Skip to main content

An Open Letter To Confused Traditional Catholics

 +
JMJ

It seems that the Crisis of the Catholic Church has cast a veil of confusion over all Catholics, as the ones in authority, that they should have been able to trust, have one by one betrayed this trust. Naturally, over 50+ years, this confusion has spread over the world as various individuals and groups vie for the attention of the masses.

Anyone who looks at various 'social media' apps will find people electronically screaming through your computer / cell phone / tablet to grab your attention, get a rise out of you, crank up your emotions and then keep them there.  

In this age of instant information gratification, it is easy to get lost in the noise. Just like in the image below, you can't see the real signal and those high peaks are just larger bursts of noise that spike up from the 'crowd' once in a while.There's no hidden message in the noise, it's just noise.  There's no way to distinguish the signal from the noise, the important from the unimportant.


As Traditional Catholics we have decades of examples of people following the noise. 

The Sedevacantists have been saying the decades that the See of Peter is vacant. Except, that can't be since the First Vatican Council declared that there would be popes until the end of the world.  But we really want an excuse to chuck the hierarchy - especially with Pope Francis.  It would be nice, but to do so it is necessary to deny a few Dogma's of the Catholic Church. In other words, you have to become a protestant, picking and choosing what to believe and what to creatively re-imagine.

Then we have the "Resistance", new (2012+) and old (1982+) who have been  screaming from YouTube videos of a sell-out by the SSPX.  Only, here we are a decade or in some cases 5 decades later and the SSPX is still doing what it does - adhering to the Teachings of the Catholic Church. Yet, in the absence of a real sell-out the resistance desperately looks for anything that they can point to and scream, "There look at that, it's a sell-out." The "Resistors" I know have made incredibly bad decisions. One in particular, started by hosting the "resistance" in St. Mary's, became disillusioned, shifted to another branch of "Resistors", then to the Sedevacantists, then another, and another - until ending up as home aloners. The last I heard they believe that they are part of the last faithful remnant of the Church. How is that Father providing for the spiritual welfare of his children?

Then you have the whining about COVID-19, masks, and conspiracy theories. 'nuff said on that mole hill.

On top of this we have the noise about vaccines, whether you can morally be vaccinated, the dangers of vaccinations, the dangers of not being vaccinated, whether the world power created the vaccine etc, etc, etc.  

One recent 'open letter' calls on Traditional Catholics (link) to follow the modern Catholics by setting aside the principles of St.Thomas Aquinas. Seriously, how can a Traditional Catholic write something like that and still think they're on the right path?  

In addition, people have said to me, "You know that your position on the vaccines runs against the majority of the Traditional Catholics". That is a really bad argument since, I could easy say, well the Traditional Catholics are a microscopic percentage of the Catholic Church and following that logic, we should accept the Novus Ordo Missae and Vatican Duo.  

With all these shiny things, Traditional Catholics are just being led by the laser pointer to the next 'BIG' thing. Whatever that may be.


This letter is my call to Traditional Catholics EVERYWHERE to step back from the madness, take a breath and start to think about what is really important. 

We are here to "Know, Love and Serve God in this life, so we can be happy with Him in the next"! For those who have forgotten, to be happy with Our Lord in the next life, we have to 'save our souls' first, then those for whom we are responsible.  

That means we need to do our duty of state and in this crisis it is harder, but not impossible.

We need to take care of our own duties before we help someone else.  That is their business, only when our own 'house' is in order can we move outwards.  For some it seems that the various crises are an excuse to step away from their duties. That is a big mistake.  If you don't do your duty, then you are in a death spiral.

Our duty of state is a filter that helps us to hear the signal, it tells us what we must do to be saved. It is the razors edge we must use to cut out the noise from our lives and realize what is important.

So, to all Traditional Catholics, understand your duty, fulfill it and stop messing around in other people's business. That's their problem, don't make it yours. 

Unless you are a politician, then you have an even bigger duty and should ask for prayers because that road is treacherous even for those with the burden to walk it.

Profit from this Advent, to understand your duty to God, country and family.

