Skip to main content

On the Ignorant and the Gullible

Image
By
+
JMJ



Sometimes codified as in the 2009 Criminal Code of Canada: "Ignorance of the law by a person who commits an offence is not an excuse for committing that offence." Source

As I write this I have a cold, so I have had time to think about my interactions with Gullible and the blogger of Restore DC Catholicism.

What occurred to me is that ignorance is the root of the issues that motivate both the blogger and Gullible.

The blogger, when confronted with Church Teaching on the required intention for confecting the Sacraments replied:
That's a bit of a stretch that I don't believe.

It is useless to argue facts so I invite the blogger to not take my word for it.  They should look up the facts from reliable sources.

Then they can judge if I am right or wrong.

The same goes for Gullible.

Like most 'resistors' that I've encountered (... NTS: I am making an assumption that Gullible is a 'resistor'), Gullible is hasty in judgement with too few facts.

I would rewrite Canadian Law to this situation: 
Ignorance of Church Teaching by a Catholic is no excuse for denying that Teaching.
If you are ignorant of Church Teaching, then you are in danger of being fooled, in other words you are gullible.

The ignorant are a large at-risk population. However, in this case there is no safety in numbers.

This is a population that I absolutely do not want to be a part of.

That is a population that you absolutely not want to be a part of.

So what do you do?

It is simple in theory, a little harder in practice.

In theory you need to:
  1. Study the faith: Studying the faith, increasing your understanding will broaden your perspective.  This helps to keep from getting blindsided by a false assertion.
  2. Deepen your spiritual life: Do spiritual reading (Lives of Saints, Imitation of Christ etc), meditation (rosary etc), regularly access the sacraments, prayer.
  3. Be grateful for what you have received!  You don't deserve it! (See this article and this one)
In short, you need to practice to your Catholic Faith with diligence otherwise if all you focus on is #1, then you will run out of grace and crash.  By crash I mean make a soul losing mistake, one from which is will be incredibly difficult to recover.

In the last 10 years, I've seen friends and acquaintances make big mistakes. Mistakes that they agreed were logically wrong. Mistakes that were emotionally motivated.

If you don't have a good foundation by understanding the faith and a strong spiritual life, then you are in the at-risk population of gullibles.  You will believe the first person that says something that 'sounds' right, that resonates with your beliefs, even if it doesn't make sense.

Enter Cognitive Dissonance.

Don't dis psychology because of its atheistic founders.  A lot of it works because it is the study of humans as a herd.  If you are gullible, then you are part of the herd.

Let me give you an example:
I heard Pope Benedict XVI make a statement that 'sounded' modernist.  I just took it as that and moved on.

I had a belief that Pope B16 was a modernist and would talk like one.So all was good 😀

Then a month of so later Bishop Fellay said almost the exact same words.😒

Woah Noah, what's going on?😅

I had a belief that the words were modernist and as long as only B16 said them all was happy.  Then when Bishop Fellay said it ... I had a set of choices:  Either the words were modernist or traditional.

I know a number of people who would jump to the conclusion that Bishop Fellay, by his contact with the authorities in Rome had become infected by modernism.

I didn't go down that path, I set aside the emotional response and did the logical thing. I looked it up and found that what Pope B16 had said was a quote from pre-council teaching (Trent if I remember correctly).😇

Wow, this taught me to be more discerning when something simply 'sounds' modernist.  It might or it might not be.  All I had to do was:


Look

It

Up

Passion is not out of place in the Catholic Faith. Passion that is disconnected from the Catholic Faith IS out of place.

If your passion is connected with a continually growing knowledge of the faith and a continually deepening of your spiritual life and a healthy dose of gratitude.

Then you will be a channel of grace.👍

P^3



    Labels:

    Comments

    Post a Comment

    Popular posts from this blog

    De Veritate - St. Thomas Aquinas - What is necessary to believe explicitly?

