Rome and the SSPX - Version 2026 Part 6c: Principles and Rules for Surviving this Crisis of the Catholic Church (Principle 2)

JMJ

Principle 2: Know the Faith as the Catholic Church Teaches or Taught it.

A knowledge of the Faith and familiarity with the history of the Catholic Church for at least the past 200 years provides a good foundation for weathering this storm.

Bias, Opinions and Misbeliefs

One landmine that undermines principle #2 is the mixing of personal opinion with doctrine. These opinions, beliefs by another name, are sometimes held in a death grip. In some cases they are just prejudices against various real groups such as immigrants, Jews, communists, masons etc. In some cases it extends to conspiracy theories such as sedevacantism.

These firmly held beliefs prevent people from both understanding Doctrine as Taught by the Church and making the necessary distinctions.

For example, which religions offer worship to the True God?

Catholics, Orthodox, Protestants, Jews and Muslims.

Some people suck in their breath through their teeth creating an noticeable hiss at the above statement. However, I have it on good authority:

12 Q. Who are infidels? A. Infidels are those who have not been baptized and do not believe in Jesus Christ, because they either believe in and worship false gods as idolaters do, or though admitting one true God, they do not believe in the Messiah, neither as already come in the Person of Jesus Christ, nor as to come; for instance, Mohammedans and the like. (Catechism of Pope St. Pius X)

- and -

Infidel: in ecclesiastical language those who by baptism have received faith in Jesus Christ and have pledged Him their fidelity and called the faithful, so the name infidel is given to those who have not been baptized. The term applies not only to all who are ignorant of the true God, such as pagans of various kinds, but also to those who adore Him but do not recognize Jesus Christ, as Jews, Mohammed; strictly speaking it may be used of catechumens also, though in early ages they were called Christians; for it is only through baptism that one can enter into the ranks of the faithful. (Catholic Encyclopedia)

Breaking it down – a distinction is made between the types of infidels as understood by the Catholic Church. There are those that worship false gods and those worshiping one true God.

I have had discussions with Trads where it took fifteen to twenty minutes for them to understand the distinction that needs to be made: Offering worship to the True God, does not mean it is ‘True Worship’ as the Catholic Church understands it.

Reference: Tradicat: Is the object of Catholic, Jewish and Islamic worship the same God? – Updated

So my point is that misbeliefs and holding to them causes a loss of perspective and ultimately adherence to religious error. Cognitive Dissonance theory is one way to explain these types of firmly held misbeliefs and the lengths that people will go to boslter their opinions when confronts with reality.

Link to articles

Building a Foundational Knowledge

There is no way around it, you need to do the work. While Catholic magazines are a great starting point, it is critical to study actual Church documents.

Ones that I recommend are:

Catechism of the Council of Trent
Catechism of Saint Pope Pius X
Documents of Vatican 1
Pre-Council Encyclicals:
- Popes Against Modern Errors (Tan book available on Archive.org)
  - ON LIBERALISM (Mirari Vos, Pope Gregory XVI)
  - ON CURRENT ERRORS (Quanta Cura, Pope Pius IX)
  - SYLLABUS OF ERRORS (Pope Pius IX)
  - ON GOVERNMENT AUTHORITY (Diuturnum Illud, Pope Leo XIII)
  - ON FREEMASONRY AND NATURALISM (Humanum Genus, Pope Leo XIII)
  - ON THE NATURE OF TRUE LIBERTY (Libertas Praestantissimum, Pope Leo XIII)
  - ON THE CONDITION OF THE WORKING CLASSES (Rerum Novarum, Pope Leo XIII)
  - ON CHRISTIAN DEMOCRACY (Graves de Communi Re, Pope Leo XIII)
  - SYLLABUS CONDEMNING THE ERRORS OF THE MODERNISTS (Lamentabili Sane, Pope St. Pius X)
  - ON MODERNISM (Pascendi Dominici Gregis, Pope St. Pius X)
  - OUR APOSTOLIC MANDATE (On the “Sillon,” Pope St. Pius X)
  - THE OATH AGAINST MODERNISM (Pope St. Pius X)
  - ON THE FEAST OF CHRIST THE KING (Quas Primas, Pope Pius XI)
  - ON FOSTERING TRUE RELIGIOUS UNITY (Mortalium Animos, Pope Pius XI)
  - ON ATHEISTIC COMMUNISM (Divini Redemptoris, Pope Pius XI)
  - ON CERTAIN FALSE OPINIONS WHICH THREATEN TO UNDERMINE THE FOUNDATIONS OF CATHOLIC DOCTRINE (Humani Generis, Pope Pius XII)
- Mystici Corporis (The Mystical Body of Christ, the Church, Pope Pius XII)
Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma by Ludwig Ott

These are all available online for free and well worth the time needed to read them – cover to cover.

Building a Spiritual Foundation

Religious knowledge dies on the vine without an active spiritual life. Key elements are spiritual reading, prayer, meditation and contemplation.

I have mentioned this before, but it bears mentioning again advice that I received from a priest in the midst of the time when it appeared that the SSPX would obtain a no-compromise canonical regularization.

