COVID-19 Vaccines, Aborted Baby Cell-Lines and Catholic Moral Theology - Part G: Does the Principle of Double Effect Apply?

JMJ

I was thinking the statement I made yesterday in this article (link):

The principle of double effect doesn't apply since the actual act of murder (abortion) occurred decades ago.

I realised that perhaps the principle of double effect (link to article) does apply when focused on the act of receiving a morally tainted vaccine.

As discussed in the article, the principle of double-effect has four criteria.

The act must be moral, meaning it cannot be immoral (ie evil). This is the simple principle that the ends do not justify the means.
Any bad effect (result) must be accidental or indirectly caused, whereas the good effect is directly caused.
The intention that directs the action must be to create only the good effect. For example, you cannot intend to kill someone, but you can intend to protect your life.
Finally, the intended effect must be proportional to the intended end.

Let's do this by the numbers

Act - Receiving a vaccine: In itself the act of receiving a vaccine is morally licit.
Bad effect - cooperation in evil: In receiving a morally-tainted vaccine, we are remotely cooperating in the evil of the murder of an unborn baby that occurred decades in the past.
Intention - protection from COVID-19: The intention is to protect ourselves or others from a disease (i.e.virus) that has deadly effect on some people and debilitating on others.
Intended effect - Proportional to bad effect: The bad effect is remote cooperation in evil, with the good effect the preservation of life.

So in this situation the principle of double effect can be applied and the answer is still the same.

You can licitly receive the vaccinations.

This is not the hill the you need to die on ....

P^3

Comments

Facts and Opinions - An Explanation

+ JMJ When a person's assumptions are events outside of their control they form an opinion and, in my experience, assert this opinion to be fact. So ... it is important to define some terms:

The Curious Case of Steve Skojec and the Dangers of Deep Diving into the Crisis Sub-Titled: The Failings of Others

+ JMJ It's been a while now since Steve Skojec sold 1P5 and abandoned the Catholic Faith. I've been a 'Trad' since 1982 and in those 40+ years I seen this death-spiral before with a similar end point. It seems that anyone who jumps into the fray unprepared for the enormous task of righting wrongs will, eventually, become discouraged by not the task but the people who surround them. I remember when Skojec complained of the treatment his family received from a traditional priest. This seems to have been the start of the end for him. So what can we learn from the likes of Steve Skojec, Michael Voris (maybe?), Louie Verrecchio, Gerry Matatix and other celebrity Catholics? Probably quite a lot about what not to do. First, don't burn out on the crisis? When you burn out, on work or anything else, little things assume a more greater importance than they are due. This is one of my 'canary in the coal mine' signals that I've been stretching myself too th...

Tradical Commentary on: Restore DC Catholicism: SSPX And Austrilian Bishops - Two Different Errors

+ JMJ An interesting thing has happened on the discussion that prompted my article on whether it is sinful to attend the Novus Ordo Missae . The blog owner of RDCC has shut down discussion by locking the article. That is their prerogative, but I am puzzled as to why? Perhaps it has something to do with some of the latter comments. They didn't believe the teaching on intention with regards to confecting the Sacraments. This is not the first time I've experienced incredulity on this topic ( reference articles ). Really this isn't about what they believe but the truth. They seem to believe that the objections to the Novus Ordo Missae are simply about "overly delicate sensibilities". In response to this I am reblogging a number of articles by the SSPX. Perhaps it was the comment made by Bishop Schneider, a currently well revered hero (who deserved the accolades) but apparently has said something similar to the SSPX. I suspect that it is more...

Communique about Avrille Dominicans - SSPX.org

+ JMJ Having completed the review of the 'Avrille' perspective, this communique from the French District Superior is perfectly timed. I believe that the 'resistance' has lost rationality and further argumentation simply results in their holding on to their false ideal all the more firmly. Pray much ... First, for them to acquiesce to the grace of humility in order to obtain a clear perspective on the principles involved. Second, that we may remain faithful to the Church, and Her Dogmas, Doctrines and Principles. Lest we become that which against we strove ... P^3 Courtesy of SSPX.org

Australia: Seal of the Confessional Outlawed at the Federal Level

+ JMJ This is simply another step in the attack on the Catholic Church. Interestingly, California's attempt to do the same failed. P^3 Courtesy of FSSPX.news Australia: Seal of the Confessional Outlawed at the Federal Level December 19, 2019 Source: fsspx.news On December 2, 2019, the Australian Conference of Bishops (ACBC) denounced the agreement between the Attorneys General of each state and the Australian federal government, with the aim of standardizing the laws imposing on priests the obligation to denounce any alleged fact of ill-treatment of minors that would be learned in the context of the sacrament of penance. “Counterproductive and unjust” are the terms with which Archbishop Mark Coleridge, Archbishop of Brisbane and President of the ACBC, denounced the new prejudicial legal norms on the sacramental seal of the confessional in Australia. The attorneys gener...

Tradicat

Search This Blog