Skip to main content

Sunday as a Day of Rest

 +
JMJ

 One of the distinguishing features of modern Catholicism is irregularity. In the modern Church nothing is sacred or untouchable. The Tabernacle, shunted off to the side; kneelers, gone; altar boys, replaced by altar girls; reading of the gospel by the priest, long gone and now the readings by women an approved abuse; communion on the tongue, should've started with this one first eh?  

I think you get the picture - nothing that defines and separates Catholics seems to be reliable.

This includes the Sunday Obligation, which is a misnomer since you can now do it on Saturday evening. ... another thing for the list.

Well here's a little article from the SSPX on this topic.

P^3

Courtesy of FSSPX.news

 

The year 2021 marks the 1,700th anniversary of the consecration of Sunday as a weekly day of rest. Having become a precept of the Church, this institution has received many blows from the French Revolution to the present day.

The Justinian Code, a collection of imperial constitutions promulgated since Hadrian, and published in 528, traces Sunday rest to the Emperor St. Constantine.

Indeed, in the spring of 321, less than ten years after the victory of the Milvian Bridge which was an essential step on the road to power and his conversion to Christianity, the son of Constance Chlore and St. Helena addressed the vicar of Rome in these terms: “that all the judges, the urban plebs, the services of all the professions rest on the venerable day of the Sun” (Justinian code, III, XII, 2).

The emperor returned three months later, on July 3, 321, to the subject by insisting once again on the respect due to the first day of the week, evoking “the day of the Sun, consecrated by its veneration” (Theodosian code, II , VIII, 1).

The day of rest was not yet called “dies dominicus” or “Lord's day” by Constantine, but “day of the Sun” in reference to the “Undefeated Sun,” a name dear to the old Romans to designate the first day of the week.*

But make no mistake, it was the Christian faith, which would lead Constantine at the end of his life to ask for baptism, which inspired such a measure from the conqueror of Maxentius at the Milvian Bridge.

This notion of rest was still quite flexible: “In the country, however, persons engaged in agriculture may freely and lawfully continue their pursuits; because it often happens that another day is not so suitable for grain-sowing or vine-planting; lest by neglecting the proper moment for such operations the bounty of heaven should be lost,” says Constantine.

On the Church side, the oldest ecclesiastical law that has come down to us on this point is a canon of the Council of Laodicea, the date of which is uncertain, but which can be placed around A.D. 364.

The council ordered abstinence from work on Sundays “as much as possible,” a formula which suggests that the custom was still rather flexible.

Beginning with the reign of the emperor Theodosius (379-395), the reference to the sun gradually faded and passed from “the day of the sun, ritually called by our ancestors the day of the Lord [dies dominicus], which gets its name from what it represents.”

From the 6th century on, we see a proliferation of special councils that recalled the duty of Sunday rest and the days of obligation, all over the Church, up to St. Thomas Aquinas who systematized this doctrine, guided by the principle according to which servile works are prohibited insofar as they prevent man from applying himself to divine things.

We had to wait for the French Revolution to see Sunday rest attacked, in particular with the implementation of the “decadi.” The revolutionaries indeed established 10-day weeks, the last of which, the Decadi, was a nonworking day. This foolishness lasted less than 15 years.

Since the institution of Sunday rest continues to suffer attacks: sometimes attacked head-on and suppressed, sometimes rehabilitated, or trimmed as evidenced by the Macron Law of 2015—which extended the hours businesses may be open—named after the current president of France, who was at the time François Hollande's Minister of Finance.

[This is more obvious in countries with Latin-based languages, where the name of the day of the week has its root in the Latin “die dominicus”: the French, dimanche; the Spanish, domingo; the Italian, domenica. The Germanic languages retained the reference to the sun: the German, Sonntag, the English, Sunday, etc. – Trans. Note.]

