Skip to main content

Reblog: What is the 'Resistance' hiding? Review of "How to see clearly through the current situation of Tradition?" Part 1

Image
By
+
JMJ

Background

I have in my possession a 'private conference not to be put on the internet' titled: How to see clearly through the current situation of Tradition?  According to their website, it was delivered by a Monk of Avrille November 15, 2014.

My intention in reviewing this document is to determine if it is consistent with my earlier observations of the issues I noted in the 'resistance' (see links below). Specifically, that the 'resistance' believes that the 'conciliar Church' is a separate organization that is parallel to the One, Holy, Roman, Catholic Church.
Let's put this into context first, as there is a tendency to oversimplify the structure of the Church from a liturgical and hierarchical perspective. 

The Catholic Church is:
 “the assembly of men united in the profession of the same Christian faith and in the communion of the same sacraments, under the rule of legitimate pastors, and in particular, that of the one Vicar of Christ on earth, the Roman Pontiff.” St. Robert Bellarmine
One objection that is put forward is that 'Modern Catholics don't profess the same Christian faith'.  This is false on a number of fronts. First, it is a generalization which is a fallacy.  Second, Catholics in material heresy are still deemed among the members of the Church since the Church assumes that they will submit to the authority of the Church when corrected. Thirdly, one can profess the faith explicitly or implicitly. I doubt many Traditionalist could quote all 230 (ish) de fide teachings of the Church.  They implicitly profess their belief whenever they recite the Creeds of the Catholic Church - just as the 'Modern' Catholics do.

So let's put this canard aside.

From an organizational point of view, the rule of legitimate pastors is hierarchical (complete list http://www.catholic-hierarchy.org/).






Keeping in mind that Christ is the Head of the Church and the Pope is His Vicar on Earth and that the Church includes the Church Suffering and Triumphant a complete diagram of the Church looks something like this:
 From a liturgical point of view, the 'same sacraments' are present in a number of different rites. Below is a chart from Phatmass that outlines the origins of the rites of the Church:


Source: Phatmass

To be clear, each of every one of these rites is a rite of the Catholic Church. Those who attend them, provided they are not in schism or heresy, are just as Catholic as those who attend the Roman rite. I have noted that a fair number of Traditionalists are ignorant about the breadth of liturgical practice within the Catholic Church.

Finally, I realize that some would contest that the Novus Ordo Missae is a Rite of the Church.  For now I will assume that it was 'legitimately promulgated' - setting aside any legal wrangling about the 'form' of the promulgation.  Meaning that 'Modern' Catholics participate in the same Sacraments and Legitimate worship as Traditionalists.

Conciliar Church

At its root, the crisis is due to the influence of certain underlying assumptions / values that have dominated the Catholic Church since the Second Vatican Council.  The first manifestation was during the conflict between Cardinals Ottaviani and Bea on the document of Religious Liberty.  The conflict has been ongoing from that point with the alteration of any and all artifacts and values that are not aligned with the new cultural assumptions.  






Cultural Perspective
Sense Making
The Vatican and the SSPX

With this foundation, we can explore the different perspectives of how the crisis of the Church affects the Church. Different perspectives are a natural consequence of our cultural background (see links below) and experiences.  In trying to impose a framework around this crisis, one term has been persistently used to encompass all the manifestations of the crisis: Conciliar Church.

The SSPX views the conciliar Church is a 'movement' within the Church of Christ. The members of the Church Militant subscribe or participate in this movement in varying degrees. (see Can one speak of the Conciliar Church?)  The varying degrees of 'infection' is represented by the gradient, with solid red being fully infected and white not infected. As we are unable to read souls like St. Padre Pio, these gradients are for illustrative purposes only.

Please note that while infected with the errors that run rampant in the Catholic Church, the people are still members of the Catholic Church as long as they don't separate themselves from the Church via either schism or heresy under the conditions discussed elsewhere on this blog ( Heresy Plain and Not So Simple ) .


... and as far as I can tell from their writings, this is how the 'resistance' sees the situation:

The generality of the leading lights of the 'resistance' see the "Conciliar Church" as a separate entity that is not within the Catholic Church.  The Vicar of Christ is simultaneously the head of both of these organizations.

As Fr. Rua (Resistance) put it:
"We appeal to you to recognize that the visible church is not the Catholic Church. It is the Conciliar Church, the Church of the new Advent as they call themselves. This Conciliar Church is suicidal and will bring about the institutional death of the Catholic Church but the faith will remain and hence the Mystical Body will remain for all days. ...
Where is the error in Bishop Fellay’s theology? It is the ecclesiological model from which he draws his conclusions. He considers the visible structure of the church to be the Conciliar Church. In a previous essay we noted that Athanasius and Archbishop Lefebvre were correct to point out that the Catholic Church resides in the Faith. We must worship in Spirit and in Truth. Structures and buildings do not constitute the Church. The Pope and officials in Rome may possess the structures but have lost the Faith." (Fr. Rua A Response to Fr. Daniel Themann’s Lecture Piece by Piece.) (link)
There is also a tendency within the 'resistance' to see only traditionalists as remaining within the Catholic Church.

This creates a number of problems concerning visibility and Indefectibility of the Church

The 'visibility' of the Church does not reside in buildings, see this link for an explanation.

