what does it mean???  According to the doctrine of dogmatic facts - it is the universal opinion of Theologians that canonizations are infallible.  It means that they enjoy the beatific vision.  ... that's it.  That is the doctrine and it is at the level of universal opinion of theologians.  It is called a 'dogmatic fact'. That they made mistakes is obvious.  That the miracles seem to not be very miraculous is also a bit of an issue. Here's something to consider: The rush that surrou...

Rome and the SSPX - the latest

+ JMJ Bishop Fellay gave a conference late last month and provided some more insight into the situation with Rome. There are comments on Deus Ex Machina Blog  and Hilary White has now entered the fray. What is one Catholic to think about all these opinions? What a Catholic is to think: With the Church! What does the Church think about obedience?  Virtue as it is? If there is no proximate occasion of sin and the other conditions are met, then one cannot resist the command.