Skip to main content

A Look Back: Archbishop Lefebvre’s Letter for Lent on Penance

 +

JMJ

A look back for some encouragement to help us make a good Lent!

 Courtesy of FSSPX.news: Archbishop Lefebvre’s Letter for Lent on Penance | FSSPX News

P^3





On February 14, 1982, for Lent, Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre wrote a letter addressed to the faithful of Tradition in order to encourage them to maintain a penitential spirit and the traditional practices.

Dearest faithful,

According to an ancient and salutary tradition in the Church, on the occasion of Lent, I address to you these few words in order to encourage you to enter with all your soul into this time of penitence, with the dispositions willed by the Church and to accomplish the purpose for which the Church prescribes it.

If I look in the books of the beginning of the century for the ends for which the Church prescribed this time of penance, they indicate three of them:

1.  First to repress the concupiscence of the flesh
2.  Then to facilitate the elevation of our souls toward divine realities
3.  Finally, to make satisfaction for our sins.

Is this not the example Our Lord shows us in the course of His life here below? Pray and do penance. But having neither concupiscence nor sin, He did penance and made satisfaction for our sins, thus showing us that our penance can be beneficial not only for us, but for our fellow man.

Pray and do penance. Doing penance in order to pray better, in order to draw closer to God. This is what all the saints have done, and what the Virgin Mary reminds us of in all her messages.

Will we dare to say this necessity is less great in our age than in previous ages? We can and must, on the contrary, affirm that never more than today have prayer and penance been necessary, because everything has been done to diminish and despise these two fundamental elements of Christian life.

Have we ever sought, as today, to satisfy without any limit all the disordered instincts of the flesh, even going as far as murdering millions of innocents? We would likewise believe that society has no other reason for existing other than to give the maximum “standard” of living to all men, in order to protect them from any deprivation of material goods.

In this way the aim of society would be opposed to what the Church prescribes. And we understand that in these times, when men of the Church align themselves with the spirit of the world, we witness the disappearance of prayer and penance, and particularly for the reparation of sins and of obtaining forgiveness for faults. Who today likes to repeat the moving psalm of Miserere and to repeat with the Psalmist Peccatum meum contra me est semper: “My sin is always before me”? And how can a Christian soul not move away from the thought of sin if the image of the crucifix is always before his eyes?

The bishops asked the Council for a reduction of fasting and abstinence that these prescriptions have practically disappeared. We must recognize that this disappearance is a consequence of the ecumenical and Protestant spirit which denies the necessity of our participation for the application of the merits of Our Lord to each of us, for the remission of our sins, and the restoration of our divine filiation.

While in the past the commandments of the Church expected:

-- obligatory fasting for all the days of Lent except Sundays, for Ember days, and several vigils;
-- abstinence on all the Fridays of the year, the Saturdays of Lent, and in many dioceses, all Saturdays of the year.

What remains of these prescriptions today?

-- fasting on Ash Wednesday and Good Friday;
-- abstinence on Ash Wednesday and Fridays of Lent.

We can ask ourselves: why such a reduction?

Who are those required to fast?

-- Adults aged 21 to 60 years old. [In the United States, the minimum age is 18. - Ed.]

Who must observe abstinence?

-- All the faithful starting from the age of 7 are required to abstain. [The current law holds that this rule applies the day after a Catholic's 14th birthday. - Ed.]

What is fasting? This is only to have one meal per day, to which it is permitted to add two collations, one in the morning and one in the evening, not exceeding two ounces, or 60 grams of solid food. [The Archbishop refers here to the European order of meals; in the United States, dinner is the evening meal and the food measurements are not applied. - Ed.]

What is abstinence? It is abstaining from meat.

The faithful who truly have the spirit of faith and who profoundly understand the Church’s motives, which were indicated above, will have at heart not only to fulfill these light prescriptions of today, but entering into the spirit of Our Lord and the Virgin Mary, they will bear the sins that they have committed and those of their fellow man, their family, their friends, their fellow citizens.

This is why they will add to these prescriptions either fasting on all Fridays of Lent, or abstaining from alcohol or wine, or they will abstain from television. They strive to pray more, to assist at holy Mass more often, to recite the Rosary, and not to miss evening prayer with the family. They will part with superfluous goods in order to help seminaries, found schools, help their priests in the arrangement of chapels, and help the development of religious houses.

The prescriptions of the Church do not only concern fast and abstinence, but also the Easter duty.

Here is what the Capitular Curate of Sion recommended to the members of his diocese on February 20, 1919:

1.  During Lent, the parish priests will make the Way of the Cross twice each week: one day with the schoolchildren, another day with the other parishioners. After the Way of the Cross, they will recite the Litany of the Sacred Heart.

2.  In Passion Week--that is to say, the Week before Palm Sunday--there will be triduum in all the parish churches. Instruction -- Litany of the Sacred Heart in the presence of the Blessed Sacrament -- Benediction. In these three instructions, the parish priests will remind their parishioners simply and clearly what the principal conditions are for receiving the sacrament of penance worthily.

3.  The time during which one can fulfill the Easter duty is fixed for all parishes from the Passion Sunday to the first Sunday after Easter. [Today, the Easter duty typically runs from Easter Sunday to Pentecost Sunday. - Ed.]

Why would these directives no longer be valid today?

Let us make the most of this salutary time during which Our Lord is wont to dispense abundant graces. Let us not imitate the foolish virgins who, not having oil in their lamps, found the door of the bridegroom’s house closed and heard this terrible response Nescio vos: I do not know you.

Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of Heaven; that is to say, the spirit of detachment from the goods of this world.

Blessed are they that mourn, for they shall be comforted. Let us think of Jesus in the Garden of Olives, who wept for our sins. It is now for us to weep for our own and those of our brothers.

Blessed are those who hunger and thirst after justice, for they shall have their fill. Sanctity goes through the cross, penance, and deprivation. If we truly seek perfection, we must follow the Way of the Cross.

This Lent, may we hear the call of Jesus and Mary and join in following them in this crusade of prayer and penance.

May our prayers, our supplications, our deprivations obtain from heaven that the leaders of the Church return to its true and holy traditions, the only solution for the institutions of the Church to revive and flourish again.

Let us enjoy repeating this conclusion of the Te Deum: In te Domine speravi, non confundar in aeternum: In Thou, O Lord, have I placed my hope; I will never be disappointed.

+ Marcel Lefebvre
Former Archbishop of Tulle
Founder of the Priestly Society of Saint Pius X


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is Tradition?

 + JMJ What Is Tradition? The basic premise, from my perspective, is that what was taught before cannot be contradicted by the 'present' magisterium, only deepened and expanded upon. I recall the Roman theologians called the SSPX protestants while the SSPX called them modernists.  I believe this was all surrounding the concept of Traditon. SSPX's Understanding of Tradition One accusation made against the SSPX is that they don't have a correct understanding of 'Tradition'.  This is how the SSPX understands Tradition: I finally profess that Tradition is not a dead memory, but the living transmission of the doctrine received from the Apostles. It remains living, in distinction to Revelation, which is closed. It is so both in the activity of the Magisterium of the Teaching Church and in the profession of Faith of the Church Taught, of which the sentire cum Ecclesia is the result of the teaching of the Magisterium. Tradition may be called ‘living’, not in the sense t...

SSPX.ca: What is the position of the SSPX on Vatican II???

 + JMJ With all the mis-information about the SSPX rejecting the Second Vatican Council, I thought it would be useful to publish an article that focuses on the real issues that the SSPX has identified. Update: Why Did the SSPX Consecrate Bishops? ( Neither Schismatic, Nor Disobedient link ) In the linked document the SSPX outlined the key motivation and core issues with Vatican II and the post-conciliar magisterium (see above link for full document): 4. The Society Acted Precisely Because of the State of Necessity in Which the Faith Finds Itself  In the present situation of the Church, if the Society of Saint Pius X had not carried out the consecrations of July 1st, it would have found itself facing an inevitable alternative: either to disappear gradually, or to accept, at least in fact, the new liturgy as well as the false doctrines of Vatican II and the post-council. Without the consecrations of July 1st, the Fraternity would have found itself, in a few years, without bishop...

Thoughts on: Finding Common Ground Between Rome and the SSPX

 + JMJ In the ramp up to the consecrations the noise floor in the intergnat grew to a constant din.  This was one of the few the peeped its signal over the noise. https://crisismagazine.com/opinion/finding-common-ground-between-rome-and-the-sspx The key issue is contained in this paragraph: In the lead-up to the planned July 1, 2026, episcopal consecrations,  the SSPX rejected Rome’s offer  of doctrinal dialogue on the grounds that “we both know in advance that we cannot agree doctrinally, particularly regarding the fundamental orientations adopted since the Second Vatican Council.” Fr. Pagliarani also said that his previous attempt at dialogue in 2019 was shut down by Rome because of an assumed irreconcilability. It seems that, from the Society’s perspective, and perhaps from Rome’s too, their positions are incompatible. If memory serves, Rome killed any opportunity for an open discussion by stating that Vatican II was not up for debate. So it was a still-birth and ...

The News is an Addiction ...

 + JMJ People seem to be mesmerised by train wrecks.   They just can't turn away as the disaster creeps forward along train tracks towards the crossing where a car, truck, bus, trailer awaits its destruction. Trads have been watching the train wreck that is this crisis of the Catholic Church for decades. The trade war between the Canada and the US has reminded me that the news is addictive.   The first time I was addicted what from 2009 to  2014 when I was closely following the Rome / SSPX discussions.  I was at work watching a live-stream as Bishop Fellay disappeared into the Vatican. The lead-up to this moment had been intense as the 'resistance' got freaked out and the cultural cracks between doctrine and conspiracy theory widened. In the decade since then other things have emerged, wars, rumours of wars, conspiracies, celebrity Catholics etc. Now we have a new addiction and its name is Trump. Lately, no matter how much I try, I find myself wonderin...

Thoughts on the Thoughts of a former SSPX priest

 + JMJ Well Gary Campbell, former SSPX Priest and now laicised has posted a new article on WherePeterIs. https://wherepeteris.com/thoughts-of-a-former-sspx-priest-on-the-july-1-consecrations/ These words stuck out: Heck, they have built a five-star hotel, wine bar, and Walmart on the opposite bank of the Rubicon! They are not in danger of entering a state of schism, for they are  already  in a state of schism. I believe he doth protest too much. All the actual facts indicate that the SSPX was not in a state of schism before July 1st and an examination of the decree of excommunication highlights the either ineptitude of those in charge or a desire to leave the barn door open. The chasm between an act of disobedience and act of schism remains just what is has always been - an inconvenient barrier that person(s) in Rome seek to bridge but appear incapable of succeeding. The SSPX re-stated that they recognize the Pope as the Vicar of Christ and feel obliged by conscience...