Skip to main content

Michael Voris, Mic'd Up and Louie Verrecchio

Image
By
+
JMJ

Ok, I have a bit of time and thought that I would pass on a link by Louie Verrecchio as well as an SSPX link.

It seems that Michael Voris et al decided to take some swipes at people whose response to this crisis of the Church is shall we say, different than theirs.

I mean of course: SSPX, Angelus Press, Remnant, and Catholic Family News.

First of all, this is Louie's best vid to date and I recommend watching it a couple of times.  The richest part is when Louie points out Michael's statement concerning obedience.


Tradwriter 25: Michael Voris almost gets the SSPX... from Louie Verrecchio on Vimeo.


Courtesy of Louie Verrecchio: Tradwriter on the Mic'd Up - Voris almost get's it!

Now it appears that the SSPX has either caught wind of Voris' latest or just decided to respond to the growing number of 'attacks' that have been launched against them.

Courtesy of SSPX.org: SSPX responds to false accusations

Some food for thought: Ever notice how the SSPX is the common 'enemy' of Voris, and the NeoCon's that Voris chastises?

Perhaps it is because Michael Voris' principles are aligned?

P^3

Labels:

Comments

  1. LarryJanuary 15, 2016 at 2:36 AM

    Schism. Seems to me you and Voris are in schism for being in union with a man you repeatedly say talks apostasy. MOreove close or even casual examinantion of the new rite of episcopal ordination shows it is invalid and thus Johey, he, and the rest of the current hierarchy are laymen. The real Church is with the faithful and priest and bishops ordained in the old rites. No? Please prove me wrong or if not join the truth. Larry

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. TradicalFebruary 13, 2016 at 2:47 PM

      Ultimately, if I were to do so I would be leaving the Church as it is a Dogma from the First Vatican Council that there would always be a legitimate successor to the See of Peter

      "Therefore,
      if anyone says that
      it is not by the institution of Christ the lord himself (that is to say, by divine law) that blessed Peter should have perpetual successors in the primacy over the whole church; or that
      the Roman pontiff is not the successor of blessed Peter in this primacy:
      let him be anathema." Source: http://www.papalencyclicals.net/Councils/ecum20.htm#Chapter 2. On the permanence of the primacy of blessed Peter in the Roman pontiffs

      Secondly, As noted elsewhere, following Church doctrine we KNOW that the post conciliar Popes have all been validly elected.

      So it appears that your concept of the Truth is not based on the doctrine of the Church - hence - I conclude that it isn't the Truth but a lie that you have accepted.

      P^3

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Rome,the SSPX and this time of Crisis - Updated

By
+ JMJ Obviously there's lots of events right now. First we have the April 1st - I almost thought it was April Fools - meeting between Pope Francis and Bishop Fellay.  Nothing really news worthy as this is a natural progression as Rome appears to be considering fulfilling Archbishop Lefebvre's wish to 'accept us as we are'. Second we have the April 8th publication of what will be a verbose exhortation of the Synod of the Family. I'm willing to bet that the Pope will give with one hand (unilateral regularization of SSPX) and take with the other (ambiguous document that opens the flood gates of sin further). Much to pray for. P^3
30 comments
Read more

A Reply to Martin Blackshaw’s FLAWED Remnant article titled: FLAWED: SSPX Advice on Abortion-tainted Vaccines

By
 + JMJ    An article has appeared in the Remnant (link to article) and I am afraid that there are a number of flaws in it that need to be addressed. The author, Martin Blackshaw, believes that both the Church and the SSPX are misapplying the principle of Moral Theology called 'Cooperation In Evil'.  Unfortunately, Mr. Blackshaw rests most of his arguments on citing authors that support his position, without considering the possibility that they are wrong. This highlights a key factor in this crisis: ignorance of the faith and its application . I don't am not singling out Mr. Blackshaw for this criticism, I have observed that it applies to laity and religious, superior and subject a like.  No one seems immune in this enduring crisis, myself included.  I further believe that this ignorance is why so many Catholics, both traditional and non, rely on their gut feeling or "Catholic conscience" for charting their way through this crisis of the faith.  While...
25 comments
Read more

Rorate-Caeli URGENT: Pope tells Italian Bishops he plans to abolish the motu proprio Summorum Pontificum

By
 + JMJ  Now THIS is probably the most important news item in the last two years - yes I place this above the pandemic. I'm only surprised by how long it took for this to surface during this pontificate. I hope and pray that it is false or that if it comes to pass that somehow some good will arise out of the ashes of Summorum Pontificum. P^3  Courtesy of Rorate-Caeli URGENT: Pope tells Italian Bishops he plans to abolish the motu proprio Summorum Pontificum (Updated) Update (May 26): Rorate's additional sources in Rome have confirmed this Wednesday that Francis has indeed a text on Summorum Pontificum lined up, which has been developed for months, but what is not known at this point is if the text is just about a more limited take on the Summorum application questionnaire (first revealed by us in the spring of 2020) or about an overhaul of Summorum Pontificum in general: drafts could be dealing with both matters. It is also not impossible for a text to come ou...
9 comments
Read more

If Pope Francis is bad - what about Pope St. John Paul II et al?

By
+ JMJ So here we are on the apparent cusp of yet another post conciliar Papal canonization. This time we have Pope's John-Paul I and Paul VI canonizations to 'look forward' to. This follows, obviously, on the heels of Pope St. John Paul II's canonization? So the first question that I usually encounter is: How is it possible, keeping in mind the doctrine on infallibility of canonizations (note doctrine not dogma), that Pope St. John Paul II is a Saint? First, what does it mean???  According to the doctrine of dogmatic facts - it is the universal opinion of Theologians that canonizations are infallible.  It means that they enjoy the beatific vision.  ... that's it.  That is the doctrine and it is at the level of universal opinion of theologians.  It is called a 'dogmatic fact'. That they made mistakes is obvious.  That the miracles seem to not be very miraculous is also a bit of an issue. Here's something to consider: The rush that surrou...
16 comments
Read more

The Vatican and SSPX – An Organizational Culture Perspective

By
Introduction The recent and continuing interactions between the Vatican and the SSPX have been a great opportunity for prayer and reflection.  The basis for the disagreement is theological and not liturgical. As noted by Dr. Lamont (2012), the SSPX theological position on the four key controversial aspects of the Second Vatican Council are base on prior theological work that resulted from relevant magisterial pronouncements.  So it is difficult to understand the apparent rejection of the theological position of the SSPX.
17 comments
Read more