Skip to main content

Black, White, Speckled and Muddy (slightly updated ...)

 +
JMJ

 

Wikicommons

Introduction

There has been a lot of chatter in the blogosphere about cannibalism, vaccines, abortion, fetal cell lines, lockdowns, masks, protests and Catholicism.

Not your normal word association eh?

How Catholics deal with the "World, Flesh and Devil" is, I feel, like holding up a mirror and not liking what we see.

Please don't be hasty and post a comment ... just yet.

Reality: The World isn't and People aren't Black and White / Good and Evil

First, the Black and White issues are, sadly, not as common as we would like to believe. They exist in the theological and theoretical realms, but once we try to categorize people as evil or good it gets more difficult.

The reason is simple ...

Most humans aren't wholly good or wholly bad. They are speckled, with varying degrees of black and white. Some people have groups of speckles that become splotches.  Yet, they still aren't wholly evil or for that matter wholly good.  The same applies to us Catholics. We are just as tainted with the effects of original sin and, since we have been given the truth, will be held to a much higher standard when we face our Judge.

So you see, in the real world, far removed from the esoteric thoughts of theologians, black and white doesn't make grey - because human, world, and spirits are involved it is muddy.

Example

Case in point is the debate about the liceity of vaccines that in some manner have been tainted by the murder of a baby.

On one side we have the Anti-Abortion lobby.  Yes, that is what they are - lobbyists. Who want,rightly, to end the murder of innocents by the millions. 

On the other side you have the industrial lobby.  To these you can add practically any biological company that makes use of human and animal derived products. Yes the abortion providers are included in this mess, but they are just the sharp end of the spear in this case. 

I've done a cursory check and the moral taint of abortions extends well beyond vaccines. If you truly want to avoid the taint of abortion, it looks like you'll need to move off grid to Antarctica and live off whatever you can grow.  Don't even think about eating fish because a lot of morally tainted products have been eaten by them and you will be benefiting from immoral acts.

The rest of us are caught in the moral kill-zone framed by these groups. That's where having recourse to principles and moral theology are important not just for this situation by living in a world that is not Catholic and barely christian.

Living in the Real World - Stockdale Paradox

 As Catholics we need to practice the virtues of Faith, Hope and Charity. This is, to some degree embeded in the Stockdale Paradox (source: Wikipedia / The Good to Great - Jim Collins)

James C. Collins related a conversation he had with Stockdale regarding his coping strategy during his period in the Vietnamese POW camp.[21][non-primary source needed] When Collins asked which prisoners didn't make it out of Vietnam, Stockdale replied:

Oh, that's easy, the optimists. Oh, they were the ones who said, 'We're going to be out by Christmas.' And Christmas would come, and Christmas would go. Then they'd say, 'We're going to be out by Easter.' And Easter would come, and Easter would go. And then Thanksgiving, and then it would be Christmas again. And they died of a broken heart. This is a very important lesson. You must never confuse faith that you will prevail in the end—which you can never afford to lose—with the discipline to confront the most brutal facts of your current reality, whatever they might be.[22]

Collins called this the Stockdale Paradox.[21]  

So we need to continually practice virtue, while at the same time dealing with the reality.  The Catholic Church is, morally, leaderless.  As Elrond said (slightly modified for today's situation):

Catholics? Catholics are weak. [...] It is because of Catholics that Modernism survives. I was there. I was there 50 years ago ... when Popes John and Paul gave Modernism power. I was there the day the strength of Catholics failed. I led the Pope into the heart of the Church, where Neo-Modernism festered, the one place it could be destroyed! It should have ended that day, but evil was allowed to endure. Paul kept the Modernists. .... There's no strength left in the world of Catholics. They're scattered, divided, leaderless." 

Catholics are not united and therefore christians and the world have lost their lodestone for truth, morality and principles.

So we have to deal with the reality that:

  • By and large the Catholic Church is infested with error and the erroneous. 
  • There's still a Pope, a Vicar of Christ, but like many bishops, priests, religious, they are not leading in accordance with Catholic Teaching.
  • The world largely has abandoned the foundations of Christianity.
  • We are living in a world Fatima's warning about errors being spread confronts us on a daily basis.

We live in a tainted, muddy world and the way we will save our souls is by practicing virtue. That is what we must do, should our burdens, help others with their loads and trudge along the path of life.

The Hill To Die On

So what is the hill that we need to die on?

When we are asked to sin, that's where we need to take a stand.  If you don't agree with the causal intentions - then hundreds of years of Catholic thinking teaches us what we can and cannot do.  

Remote cooperation in evil means that you can be vaccinated if you want, but you can't be forced to be vaccinated. It also means that there are obligations that we have to address the cooperation.

Last Thought

I had to opportunity to speak with a scientist who was a student in Beijing the summer of  1989.  He was in Beijing when the army moved into the square.

I asked him what he did ... his reply surprised me.  He got on a train and got out of Beijing as quickly as he could.

There's wisdom in his response. All the protestors achieved was to give the government the excuse to issue the orders to disperse the demonstrators. 

The scientist's response showed that that wasn't the hill he wanted to die on.

It also reminds me of something my Dad, having escaped from the communists after the war, said to some family members,

You talk too much.

There are things that you may want to say, but do you truly have a duty to say them. More importantly, when you say them are you certain that they will create a good outcome or will they make a bad situation worse?  Will they make a good or neutral situation a bad one?

