Skip to main content

Sunday as a Day of Rest

 +
JMJ

 One of the distinguishing features of modern Catholicism is irregularity. In the modern Church nothing is sacred or untouchable. The Tabernacle, shunted off to the side; kneelers, gone; altar boys, replaced by altar girls; reading of the gospel by the priest, long gone and now the readings by women an approved abuse; communion on the tongue, should've started with this one first eh?  

I think you get the picture - nothing that defines and separates Catholics seems to be reliable.

This includes the Sunday Obligation, which is a misnomer since you can now do it on Saturday evening. ... another thing for the list.

Well here's a little article from the SSPX on this topic.

P^3

Courtesy of FSSPX.news

 

The year 2021 marks the 1,700th anniversary of the consecration of Sunday as a weekly day of rest. Having become a precept of the Church, this institution has received many blows from the French Revolution to the present day.

The Justinian Code, a collection of imperial constitutions promulgated since Hadrian, and published in 528, traces Sunday rest to the Emperor St. Constantine.

Indeed, in the spring of 321, less than ten years after the victory of the Milvian Bridge which was an essential step on the road to power and his conversion to Christianity, the son of Constance Chlore and St. Helena addressed the vicar of Rome in these terms: “that all the judges, the urban plebs, the services of all the professions rest on the venerable day of the Sun” (Justinian code, III, XII, 2).

The emperor returned three months later, on July 3, 321, to the subject by insisting once again on the respect due to the first day of the week, evoking “the day of the Sun, consecrated by its veneration” (Theodosian code, II , VIII, 1).

The day of rest was not yet called “dies dominicus” or “Lord's day” by Constantine, but “day of the Sun” in reference to the “Undefeated Sun,” a name dear to the old Romans to designate the first day of the week.*

But make no mistake, it was the Christian faith, which would lead Constantine at the end of his life to ask for baptism, which inspired such a measure from the conqueror of Maxentius at the Milvian Bridge.

This notion of rest was still quite flexible: “In the country, however, persons engaged in agriculture may freely and lawfully continue their pursuits; because it often happens that another day is not so suitable for grain-sowing or vine-planting; lest by neglecting the proper moment for such operations the bounty of heaven should be lost,” says Constantine.

On the Church side, the oldest ecclesiastical law that has come down to us on this point is a canon of the Council of Laodicea, the date of which is uncertain, but which can be placed around A.D. 364.

The council ordered abstinence from work on Sundays “as much as possible,” a formula which suggests that the custom was still rather flexible.

Beginning with the reign of the emperor Theodosius (379-395), the reference to the sun gradually faded and passed from “the day of the sun, ritually called by our ancestors the day of the Lord [dies dominicus], which gets its name from what it represents.”

From the 6th century on, we see a proliferation of special councils that recalled the duty of Sunday rest and the days of obligation, all over the Church, up to St. Thomas Aquinas who systematized this doctrine, guided by the principle according to which servile works are prohibited insofar as they prevent man from applying himself to divine things.

We had to wait for the French Revolution to see Sunday rest attacked, in particular with the implementation of the “decadi.” The revolutionaries indeed established 10-day weeks, the last of which, the Decadi, was a nonworking day. This foolishness lasted less than 15 years.

Since the institution of Sunday rest continues to suffer attacks: sometimes attacked head-on and suppressed, sometimes rehabilitated, or trimmed as evidenced by the Macron Law of 2015—which extended the hours businesses may be open—named after the current president of France, who was at the time François Hollande's Minister of Finance.

[This is more obvious in countries with Latin-based languages, where the name of the day of the week has its root in the Latin “die dominicus”: the French, dimanche; the Spanish, domingo; the Italian, domenica. The Germanic languages retained the reference to the sun: the German, Sonntag, the English, Sunday, etc. – Trans. Note.]

 

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is Tradition?

