Skip to main content

COVID-19 Vaccines, Aborted Baby Cell-Lines and Catholic Moral Theology - Part F: Is it sinful to be innoculated with the COVID-19 Vaccines?

 +
JMJ

 After all this research, I now come to the final question: Is it sinful for us to be innoculated with a COVID-19 vaccines?

There are three factors to consider: morality, safety and efficacy.

First the easy topic: safety and efficacy.

When the H1N1 vaccine was pushed through at an alarming rate, I had concerns and did researched both H1N1 and the vaccine impacts. For H1N1 this meant the likelihood of various impacts ... like death, cronic deficits, etc.  For the vaccine I focused on adverse events.

I found that the risk /benefit ratio was about 1:1. Meaning the chances of an adverse reaction were on par with the chances of serious disease.  

There was also a lot of pressure to receive the vaccine and, as usual, my wife and I took a cautious approach - first by waiting for results from the first batch of immunizations. What did we discover, that that particular version increased miscarriages in pregnant women.  ... my wife at the time was pregnant.

The other version did not have this issue.

When we discussed it with our doctor, she tried to pressure us into getting the family immunized. We discussed the risk /benefits with her and when we decided then and there to not proceed we were in for a surprise.  Once our decision was made she told us that her son was immunized and had an adverse reaction.  The reaction was as bad as the worst H1N1 had to offer.

So we were very happy to not be part of that bit of history.

Now for the more important factor: Morality.

 As the attached map shows, the Vatican's explanation is quite involved and difficult to follow in some places. I highlighted key line crossing elements in red, material coop / on the line in orange, safety in  green and finally what we need to do in purple.

It all comes down to your intention and some form of sin of scandal.

For the people doing the research, there is a serious obligation to look for moral alternative production methods.

For people using the vaccines, there is a serious obligation to apply pressure to the governments to support research for these same moral alternative production methods. This was reiterated in a clear fashion by the Vatican in 2017 (see end of this post). I know that in 2017 LifeSite News and Catholic Culture felt that this was a shift. Having read both documents and broken them out --- the answer is no. Nothing is changed, they just highlighted what I noted in my own analysis. The cooperation is distantly remote.

For people in between these groups, it is more complicated.  I am now one of these people as I am now peripherally involved in vaccine development and will be taking my own advice.

P^3

 



 



Further Reading:

https://www.voanews.com/covid-19-pandemic/australian-religious-leaders-criticize-immoral-covid-19-vaccine-deal

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/06/abortion-opponents-protest-covid-19-vaccines-use-fetal-cells

https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/gaining-clarity-on-the-ethical-issues-of-a-possible-covid-19-vaccine

https://www.americamagazine.org/politics-society/2020/08/27/australian-english-bishops-discuss-morality-possible-covid-19-vaccine

https://cruxnow.com/vatican/2019/03/vaticans-academy-for-life-encourages-parents-to-vaccinate-children/

“The Catholic Church does not oppose vaccinations in principle, but it does consider as morally illicit the development of vaccines from aborted fetal tissues,” the handbook continued. “In 2005, the Vatican clarified the proper position of all Catholics on this matter, and the SSPX adheres to that declaration.” (Cruxnow article)

https://www.catholicculture.org/news/headlines/index.cfm?storyid=41110

https://angelusnews.com/news/vatican/church-leaders-urge-scientists-to-develop-ethical-covid-19-vaccine/

https://mycatholicdoctor.com/our-services/vaccines/

http://www.academyforlife.va/content/pav/en/the-academy/activity-academy/note-vaccini.html

Note on Italian vaccine issue

The Pontifical Academy for Life issued a document commenting on the Italian vaccine issue, in collaboration with the "Ufficio per la Pastorale della Salute" of Italian Bishops' Conference and the "Association of Italian Catholic Doctors", on July 31, 2017.

Clarifications on the medical and scientific nature of vaccination:

The lack of vaccinations of the population indicates a serious health risk of diffusing dangerous and often lethal diseases and infections that had been eradicated in the past, such as measles, rubella, and chickenpox. As noted by the Italian National Health Institute, since 2013 there has been a progressive trend in decreasing vaccination coverage. Vaccination coverage data for measles and rubella decreased from 90.4% in 2013 to 85.3% in 2015, contrary to WHO indications that recommend 95% vaccination coverage to eliminate virus circulation.

In the past, vaccines had been prepared using cells from aborted human fetuses, however currently used cell lines are very distant from the original abortions. The vaccines being referred to, the ones most commonly used in Italy, are those against rubella, chickenpox, polio, and hepatitis A. It should be noted that today it is no longer necessary to obtain cells from new voluntary abortions, and that the cell lines on which the vaccines are based in are derived solely from two fetuses originally aborted in the 1960’s. From the clinical point of view, it should also be reiterated that treatment with vaccines, despite the very rare side effects (the events that occur most commonly are mild and due to an immune response to the vaccine itself), is safe and effective. No correlation exists between the administration of the vaccine and the onset of Autism.

Reflections on the ethical nature of vaccines:

In 2005 the Pontifical Academy for Life published a document entitled: "Moral reflections about vaccines prepared from cells of aborted human fetuses" which, in the light of medical advances and current conditions of vaccine preparation, could soon be revised and updated.

