Skip to main content

Sunday as a Day of Rest

 +
JMJ

 One of the distinguishing features of modern Catholicism is irregularity. In the modern Church nothing is sacred or untouchable. The Tabernacle, shunted off to the side; kneelers, gone; altar boys, replaced by altar girls; reading of the gospel by the priest, long gone and now the readings by women an approved abuse; communion on the tongue, should've started with this one first eh?  

I think you get the picture - nothing that defines and separates Catholics seems to be reliable.

This includes the Sunday Obligation, which is a misnomer since you can now do it on Saturday evening. ... another thing for the list.

Well here's a little article from the SSPX on this topic.

P^3

Courtesy of FSSPX.news

 

The year 2021 marks the 1,700th anniversary of the consecration of Sunday as a weekly day of rest. Having become a precept of the Church, this institution has received many blows from the French Revolution to the present day.

The Justinian Code, a collection of imperial constitutions promulgated since Hadrian, and published in 528, traces Sunday rest to the Emperor St. Constantine.

Indeed, in the spring of 321, less than ten years after the victory of the Milvian Bridge which was an essential step on the road to power and his conversion to Christianity, the son of Constance Chlore and St. Helena addressed the vicar of Rome in these terms: “that all the judges, the urban plebs, the services of all the professions rest on the venerable day of the Sun” (Justinian code, III, XII, 2).

The emperor returned three months later, on July 3, 321, to the subject by insisting once again on the respect due to the first day of the week, evoking “the day of the Sun, consecrated by its veneration” (Theodosian code, II , VIII, 1).

The day of rest was not yet called “dies dominicus” or “Lord's day” by Constantine, but “day of the Sun” in reference to the “Undefeated Sun,” a name dear to the old Romans to designate the first day of the week.*

But make no mistake, it was the Christian faith, which would lead Constantine at the end of his life to ask for baptism, which inspired such a measure from the conqueror of Maxentius at the Milvian Bridge.

This notion of rest was still quite flexible: “In the country, however, persons engaged in agriculture may freely and lawfully continue their pursuits; because it often happens that another day is not so suitable for grain-sowing or vine-planting; lest by neglecting the proper moment for such operations the bounty of heaven should be lost,” says Constantine.

On the Church side, the oldest ecclesiastical law that has come down to us on this point is a canon of the Council of Laodicea, the date of which is uncertain, but which can be placed around A.D. 364.

The council ordered abstinence from work on Sundays “as much as possible,” a formula which suggests that the custom was still rather flexible.

Beginning with the reign of the emperor Theodosius (379-395), the reference to the sun gradually faded and passed from “the day of the sun, ritually called by our ancestors the day of the Lord [dies dominicus], which gets its name from what it represents.”

From the 6th century on, we see a proliferation of special councils that recalled the duty of Sunday rest and the days of obligation, all over the Church, up to St. Thomas Aquinas who systematized this doctrine, guided by the principle according to which servile works are prohibited insofar as they prevent man from applying himself to divine things.

We had to wait for the French Revolution to see Sunday rest attacked, in particular with the implementation of the “decadi.” The revolutionaries indeed established 10-day weeks, the last of which, the Decadi, was a nonworking day. This foolishness lasted less than 15 years.

Since the institution of Sunday rest continues to suffer attacks: sometimes attacked head-on and suppressed, sometimes rehabilitated, or trimmed as evidenced by the Macron Law of 2015—which extended the hours businesses may be open—named after the current president of France, who was at the time François Hollande's Minister of Finance.

[This is more obvious in countries with Latin-based languages, where the name of the day of the week has its root in the Latin “die dominicus”: the French, dimanche; the Spanish, domingo; the Italian, domenica. The Germanic languages retained the reference to the sun: the German, Sonntag, the English, Sunday, etc. – Trans. Note.]

