Skip to main content

More on Vaccines

Image
By
 +
JMJ

 

 So it is clear that taking the COVID-19 vaccines - even those morally tainted - is permissible according to Catholic Teaching.

The question that remains for me is one of risk vs benefit.

For example the UK has started its vaccination program and there have been two anaphylactic reactions. Other results look good so far ...

With recent polls showing that a sizeable number of Canadians will refuse a vaccine altogether, or will wait some time before lining up for a shot, Pinnow said he wants Canadians to be assured the product is safe. CBC.ca

What follows is my personal approach to vaccination

 As with the H1N1 vaccination program, I will take a rational risk vs benefit approach by:

  • Reviewing the "monograph" data looking for the adverse events (risks) and contraindications.
  • Compare this with the dangers of the disease and potential adverse reactions to both the person being vaccinated and the persons they would come in contact with (in this case the elderly).
  • Assess alternative vaccines that are available to me and my family (ie morally untainted vaccines).

  With the H1N1 the adverse events were as bad and in the same likelihood as the vaccination.  So we elected to not vaccinate.

 A key input to this process is the drug monograph, that will be publicly available. An example of the Pfizer monograph is available here.  

Key Sections and points from the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine monograph:

  • Indications: This section indicates when and to whom a drug should be administered.  It will sometimes contain information about specific sections of the population.
    •  To prevent COVID-19
    • For individual 16 years of age and older.
    • Safety and efficacy has not been established for those under 16 years of age
    • Geriatric safety and efficacy was tested.
  • Contraindications: This section indicate who should NOT receive the medication.
    • People who are hypersensitive to active substance or ingredient in the formulation (see list)
    • People suffer from severe allergies should be cautious (noted in England and Canada)
  • Serious warning and Precautions: No explanation necessary :-)
  • Warnings and Precautions: Similar to above.
    • If you have a fever - postpone receiving the vaccination.
    • Vaccination does not automatically convey immunity
    • Immunization may not be optimal until at least 7 days after the second dose. 
    • If you have a bleeding disorder or receiving anticoagulant - defer
    • Pregnant women - no safety data
    • Breast-feeding - no safety data
  • Adverse Reactions: Bad reactions to the vaccination.
    • injection site pain ( 84.1%), 
    • fatigue (62.9%),
    • headache (55.1%), 
    • muscle pain (38.3%), 
    • chills (31.9%),
    • joint pain (23.6%) 
    • fever (14.2%) 
    • were usually mild or moderate in intensity and resolved within a few days after vaccination.

Of interest is that some people developed swollen lymph nodes.

So for me it is simple, moral implications aside:

  1. The vaccine is effective about 95% of the time
  2. It should not be given to: pregnant or breastfeeding women, youth under the age of 16 or people with the other contraindications.
  3. The risks of taking the vaccine are less than the worse case Canadian data.  

The following graphs were taken from infobase Canada.

Distribution of Hospitalized Cases

So, 70.5% of hospitalization are over the age of 60, and the distribution follow a rough 10% per decade of age distribution. 

The danger is the false sense of security that the young will feel in looking at this data.  Their sense of mortality is typically ill-developed. While the odds sound 'great' for them, the reality is that they can dramatically increase the odds against them by their behaviour.

Distribution of Deaths

 While some carry over their false sense of security when looknig at the numbers,the reality is that although COVID is particularly dangerous to the elderly (see above). But this doesn't guarantee a young person that they will escape death.  While all the young cases that I know have had only minor symptoms (head-ache, fever, lack of taste, difficulty breathing) a young man of 20 died last week.

So, be wise in your behaviour and precautions.

P^3

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Rome,the SSPX and this time of Crisis - Updated

By
+ JMJ Obviously there's lots of events right now. First we have the April 1st - I almost thought it was April Fools - meeting between Pope Francis and Bishop Fellay.  Nothing really news worthy as this is a natural progression as Rome appears to be considering fulfilling Archbishop Lefebvre's wish to 'accept us as we are'. Second we have the April 8th publication of what will be a verbose exhortation of the Synod of the Family. I'm willing to bet that the Pope will give with one hand (unilateral regularization of SSPX) and take with the other (ambiguous document that opens the flood gates of sin further). Much to pray for. P^3
30 comments
Read more

A Reply to Martin Blackshaw’s FLAWED Remnant article titled: FLAWED: SSPX Advice on Abortion-tainted Vaccines

By
 + JMJ    An article has appeared in the Remnant (link to article) and I am afraid that there are a number of flaws in it that need to be addressed. The author, Martin Blackshaw, believes that both the Church and the SSPX are misapplying the principle of Moral Theology called 'Cooperation In Evil'.  Unfortunately, Mr. Blackshaw rests most of his arguments on citing authors that support his position, without considering the possibility that they are wrong. This highlights a key factor in this crisis: ignorance of the faith and its application . I don't am not singling out Mr. Blackshaw for this criticism, I have observed that it applies to laity and religious, superior and subject a like.  No one seems immune in this enduring crisis, myself included.  I further believe that this ignorance is why so many Catholics, both traditional and non, rely on their gut feeling or "Catholic conscience" for charting their way through this crisis of the faith.  While...
25 comments
Read more

Rorate-Caeli URGENT: Pope tells Italian Bishops he plans to abolish the motu proprio Summorum Pontificum

By
 + JMJ  Now THIS is probably the most important news item in the last two years - yes I place this above the pandemic. I'm only surprised by how long it took for this to surface during this pontificate. I hope and pray that it is false or that if it comes to pass that somehow some good will arise out of the ashes of Summorum Pontificum. P^3  Courtesy of Rorate-Caeli URGENT: Pope tells Italian Bishops he plans to abolish the motu proprio Summorum Pontificum (Updated) Update (May 26): Rorate's additional sources in Rome have confirmed this Wednesday that Francis has indeed a text on Summorum Pontificum lined up, which has been developed for months, but what is not known at this point is if the text is just about a more limited take on the Summorum application questionnaire (first revealed by us in the spring of 2020) or about an overhaul of Summorum Pontificum in general: drafts could be dealing with both matters. It is also not impossible for a text to come ou...
9 comments
Read more

If Pope Francis is bad - what about Pope St. John Paul II et al?

By
+ JMJ So here we are on the apparent cusp of yet another post conciliar Papal canonization. This time we have Pope's John-Paul I and Paul VI canonizations to 'look forward' to. This follows, obviously, on the heels of Pope St. John Paul II's canonization? So the first question that I usually encounter is: How is it possible, keeping in mind the doctrine on infallibility of canonizations (note doctrine not dogma), that Pope St. John Paul II is a Saint? First, what does it mean???  According to the doctrine of dogmatic facts - it is the universal opinion of Theologians that canonizations are infallible.  It means that they enjoy the beatific vision.  ... that's it.  That is the doctrine and it is at the level of universal opinion of theologians.  It is called a 'dogmatic fact'. That they made mistakes is obvious.  That the miracles seem to not be very miraculous is also a bit of an issue. Here's something to consider: The rush that surrou...
16 comments
Read more

The Vatican and SSPX – An Organizational Culture Perspective

By
Introduction The recent and continuing interactions between the Vatican and the SSPX have been a great opportunity for prayer and reflection.  The basis for the disagreement is theological and not liturgical. As noted by Dr. Lamont (2012), the SSPX theological position on the four key controversial aspects of the Second Vatican Council are base on prior theological work that resulted from relevant magisterial pronouncements.  So it is difficult to understand the apparent rejection of the theological position of the SSPX.
17 comments
Read more