In those discussions, he said, I was pouring out drops of grace from my cup and if I didn’t “refill my cup”, I would crash and likely make big mistakes. Thinking about other Trads who were fervent, but held strong beliefs – they all ended poorly either abandoning the Faith altogether, ‘returning’ to the Novus Ordo, or became Sedevacantist.

“So you need to fill your cup and only give from the over flow.”

Another element is being grateful, not in the context that you have something someone else lacks, but that you have something that you didn’t and don’t deserve – the Faith and Catholicism. There was an article written by Robert Siscoe for the now defunct Catholic Family News that I recommend. When my wife and I first read it, we recognized it for what it is – a cornerstone for surviving this Crisis.

The Importance of Gratitude (Tradicat: Gratitude - Necessary for Surviving and Thriving in this Crisis)

P^3

What is Tradition?

+ JMJ What Is Tradition? The basic premise, from my perspective, is that what was taught before cannot be contradicted by the 'present' magisterium, only deepened and expanded upon. I recall the Roman theologians called the SSPX protestants while the SSPX called them modernists. I believe this was all surrounding the concept of Traditon. SSPX's Understanding of Tradition One accusation made against the SSPX is that they don't have a correct understanding of 'Tradition'. This is how the SSPX understands Tradition: I finally profess that Tradition is not a dead memory, but the living transmission of the doctrine received from the Apostles. It remains living, in distinction to Revelation, which is closed. It is so both in the activity of the Magisterium of the Teaching Church and in the profession of Faith of the Church Taught, of which the sentire cum Ecclesia is the result of the teaching of the Magisterium. Tradition may be called ‘living’, not in the sense t...

SSPX.ca: What is the position of the SSPX on Vatican II???

+ JMJ With all the mis-information about the SSPX rejecting the Second Vatican Council, I thought it would be useful to publish an article that focuses on the real issues that the SSPX has identified. Update: Why Did the SSPX Consecrate Bishops? ( Neither Schismatic, Nor Disobedient link ) In the linked document the SSPX outlined the key motivation and core issues with Vatican II and the post-conciliar magisterium (see above link for full document): 4. The Society Acted Precisely Because of the State of Necessity in Which the Faith Finds Itself In the present situation of the Church, if the Society of Saint Pius X had not carried out the consecrations of July 1st, it would have found itself facing an inevitable alternative: either to disappear gradually, or to accept, at least in fact, the new liturgy as well as the false doctrines of Vatican II and the post-council. Without the consecrations of July 1st, the Fraternity would have found itself, in a few years, without bishop...

Thoughts on: Finding Common Ground Between Rome and the SSPX

+ JMJ In the ramp up to the consecrations the noise floor in the intergnat grew to a constant din. This was one of the few the peeped its signal over the noise. https://crisismagazine.com/opinion/finding-common-ground-between-rome-and-the-sspx The key issue is contained in this paragraph: In the lead-up to the planned July 1, 2026, episcopal consecrations, the SSPX rejected Rome’s offer of doctrinal dialogue on the grounds that “we both know in advance that we cannot agree doctrinally, particularly regarding the fundamental orientations adopted since the Second Vatican Council.” Fr. Pagliarani also said that his previous attempt at dialogue in 2019 was shut down by Rome because of an assumed irreconcilability. It seems that, from the Society’s perspective, and perhaps from Rome’s too, their positions are incompatible. If memory serves, Rome killed any opportunity for an open discussion by stating that Vatican II was not up for debate. So it was a still-birth and ...

The News is an Addiction ...

+ JMJ People seem to be mesmerised by train wrecks. They just can't turn away as the disaster creeps forward along train tracks towards the crossing where a car, truck, bus, trailer awaits its destruction. Trads have been watching the train wreck that is this crisis of the Catholic Church for decades. The trade war between the Canada and the US has reminded me that the news is addictive. The first time I was addicted what from 2009 to 2014 when I was closely following the Rome / SSPX discussions. I was at work watching a live-stream as Bishop Fellay disappeared into the Vatican. The lead-up to this moment had been intense as the 'resistance' got freaked out and the cultural cracks between doctrine and conspiracy theory widened. In the decade since then other things have emerged, wars, rumours of wars, conspiracies, celebrity Catholics etc. Now we have a new addiction and its name is Trump. Lately, no matter how much I try, I find myself wonderin...

Thoughts on the Thoughts of a former SSPX priest

+ JMJ Well Gary Campbell, former SSPX Priest and now laicised has posted a new article on WherePeterIs. https://wherepeteris.com/thoughts-of-a-former-sspx-priest-on-the-july-1-consecrations/ These words stuck out: Heck, they have built a five-star hotel, wine bar, and Walmart on the opposite bank of the Rubicon! They are not in danger of entering a state of schism, for they are already in a state of schism. I believe he doth protest too much. All the actual facts indicate that the SSPX was not in a state of schism before July 1st and an examination of the decree of excommunication highlights the either ineptitude of those in charge or a desire to leave the barn door open. The chasm between an act of disobedience and act of schism remains just what is has always been - an inconvenient barrier that person(s) in Rome seek to bridge but appear incapable of succeeding. The SSPX re-stated that they recognize the Pope as the Vicar of Christ and feel obliged by conscience...

Tradicat

Search This Blog