Have the protests done any good?  From where I'm standing on a hill of principle of virtue (I hope) the anti-maskers and anti-vaxxers, are just giving the government the excuse to ignore them and exclude them as a legitimate factor in making decisions.  All because they picked what they though was a hill, but turned out to be a mound of private opinions instead of principles.

We need to weigh our words and actions carefully as once said or done, they cannot be unsaid or undone.

The world is a muddy place, chose your path with prudence.

P^3


 





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

De Veritate - St. Thomas Aquinas - What is necessary to believe explicitly?

I was recently introduced to a work of St. Thomas De Veritate ( Source ) in the course of an argument concerning the minimum content of explicit faith.  When I submitted the following quote as proof: Theological faith, that is, a supernatural faith in Revelation, is necessary, and this is an effect of grace (D 1789); nemini unquam sine ilIa contigit iustificatio (D 1793). As far as the content of this faith is concerned, according to Hebr. 11, 6, at least the existence of God and retribution in the other world must be firmly held, necessitate medii (by the necessity of means) with explicit faith. In regard to the Trinity and the Incarnation, implicit faith suffices. The supernatural faith necessary for justification is attained when God grants to the unbeliever by internal inspiration or external teaching a knowledge of the truths of Revelation, and actual grace to make the supernatural act of faith. Cf. De verite 14, I I.Ott - Fundamentals of Dogma p241 In response my opponent ...

Comparision of the Tridentine, Cranmer and Novus Ordo Masses

+ JMJ I downloaded the comparison that was linked in the previous article on the mass (here) . ... a very good reference! P^3 From: Whispers of Restoration (available at this link) . CHARTING LITURGICAL CHANGE Comparing the 1962 Ordinary of the Roman Mass to changes made during the Anglican Schism; Compared in turn to changes adopted in the creation of Pope Paul VI’s Mass in 1969 The chart on the reverse is a concise comparison of certain ritual differences between three historical rites for the celebration of the Catholic Mass Vetus Ordo: “Old Order,” the Roman Rite of Mass as contained in the 1962 Missal, often referred to as the “Traditional Latin Mass.”The Ordinary of this Mass is that of Pope St. Pius V (1570) following the Council of Trent (1545-63), hence the occasional moniker “Tridentine Mass.” However, Trent only consolidated and codified the Roman Rite already in use at that time; its essential form dates to Pope St. Gregory the Great (+604), in whose time the R...

Rome and the SSPX - Version 2026 Part 5b - How Did We Get Here??? ... A Continued Anlaysis using ChatGPT.

 + JMJ Part 5b How Did We Get Here??? So in the previous ChatGPT analysis the LLM ‘concluded’ that there was continuity in doctrine. So now we’re going to explore this element. There is some repetition but I don't have time right now to do a lot of editing.  I think instead we'll have a Part 5c where I try to pull it all together with some old fashioned human sense making. At the end point, I think the LLM collects an interesting if somewhat skewed perspective: The SSPX mapping hinges on this claim: That Vatican II affirms (at least implicitly) propositions that the Syllabus of Errors explicitly condemned. The broader Church response is: The same propositions are still rejected—but Vatican II is addressing different categories (political, pastoral, anthropological) rather than reversing doctrine. While the summary of the SSPX position seems close, that of the broader Church seems to be either an outright AI hallucination or a consensus point from the literature that it used...

News Roundup: April 30, 2026

 + JMJ I just realised that I haven't posted the latest Roundup ... and there is a lot in the roundup as the media storm around the SSPX continues! I also just noticed this article: European Conservative: Why the SSPX Bishop Decision Matters Far Beyond Church Politics (link) .  P^3 === Popes Past Present and Future Papal News and Views Cardinal Fernandez maintains that Francis is not dead- metaphorically Pope Leo XIV Reopens Amoris Laetitia File | FSSPX News Pope Leo: “We Do Not Agree with the Formalized Blessing of …Homosexual Couples” - OnePeterFive RORATE CÆLI: How Pope Leo is Reshuffling the Curia: Musical Chairs and Power Games RORATE CÆLI: A Giant Leap: The meaning of Cardinal Eijk’s Pontifical High Mass and the Rebirth of Dutch Catholicism RORATE CÆLI: A Sign of Continuity with the Pre-Francis Papacy: Pope to Wash Feet of Twelve Priests RORATE CÆLI: Vatican Blocks Continuity of Procedure of Beatification and Canonization of Argentine Bishop -- no new Satanellis Pope Leo...

Rome and the SSPX - Version 2026 Part 5 - How Did We Get Here???

 + JMJ This is the fifth in this series and I think it may require a part b to show the controversial documents and teachings of the Pope post V2. P^3 Part 5 How Did We Get Here??? Introduction My family became ‘Traditional’ in early 1980’s and I didn’t realise until years later how early we entered the Fray. So the SSPX was slightly over a decade old when we started going to Mass. That is a young organization, as someone said at the consecrations “Aren’t you a little young to be a bishop?”, the response was, “That is something that time will change.” 1970: SSPX founded with diocesan approval (Abp. Marcel Lefebvre) 1974–1976: Vatican II disputes escalate; Lefebvre suspended a divinis 1988: Illicit episcopal consecrations → excommunications declared 2000: SSPX Jubilee pilgrimage to Rome (signals openness to talks) 2009: Excommunications lifted by Pope Benedict XVI 2011–2012: Doctrinal talks with CDF collapse 2015–2017: SSPX granted faculties for confessi...