Skip to main content

More on Vaccines

Image
By
 +
JMJ

 

 So it is clear that taking the COVID-19 vaccines - even those morally tainted - is permissible according to Catholic Teaching.

The question that remains for me is one of risk vs benefit.

For example the UK has started its vaccination program and there have been two anaphylactic reactions. Other results look good so far ...

With recent polls showing that a sizeable number of Canadians will refuse a vaccine altogether, or will wait some time before lining up for a shot, Pinnow said he wants Canadians to be assured the product is safe. CBC.ca

What follows is my personal approach to vaccination

 As with the H1N1 vaccination program, I will take a rational risk vs benefit approach by:

  • Reviewing the "monograph" data looking for the adverse events (risks) and contraindications.
  • Compare this with the dangers of the disease and potential adverse reactions to both the person being vaccinated and the persons they would come in contact with (in this case the elderly).
  • Assess alternative vaccines that are available to me and my family (ie morally untainted vaccines).

  With the H1N1 the adverse events were as bad and in the same likelihood as the vaccination.  So we elected to not vaccinate.

 A key input to this process is the drug monograph, that will be publicly available. An example of the Pfizer monograph is available here.  

Key Sections and points from the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine monograph:

  • Indications: This section indicates when and to whom a drug should be administered.  It will sometimes contain information about specific sections of the population.
    •  To prevent COVID-19
    • For individual 16 years of age and older.
    • Safety and efficacy has not been established for those under 16 years of age
    • Geriatric safety and efficacy was tested.
  • Contraindications: This section indicate who should NOT receive the medication.
    • People who are hypersensitive to active substance or ingredient in the formulation (see list)
    • People suffer from severe allergies should be cautious (noted in England and Canada)
  • Serious warning and Precautions: No explanation necessary :-)
  • Warnings and Precautions: Similar to above.
    • If you have a fever - postpone receiving the vaccination.
    • Vaccination does not automatically convey immunity
    • Immunization may not be optimal until at least 7 days after the second dose. 
    • If you have a bleeding disorder or receiving anticoagulant - defer
    • Pregnant women - no safety data
    • Breast-feeding - no safety data
  • Adverse Reactions: Bad reactions to the vaccination.
    • injection site pain ( 84.1%), 
    • fatigue (62.9%),
    • headache (55.1%), 
    • muscle pain (38.3%), 
    • chills (31.9%),
    • joint pain (23.6%) 
    • fever (14.2%) 
    • were usually mild or moderate in intensity and resolved within a few days after vaccination.

Of interest is that some people developed swollen lymph nodes.

So for me it is simple, moral implications aside:

  1. The vaccine is effective about 95% of the time
  2. It should not be given to: pregnant or breastfeeding women, youth under the age of 16 or people with the other contraindications.
  3. The risks of taking the vaccine are less than the worse case Canadian data.  

The following graphs were taken from infobase Canada.

Distribution of Hospitalized Cases

So, 70.5% of hospitalization are over the age of 60, and the distribution follow a rough 10% per decade of age distribution. 

The danger is the false sense of security that the young will feel in looking at this data.  Their sense of mortality is typically ill-developed. While the odds sound 'great' for them, the reality is that they can dramatically increase the odds against them by their behaviour.

Distribution of Deaths

 While some carry over their false sense of security when looknig at the numbers,the reality is that although COVID is particularly dangerous to the elderly (see above). But this doesn't guarantee a young person that they will escape death.  While all the young cases that I know have had only minor symptoms (head-ache, fever, lack of taste, difficulty breathing) a young man of 20 died last week.

So, be wise in your behaviour and precautions.

P^3

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

De Veritate - St. Thomas Aquinas - What is necessary to believe explicitly?

By
I was recently introduced to a work of St. Thomas De Veritate ( Source ) in the course of an argument concerning the minimum content of explicit faith.  When I submitted the following quote as proof: Theological faith, that is, a supernatural faith in Revelation, is necessary, and this is an effect of grace (D 1789); nemini unquam sine ilIa contigit iustificatio (D 1793). As far as the content of this faith is concerned, according to Hebr. 11, 6, at least the existence of God and retribution in the other world must be firmly held, necessitate medii (by the necessity of means) with explicit faith. In regard to the Trinity and the Incarnation, implicit faith suffices. The supernatural faith necessary for justification is attained when God grants to the unbeliever by internal inspiration or external teaching a knowledge of the truths of Revelation, and actual grace to make the supernatural act of faith. Cf. De verite 14, I I.Ott - Fundamentals of Dogma p241 In response my opponent ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Comparision of the Tridentine, Cranmer and Novus Ordo Masses

