Skip to main content

Michael Voris, Mic'd Up and Louie Verrecchio

Image
By
+
JMJ

Ok, I have a bit of time and thought that I would pass on a link by Louie Verrecchio as well as an SSPX link.

It seems that Michael Voris et al decided to take some swipes at people whose response to this crisis of the Church is shall we say, different than theirs.

I mean of course: SSPX, Angelus Press, Remnant, and Catholic Family News.

First of all, this is Louie's best vid to date and I recommend watching it a couple of times.  The richest part is when Louie points out Michael's statement concerning obedience.


Tradwriter 25: Michael Voris almost gets the SSPX... from Louie Verrecchio on Vimeo.


Courtesy of Louie Verrecchio: Tradwriter on the Mic'd Up - Voris almost get's it!

Now it appears that the SSPX has either caught wind of Voris' latest or just decided to respond to the growing number of 'attacks' that have been launched against them.

Courtesy of SSPX.org: SSPX responds to false accusations

Some food for thought: Ever notice how the SSPX is the common 'enemy' of Voris, and the NeoCon's that Voris chastises?

Perhaps it is because Michael Voris' principles are aligned?

P^3

Labels:

Comments

  1. LarryJanuary 15, 2016 at 2:36 AM

    Schism. Seems to me you and Voris are in schism for being in union with a man you repeatedly say talks apostasy. MOreove close or even casual examinantion of the new rite of episcopal ordination shows it is invalid and thus Johey, he, and the rest of the current hierarchy are laymen. The real Church is with the faithful and priest and bishops ordained in the old rites. No? Please prove me wrong or if not join the truth. Larry

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. TradicalFebruary 13, 2016 at 2:47 PM

      Ultimately, if I were to do so I would be leaving the Church as it is a Dogma from the First Vatican Council that there would always be a legitimate successor to the See of Peter

      "Therefore,
      if anyone says that
      it is not by the institution of Christ the lord himself (that is to say, by divine law) that blessed Peter should have perpetual successors in the primacy over the whole church; or that
      the Roman pontiff is not the successor of blessed Peter in this primacy:
      let him be anathema." Source: http://www.papalencyclicals.net/Councils/ecum20.htm#Chapter 2. On the permanence of the primacy of blessed Peter in the Roman pontiffs

      Secondly, As noted elsewhere, following Church doctrine we KNOW that the post conciliar Popes have all been validly elected.

      So it appears that your concept of the Truth is not based on the doctrine of the Church - hence - I conclude that it isn't the Truth but a lie that you have accepted.

      P^3

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Father, Should I Attend That Mass?" Advice on Attending Non-SSPX Latin Masses

By
 + JMJ I see that the 'resistors' are in a tizzy because Fr. Robinson used them as an example instead of the sedevacantists. What is interesting is that you can apply the exact same reasons against going to a sede mass as that of the 'resistors'. Namely: On the other extreme are those situations where an SSPX priest knows that a certain non-SSPX traditionalist venue is a grave danger to the faith . Frankly, most, if not all, of the Resistance Masses would fall into this category. In many cases, the behavior of these priests has been and continues to be scandalous, by their (A) spirit, their (B) preaching, and their indiscriminate conferral of the (C) priesthood and (D) episcopacy. To attend a Mass with such ongoing scandals poses a serious danger to the souls of the faithful. Yep, looking at A,B,C and D the shoe fits. On this basis the "resistors" = "sedevacantists". P^3 Courtesy of SSPX.org   A companion article to a recent "Questions with ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Correcting Caricatures of the SSPX

By
 + JMJ Introduction First, a little background on the FSSP St. John Vianney Chapel in Mission Hill Kansas.  After the 1988 consecrations and the foundation of the FSSP there was a consistent trend of Dioceses allowing the SSPX to run chapels and churches near SSPX locations. As with any 'organizational change' there were those who didn't agree with the change and no longer sought the sacraments from the SSPX. I heard from friends that in that era there was a lot of anger and tension (on both sides) between the St. Mary's SSPX and Mission Hill FSSP.  Second, there have been caricatures of the SSPX position (some are evident below) in which personal opinions of SSPX priests and laity are taken as the official position or conflated with those of sedevacantists or 'resistance'. Recent Perspectives of the SSPX Position In the shadow of the consecrations a fever pitch accusations and opinions how surfaced - many of which include caricatures of the SSPX positions, of w...
Post a Comment
Read more

SSPX: Why Is the SSPX So Criticized?

By
 + JMJ As long as you are ok with what happens in other Catholic Churches, Traditional Catholics will be left 'alone'.  This is a paraphrase of words spoken by an Archbishop to Traditional Catholics (with a sprinkling of SSPX) who had requested the Traditional Latin Mass under Summorum Pontificum. This reflects that attitude of the Church towards anyone who takes issue with some of the ambiguities of Vatican II and the post-conciliar magisterium.  If you reject the papacy but are ok with V2, the New Mass, and what Rome has stated since 1965 - then you are welcome. Question some of the more abiguous statements and ask for Rome to realise that a circle is not a square - then you are in for a world of hurt. This is where the SSPX exists and has existed from almost its very first moments. Pointing out contradictions with previous magisterium is not acceptable - under any condition. Why? Because it will cause the whole V2 house of cards to fall. I guess only when the contradic...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stories: Early Days of Tradition Part 8 - Convention Centre Chapel

By
 + JMJ I came to Tradition a few years after they had bought a chapel. My wife told me of the earlier years when Fr. Normandin would come to town and Mass would be held in a room at the convention centre.  He'd start by blessing the room and then proceed with Mass. This went on for a while before the one of the faithful found a small hall that would suit just fine. They pooled their money and bought the building.  Then came the work as the retiree's refinished the floor, setup the sactuary. Oh, did I mention that I heard that the hall had been used by a motorcycle gang? The floor needed a lot of work.  I remember seeing pictures of the founders working to make the hall into a fitting place for the Sacrifice of the Mass. That little chapel would be a refuge like many others serviced by Fr. Normandin.  From Thunderbay, Ontrario to Nanaimo, British Columbia - the SSPX chapels are all the results of Fr. Normandin's missionary work in those desperate times. Without h...
Post a Comment
Read more

How many more must die for the throne? or How to combat FUD!

By
 + JMJ How many more must die for the throne? (Movie Quote: Prince Caspian) The Spread of Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt I've seen a lot of FUD spreading across the intergnat on various stats etc.   So let's put this in context ... especially the perspective of those people in positions of authority who need to make decisions to protect the lives of their citizens. Yep, this is going to be that type of post.  Like it or not the leaders of our governments have their authority from God.  So, as Catholics should know, you need to have a very good reason to deliberately disobey the orders of their superiors. This is basic St. Thomas Aquinas ... so don't blame me for discussing things from a Catholic perspective. The leaders of our countries have taken action to protect the vulnerable of our countries.   As much as the young and not-so-young may whine and complain - I have to ask how many more of our elderly have to die? What the armchair virologists and ec...
10 comments
Read more