P^3


P.S. The Advent Series started on December 1st.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Father, Should I Attend That Mass?" Advice on Attending Non-SSPX Latin Masses

 + JMJ I see that the 'resistors' are in a tizzy because Fr. Robinson used them as an example instead of the sedevacantists. What is interesting is that you can apply the exact same reasons against going to a sede mass as that of the 'resistors'. Namely: On the other extreme are those situations where an SSPX priest knows that a certain non-SSPX traditionalist venue is a grave danger to the faith . Frankly, most, if not all, of the Resistance Masses would fall into this category. In many cases, the behavior of these priests has been and continues to be scandalous, by their (A) spirit, their (B) preaching, and their indiscriminate conferral of the (C) priesthood and (D) episcopacy. To attend a Mass with such ongoing scandals poses a serious danger to the souls of the faithful. Yep, looking at A,B,C and D the shoe fits. On this basis the "resistors" = "sedevacantists". P^3 Courtesy of SSPX.org   A companion article to a recent "Questions with ...

Correcting Caricatures of the SSPX

 + JMJ Introduction First, a little background on the FSSP St. John Vianney Chapel in Mission Hill Kansas.  After the 1988 consecrations and the foundation of the FSSP there was a consistent trend of Dioceses allowing the SSPX to run chapels and churches near SSPX locations. As with any 'organizational change' there were those who didn't agree with the change and no longer sought the sacraments from the SSPX. I heard from friends that in that era there was a lot of anger and tension (on both sides) between the St. Mary's SSPX and Mission Hill FSSP.  Second, there have been caricatures of the SSPX position (some are evident below) in which personal opinions of SSPX priests and laity are taken as the official position or conflated with those of sedevacantists or 'resistance'. Recent Perspectives of the SSPX Position In the shadow of the consecrations a fever pitch accusations and opinions how surfaced - many of which include caricatures of the SSPX positions, of w...

SSPX: Why Is the SSPX So Criticized?

 + JMJ As long as you are ok with what happens in other Catholic Churches, Traditional Catholics will be left 'alone'.  This is a paraphrase of words spoken by an Archbishop to Traditional Catholics (with a sprinkling of SSPX) who had requested the Traditional Latin Mass under Summorum Pontificum. This reflects that attitude of the Church towards anyone who takes issue with some of the ambiguities of Vatican II and the post-conciliar magisterium.  If you reject the papacy but are ok with V2, the New Mass, and what Rome has stated since 1965 - then you are welcome. Question some of the more abiguous statements and ask for Rome to realise that a circle is not a square - then you are in for a world of hurt. This is where the SSPX exists and has existed from almost its very first moments. Pointing out contradictions with previous magisterium is not acceptable - under any condition. Why? Because it will cause the whole V2 house of cards to fall. I guess only when the contradic...

Stories: Early Days of Tradition Part 8 - Convention Centre Chapel

 + JMJ I came to Tradition a few years after they had bought a chapel. My wife told me of the earlier years when Fr. Normandin would come to town and Mass would be held in a room at the convention centre.  He'd start by blessing the room and then proceed with Mass. This went on for a while before the one of the faithful found a small hall that would suit just fine. They pooled their money and bought the building.  Then came the work as the retiree's refinished the floor, setup the sactuary. Oh, did I mention that I heard that the hall had been used by a motorcycle gang? The floor needed a lot of work.  I remember seeing pictures of the founders working to make the hall into a fitting place for the Sacrifice of the Mass. That little chapel would be a refuge like many others serviced by Fr. Normandin.  From Thunderbay, Ontrario to Nanaimo, British Columbia - the SSPX chapels are all the results of Fr. Normandin's missionary work in those desperate times. Without h...

How many more must die for the throne? or How to combat FUD!

 + JMJ How many more must die for the throne? (Movie Quote: Prince Caspian) The Spread of Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt I've seen a lot of FUD spreading across the intergnat on various stats etc.   So let's put this in context ... especially the perspective of those people in positions of authority who need to make decisions to protect the lives of their citizens. Yep, this is going to be that type of post.  Like it or not the leaders of our governments have their authority from God.  So, as Catholics should know, you need to have a very good reason to deliberately disobey the orders of their superiors. This is basic St. Thomas Aquinas ... so don't blame me for discussing things from a Catholic perspective. The leaders of our countries have taken action to protect the vulnerable of our countries.   As much as the young and not-so-young may whine and complain - I have to ask how many more of our elderly have to die? What the armchair virologists and ec...