Especially in consideration of the fact that the cell lines currently used are very distant from the original abortions and no longer imply that bond of moral cooperation indispensable for an ethically negative evaluation of their use.{Tradical: This is a repeat of the original doc}

On the other hand, the moral obligation to guarantee the vaccination coverage necessary for the safety of others is no less urgent, especially the safety more vulnerable subjects such as pregnant women and those affected by immunodeficiency who cannot be vaccinated against these diseases.

As for the question of the vaccines that used or may have used cells coming from voluntarily aborted fetuses in their preparation, it must be specified that the "wrong" in the moral sense lies in the actions, not in the vaccines or the material itself.

The technical characteristics of the production of the vaccines most commonly used  in childhood lead us to exclude that there is a morally relevant cooperation between those who use these vaccines today and the practice of voluntary abortion. Hence, we believe that all clinically recommended vaccinations can be used with a clear conscience and that the use of such vaccines does not signify some sort of cooperation with voluntary abortion. While the commitment to ensuring that every vaccine has no connection in its preparation to any material of originating from an abortion, the moral responsibility to vaccinate is reiterated in order to avoid serious health risks for children and the general population.

Rome, 31 July 2017

Pontifical Academy for Life - National Office for Health Pastoral Care (CEI) - Association of Italian Catholic Doctors



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SSPX and the Resistance - A Comparison Of Ecclesiology

Shining the light of Church Teaching on the doctrinal positions of the SSPX and the Resistance. Principles are guides used to aid in decision making.  It stands to reason that bad principles will lead to bad decisions. The recent interactions between Rome and the SSPX has challenged a number of closely held cultural assumptions of people in both sides of the disagreement. This has resulted in cultural skirmishes in both Rome and the SSPX. Since it is the smaller of the two, the skirmishes have been more evident within the SSPX.  The cultural fault-line that Bishop Fellay crossed appears to be linked to two points of Catholic Doctrine: Ecclesiology and Obedience.  The cultural difference of view points is strong enough that it has resulted in the expulsion of a number of members.  It should also be noted that some other priests expelled since the beginning of the latest interactions (starting in 2000) held the same view points and have joined with the l...

Morning and Evening and other sundry Prayers

+ JMJ Along the theme of P^3 (Prayer, Penance, Patience), and for my own reference ... here is a collection of Morning and Evening prayers from the Ideal Daily Missal along with some additional prayers. In this crisis of the Church, I do not think it is possible to do too much prayer, penance and have patience. P^3

Church Militant TV and the SSPX - Again

+ JMJ The old narrative used to be that the SSPX was 'schismatic' and 'excommunicated'. Now the excommunication has been lifted for a number of years and the only ones who think it still has effect are the 'resistors'. That leaves the other opponents of the SSPX with the label 'schismatic'. Make it clear, the conservative Catholics have issues with the SSPX probably because they violate some of their assumptions about the Faith and this crisis of the Church. Church Militant TV is one of these the exists along the Catholic thought spectrum. They like the Traditional Mass but must ensure that they don't get tarred with the same 'schismatic' brush that the liberals use against the SSPX.  So what do they do, they use the same brush against the SSPX. The funny thing is that even when the Church does speak, they don't want to listen and persist in calling the SSPX 'schismatic'. Here's a transcript of the latest s...

The Curious Case of Steve Skojec and the Dangers of Deep Diving into the Crisis Sub-Titled: The Failings of Others

 + JMJ It's been a while now since Steve Skojec sold 1P5 and abandoned the Catholic Faith. I've been a 'Trad' since 1982 and in those 40+ years I seen this death-spiral before with a similar end point. It seems that anyone who jumps into the fray unprepared for the enormous task of righting wrongs will, eventually, become discouraged by not the task but the people who surround them.   I remember when Skojec complained of the treatment his family received from a traditional priest.  This seems to have been the start of the end for him. So what can we learn from the likes of Steve Skojec, Michael Voris (maybe?), Louie Verrecchio, Gerry Matatix and other celebrity Catholics? Probably quite a lot about what not to do. First, don't burn out on the crisis?  When you burn out, on work or anything else, little things assume a more greater importance than they are due.   This is one of my 'canary in the coal mine' signals that I've been stretching myself too th...

The Position of the SSPX on Canonizations by the Saint Factory

+ JMJ I have sometimes been criticized for including 'St' as a title for Pope John Paul II et al. I've given my reasons here  in a discussion with Alex Long. The question is one of prudence in discussions with ntCatholics and in some cases with tCatholics. In discussions with:  ntCatholics, I will use the title in order to continue the discussion and help them arrive at a realistic understanding of the crisis of the Church. tCatholics, I will use the title in order to broaden their perspective on the doctrine of dogmatic facts. This broader perspective is, in my opinion, essential maintaining a realistic understanding of the crisis of the Church. So from a doctrinal position, I have written the article Dogmatic Fact of Fancy  and includes a reference on canonizations. Now, I know the position of the SSPX is that the canonizations are doubtful (see references below) and I also know of at least one non-SSPX theologian who agrees with the level of doubt du...