I am uncertain if the resistance includes the sede-vacantists in the "Trad" category. Perhaps they have a separate conciliar type structure for them.

Attached below are some articles that I've written on this topic.

I have concluded that the 'resistance' sees any canonical regularization as a submission and attachment to the conciliar Church and not the Catholic Church.  Hence their response to even the possibility that the SSPX could have been regularized.

With that foundation, we can now explore this sensitive resistance document and evaluate if my earlier conclusions are supported.

P^3

References:
SSPX and the Resistance - A Comparison Of Ecclesiology 
Open Letter to Bishop Williamson Regarding EC354 - Updated June 7, 2014
Where are Bishop Williamson and the 'resistance' going?
How far does the Apple fall from the Tree? Fr. Pfeiffer as the Apple and Bishop Williamson as the Tree
How far does the Apple fall from the Tree? Fr. Pfeiffer as the Apple and Bishop Williamson as the Tree. - The Sequel


Series Links
Part 1: Background
Part 2: Introduction and Heart of the Fight
Part 3: Distinction between "eternal Rome" and "the Rome of Neo-Modernist ..."
Part 4: Silence regarding the Roman scandals
Part 5: Relations with Conciliar Rome: can a practical agreement ...

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

SSPX and the Resistance - A Comparison Of Ecclesiology

By
Shining the light of Church Teaching on the doctrinal positions of the SSPX and the Resistance. Principles are guides used to aid in decision making.  It stands to reason that bad principles will lead to bad decisions. The recent interactions between Rome and the SSPX has challenged a number of closely held cultural assumptions of people in both sides of the disagreement. This has resulted in cultural skirmishes in both Rome and the SSPX. Since it is the smaller of the two, the skirmishes have been more evident within the SSPX.  The cultural fault-line that Bishop Fellay crossed appears to be linked to two points of Catholic Doctrine: Ecclesiology and Obedience.  The cultural difference of view points is strong enough that it has resulted in the expulsion of a number of members.  It should also be noted that some other priests expelled since the beginning of the latest interactions (starting in 2000) held the same view points and have joined with the l...
8 comments
Read more

America Magazine: Why liturgy is not a space for self-expression

By
 + JMJ Introduction I subscribed to Jesuit Review America Magazine in order to improve my perspective on the crisis of the Church. At first, I found that I had a hard time reading through the articles that caught my attention.  Actually, at best, I didn't get further than a few sentences.  Mostly due to demands on what time I have left on this Good Earth. Then a title caught my eye in a latest article ... someone is saying that the Liturgy is not a space for self-expression.  Then there's the Performative Piety?  What does this mean? What is Performative Piety? I had a sense that "Performative Piety" is the practice of making external acts of piety to be seen by others and Matthew 6:1 (link) confirms this thought. Let's break down the Knox translation: Be sure you do not perform your acts of piety before men ,  for them to watch ;  if you do that,  you have no title to a reward from your Father who is in heaven. If you stopped after the first ph...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Episcopal Consecrations of 1988, 1991 and 2015 - Some Perspectives

By
+ JMJ In defense of the recent consecration of Fr. Faure by Bishop Williamson, some have argued that the 1991 consecration of Bishop Rangel (RIP) by the Bishops of the SSPX present an equivalent standard of action and principles.  From this they conclude that the SSPX's condemnation of Bishop Williamson's action is flawed as the principles of the 1991 consecration and that of 2015 are equivalent.
2 comments
Read more

Canonical Mission and State of Emergency - A Response to Mr. John Salza - Part B

By
 +  JMJ  I was trying to think of a way to map out the time course I discussed in Part A of this article.  Early this morning it came to me that this is more about obedience and duty than canon law.  As is my wont, I mapped out my thoughts (see image) to draw linkages between the core concepts. My conclusion is that, at least subjectively, Archbishop Lefebvre had sufficient information to make good decisions concerning whether or not he was obliged to obey.  I know that the Jesuits, some Sedevacantists and the priests that left over the years will not agree with my thoughts. So be it.  The core pieces of information include: Attacks against the SSPX were launched because they kept the Tridentine Mass and the pre-conciliar understanding of the Truths of the Faith. The authorities in the Church were willing to go against the laws of the Church. The same authorities encouraged the various dangers to the Faith embedded in popular interpretations of ambiguo...
Post a Comment
Read more

Did Rome believe that the Bishops of the SSPX incurred the penalty of excommunication? - Updated

By
+ JMJ See Update below ... A reader asked me the following question: Hi P^3 Help me straighten out a friend, can you please get me the Vatican documentation saying that the Bishops were not guilty of excommunication, my friend thinks the Vatican still considered all guilty but removed the excommunication of the 4 Bishops as a sign of good will. Thanks A.S.  I think your friend is materially correct - here's the section of the letter the remits the excommunication: On the basis of the powers expressly granted to me by the Holy Father Benedict XVI, by virtue of the present Decree I remit the penalty of excommunication  latae sententiae  incurred by Bishops Bernard Fellay, Bernard Tissier de Mallerais, Richard Williamson and Alfonso de Galarreta, and declared by this Congregation on 1 July 1988. At the same time I declare that, as of today's date, the Decree issued at that time no longer has juridical effect. So, as far as Rome was concerned,...
2 comments
Read more