    By
    I was recently introduced to a work of St. Thomas De Veritate ( Source ) in the course of an argument concerning the minimum content of explicit faith.  When I submitted the following quote as proof: Theological faith, that is, a supernatural faith in Revelation, is necessary, and this is an effect of grace (D 1789); nemini unquam sine ilIa contigit iustificatio (D 1793). As far as the content of this faith is concerned, according to Hebr. 11, 6, at least the existence of God and retribution in the other world must be firmly held, necessitate medii (by the necessity of means) with explicit faith. In regard to the Trinity and the Incarnation, implicit faith suffices. The supernatural faith necessary for justification is attained when God grants to the unbeliever by internal inspiration or external teaching a knowledge of the truths of Revelation, and actual grace to make the supernatural act of faith. Cf. De verite 14, I I.Ott - Fundamentals of Dogma p241 In response my opponent ...
    Post a Comment
    Read more

    Comparision of the Tridentine, Cranmer and Novus Ordo Masses

    By
    + JMJ I downloaded the comparison that was linked in the previous article on the mass (here) . ... a very good reference! P^3 From: Whispers of Restoration (available at this link) . CHARTING LITURGICAL CHANGE Comparing the 1962 Ordinary of the Roman Mass to changes made during the Anglican Schism; Compared in turn to changes adopted in the creation of Pope Paul VI’s Mass in 1969 The chart on the reverse is a concise comparison of certain ritual differences between three historical rites for the celebration of the Catholic Mass Vetus Ordo: “Old Order,” the Roman Rite of Mass as contained in the 1962 Missal, often referred to as the “Traditional Latin Mass.”The Ordinary of this Mass is that of Pope St. Pius V (1570) following the Council of Trent (1545-63), hence the occasional moniker “Tridentine Mass.” However, Trent only consolidated and codified the Roman Rite already in use at that time; its essential form dates to Pope St. Gregory the Great (+604), in whose time the R...
    Post a Comment
    Read more

    Rome and the SSPX - Version 2026 Part 5b - How Did We Get Here??? ... A Continued Anlaysis using ChatGPT.

    By
     + JMJ Part 5b How Did We Get Here??? So in the previous ChatGPT analysis the LLM ‘concluded’ that there was continuity in doctrine. So now we’re going to explore this element. There is some repetition but I don't have time right now to do a lot of editing.  I think instead we'll have a Part 5c where I try to pull it all together with some old fashioned human sense making. At the end point, I think the LLM collects an interesting if somewhat skewed perspective: The SSPX mapping hinges on this claim: That Vatican II affirms (at least implicitly) propositions that the Syllabus of Errors explicitly condemned. The broader Church response is: The same propositions are still rejected—but Vatican II is addressing different categories (political, pastoral, anthropological) rather than reversing doctrine. While the summary of the SSPX position seems close, that of the broader Church seems to be either an outright AI hallucination or a consensus point from the literature that it used...
    Post a Comment
    Read more

    News Roundup: April 30, 2026

    By
     + JMJ I just realised that I haven't posted the latest Roundup ... and there is a lot in the roundup as the media storm around the SSPX continues! I also just noticed this article: European Conservative: Why the SSPX Bishop Decision Matters Far Beyond Church Politics (link) .  P^3 === Popes Past Present and Future Papal News and Views Cardinal Fernandez maintains that Francis is not dead- metaphorically Pope Leo XIV Reopens Amoris Laetitia File | FSSPX News Pope Leo: “We Do Not Agree with the Formalized Blessing of …Homosexual Couples” - OnePeterFive RORATE CÆLI: How Pope Leo is Reshuffling the Curia: Musical Chairs and Power Games RORATE CÆLI: A Giant Leap: The meaning of Cardinal Eijk’s Pontifical High Mass and the Rebirth of Dutch Catholicism RORATE CÆLI: A Sign of Continuity with the Pre-Francis Papacy: Pope to Wash Feet of Twelve Priests RORATE CÆLI: Vatican Blocks Continuity of Procedure of Beatification and Canonization of Argentine Bishop -- no new Satanellis Pope Leo...
    Post a Comment
    Read more

    Rome and the SSPX - Version 2026 Part 5 - How Did We Get Here???

    By
     + JMJ This is the fifth in this series and I think it may require a part b to show the controversial documents and teachings of the Pope post V2. P^3 Part 5 How Did We Get Here??? Introduction My family became ‘Traditional’ in early 1980’s and I didn’t realise until years later how early we entered the Fray. So the SSPX was slightly over a decade old when we started going to Mass. That is a young organization, as someone said at the consecrations “Aren’t you a little young to be a bishop?”, the response was, “That is something that time will change.” 1970: SSPX founded with diocesan approval (Abp. Marcel Lefebvre) 1974–1976: Vatican II disputes escalate; Lefebvre suspended a divinis 1988: Illicit episcopal consecrations → excommunications declared 2000: SSPX Jubilee pilgrimage to Rome (signals openness to talks) 2009: Excommunications lifted by Pope Benedict XVI 2011–2012: Doctrinal talks with CDF collapse 2015–2017: SSPX granted faculties for confessi...
    Post a Comment
    Read more