 

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Count Capponi - RIP

+ JMJ I had heard of Count Capponi over the years and was happy to hear a voice crying in the wilderness. I suspect that his conscience was clearer than many. This part of the article caught my attention: Capponi defended the right of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre to continue his work without the label “schismatic,” which term Capponi rejected, saying: “You cannot apply the standards of the new code of canon law and the mentality of the old code. According to the new code, Lefebvre could do what he did with a Catholic intention, and he did what he did in ‘sincerity’ and invoked the ‘state of emergency’ argument, which the new code permits. You might not like the new code, but it’s what governs the Church.” I know a few people who tried to stir up a fuss when the SSPX cited the New Code in one of the documents with Rome.  Yet, the truth is what it is --- the New Code was promulgated by a reigning Pope and flawed as it is ... there are some benefits to its liberality. ...

Is it sinful to attend the Novus Ordo (New Mass) - Is it Sinful to Not Attend the Novus Ordo on Sunday?

+ JMJ A non-SSPX Catholic is upset over the SSPX statements on not attending the Novus Ordo Missae. Ladies and gentlemen, what the SSPX, or at least its website editor, is advocating is a mortal sin against the Third Commandment.  Unless the priest deviates from the language of the Sacramentary, the consecration, and thus the rest of Mass is to be considered valid.  No one may elect not to attend Mass simply because abuses are occurring therein.  Might I suggest that such absenteeism is its own abuse?  The Third Commandment binds under mortal sin.  Father So-And-So from the SSPX has no authority whatsoever to excuse attendance at Mass, be that Mass ever so unpalatable. Source:Restore DC Catholicism Well, this is interesting. First why does the SSPX issue this statement? Because it is sinful to put your faith in danger by attending a protestant service.  It is likewise dangerous to put your faith in danger by attending a protestantized ma...

Those who return to the past are not outside the Church - Rorate Caeli

+ JMJ I had been thinking about putting together a post explaining some of the history of how the SSPX has arrived at its current position. Now I see that Rorate has posted a translated editorial that shows the roots of the SSPX principles. In reading these words, I see patterns and themes that were put forward by Archbishop Lefebvre decades ago. Perhaps his sight was clearer than most. P^3

Fr. Burfitt on Fr. Pfeiffer's Attempted Consecration

 + JMJ   Amidst the shadows cast by the publication of Traditionis Custodes, I am working on a map of the 'resistance' splinters to put their reaction in contrast with that of the SSPX.  In the midst of this, I just came across Fr. Burfitt letter on the attempted consecration. Breaking it down (see below)  items 2 and 3 are key.  Just as the consecrating bishop is 'doubtful', even if he hadn't muffed the first attempt, Fr. Pfeiffer remain doubtful and therefore this impacts those men is attempts to 'ordain'. There were rumours that Fr. Pfeiffer was seeking episcopal consecration for years as he cast about for various bishops (also doubtful) to help him achieve this goal. I wonder how he convinced the 'doubtful' bishop to provide (twice) the doubtful consecration. What a mess!  This creates a danger to the souls of his followers and wonder where it will end. Will he go full sede and have himself 'elected' pontiff as others have done before him...

SSPX Transfers

+ JMJ Eponymous flow posted the following list of transfers etc. Source: http://eponymousflower.blogspot.com/2020/04/castling-of-leadership-at-sspx.html The departures Bishop Bernard Fellay, the third Superior General until 2018, leaves the General House in Menzingen and moves to the Seminary of St. Thomas Aquinas in the USA. Bishop Bernard Tissier de Mallerais, suffering from ill health, is being referred to the Seminary of St. Pius X in Ecene as a retreat. Fr. Christian Thouvenot, until now Secretary General of the General House, becomes a professor at the seminary in Ecene. Fr. Franz Schmidberger, until now Rector at the Seminary of the Heart of Jesus in Zaitzkofen, moves to the district of Germany. Fr. Jürgen Wegner, until now district superior of the DISTRICT USA, moves to the district of Austria. Fr. Philippe Brunet, until now Superior of the Autonomous House of Spain-Portugal, becomes professor at the Seminary U.L.F. and co-saviour of La Reja in...