Skip to main content

FSSPX.News: Australia: Law Against Secrecy of Confession Takes Effect

 +

JMJ

 So - this is an important point in this crisis of the Church - the Seal of Confession is now grounds for prosecution and therefore persecution.

All that has to happen is someone to 'fake' a confession and see if it is reported to the authorities.

P^3

 

Courtesy of FSSPX.News

Australia: Law Against Secrecy of Confession Takes Effect

November 27, 2022
Source: fsspx.news

 
 
Western Australian Parliament

The law applies to Western Australia, the largest of the Australian states. Entering into force on November 1, 2022, it obliges ministers of religion to report all cases of child abuse, including those for which the information obtained would have been within the framework of the Sacrament of Penance.

These changes are part of new laws introduced by the government of Mark McGowan, currently Premier of Western Australia. However, this law was passed in October of 2021.

The law specifies that priests will be considered culpable if they failed to report the fact that the information was revealed to them during the administration of the Sacrament of Penance.

The omission of such a report is a crime in this Australian state – as in many countries of the world – punishable by a maximum penalty of $6,000 AUD.

A Growing Restriction

Archbishop Timothy Costelloe of Perth defended the secrecy of confession as essential to the Catholic Faith before a Western Australian parliamentary inquiry.

Acknowledging the “appalling history” of sexual abuse in the Catholic Church, the archbishop said he understood why people were appalled by his insistence on maintaining the principle of absolute confidentiality of the sacrament as practiced in the Catholic Church.

“But,” he explained, “sins are not confessed to the priest, but to God. … The priest therefore has neither the right nor the authority to reveal anything that happens in this intimate encounter with God.… Making illegal the free practice of an essential aspect of the Catholic faith seems to me something that modern secular societies have always understood to be beyond the limits of their authority.”

The Minister of Child Protection, Simone McGurk, said the government is committed to implementing the recommendations of the Royal Commission on Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse published in 2017.

But the parliamentarians willfully ignored a recommendation from the state’s permanent legislative commission, dating from September 2020, asking that sacramental confession be excluded from the scope of the law on the denunciation of abuses committed on minors.

Other States Concerned

Western Australia is not the first Australian state to issue such legislation. It is the fifth Australian state – out of six – to have launched the offensive against the secrecy of sacramental confession after Victoria, Tasmania, South Australia, the Australian Capital Territory, and finally, in September 2020, the State of Queensland.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is it sinful to attend the Novus Ordo (New Mass) - Is it Sinful to Not Attend the Novus Ordo on Sunday?

+ JMJ A non-SSPX Catholic is upset over the SSPX statements on not attending the Novus Ordo Missae. Ladies and gentlemen, what the SSPX, or at least its website editor, is advocating is a mortal sin against the Third Commandment.  Unless the priest deviates from the language of the Sacramentary, the consecration, and thus the rest of Mass is to be considered valid.  No one may elect not to attend Mass simply because abuses are occurring therein.  Might I suggest that such absenteeism is its own abuse?  The Third Commandment binds under mortal sin.  Father So-And-So from the SSPX has no authority whatsoever to excuse attendance at Mass, be that Mass ever so unpalatable. Source:Restore DC Catholicism Well, this is interesting. First why does the SSPX issue this statement? Because it is sinful to put your faith in danger by attending a protestant service.  It is likewise dangerous to put your faith in danger by attending a protestantized mass (ie the Novus Ordo Missae

Morning and Evening and other sundry Prayers

+ JMJ Along the theme of P^3 (Prayer, Penance, Patience), and for my own reference ... here is a collection of Morning and Evening prayers from the Ideal Daily Missal along with some additional prayers. In this crisis of the Church, I do not think it is possible to do too much prayer, penance and have patience. P^3

Regarding Post: Fr. Joseph Pfeiffer no longer ... now Bishop Joseph Pfeiffer (Can't see this being a problem...)

 + JMJ   I've been watching the popularity of the post about Fr. Pfeiffer's attempted episcopal consecration and its continued top listing on the 'popular posts' list at the bottom of posts.  After some thought, I decided that I don't want to be responsible for anyone joining Fr. Pfeiffer's 'group', however unlikely that would be at this time. So I have reverted the article to the draft state. If anyone wants it reinstated, I would ask that they comment on this post with a rationale for reinstatement. P^3

Fr. Burfitt on Fr. Pfeiffer's Attempted Consecration

 + JMJ   Amidst the shadows cast by the publication of Traditionis Custodes, I am working on a map of the 'resistance' splinters to put their reaction in contrast with that of the SSPX.  In the midst of this, I just came across Fr. Burfitt letter on the attempted consecration. Breaking it down (see below)  items 2 and 3 are key.  Just as the consecrating bishop is 'doubtful', even if he hadn't muffed the first attempt, Fr. Pfeiffer remain doubtful and therefore this impacts those men is attempts to 'ordain'. There were rumours that Fr. Pfeiffer was seeking episcopal consecration for years as he cast about for various bishops (also doubtful) to help him achieve this goal. I wonder how he convinced the 'doubtful' bishop to provide (twice) the doubtful consecration. What a mess!  This creates a danger to the souls of his followers and wonder where it will end. Will he go full sede and have himself 'elected' pontiff as others have done before him

The Vatican and SSPX – An Organizational Culture Perspective

Introduction The recent and continuing interactions between the Vatican and the SSPX have been a great opportunity for prayer and reflection.  The basis for the disagreement is theological and not liturgical. As noted by Dr. Lamont (2012), the SSPX theological position on the four key controversial aspects of the Second Vatican Council are base on prior theological work that resulted from relevant magisterial pronouncements.  So it is difficult to understand the apparent rejection of the theological position of the SSPX.