Skip to main content

Stories: Early Days of Tradition Part 10 - The Struggle Within

 +

JMJ

Immediately after the council (i.e. Second Vatican Council) things changed in Catholic Church around the world.

Some of the Veteran Trads gave a good fight in those early years.

In this story, three friends in Quebec agreed that what they were hearing from the pulpit reeked of heresy. After a while, they decided that it was time to take some action. 

The following Sunday all three of them took up their position in the front pew, directly in front of the pulpit.  It wasn't difficult as the front pew was rarely occupied even in this era.

They had a plan!

As the sermon began the men sat there staring at the priest, waiting.  

Then it happened.

A statement that deviated from pre-conciliar teaching leapt from the priests lips.

The reaction wasn't explosive ... it was passive-aggressive ... in a way.

As if on cue, the three men shook their heads, left to right.

The priest paused, studdered a little and continued. All was good for a few minutes before some other novelty escaped his lips. 

He knew what he'd said but he couldn't look away - they were right there shaking their head like synchronized machines left to right then froze - stares centered on them.

It went on for about a month or so and the priest was "transferred".  The scuttle but in the priory was that he was had take some sort of stress leave.

The next Sunday a new priest took the pulpit and the three same men were in the first pew.

The same action was taken are the 'new thinking' with the same result.  This went on for a while until this priest also left.

A third left in the same manner.

The fourth arrived and before Sunday a knock came at the door of one of the three men (perhaps the others but I heard the story from only one of the newly minted Trads).

"I won't stand for this.", the new Pastor started as the door closed, "If you don't like it, leave."

The next Sunday the front pew was empty. I don't know if the Church had started to empty yet.

A few months later there was another knock at the door and it was the Assistant Pastor looking a little sheepish. "I'm here to collect your annual stipend." It came out that the Pastor has sent his assistant to do the dirty deed.

Bear in mind that at this time, Church jumping was not a thing in the Catholic Church. You actually needed permission to switch parishes etc.

The response was firm and immediate, "I make my donations where I attend Church", after a moments thought, "If the Pastor wants it that badly, he will have to come in person." The Assistant left empty handed, probably thankful that he didn't get worse. The Pastor never showed up to collect the stipend.

I think this is one of the best Traditional Catholic story that I've ever heard.

P^3


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thoughts on the FSSP Perspectives On the SSPX Situation

+ JMJ  Perspectives – FSSP vs SSPX In August, Fr. Debow (FSSP) of Holy Family Parish in Vancouver, B.C. wrote two letters on the SSPX “situation”. Obviously, Father is writing from the FSSP perspective and some elements are simply repeating what he’s been taught in seminary by the founders of the FSSP. In other words, they don’t truthfully reflect the position of the SSPX or, I feel, make the necessary distinctions. Father’s key points I noted were: The situation isn’t primarily about the Tridentine 1 Mass, the SSPX “no longer believes that Rome can transmit the faith, the SSPX “have taken it upon themselves to save the Church”, the penalties are not a persecution but a correction of a theological error manifesting itself as schism, It is a sin to attend Mass at an SSPX chapel. My goal is to assess the five points in as objective a manner as possible. Since I have sought the sacraments from either Fr. Normandin or the SSPX since the early 80’s it is probably t...

Is This "Here We Go Again!!!! - Russian researcher at plague lab dies of 'unknown' infection

 + JMJ Since SARS-CoV-2, I've known that there is the possibility of a SARS-CoV-3 emerging sometime in the years following the 2020 Pandemic. This is born out by that the there were two 'echoes' of the H1N1 virus that caused Spanish Influenza.  One in 1957 and another in 1968 - along with a continual seasonal outbreaks. Don't panic - time will tell. P^3 Russian researcher at plague lab dies of ‘unknown’ infection Influenza Pandemics of the 20th Century - PMC

Rome and the SSPX - Part 8: Appendices

 + JMJ The following are some appendices for the previous parts of this series. Appendix A: Rome / SSPX Links Used for ChatGPT LLM Analysis The SSPX Confronts Rome: the Consecrations are Scheduled for July 1 - OnePeterFive RORATE CÆLI: Urgent - SSPX Consecrations - Full Sermon of the Superior-General of the SSPX, Fr. Davide Pagliarani RORATE CÆLI: URGENT - Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX) Announces Future Consecrations for July 1st, 2026 Abbé Pagliarani : “Des sacres, par fidélité à l'Église et aux âmes”  • Don Davide Pagliarani • LPL The General House of the FSSPX announces future consecrations | District of the USA The General House of the FSSPX announces future consecrations | FSSPX News With or without Vatican approval, the SSPX may consecrate bishops SSPX announces plan for bishop consecration Society of St. Pius X to Consecrate Bishops Without Rome’s Approval, Courting Excommunication| National Catholic Register ...

Morning and Evening and other sundry Prayers

+ JMJ Along the theme of P^3 (Prayer, Penance, Patience), and for my own reference ... here is a collection of Morning and Evening prayers from the Ideal Daily Missal along with some additional prayers. In this crisis of the Church, I do not think it is possible to do too much prayer, penance and have patience. P^3

Hell: Neither Empty nor Full - There is Always Room for One More!!!

 + JMJ Except for the SSPX, the Catholic Church of the 21st Century seems to lack consequences. Obviously, when I speak about consequences I am referring to the speed with which Rome responded when the SSPX announced and the proceeded with the consecration of four bishops without a Papal Mandate to do so. Moving on ... The biggest consequence  whose absence I am thinking about is: The existence of hell, that the damned are damned forever (i.e. eternity), that the fallen angels are the first condemned to hell, that humans who die in a state of mortal sin are condemned to hell, Hell is neither empty nor full, there is always room for one more, See #2. However ... since the Second Vatican Council, there is a paucity of discourse within the mainstream Catholic Church on the topic.   While it is true that, except for Judas Iscariat, we cannot know without for certain who is in hell without God's help, the fact is that it exists and everyone who dies in the state of mortal...