Skip to main content

News Roundup: August 23, 2026

Image
By

 +

JMJ

I want to highlight / respond to two articles in particular:


National Catholic Reporter: Former SSPX member says unity with Catholicism means more than valid ordinations: 

  1. First, Louis Massett was not a member of the SSPX, only priests, religious and perhaps the Third Order members are actually members of the SSPX. 
  2. Massett's experience regarding the cultural shift is aligned with my experience in that a change in belief is followed by a change in the artifacts - such as dress, music, association etc.  There are extremes in each of these - to the point where belief exceeds what is actually required.  Female dress is a key point and, for better or worse, Bishop Williamson's (RIP) series on slacks for women reflect a more extreme version of the modesty.
  3. "They're not Catholic. They're SSPX" actually reflects either the Sedevacantist or modern Catholic perspective.  
    1. In general the Sedevacantists - and I've run into this belief system throughout the world - believe that the Pope's elected since a certain time CANNOT be Catholic.  I hold that a sedevacantist will not regularly attend the novus ordo missae. Some, not all, will attend the SSPX.
    2. I've seen the 'They're not Catholic' perspective from ignorant Modern Catholics who just can't believe that what the SSPX believes is Catholic.  Read Cognitive Dissonance (link).
  4. Conspiracy theories are not limited to the SSPX. I've heard these theories from various non-trads, trads, non-Catholics ... so we can set this aside. If you haven't encountered a conspiracy theorist outside the SSPX ... then perhaps you need to open both your eyes and ears when out and about.
  5. Then there's the 'schism' Schick. I asked the authority and can say that the SSPX post 1988 was listed as 'not in full communion' and since the 2026 amateur canonical warning and declaration of schism didn't change anything (link). 

God's Unconditional Love and the SSPX's Conditions: 

  1. So an SSPX priest recommended that her parents 'ostracize' their daughter. I know of cases where that could have been culturally aligned in the Church of the 1950s and I know that the contrary advice is also provided by SSPX priests when a child leaves the SSPX and / or the Catholic Church.  What I noticed is that she is silent on the rationale for the cutting of ties with their daughter.
  2. Interestingly, I was in St. Mary's in the same era when both McAuliffe and Massett. Some elements they highlighted as cultural and I can say that our experiences were either very different or we remember them differently.
  3. In the end, McAuliffe has left the Catholic Faith and holds onto only a single hope by ending these words: God who loves us all, unconditionally. And that’s what counts.  This is a narrow perspective and I would say reflects a confirmation bias of someone who has lost the Faith. God does love us all unconditionally and at the same time will deal with each and everyone of us with Justice.  God will condemn each person who dies in a state of personal mortal sin to an eternity in Hell with the punishments due to their actual sins.

As always, these types of articles don't reflect the actual core issues of the crisis of the Catholic Church and the SSPX response to it.

P^3



 1 Popes Past Present and Future

2 The Church, The Crisis and the Persecution

3 SSPX

4 World, Wars and Conflict




Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

SSPX: Why Is the SSPX So Criticized?

By
 + JMJ As long as you are ok with what happens in other Catholic Churches, Traditional Catholics will be left 'alone'.  This is a paraphrase of words spoken by an Archbishop to Traditional Catholics (with a sprinkling of SSPX) who had requested the Traditional Latin Mass under Summorum Pontificum. This reflects that attitude of the Church towards anyone who takes issue with some of the ambiguities of Vatican II and the post-conciliar magisterium.  If you reject the papacy but are ok with V2, the New Mass, and what Rome has stated since 1965 - then you are welcome. Question some of the more abiguous statements and ask for Rome to realise that a circle is not a square - then you are in for a world of hurt. This is where the SSPX exists and has existed from almost its very first moments. Pointing out contradictions with previous magisterium is not acceptable - under any condition. Why? Because it will cause the whole V2 house of cards to fall. I guess only when the contradic...
Post a Comment
Read more

Morning and Evening and other sundry Prayers

By
+ JMJ Along the theme of P^3 (Prayer, Penance, Patience), and for my own reference ... here is a collection of Morning and Evening prayers from the Ideal Daily Missal along with some additional prayers. In this crisis of the Church, I do not think it is possible to do too much prayer, penance and have patience. P^3
Post a Comment
Read more

SSPX and the Resistance - A Comparison Of Ecclesiology

By
Shining the light of Church Teaching on the doctrinal positions of the SSPX and the Resistance. Principles are guides used to aid in decision making.  It stands to reason that bad principles will lead to bad decisions. The recent interactions between Rome and the SSPX has challenged a number of closely held cultural assumptions of people in both sides of the disagreement. This has resulted in cultural skirmishes in both Rome and the SSPX. Since it is the smaller of the two, the skirmishes have been more evident within the SSPX.  The cultural fault-line that Bishop Fellay crossed appears to be linked to two points of Catholic Doctrine: Ecclesiology and Obedience.  The cultural difference of view points is strong enough that it has resulted in the expulsion of a number of members.  It should also be noted that some other priests expelled since the beginning of the latest interactions (starting in 2000) held the same view points and have joined with the l...
8 comments
Read more

The Catholic Church and the Rule of Law- Part II: Dr. John Lamont

By
+ JMJ This is the second article from Dr. Lamont from his lecture given in May 2014. P^3 Source Part A: Society of St. Hugh of Cluny Source Part B: Society of St. Hugh of Cluny 8 May2014 The Catholic Church and the Rule of Law- Part II By John Lamont To understand how the Jesuit conception of obedience departed from earlier conceptions, it is helpful to compare it with the teaching of St. Thomas on obedience. The fundamental difference between the two is that St. Thomas considers the proper object of obedience to be the precept of the superior (2a2ae q. 104 a. 2 co., ad 3). Obedience that seeks to forestall the expressed will of the superior does not bear on what the superior wants or thinks in general, but only on what the superior intends to command. St. Ignatius’s lowest degree of obedience, which he does not consider to be virtuous, is thus what St. Thomas considers to be the only form of obedience. St. Thomas holds that St. Ignatius’s alleged higher forms of o...
Post a Comment
Read more