By
+ JMJ I downloaded the comparison that was linked in the previous article on the mass (here) . ... a very good reference! P^3 From: Whispers of Restoration (available at this link) . CHARTING LITURGICAL CHANGE Comparing the 1962 Ordinary of the Roman Mass to changes made during the Anglican Schism; Compared in turn to changes adopted in the creation of Pope Paul VI’s Mass in 1969 The chart on the reverse is a concise comparison of certain ritual differences between three historical rites for the celebration of the Catholic Mass Vetus Ordo: “Old Order,” the Roman Rite of Mass as contained in the 1962 Missal, often referred to as the “Traditional Latin Mass.”The Ordinary of this Mass is that of Pope St. Pius V (1570) following the Council of Trent (1545-63), hence the occasional moniker “Tridentine Mass.” However, Trent only consolidated and codified the Roman Rite already in use at that time; its essential form dates to Pope St. Gregory the Great (+604), in whose time the R...
Post a Comment
Read more

Rome and the SSPX - Version 2026 Part 5b - How Did We Get Here??? ... A Continued Anlaysis using ChatGPT.

By
 + JMJ Part 5b How Did We Get Here??? So in the previous ChatGPT analysis the LLM ‘concluded’ that there was continuity in doctrine. So now we’re going to explore this element. There is some repetition but I don't have time right now to do a lot of editing.  I think instead we'll have a Part 5c where I try to pull it all together with some old fashioned human sense making. At the end point, I think the LLM collects an interesting if somewhat skewed perspective: The SSPX mapping hinges on this claim: That Vatican II affirms (at least implicitly) propositions that the Syllabus of Errors explicitly condemned. The broader Church response is: The same propositions are still rejected—but Vatican II is addressing different categories (political, pastoral, anthropological) rather than reversing doctrine. While the summary of the SSPX position seems close, that of the broader Church seems to be either an outright AI hallucination or a consensus point from the literature that it used...
Post a Comment
Read more

News Roundup: April 30, 2026

By
 + JMJ I just realised that I haven't posted the latest Roundup ... and there is a lot in the roundup as the media storm around the SSPX continues! I also just noticed this article: European Conservative: Why the SSPX Bishop Decision Matters Far Beyond Church Politics (link) .  P^3 === Popes Past Present and Future Papal News and Views Cardinal Fernandez maintains that Francis is not dead- metaphorically Pope Leo XIV Reopens Amoris Laetitia File | FSSPX News Pope Leo: “We Do Not Agree with the Formalized Blessing of …Homosexual Couples” - OnePeterFive RORATE CÆLI: How Pope Leo is Reshuffling the Curia: Musical Chairs and Power Games RORATE CÆLI: A Giant Leap: The meaning of Cardinal Eijk’s Pontifical High Mass and the Rebirth of Dutch Catholicism RORATE CÆLI: A Sign of Continuity with the Pre-Francis Papacy: Pope to Wash Feet of Twelve Priests RORATE CÆLI: Vatican Blocks Continuity of Procedure of Beatification and Canonization of Argentine Bishop -- no new Satanellis Pope Leo...
Post a Comment
Read more

Rome and the SSPX - Version 2026 Part 5 - How Did We Get Here???

By
 + JMJ This is the fifth in this series and I think it may require a part b to show the controversial documents and teachings of the Pope post V2. P^3 Part 5 How Did We Get Here??? Introduction My family became ‘Traditional’ in early 1980’s and I didn’t realise until years later how early we entered the Fray. So the SSPX was slightly over a decade old when we started going to Mass. That is a young organization, as someone said at the consecrations “Aren’t you a little young to be a bishop?”, the response was, “That is something that time will change.” 1970: SSPX founded with diocesan approval (Abp. Marcel Lefebvre) 1974–1976: Vatican II disputes escalate; Lefebvre suspended a divinis 1988: Illicit episcopal consecrations → excommunications declared 2000: SSPX Jubilee pilgrimage to Rome (signals openness to talks) 2009: Excommunications lifted by Pope Benedict XVI 2011–2012: Doctrinal talks with CDF collapse 2015–2017: SSPX granted faculties for confessi...
Post a Comment
Read more