 + JMJ What Is Tradition? The basic premise, from my perspective, is that what was taught before cannot be contradicted by the 'present' magisterium, only deepened and expanded upon. I recall the Roman theologians called the SSPX protestants while the SSPX called them modernists.  I believe this was all surrounding the concept of Traditon. SSPX's Understanding of Tradition One accusation made against the SSPX is that they don't have a correct understanding of 'Tradition'.  This is how the SSPX understands Tradition: I finally profess that Tradition is not a dead memory, but the living transmission of the doctrine received from the Apostles. It remains living, in distinction to Revelation, which is closed. It is so both in the activity of the Magisterium of the Teaching Church and in the profession of Faith of the Church Taught, of which the sentire cum Ecclesia is the result of the teaching of the Magisterium. Tradition may be called ‘living’, not in the sense t...

SSPX.ca: What is the position of the SSPX on Vatican II???

 + JMJ With all the mis-information about the SSPX rejecting the Second Vatican Council, I thought it would be useful to publish an article that focuses on the real issues that the SSPX has identified. Update: Why Did the SSPX Consecrate Bishops? ( Neither Schismatic, Nor Disobedient link ) In the linked document the SSPX outlined the key motivation and core issues with Vatican II and the post-conciliar magisterium (see above link for full document): 4. The Society Acted Precisely Because of the State of Necessity in Which the Faith Finds Itself  In the present situation of the Church, if the Society of Saint Pius X had not carried out the consecrations of July 1st, it would have found itself facing an inevitable alternative: either to disappear gradually, or to accept, at least in fact, the new liturgy as well as the false doctrines of Vatican II and the post-council. Without the consecrations of July 1st, the Fraternity would have found itself, in a few years, without bishop...

Thoughts on: Finding Common Ground Between Rome and the SSPX

 + JMJ In the ramp up to the consecrations the noise floor in the intergnat grew to a constant din.  This was one of the few the peeped its signal over the noise. https://crisismagazine.com/opinion/finding-common-ground-between-rome-and-the-sspx The key issue is contained in this paragraph: In the lead-up to the planned July 1, 2026, episcopal consecrations,  the SSPX rejected Rome’s offer  of doctrinal dialogue on the grounds that “we both know in advance that we cannot agree doctrinally, particularly regarding the fundamental orientations adopted since the Second Vatican Council.” Fr. Pagliarani also said that his previous attempt at dialogue in 2019 was shut down by Rome because of an assumed irreconcilability. It seems that, from the Society’s perspective, and perhaps from Rome’s too, their positions are incompatible. If memory serves, Rome killed any opportunity for an open discussion by stating that Vatican II was not up for debate. So it was a still-birth and ...

The News is an Addiction ...

 + JMJ People seem to be mesmerised by train wrecks.   They just can't turn away as the disaster creeps forward along train tracks towards the crossing where a car, truck, bus, trailer awaits its destruction. Trads have been watching the train wreck that is this crisis of the Catholic Church for decades. The trade war between the Canada and the US has reminded me that the news is addictive.   The first time I was addicted what from 2009 to  2014 when I was closely following the Rome / SSPX discussions.  I was at work watching a live-stream as Bishop Fellay disappeared into the Vatican. The lead-up to this moment had been intense as the 'resistance' got freaked out and the cultural cracks between doctrine and conspiracy theory widened. In the decade since then other things have emerged, wars, rumours of wars, conspiracies, celebrity Catholics etc. Now we have a new addiction and its name is Trump. Lately, no matter how much I try, I find myself wonderin...

Thoughts on the Thoughts of a former SSPX priest

 + JMJ Well Gary Campbell, former SSPX Priest and now laicised has posted a new article on WherePeterIs. https://wherepeteris.com/thoughts-of-a-former-sspx-priest-on-the-july-1-consecrations/ These words stuck out: Heck, they have built a five-star hotel, wine bar, and Walmart on the opposite bank of the Rubicon! They are not in danger of entering a state of schism, for they are  already  in a state of schism. I believe he doth protest too much. All the actual facts indicate that the SSPX was not in a state of schism before July 1st and an examination of the decree of excommunication highlights the either ineptitude of those in charge or a desire to leave the barn door open. The chasm between an act of disobedience and act of schism remains just what is has always been - an inconvenient barrier that person(s) in Rome seek to bridge but appear incapable of succeeding. The SSPX re-stated that they recognize the Pope as the Vicar of Christ and feel obliged by conscience...