Skip to main content

Angelus Press Conference, Fr. Sean Kilcawley and a little confirmation bias

Image
By
+
JMJ


There's a whole lot of electrons being spilt over the invitation of Fr. Kilcawley to present at the Angelus Press Conference.

When I saw the article by Louie Verrechio and the angst that was being caused ... I suspected that they didn't listen to the whole 2 minute presentation and place what they deemed offensive to their ears in context.

Frankly, I doubt that they would do that because it goes against the belief that the Novus Ordo Priests are actually members of the Catholic Religion and priests.

How did they alter the perception of the act?  By employing confirmation bias and poor grammar they succeed in altering the perception of the action by excluding the key point that Fr. Kilcawley was  making: That OLJC dispels the temptation.



First here's what Louie quoted:
… simply invite Our Lord into our temptation and into our thoughts in the present moment. To say, “Jesus, I want to look at pornography right now.” Or, “Jesus, I’m having an impure thought right now. You’re welcome into my imagination. You’re welcome to watch these thoughts with me.”
One commentator that I saw was that this priest was telling people to ask OLJC to watch pornography with them.  If a person missed the two highlighted words, they would probably come to that conclusion.

So ... having been burned before, I wanted to see the entire clip and judge for myself.

Here's my transcript and interleaved comments / thoughts:

In the opening words Fr. sets the stage - a person is undergoing a temptation. In other words they are still fighting and have turned to Our Lord in prayer for help.  While some might take issue with being 'worthy of God's love', fundamentally God created us and He doesn't make mistakes so as creatures of God we are worthy as if we weren't He wouldn't have created us.
Whenever somebody comes to me when they're struggling with habitual sin or with pornography and masturbation I ask them how are you praying in the midst of your temptation and they'll say things like I'm praying that Jesus will come and take this temptation away or they'll say I'm praying that I'll have the strength to fight this temptation off or maybe even I'm praying that I'll be worthy of God's love and at that point I have to say stop you are already worthy of Our Lord's love
 Father is correct, the thought that we can fix ourselves is pelagianism.
and a better way of approaching our temptations instead of asking Our Lord to take them away which gives us the impression that Jesus enters into our life to take away our temptations so that we can then fix ourselves and eventually be worthy of him to come back and enter in is simply
The following section contains the 'offensive' section - which needs to be linked to the next one.  Note, he's not saying to ask OLJC to watch pornography, but the temptations that the person is undergoing.
invite Our Lord into our temptation and into our thoughts in the present moment to say Jesus I want to look at pornography right now or Jesus I'm having an impure thought right now you're welcome into my imagination you're welcome to watch these thoughts with me
 The following is the proper conclusion of the thought: OLJC dispels the temptation by His presence.
because as we do that the light of Christ can enter into our imagination and His light scatters the darkness in that moment in which we're feeling unlovable or we're feeling a need for love that need is responded to by he who is love the person who is love Our Lord Jesus Christ
 The final phrase -
and it's with his help that we can put our lives back in order again and live and love as we should it's a reminder to us that we're never alone that we can do all things through Christ who strengthens us and we can do nothing without Him.
So while Father uses the 'modern' manner of speech, there isn't anything truly offensive in what he stated.

I also found it interesting that Louie Verrecchio ended his article with this phrase:
We’ll keep an eye on this situation and follow-up next week as warranted.

Really, it is a non situation and I think Louie could put his time to better use.

P^3


Labels:

Comments

  1. kamOctober 7, 2019 at 11:59 AM

    You nailed it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. GullibleOctober 21, 2019 at 9:32 AM

    Hi Tradical
    If you are suffering from temptations and you ask Our Lord Jesus Christ to take them away how in the world do you get the impression you are going to fix this yourself?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. TradicalOctober 21, 2019 at 8:14 PM

      My thought was that the way the penitents were asking, Our Lord would comes, take away the temptation ... then leave. At that point people would do their own work.

      There's definitely better ways to express it ...

