Skip to main content

Fr. Gruner - RIP and don't forget to pray for the rabid anti-SSPX (ie Fr. Nicholson)

Image
By
+
JMJ

Today Fr. Gruner will be laid to rest after practically a lifetime of striving for the work of the Immaculate.

As with anyone else who has refused to compromise with the 'New Springtime' that erupted after the Second Vatican Council, he had his collection of critics and persecutors.

Persecutors
A simple look at the attempts to label Fr. Gruner as a vagus priest who is disobedient etc is sufficient. Look at both sides, they both can't be right. Either Fr. Gruner is incardinated or he is not.  I understand that he demonstrated that he was incardinated (in a similar situation as. Fr. Z), but his persecutors just keep repeating labels with the assurance that if you repeat a lie enough times people (and the liar) will believe it to be true.



Critics
Among other things one of his critics (link below) claim that the Consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary has occurred. Further, they claim that Fr. Gruner's campaign to have the consecration performed 'sowed mistrust of the hierarchy wherever he went'.

This is a constant canard, along with those of schism and heresy, that are spread by the critics of anyone who has the integrity to state that the emperor has no clothes.

Why this rabid reaction from Fr. Nicholson (fatherpaulnicholson.blogspot.it - The "Scotiabank Cathedral" ) and Michael Voris et al?

Cognitive Dissonance

There is a disconnect between the beliefs held by the critics of Traditionalists like Fr. Gruner and the actions of the hierarchy.

As far as I can tell the beliefs held by Fr. Nicholson, Voris et al are something like:

  1. Pope can never, ever be criticized.
  2. Hierarchy must be obeyed in all cases.
  3. Hierarchy must be trusted.
Now the problem that is faced by the 'critics' is that the:
  1. Popes on a number of levels have been more than worthy of criticism.
  2. Hierarchs must be disobeyed in a number of cases.
  3. Many in the Hierarchy have both betrayed their fiducial trust and cannot be trusted.
So this creates dissonance (discomfort, mental and spiritual pain and anguish) so they have three choices to reduce the pain of the last 50+ years.

They can change their belief.  They appear unwilling to open that can of worms because their belief structure may crumble like an old dried-out Oreo cookie.

They can change the action Well actually, they can't change the action because these are facts not rumours.

They can change their perception of the action.  Folks we have a winner!!! 

For the likes of the more liberal Catholics, they twist themselves into pretzels with the spinning of the Pope's latest questionable words / actions.

For Voris and friends, they have to ignore the actions of the Pope and criticize those members of the hierarchy who are doing just what the Pope is doing, but not dressed in white.

As a result, because in reality the conflict still exists (ie the problems in the Church go right up to and include the Pope - see last Synod). The reduce the pain they have to:

  1. Seek out confirmation that they are correct by convincing people to agree with them.  The more people that agree with them, the better they'll feel.  Basically, hey all these people can't be wrong so I'm right.
  2. They have to silence dis-confirmation, meaning that they have to lash out against anyone and anything that undermines the fragile mental model that they have constructed. 

Hence the irrational attacks of Fr. Nicholson, Michael Voris et al against Fr. Gruner and the SSPX.

They are unable to distinguish between the SSPX & Sede-vacantists because they need affirmation of their position and therefore they devolve into an 'us vs them' mentality.

To paraphrase a modern Catholic, 'they have to be right' therefore everyone else is wrong ... except of course the Pope.

So, while we pray for the repose of the soul of Fr. Gruner, remember to utter a prayer for his critics.  

I suspect that they may be more in need of prayer than Fr. Gruner, the Fatima Priest.

P^3
Prayer
Penance
Patience






Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Catholic Church and the Rule of Law- Part II: Dr. John Lamont

By
+ JMJ This is the second article from Dr. Lamont from his lecture given in May 2014. P^3 Source Part A: Society of St. Hugh of Cluny Source Part B: Society of St. Hugh of Cluny 8 May2014 The Catholic Church and the Rule of Law- Part II By John Lamont To understand how the Jesuit conception of obedience departed from earlier conceptions, it is helpful to compare it with the teaching of St. Thomas on obedience. The fundamental difference between the two is that St. Thomas considers the proper object of obedience to be the precept of the superior (2a2ae q. 104 a. 2 co., ad 3). Obedience that seeks to forestall the expressed will of the superior does not bear on what the superior wants or thinks in general, but only on what the superior intends to command. St. Ignatius’s lowest degree of obedience, which he does not consider to be virtuous, is thus what St. Thomas considers to be the only form of obedience. St. Thomas holds that St. Ignatius’s alleged higher forms of o...
Post a Comment
Read more

Open Letter to Cardinal Gantin - July 6, 1988

By
There has been some discussion (read lots) about the term 'Conciliar Church'. I have posted this letter written by the Superior General and District Superiors of the SSPX after the 1988 Consecrations. Of particular interest is that the 'Conciliar Church' being referred to as a system. My paraphrase would be that the SSPX regards the 'conciliar Church' as an error within the Church. Source Open Letter to Cardinal Gantin Prefect of the Congregation for Bishops
Post a Comment
Read more

Morning and Evening and other sundry Prayers

By
+ JMJ Along the theme of P^3 (Prayer, Penance, Patience), and for my own reference ... here is a collection of Morning and Evening prayers from the Ideal Daily Missal along with some additional prayers. In this crisis of the Church, I do not think it is possible to do too much prayer, penance and have patience. P^3
Post a Comment
Read more

Rome and the SSPX - Version 2026 Part 6b: Principles and Rules for Surviving this Crisis of the Catholic Church (Principle 1)

By
 + JMJ Principle 1: Realize that something is amiss in the Catholic Church The world in which I had my Traditional Awakening, is one in which practically anything pre-Conciliar such as liturgy, doctrinc, and even dogmas are either suppressed, ignored or re-framed to be acceptable to the ‘world’. What is more, the people adhering to these pre-conciliar teachings and liturgy are persecuted by other members of the Catholic Church. The things that non-Trads say about Trads can be quite extreme. For example, accusations against Traditionalists include that they are: A revival of the Jansenists (link) , Schismatics, Heretics, Uncharitable, Lefebrists Radicals Integrists When one group of Catholics is persecuted by the others for simply wanting to live as Catholics before them did for generations … well something is wrong. Further, we need to realize that when what was previously condemned is now promoted and what was previously promoted as the trut...
Post a Comment
Read more

How is the SSPX prepared to accept the Second Vatican Council??? - Reblogged and Updated.

By
+ JMJ The Archbishop remained steadfast. In the 1980s, in his correspondence with then-Cardinal Ratzinger, Archbishop Lefebvre stated his position that the criterion for interpreting Vatican II in light of Tradition comprises three elements: 1) He and the SSPX would accept anything in Vatican II that is clearly consistent with Tradition; 2) Any ambiguous texts of Vatican II must be interpreted strictly according to Tradition; according to the consistent teaching of the Church throughout the centuries. 3) Anything in the Council that cannot be interpreted according to Tradition should be revised. The Archbishop laid this out explicitly in his letters to Cardinal Ratzinger in 1982 and 1985. CF News: Rome-SSPX: Background to the Doctrinal Discussions CF News: The April 15 Deadline A few years ago Tony La Rosa (aka ecclesia militans a Toronto based 'resistor') had a difficult time accepting this approach to the council. He held that it must be completely tossed as...
Post a Comment
Read more