Skip to main content

US District Superior's Letter - A look back at 2017 - a year of tumult

+
JMJ

This year the SSPX District superior offers a look back at a "tumultuous year".  I couldn't agree more as Pope Francis attaches a few more JATO rockets to the Church!

P^3


Dear friend of the Society,
It was a tumultuous year, filled with great expectations and great confusion.
The year began with much talk of the Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX) receiving canonical regularization from Rome. In March, we received the surprise announcement that Pope Francis had taken the steps to remove all doubt concerning the validity of marriages celebrated by priests of the Society. This came at a time when the precise theological and doctrinal understanding of marriage was being challenged by Amoris Laetitia and the subsequent letter of Pope Francis to the Argentine Bishops, a source of great confusion, which prompted some bishops’ conferences to green-light communion for divorced-and-remarried Catholics.
The confusion did not end there.

So much confusion.

2017 was a year in which our own Angelus Press dedicated an entire issue of The Angelus magazine to understanding the background and devastating consequences of the revolution started by Martin Luther 500 years ago. And, sorrowfully, 2017 was a year in which Rome sought to honor Luther with a bust in the Vatican and a commemorative stamp from the Vatican Post Office.
Indeed, it was a year in which so much confusion emanated from Rome that a large number of prominent Catholics, including our own Bishop Bernard Fellay, signed a public filial correction of the Pope for the grave errors presented in Amoris Laetitia.
And in the midst of so much confusion, the SSPX stands firm, providing answers and dispelling confusion by holding fast to tradition and the faith as it has been handed down to us for 2,000 years.

Will you stand with us?

Here, at the year’s end, in the midst of celebrating the Nativity of Our Lord, look at the state of Tradition in the Catholic Church and the work the Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX) has accomplished in 2017. As Tradition continues to make advances within the Church, the Mystical Body of Christ remains under siege from heterodoxy, scandal, and indifferentism. Confusion reigns. Indeed, some of the faithful ask me, “How can we be happy with the growth of Tradition when there is still a crisis within the Church?” To that, I say do not be happy in a prideful sense; rather rejoice that our Lord, the Blessed Virgin Mary, and all the angels and saints of Heaven have intervened on behalf of traditional Catholics to ensure that the Church’s invaluable patrimony remains to be passed down to succeeding generations of Catholics.
As I have discussed in my previous letters, the SSPX’s apostolate continues to thrive. Our network of schools has grown to over 20 educational institutions, including St. Mary’s College. Similarly, the Brothers’ Novitiate has received an important boost by taking over the former St. Thomas Aquinas seminary grounds in Winona. However, in order to expand this indispensable ministry and keep the brothers’ new headquarters functioning, we continue to depend on your charity.
And let us not lose sight what all of this is ultimately for: the salvation of souls. Every aspect of the Society’s apostolate is directed toward the most important work of all, which is administering the Church’s sacraments in the traditional Roman Rite, particularly the graces of Confession and the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass.
With all the confusion in the Church, no doubt it is easy to get discouraged at times. For every Catholic who steps through the door in one of our chapels, innumerable more persist in disregarding Church teaching or, worse, abandoning the Faith altogether. Civil society, too, remains ravaged by liberalism—religious, political, and economic. It would be so easy for us to despair, but that is not our calling. Our calling as faithful Catholics is to resist the spread of darkness and to work always, in concert with divine assistance, for the restoration of Christendom and the glory of God’s Holy Church.
Although none of us know what the future holds, may we never forget that the battle for Tradition, initiated nearly 50 years ago by our dear Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, began in a small European country with a handful of seminarians. Today, the Society boasts of over 600 priests with chapels and missions on six continents. The traditional Latin Mass, which many Catholics assumed was a dead relic only a decade ago, is attracting more and more Catholics to return to the faith of their fathers. While the work before us—clergy, religious, and laity alike—is formidable, “with God all things are possible.”
As always, our work cannot continue without your help. While it pains me to be constantly asking for money, it is a reality that none of our work can be accomplished without it. Will you stand with us? Will you commit a donation of $100, in thanksgiving for all your SSPX priests and all they do for you? If everyone reading this letter donates $100, or even $50, I can begin the new year with confidence that we can continue our apostolic work.

You can donate online here


Or, mail a check to me at the Regina Coeli house:
SSPX US District
11485 N. Farley Road
Platte City MO 64079

Your donations are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by the law and they make it possible for us to continue the fight, dispel confusion, and preach the Gospel.