 

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Comparision of the Tridentine, Cranmer and Novus Ordo Masses

+ JMJ I downloaded the comparison that was linked in the previous article on the mass (here) . ... a very good reference! P^3 From: Whispers of Restoration (available at this link) . CHARTING LITURGICAL CHANGE Comparing the 1962 Ordinary of the Roman Mass to changes made during the Anglican Schism; Compared in turn to changes adopted in the creation of Pope Paul VI’s Mass in 1969 The chart on the reverse is a concise comparison of certain ritual differences between three historical rites for the celebration of the Catholic Mass Vetus Ordo: “Old Order,” the Roman Rite of Mass as contained in the 1962 Missal, often referred to as the “Traditional Latin Mass.”The Ordinary of this Mass is that of Pope St. Pius V (1570) following the Council of Trent (1545-63), hence the occasional moniker “Tridentine Mass.” However, Trent only consolidated and codified the Roman Rite already in use at that time; its essential form dates to Pope St. Gregory the Great (+604), in whose time the R...

SSPX and the Resistance - A Comparison Of Ecclesiology

Shining the light of Church Teaching on the doctrinal positions of the SSPX and the Resistance. Principles are guides used to aid in decision making.  It stands to reason that bad principles will lead to bad decisions. The recent interactions between Rome and the SSPX has challenged a number of closely held cultural assumptions of people in both sides of the disagreement. This has resulted in cultural skirmishes in both Rome and the SSPX. Since it is the smaller of the two, the skirmishes have been more evident within the SSPX.  The cultural fault-line that Bishop Fellay crossed appears to be linked to two points of Catholic Doctrine: Ecclesiology and Obedience.  The cultural difference of view points is strong enough that it has resulted in the expulsion of a number of members.  It should also be noted that some other priests expelled since the beginning of the latest interactions (starting in 2000) held the same view points and have joined with the l...

If Pope Francis is bad - what about Pope St. John Paul II et al?

+ JMJ So here we are on the apparent cusp of yet another post conciliar Papal canonization. This time we have Pope's John-Paul I and Paul VI canonizations to 'look forward' to. This follows, obviously, on the heels of Pope St. John Paul II's canonization? So the first question that I usually encounter is: How is it possible, keeping in mind the doctrine on infallibility of canonizations (note doctrine not dogma), that Pope St. John Paul II is a Saint? First, what does it mean???  According to the doctrine of dogmatic facts - it is the universal opinion of Theologians that canonizations are infallible.  It means that they enjoy the beatific vision.  ... that's it.  That is the doctrine and it is at the level of universal opinion of theologians.  It is called a 'dogmatic fact'. That they made mistakes is obvious.  That the miracles seem to not be very miraculous is also a bit of an issue. Here's something to consider: The rush that surrou...

Spiritual Journey Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre - Extracts

+ JMJ I have posted these two chapters to provide context for the quote of: It is, therefore, a strict duty for every priest wanting to remain Catholic to separate himself from this Conciliar Church for as long as it does not rediscover the Tradition of the Church and of the Catholic Faith. P^3 Courtesy of SSPX.ca Chapter II The Perfections of God We ought to remember during this entire contemplation of God that we must apply all that is said of God to Our Lord Jesus Christ, Who is God. We cannot separate Jesus Christ from God. We cannot separate the Christian religion from Jesus Christ, Who is God, and we must affirm and believe that only the Catholic religion is the Christian religion. These affirmations have, as a result, inescapable conclusions that no ecclesiastic authority can contest: outside of Jesus Christ and the Catholic religion, that is, outsi...

Dogmas of the Catholic Faith (de fide) - Expanded Listing: Answer for Reader

 + JMJ  A reader asked the following question in the 2015 version of the article on the Dogmas of the Catholic Faith (link) : 117: "In the state of fallen nature it is morally impossible for man without Supernatural Revelation, to know easily, with absolute certainty and without admixture of error, all religious and moral truths of the natural order." Where can you find this in the documents of the Church? ( Link to comment )  Here's the reference from Ott: The citation that Ott provided was Denzinger 1786 and the source document is Dogmatic Consitution Concerning the Faith from the First Vatican Council (Papal Encyclicals - link) : Chapter 2 On Revelation, Article 3: It is indeed thanks to this divine revelation , that those matters concerning God, which are not of themselves beyond the scope of human reason, can, even in the present state of the human race, be known by everyone, without difficulty, with firm certitude and with no intermingling of error. Here's ...