Skip to main content

Michael Voris, Mic'd Up and Louie Verrecchio

Image
By
+
JMJ

Ok, I have a bit of time and thought that I would pass on a link by Louie Verrecchio as well as an SSPX link.

It seems that Michael Voris et al decided to take some swipes at people whose response to this crisis of the Church is shall we say, different than theirs.

I mean of course: SSPX, Angelus Press, Remnant, and Catholic Family News.

First of all, this is Louie's best vid to date and I recommend watching it a couple of times.  The richest part is when Louie points out Michael's statement concerning obedience.


Tradwriter 25: Michael Voris almost gets the SSPX... from Louie Verrecchio on Vimeo.


Courtesy of Louie Verrecchio: Tradwriter on the Mic'd Up - Voris almost get's it!

Now it appears that the SSPX has either caught wind of Voris' latest or just decided to respond to the growing number of 'attacks' that have been launched against them.

Courtesy of SSPX.org: SSPX responds to false accusations

Some food for thought: Ever notice how the SSPX is the common 'enemy' of Voris, and the NeoCon's that Voris chastises?

Perhaps it is because Michael Voris' principles are aligned?

P^3

Labels:

Comments

  1. LarryJanuary 15, 2016 at 2:36 AM

    Schism. Seems to me you and Voris are in schism for being in union with a man you repeatedly say talks apostasy. MOreove close or even casual examinantion of the new rite of episcopal ordination shows it is invalid and thus Johey, he, and the rest of the current hierarchy are laymen. The real Church is with the faithful and priest and bishops ordained in the old rites. No? Please prove me wrong or if not join the truth. Larry

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. TradicalFebruary 13, 2016 at 2:47 PM

      Ultimately, if I were to do so I would be leaving the Church as it is a Dogma from the First Vatican Council that there would always be a legitimate successor to the See of Peter

      "Therefore,
      if anyone says that
      it is not by the institution of Christ the lord himself (that is to say, by divine law) that blessed Peter should have perpetual successors in the primacy over the whole church; or that
      the Roman pontiff is not the successor of blessed Peter in this primacy:
      let him be anathema." Source: http://www.papalencyclicals.net/Councils/ecum20.htm#Chapter 2. On the permanence of the primacy of blessed Peter in the Roman pontiffs

      Secondly, As noted elsewhere, following Church doctrine we KNOW that the post conciliar Popes have all been validly elected.

      So it appears that your concept of the Truth is not based on the doctrine of the Church - hence - I conclude that it isn't the Truth but a lie that you have accepted.

      P^3

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Catholic Church and the Rule of Law- Part II: Dr. John Lamont

By
+ JMJ This is the second article from Dr. Lamont from his lecture given in May 2014. P^3 Source Part A: Society of St. Hugh of Cluny Source Part B: Society of St. Hugh of Cluny 8 May2014 The Catholic Church and the Rule of Law- Part II By John Lamont To understand how the Jesuit conception of obedience departed from earlier conceptions, it is helpful to compare it with the teaching of St. Thomas on obedience. The fundamental difference between the two is that St. Thomas considers the proper object of obedience to be the precept of the superior (2a2ae q. 104 a. 2 co., ad 3). Obedience that seeks to forestall the expressed will of the superior does not bear on what the superior wants or thinks in general, but only on what the superior intends to command. St. Ignatius’s lowest degree of obedience, which he does not consider to be virtuous, is thus what St. Thomas considers to be the only form of obedience. St. Thomas holds that St. Ignatius’s alleged higher forms of o...
Post a Comment
Read more

Open Letter to Cardinal Gantin - July 6, 1988

By
There has been some discussion (read lots) about the term 'Conciliar Church'. I have posted this letter written by the Superior General and District Superiors of the SSPX after the 1988 Consecrations. Of particular interest is that the 'Conciliar Church' being referred to as a system. My paraphrase would be that the SSPX regards the 'conciliar Church' as an error within the Church. Source Open Letter to Cardinal Gantin Prefect of the Congregation for Bishops
Post a Comment
Read more

Morning and Evening and other sundry Prayers

By
+ JMJ Along the theme of P^3 (Prayer, Penance, Patience), and for my own reference ... here is a collection of Morning and Evening prayers from the Ideal Daily Missal along with some additional prayers. In this crisis of the Church, I do not think it is possible to do too much prayer, penance and have patience. P^3
Post a Comment
Read more

Rome and the SSPX - Version 2026 Part 6b: Principles and Rules for Surviving this Crisis of the Catholic Church (Principle 1)

By
 + JMJ Principle 1: Realize that something is amiss in the Catholic Church The world in which I had my Traditional Awakening, is one in which practically anything pre-Conciliar such as liturgy, doctrinc, and even dogmas are either suppressed, ignored or re-framed to be acceptable to the ‘world’. What is more, the people adhering to these pre-conciliar teachings and liturgy are persecuted by other members of the Catholic Church. The things that non-Trads say about Trads can be quite extreme. For example, accusations against Traditionalists include that they are: A revival of the Jansenists (link) , Schismatics, Heretics, Uncharitable, Lefebrists Radicals Integrists When one group of Catholics is persecuted by the others for simply wanting to live as Catholics before them did for generations … well something is wrong. Further, we need to realize that when what was previously condemned is now promoted and what was previously promoted as the trut...
Post a Comment
Read more

How is the SSPX prepared to accept the Second Vatican Council??? - Reblogged and Updated.

By
+ JMJ The Archbishop remained steadfast. In the 1980s, in his correspondence with then-Cardinal Ratzinger, Archbishop Lefebvre stated his position that the criterion for interpreting Vatican II in light of Tradition comprises three elements: 1) He and the SSPX would accept anything in Vatican II that is clearly consistent with Tradition; 2) Any ambiguous texts of Vatican II must be interpreted strictly according to Tradition; according to the consistent teaching of the Church throughout the centuries. 3) Anything in the Council that cannot be interpreted according to Tradition should be revised. The Archbishop laid this out explicitly in his letters to Cardinal Ratzinger in 1982 and 1985. CF News: Rome-SSPX: Background to the Doctrinal Discussions CF News: The April 15 Deadline A few years ago Tony La Rosa (aka ecclesia militans a Toronto based 'resistor') had a difficult time accepting this approach to the council. He held that it must be completely tossed as...
Post a Comment
Read more