May God bless you abundantly for your generosity.
With appreciation I remain,
Sincerely yours in Christ,

Father Jürgen Wegner
United States District Superior

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is Tradition?

 + JMJ What Is Tradition? The basic premise, from my perspective, is that what was taught before cannot be contradicted by the 'present' magisterium, only deepened and expanded upon. I recall the Roman theologians called the SSPX protestants while the SSPX called them modernists.  I believe this was all surrounding the concept of Traditon. SSPX's Understanding of Tradition One accusation made against the SSPX is that they don't have a correct understanding of 'Tradition'.  This is how the SSPX understands Tradition: I finally profess that Tradition is not a dead memory, but the living transmission of the doctrine received from the Apostles. It remains living, in distinction to Revelation, which is closed. It is so both in the activity of the Magisterium of the Teaching Church and in the profession of Faith of the Church Taught, of which the sentire cum Ecclesia is the result of the teaching of the Magisterium. Tradition may be called ‘living’, not in the sense t...

SSPX.ca: What is the position of the SSPX on Vatican II???

 + JMJ With all the mis-information about the SSPX rejecting the Second Vatican Council, I thought it would be useful to publish an article that focuses on the real issues that the SSPX has identified. Update: Why Did the SSPX Consecrate Bishops? ( Neither Schismatic, Nor Disobedient link ) In the linked document the SSPX outlined the key motivation and core issues with Vatican II and the post-conciliar magisterium (see above link for full document): 4. The Society Acted Precisely Because of the State of Necessity in Which the Faith Finds Itself  In the present situation of the Church, if the Society of Saint Pius X had not carried out the consecrations of July 1st, it would have found itself facing an inevitable alternative: either to disappear gradually, or to accept, at least in fact, the new liturgy as well as the false doctrines of Vatican II and the post-council. Without the consecrations of July 1st, the Fraternity would have found itself, in a few years, without bishop...

Thoughts on: Finding Common Ground Between Rome and the SSPX

 + JMJ In the ramp up to the consecrations the noise floor in the intergnat grew to a constant din.  This was one of the few the peeped its signal over the noise. https://crisismagazine.com/opinion/finding-common-ground-between-rome-and-the-sspx The key issue is contained in this paragraph: In the lead-up to the planned July 1, 2026, episcopal consecrations,  the SSPX rejected Rome’s offer  of doctrinal dialogue on the grounds that “we both know in advance that we cannot agree doctrinally, particularly regarding the fundamental orientations adopted since the Second Vatican Council.” Fr. Pagliarani also said that his previous attempt at dialogue in 2019 was shut down by Rome because of an assumed irreconcilability. It seems that, from the Society’s perspective, and perhaps from Rome’s too, their positions are incompatible. If memory serves, Rome killed any opportunity for an open discussion by stating that Vatican II was not up for debate. So it was a still-birth and ...

The News is an Addiction ...

 + JMJ People seem to be mesmerised by train wrecks.   They just can't turn away as the disaster creeps forward along train tracks towards the crossing where a car, truck, bus, trailer awaits its destruction. Trads have been watching the train wreck that is this crisis of the Catholic Church for decades. The trade war between the Canada and the US has reminded me that the news is addictive.   The first time I was addicted what from 2009 to  2014 when I was closely following the Rome / SSPX discussions.  I was at work watching a live-stream as Bishop Fellay disappeared into the Vatican. The lead-up to this moment had been intense as the 'resistance' got freaked out and the cultural cracks between doctrine and conspiracy theory widened. In the decade since then other things have emerged, wars, rumours of wars, conspiracies, celebrity Catholics etc. Now we have a new addiction and its name is Trump. Lately, no matter how much I try, I find myself wonderin...

Thoughts on the Thoughts of a former SSPX priest

 + JMJ Well Gary Campbell, former SSPX Priest and now laicised has posted a new article on WherePeterIs. https://wherepeteris.com/thoughts-of-a-former-sspx-priest-on-the-july-1-consecrations/ These words stuck out: Heck, they have built a five-star hotel, wine bar, and Walmart on the opposite bank of the Rubicon! They are not in danger of entering a state of schism, for they are  already  in a state of schism. I believe he doth protest too much. All the actual facts indicate that the SSPX was not in a state of schism before July 1st and an examination of the decree of excommunication highlights the either ineptitude of those in charge or a desire to leave the barn door open. The chasm between an act of disobedience and act of schism remains just what is has always been - an inconvenient barrier that person(s) in Rome seek to bridge but appear incapable of succeeding. The SSPX re-stated that they recognize the Pope as the Vicar of Christ and feel obliged by conscience...