Skip to main content

More on Vaccines

Image
By
 +
JMJ

 

 So it is clear that taking the COVID-19 vaccines - even those morally tainted - is permissible according to Catholic Teaching.

The question that remains for me is one of risk vs benefit.

For example the UK has started its vaccination program and there have been two anaphylactic reactions. Other results look good so far ...

With recent polls showing that a sizeable number of Canadians will refuse a vaccine altogether, or will wait some time before lining up for a shot, Pinnow said he wants Canadians to be assured the product is safe. CBC.ca

What follows is my personal approach to vaccination

 As with the H1N1 vaccination program, I will take a rational risk vs benefit approach by:

  • Reviewing the "monograph" data looking for the adverse events (risks) and contraindications.
  • Compare this with the dangers of the disease and potential adverse reactions to both the person being vaccinated and the persons they would come in contact with (in this case the elderly).
  • Assess alternative vaccines that are available to me and my family (ie morally untainted vaccines).

  With the H1N1 the adverse events were as bad and in the same likelihood as the vaccination.  So we elected to not vaccinate.

 A key input to this process is the drug monograph, that will be publicly available. An example of the Pfizer monograph is available here.  

Key Sections and points from the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine monograph:

  • Indications: This section indicates when and to whom a drug should be administered.  It will sometimes contain information about specific sections of the population.
    •  To prevent COVID-19
    • For individual 16 years of age and older.
    • Safety and efficacy has not been established for those under 16 years of age
    • Geriatric safety and efficacy was tested.
  • Contraindications: This section indicate who should NOT receive the medication.
    • People who are hypersensitive to active substance or ingredient in the formulation (see list)
    • People suffer from severe allergies should be cautious (noted in England and Canada)
  • Serious warning and Precautions: No explanation necessary :-)
  • Warnings and Precautions: Similar to above.
    • If you have a fever - postpone receiving the vaccination.
    • Vaccination does not automatically convey immunity
    • Immunization may not be optimal until at least 7 days after the second dose. 
    • If you have a bleeding disorder or receiving anticoagulant - defer
    • Pregnant women - no safety data
    • Breast-feeding - no safety data
  • Adverse Reactions: Bad reactions to the vaccination.
    • injection site pain ( 84.1%), 
    • fatigue (62.9%),
    • headache (55.1%), 
    • muscle pain (38.3%), 
    • chills (31.9%),
    • joint pain (23.6%) 
    • fever (14.2%) 
    • were usually mild or moderate in intensity and resolved within a few days after vaccination.

Of interest is that some people developed swollen lymph nodes.

So for me it is simple, moral implications aside:

  1. The vaccine is effective about 95% of the time
  2. It should not be given to: pregnant or breastfeeding women, youth under the age of 16 or people with the other contraindications.
  3. The risks of taking the vaccine are less than the worse case Canadian data.  

The following graphs were taken from infobase Canada.

Distribution of Hospitalized Cases

So, 70.5% of hospitalization are over the age of 60, and the distribution follow a rough 10% per decade of age distribution. 

The danger is the false sense of security that the young will feel in looking at this data.  Their sense of mortality is typically ill-developed. While the odds sound 'great' for them, the reality is that they can dramatically increase the odds against them by their behaviour.

Distribution of Deaths

 While some carry over their false sense of security when looknig at the numbers,the reality is that although COVID is particularly dangerous to the elderly (see above). But this doesn't guarantee a young person that they will escape death.  While all the young cases that I know have had only minor symptoms (head-ache, fever, lack of taste, difficulty breathing) a young man of 20 died last week.

So, be wise in your behaviour and precautions.

P^3

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Curious Case of Steve Skojec and the Dangers of Deep Diving into the Crisis Sub-Titled: The Failings of Others

By
 + JMJ It's been a while now since Steve Skojec sold 1P5 and abandoned the Catholic Faith. I've been a 'Trad' since 1982 and in those 40+ years I seen this death-spiral before with a similar end point. It seems that anyone who jumps into the fray unprepared for the enormous task of righting wrongs will, eventually, become discouraged by not the task but the people who surround them.   I remember when Skojec complained of the treatment his family received from a traditional priest.  This seems to have been the start of the end for him. So what can we learn from the likes of Steve Skojec, Michael Voris (maybe?), Louie Verrecchio, Gerry Matatix and other celebrity Catholics? Probably quite a lot about what not to do. First, don't burn out on the crisis?  When you burn out, on work or anything else, little things assume a more greater importance than they are due.   This is one of my 'canary in the coal mine' signals that I've been stretching myself too thin
Post a Comment
Read more

What the heck is a congregation of "Pontifical Right"

By
+ JMJ In a discussion with a friend the question occurred to me that I didn't actually know was is involved in being a religious order of 'pontifical right'. I had a vague notion that this meant they reported to Rome as opposed to the local diocese. I'm also aware that, according to the accounts I have heard, the Archbishop received 'praise' and the written direction to incardinate priests directly into the SSPX.  This is interesting because it implies that the SSPX priests were no longer required to incardinate in the local diocese but in the SSPX. This is something that belongs to an order of 'pontifical right'. Anyway here's some definitions: Di diritto pontificio is the Italian term for “of pontifical right” . It is given to the ecclesiastical institutions (the religious and secular institutes, societies of apostolic life) either created by the Holy See or approved by it with the formal decree, known by its Latin name, Decretu
Post a Comment
Read more

Morning and Evening and other sundry Prayers

By
+ JMJ Along the theme of P^3 (Prayer, Penance, Patience), and for my own reference ... here is a collection of Morning and Evening prayers from the Ideal Daily Missal along with some additional prayers. In this crisis of the Church, I do not think it is possible to do too much prayer, penance and have patience. P^3
Post a Comment
Read more

Kuala Lumpur warns faithful about the SSPX

By
+ JMJ A couple of humorous perspectives: Chapel of the Sacred Heart of Jesus (SSPX), a chapel not recognized by the Archdiocese I guess they are no longer able to recognize what is authentically Catholic vs inculturated ... :-) The views of the SSPX also dissent from the teachings of the Second Vatican Council This is a little outdated ... I wish I knew what exactly they are talking about and how to square the circle with pre-conciliar Catholic Teaching. and they have serious questions about the order of mass promulgated by Pope St. Paul VI Darn tooting they are serious questions, I'm glad they have admitted that the questions posed by the SSPX are serious and meriting a serious answer. But we already know the answer to one of them:   As for the use of the 1962 Missal as a Forma extraordinaria of the liturgy of the Mass, I would like to draw attention to the fact that this Missal was never juridically abrogated and, consequently, in principle, was always p
Post a Comment
Read more