Skip to main content

US District Superior's Letter - A look back at 2017 - a year of tumult

+
JMJ

This year the SSPX District superior offers a look back at a "tumultuous year".  I couldn't agree more as Pope Francis attaches a few more JATO rockets to the Church!

P^3


Dear friend of the Society,
It was a tumultuous year, filled with great expectations and great confusion.
The year began with much talk of the Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX) receiving canonical regularization from Rome. In March, we received the surprise announcement that Pope Francis had taken the steps to remove all doubt concerning the validity of marriages celebrated by priests of the Society. This came at a time when the precise theological and doctrinal understanding of marriage was being challenged by Amoris Laetitia and the subsequent letter of Pope Francis to the Argentine Bishops, a source of great confusion, which prompted some bishops’ conferences to green-light communion for divorced-and-remarried Catholics.
The confusion did not end there.

So much confusion.

2017 was a year in which our own Angelus Press dedicated an entire issue of The Angelus magazine to understanding the background and devastating consequences of the revolution started by Martin Luther 500 years ago. And, sorrowfully, 2017 was a year in which Rome sought to honor Luther with a bust in the Vatican and a commemorative stamp from the Vatican Post Office.
Indeed, it was a year in which so much confusion emanated from Rome that a large number of prominent Catholics, including our own Bishop Bernard Fellay, signed a public filial correction of the Pope for the grave errors presented in Amoris Laetitia.
And in the midst of so much confusion, the SSPX stands firm, providing answers and dispelling confusion by holding fast to tradition and the faith as it has been handed down to us for 2,000 years.

Will you stand with us?

Here, at the year’s end, in the midst of celebrating the Nativity of Our Lord, look at the state of Tradition in the Catholic Church and the work the Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX) has accomplished in 2017. As Tradition continues to make advances within the Church, the Mystical Body of Christ remains under siege from heterodoxy, scandal, and indifferentism. Confusion reigns. Indeed, some of the faithful ask me, “How can we be happy with the growth of Tradition when there is still a crisis within the Church?” To that, I say do not be happy in a prideful sense; rather rejoice that our Lord, the Blessed Virgin Mary, and all the angels and saints of Heaven have intervened on behalf of traditional Catholics to ensure that the Church’s invaluable patrimony remains to be passed down to succeeding generations of Catholics.
As I have discussed in my previous letters, the SSPX’s apostolate continues to thrive. Our network of schools has grown to over 20 educational institutions, including St. Mary’s College. Similarly, the Brothers’ Novitiate has received an important boost by taking over the former St. Thomas Aquinas seminary grounds in Winona. However, in order to expand this indispensable ministry and keep the brothers’ new headquarters functioning, we continue to depend on your charity.
And let us not lose sight what all of this is ultimately for: the salvation of souls. Every aspect of the Society’s apostolate is directed toward the most important work of all, which is administering the Church’s sacraments in the traditional Roman Rite, particularly the graces of Confession and the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass.
With all the confusion in the Church, no doubt it is easy to get discouraged at times. For every Catholic who steps through the door in one of our chapels, innumerable more persist in disregarding Church teaching or, worse, abandoning the Faith altogether. Civil society, too, remains ravaged by liberalism—religious, political, and economic. It would be so easy for us to despair, but that is not our calling. Our calling as faithful Catholics is to resist the spread of darkness and to work always, in concert with divine assistance, for the restoration of Christendom and the glory of God’s Holy Church.
Although none of us know what the future holds, may we never forget that the battle for Tradition, initiated nearly 50 years ago by our dear Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, began in a small European country with a handful of seminarians. Today, the Society boasts of over 600 priests with chapels and missions on six continents. The traditional Latin Mass, which many Catholics assumed was a dead relic only a decade ago, is attracting more and more Catholics to return to the faith of their fathers. While the work before us—clergy, religious, and laity alike—is formidable, “with God all things are possible.”
As always, our work cannot continue without your help. While it pains me to be constantly asking for money, it is a reality that none of our work can be accomplished without it. Will you stand with us? Will you commit a donation of $100, in thanksgiving for all your SSPX priests and all they do for you? If everyone reading this letter donates $100, or even $50, I can begin the new year with confidence that we can continue our apostolic work.

You can donate online here


Or, mail a check to me at the Regina Coeli house:
SSPX US District
11485 N. Farley Road
Platte City MO 64079

Your donations are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by the law and they make it possible for us to continue the fight, dispel confusion, and preach the Gospel.

May God bless you abundantly for your generosity.
With appreciation I remain,
Sincerely yours in Christ,

Father Jürgen Wegner
United States District Superior

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

De Veritate - St. Thomas Aquinas - What is necessary to believe explicitly?