      P^3

      Delete
  3. AthanasiusAugust 21, 2022 at 12:31 PM

    Fr. Kilcawley is at odds with Traditional moral teaching in this matter. It has always been the teaching of the Church and her saints that when tempted to any other sin Catholics may fight manfully, but when tempted to impurity the victory lies in cowardice. We should flee these temptations at once, not invite Our Lord to view them with us. Although no clarified, St. Paul wrote of a particular temptation of the flesh that may have been impure temptation. He says that he was given a sting in his flesh, an angel of Satan to buffet him, for which thing he thrice besought the Lord to deliver him. And how did Our Lord respond? He said "my grace is sufficient for thee". In other words, Our Lord will never allow us to be tempted beyond our strength, for adequate grace is given at the time for us to triumph with effort. He will not step in and relieve us of every opportunity to prove our love for Him. Indeed, He did not even receive such comfort Himself in the agony of Gethsemene. If I recall correctly, St. Bernard, when impurely tempted, had recourse to the thorns of an exceptionally thorny bush, in which he rolled about covering his body in wounds. His was the bravest act of cowardice I ever read about, but the point is he took measures by the grace of God already in him to win the victory. That's what we're called to do when tempted to impurity, to run away from it by distraction ourselves. The worst thing any Catholic can do is open the door to bad thoughts, even under the pretext of asking Our Lord to view them with us. Our success lies in flight, pure and simple.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Catholic Church and the Rule of Law- Part II: Dr. John Lamont

By
+ JMJ This is the second article from Dr. Lamont from his lecture given in May 2014. P^3 Source Part A: Society of St. Hugh of Cluny Source Part B: Society of St. Hugh of Cluny 8 May2014 The Catholic Church and the Rule of Law- Part II By John Lamont To understand how the Jesuit conception of obedience departed from earlier conceptions, it is helpful to compare it with the teaching of St. Thomas on obedience. The fundamental difference between the two is that St. Thomas considers the proper object of obedience to be the precept of the superior (2a2ae q. 104 a. 2 co., ad 3). Obedience that seeks to forestall the expressed will of the superior does not bear on what the superior wants or thinks in general, but only on what the superior intends to command. St. Ignatius’s lowest degree of obedience, which he does not consider to be virtuous, is thus what St. Thomas considers to be the only form of obedience. St. Thomas holds that St. Ignatius’s alleged higher forms of o...
Post a Comment
Read more

Open Letter to Cardinal Gantin - July 6, 1988

By
There has been some discussion (read lots) about the term 'Conciliar Church'. I have posted this letter written by the Superior General and District Superiors of the SSPX after the 1988 Consecrations. Of particular interest is that the 'Conciliar Church' being referred to as a system. My paraphrase would be that the SSPX regards the 'conciliar Church' as an error within the Church. Source Open Letter to Cardinal Gantin Prefect of the Congregation for Bishops
Post a Comment
Read more

Morning and Evening and other sundry Prayers

By
+ JMJ Along the theme of P^3 (Prayer, Penance, Patience), and for my own reference ... here is a collection of Morning and Evening prayers from the Ideal Daily Missal along with some additional prayers. In this crisis of the Church, I do not think it is possible to do too much prayer, penance and have patience. P^3
Post a Comment
Read more

Rome and the SSPX - Version 2026 Part 6b: Principles and Rules for Surviving this Crisis of the Catholic Church (Principle 1)

By
 + JMJ Principle 1: Realize that something is amiss in the Catholic Church The world in which I had my Traditional Awakening, is one in which practically anything pre-Conciliar such as liturgy, doctrinc, and even dogmas are either suppressed, ignored or re-framed to be acceptable to the ‘world’. What is more, the people adhering to these pre-conciliar teachings and liturgy are persecuted by other members of the Catholic Church. The things that non-Trads say about Trads can be quite extreme. For example, accusations against Traditionalists include that they are: A revival of the Jansenists (link) , Schismatics, Heretics, Uncharitable, Lefebrists Radicals Integrists When one group of Catholics is persecuted by the others for simply wanting to live as Catholics before them did for generations … well something is wrong. Further, we need to realize that when what was previously condemned is now promoted and what was previously promoted as the trut...
Post a Comment
Read more

How is the SSPX prepared to accept the Second Vatican Council??? - Reblogged and Updated.

By
+ JMJ The Archbishop remained steadfast. In the 1980s, in his correspondence with then-Cardinal Ratzinger, Archbishop Lefebvre stated his position that the criterion for interpreting Vatican II in light of Tradition comprises three elements: 1) He and the SSPX would accept anything in Vatican II that is clearly consistent with Tradition; 2) Any ambiguous texts of Vatican II must be interpreted strictly according to Tradition; according to the consistent teaching of the Church throughout the centuries. 3) Anything in the Council that cannot be interpreted according to Tradition should be revised. The Archbishop laid this out explicitly in his letters to Cardinal Ratzinger in 1982 and 1985. CF News: Rome-SSPX: Background to the Doctrinal Discussions CF News: The April 15 Deadline A few years ago Tony La Rosa (aka ecclesia militans a Toronto based 'resistor') had a difficult time accepting this approach to the council. He held that it must be completely tossed as...
Post a Comment
Read more