Skip to main content

Bishop Williamson and Fidelity - AKA Blind Leading the Blind

Image
By
+
JMJ

Pope F1 (Not exactly as shown)



I haven't written about Bishop Williamson in a while and the latest "Eleison Comments" seems to be as good as reason as any to revisit the topic.

Short vesion: Bishop Williamson is defending a chimera. The resistance is united only in one thing, that it isn't the SSPX ... at least most of them think that while others (Fr. Pfeiffer and Bishop Williamson) believe themselves to still be members of the SSPX. At least they did shortly after their expulsions. The "resistance" isn't united on doctrine as it includes in its spectrum of beliefs sedevacantism,  ecclesia vacantism and heresy (I'm not making this up).  Normally I would have assumed that Doctrine would have been an important unifying force ... but alas ... that is not the case.

Now for Bishop Williamson's latest epistle titled: "Resistance Unity"

First his Excellency starts by quoting a "resistor":

For instance a long-standing observer of the “Resistance” scene makes the following pertinent remarks: The main argument of the Superiors of the Newsociety against the “Resistance” is to point out the divisions between Resistant priests. But while various Resistant priests have a variety of vocational gifts, giving rise to a variety of Resistant works (e.g. a Friary, a Seminary, a Monastery, a Priory, a Mission, etc.), there reigns amongst them all a remarkable unity as to the end being pursued – the survival of the Catholic Faith.  On the contrary, the Newsociety is a giant with feet of clay, held together only by disciplinary measures, the fear of sanctions and personal interests, but as to the end being pursued it is highly divided: an Agreement with Rome, or not; marriages under official authority, or not; flirting with Conciliar bishops, or not – the Newsociety is cracking in all directions.
 The 'observer' has put his finger on one key element: The SSPX has discipline! ... Some how he believes this is holding it together?  Well yes, I suppose it is in a way as those who prefer their own authority vs the authority of the superior will not be able to abide by discipline.  In the 'resistance' there is no authority, just a collection of independents who work in their own little fiefdoms.  The goal of pursuing the "survival of the Catholic Faith" is laudable and laughable given the beams in their own eyes.


What I have noticed most about the 'resistance' is their departure from the ultimate truth. In order to justify their actions to their supporters and (I assume) their consciences they make various claims. In these claims not a few have deviated from the ultimate Catholic Truth of Doctrine - including in some cases Dogmas.  In other words, they are flirting with heresy, just like Martin Luther et al.

For myself the alignment with Catholic Doctrine has always been the litmus test of the SSPX and the various people that have split off over the decades ... normally when they discover that the SSPX actually believes and adheres to the teachings of the Catholic Church.

But Truth is the purpose of Authority, and not the other way round. “Peter, when you have turned again, strengthen your brethren” (Lk. XXII, 32). In other words, firstly recover your own shaken faith in the Truth, then secondly exercise your Authority over the other Apostles. This is because in a fallen world, the inward Truth needs outward Authority to defend it, but if the outward Authority is no longer defending that inward Truth then it has lost its true reason for being, and it becomes an end in itself, ultimately a tyranny to serve personal positions, as with Paul VI and the Archbishop’s successors.
Bishop Williamson's first statement felt wrong, especially this part:
In other words, firstly recover your own shaken faith in the Truth, then secondly exercise your Authority over the other Apostles.
A similar theme has emerged in Bishop Williamson's writings a few years ago. From his perspective this quote from the bible means that a person whose faith is shaken cannot exercise authority.  Taken to its logical conclusion would be consistent with Bishop Williamson's 2015 statement that the SSPX should not be talking to the 'Conciliar Officials'.  Let's make certain we understand who these officials are: Cardinals of the Catholic Church operating under the orders of Pope JP2, B16 and F1 (Pope not race car). I seriously doubt that Bishop Williamson believes that the 'Conciliar Church' under the leadership (bad as it is) of Pope F1 is the Catholic Church.  This is another spot where the "Resistance" has abandoned the Truth (art 1, art 2).

Thus however plentiful be the personal miseries of individual Resistants, so long as they are faithful to the Truth, the “Resistance” will outlive the Newsociety, just as the Archbishop’s Society, as long as it was faithful to the Truth, dominated, and will ultimately outlive, the Conciliar Romans. The ultimate problem is not one of persons or Authority, but of doctrines and Truth. Thus when in the early 2000’s the successor of the Archbishop at that time appealed to Authority to solve divisions inside the Society, he was already well down the Conciliar path of preferring Authority to Truth, of preferring will to reason. As a result, the Archbishop’s Society has been turned into a tyranny, and although the tyrant was apparently dismissed from the seat of power by the election of a year ago, really he is back there. Such is our modern world. Reality gives the lie to appearances.
 "... so long as they are faithful tot he Truth, the "Resistance" will outlive the Newsociety [ie SSPX].