I was recently introduced to a work of St. Thomas De Veritate ( Source ) in the course of an argument concerning the minimum content of explicit faith.  When I submitted the following quote as proof: Theological faith, that is, a supernatural faith in Revelation, is necessary, and this is an effect of grace (D 1789); nemini unquam sine ilIa contigit iustificatio (D 1793). As far as the content of this faith is concerned, according to Hebr. 11, 6, at least the existence of God and retribution in the other world must be firmly held, necessitate medii (by the necessity of means) with explicit faith. In regard to the Trinity and the Incarnation, implicit faith suffices. The supernatural faith necessary for justification is attained when God grants to the unbeliever by internal inspiration or external teaching a knowledge of the truths of Revelation, and actual grace to make the supernatural act of faith. Cf. De verite 14, I I.Ott - Fundamentals of Dogma p241 In response my opponent ...

Comparision of the Tridentine, Cranmer and Novus Ordo Masses

+ JMJ I downloaded the comparison that was linked in the previous article on the mass (here) . ... a very good reference! P^3 From: Whispers of Restoration (available at this link) . CHARTING LITURGICAL CHANGE Comparing the 1962 Ordinary of the Roman Mass to changes made during the Anglican Schism; Compared in turn to changes adopted in the creation of Pope Paul VI’s Mass in 1969 The chart on the reverse is a concise comparison of certain ritual differences between three historical rites for the celebration of the Catholic Mass Vetus Ordo: “Old Order,” the Roman Rite of Mass as contained in the 1962 Missal, often referred to as the “Traditional Latin Mass.”The Ordinary of this Mass is that of Pope St. Pius V (1570) following the Council of Trent (1545-63), hence the occasional moniker “Tridentine Mass.” However, Trent only consolidated and codified the Roman Rite already in use at that time; its essential form dates to Pope St. Gregory the Great (+604), in whose time the R...

Rome and the SSPX - Version 2026 Part 5b - How Did We Get Here??? ... A Continued Anlaysis using ChatGPT.

 + JMJ Part 5b How Did We Get Here??? So in the previous ChatGPT analysis the LLM ‘concluded’ that there was continuity in doctrine. So now we’re going to explore this element. There is some repetition but I don't have time right now to do a lot of editing.  I think instead we'll have a Part 5c where I try to pull it all together with some old fashioned human sense making. At the end point, I think the LLM collects an interesting if somewhat skewed perspective: The SSPX mapping hinges on this claim: That Vatican II affirms (at least implicitly) propositions that the Syllabus of Errors explicitly condemned. The broader Church response is: The same propositions are still rejected—but Vatican II is addressing different categories (political, pastoral, anthropological) rather than reversing doctrine. While the summary of the SSPX position seems close, that of the broader Church seems to be either an outright AI hallucination or a consensus point from the literature that it used...

News Roundup: April 30, 2026

 + JMJ I just realised that I haven't posted the latest Roundup ... and there is a lot in the roundup as the media storm around the SSPX continues! I also just noticed this article: European Conservative: Why the SSPX Bishop Decision Matters Far Beyond Church Politics (link) .  P^3 === Popes Past Present and Future Papal News and Views Cardinal Fernandez maintains that Francis is not dead- metaphorically Pope Leo XIV Reopens Amoris Laetitia File | FSSPX News Pope Leo: “We Do Not Agree with the Formalized Blessing of …Homosexual Couples” - OnePeterFive RORATE CÆLI: How Pope Leo is Reshuffling the Curia: Musical Chairs and Power Games RORATE CÆLI: A Giant Leap: The meaning of Cardinal Eijk’s Pontifical High Mass and the Rebirth of Dutch Catholicism RORATE CÆLI: A Sign of Continuity with the Pre-Francis Papacy: Pope to Wash Feet of Twelve Priests RORATE CÆLI: Vatican Blocks Continuity of Procedure of Beatification and Canonization of Argentine Bishop -- no new Satanellis Pope Leo...

Rome and the SSPX - Version 2026 Part 5 - How Did We Get Here???

 + JMJ This is the fifth in this series and I think it may require a part b to show the controversial documents and teachings of the Pope post V2. P^3 Part 5 How Did We Get Here??? Introduction My family became ‘Traditional’ in early 1980’s and I didn’t realise until years later how early we entered the Fray. So the SSPX was slightly over a decade old when we started going to Mass. That is a young organization, as someone said at the consecrations “Aren’t you a little young to be a bishop?”, the response was, “That is something that time will change.” 1970: SSPX founded with diocesan approval (Abp. Marcel Lefebvre) 1974–1976: Vatican II disputes escalate; Lefebvre suspended a divinis 1988: Illicit episcopal consecrations → excommunications declared 2000: SSPX Jubilee pilgrimage to Rome (signals openness to talks) 2009: Excommunications lifted by Pope Benedict XVI 2011–2012: Doctrinal talks with CDF collapse 2015–2017: SSPX granted faculties for confessi...