Well we know that the "Resistance" has abandoned the Truth of the Doctrine of the Catholic Church and therefore, so long as the SSPX is united to that Doctrine is will be united to the Catholic Church under the Vicar of Christ (presently Pope Francis the First). Therefore it will outlive any and all splinters of the "Resistance" the separates itself from the Doctrine and the Vicar.

When they separated from the doctrine that is when they blinded themselves, that is why the "Resistance" is simply the blind leading the blind.


By Питер Брейгель Старший - Точная репродукция картины 16 века, Public Domain, Link


P^3




Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Comparision of the Tridentine, Cranmer and Novus Ordo Masses

By
+ JMJ I downloaded the comparison that was linked in the previous article on the mass (here) . ... a very good reference! P^3 From: Whispers of Restoration (available at this link) . CHARTING LITURGICAL CHANGE Comparing the 1962 Ordinary of the Roman Mass to changes made during the Anglican Schism; Compared in turn to changes adopted in the creation of Pope Paul VI’s Mass in 1969 The chart on the reverse is a concise comparison of certain ritual differences between three historical rites for the celebration of the Catholic Mass Vetus Ordo: “Old Order,” the Roman Rite of Mass as contained in the 1962 Missal, often referred to as the “Traditional Latin Mass.”The Ordinary of this Mass is that of Pope St. Pius V (1570) following the Council of Trent (1545-63), hence the occasional moniker “Tridentine Mass.” However, Trent only consolidated and codified the Roman Rite already in use at that time; its essential form dates to Pope St. Gregory the Great (+604), in whose time the R...
Post a Comment
Read more

SSPX and the Resistance - A Comparison Of Ecclesiology

By
Shining the light of Church Teaching on the doctrinal positions of the SSPX and the Resistance. Principles are guides used to aid in decision making.  It stands to reason that bad principles will lead to bad decisions. The recent interactions between Rome and the SSPX has challenged a number of closely held cultural assumptions of people in both sides of the disagreement. This has resulted in cultural skirmishes in both Rome and the SSPX. Since it is the smaller of the two, the skirmishes have been more evident within the SSPX.  The cultural fault-line that Bishop Fellay crossed appears to be linked to two points of Catholic Doctrine: Ecclesiology and Obedience.  The cultural difference of view points is strong enough that it has resulted in the expulsion of a number of members.  It should also be noted that some other priests expelled since the beginning of the latest interactions (starting in 2000) held the same view points and have joined with the l...
8 comments
Read more

If Pope Francis is bad - what about Pope St. John Paul II et al?

By
+ JMJ So here we are on the apparent cusp of yet another post conciliar Papal canonization. This time we have Pope's John-Paul I and Paul VI canonizations to 'look forward' to. This follows, obviously, on the heels of Pope St. John Paul II's canonization? So the first question that I usually encounter is: How is it possible, keeping in mind the doctrine on infallibility of canonizations (note doctrine not dogma), that Pope St. John Paul II is a Saint? First, what does it mean???  According to the doctrine of dogmatic facts - it is the universal opinion of Theologians that canonizations are infallible.  It means that they enjoy the beatific vision.  ... that's it.  That is the doctrine and it is at the level of universal opinion of theologians.  It is called a 'dogmatic fact'. That they made mistakes is obvious.  That the miracles seem to not be very miraculous is also a bit of an issue. Here's something to consider: The rush that surrou...
16 comments
Read more

Spiritual Journey Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre - Extracts

By
+ JMJ I have posted these two chapters to provide context for the quote of: It is, therefore, a strict duty for every priest wanting to remain Catholic to separate himself from this Conciliar Church for as long as it does not rediscover the Tradition of the Church and of the Catholic Faith. P^3 Courtesy of SSPX.ca Chapter II The Perfections of God We ought to remember during this entire contemplation of God that we must apply all that is said of God to Our Lord Jesus Christ, Who is God. We cannot separate Jesus Christ from God. We cannot separate the Christian religion from Jesus Christ, Who is God, and we must affirm and believe that only the Catholic religion is the Christian religion. These affirmations have, as a result, inescapable conclusions that no ecclesiastic authority can contest: outside of Jesus Christ and the Catholic religion, that is, outsi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Dogmas of the Catholic Faith (de fide) - Expanded Listing: Answer for Reader

By
 + JMJ  A reader asked the following question in the 2015 version of the article on the Dogmas of the Catholic Faith (link) : 117: "In the state of fallen nature it is morally impossible for man without Supernatural Revelation, to know easily, with absolute certainty and without admixture of error, all religious and moral truths of the natural order." Where can you find this in the documents of the Church? ( Link to comment )  Here's the reference from Ott: The citation that Ott provided was Denzinger 1786 and the source document is Dogmatic Consitution Concerning the Faith from the First Vatican Council (Papal Encyclicals - link) : Chapter 2 On Revelation, Article 3: It is indeed thanks to this divine revelation , that those matters concerning God, which are not of themselves beyond the scope of human reason, can, even in the present state of the human race, be known by everyone, without difficulty, with firm certitude and with no intermingling of error. Here's ...
Post a Comment
Read more