Skip to main content

Forcing the Hand of God: Is Santo Subito a Good Idea? - The Remant

+
JMJ

While the infallibility of canonizations revolves around whether or not the beati enjoys the beatific vision, I anticipate the canonizations of Pope John XXIII and Pope John Paul II to be used to 'canonize' their pontificates and the Second Vatican Council, in spite of what the Vatican stated.

Attached below is an excellent Remnant article by Father Celatus that will be fitting in the context of today's planned ceremony (which I pray will not occur).

-Tradical

Forcing the Hand of God: Is Santo Subito a Good Idea? Featured

Written by  Father Celatus


Forcing the Hand of God: Is Santo Subito a Good Idea?

As one advocate for victims stated, “In his more than 25 years as the world’s most powerful religious figure, we can’t think of a single predatory priest or complicit bishop who experienced any consequences whatsoever for committing or concealing heinous child sex crimes.
Did you hear what one English writer, Jerome K. Jerome, said to the other English writer, Ford M. Ford?
“There’s something, old boy, which I’ve always abhorred: When people address me and call me, ‘Jerome’, Are they being standoffish, or too much at home?” Said Ford, “I agree; it’s the same thing with me.” There is something about reduplicated names that is not only repetitive but just a bit odd. I have an inherent distrust of those so named.
And while his name is not a perfect reduplication, a truly untrustworthy person with a now infamous name was Marciel Maciel. Marciel Maciel Degollado was a Mexican born Roman Catholic priest who founded the Legion of Christ and later the Regnum Christi movement.


Decades ago these two groups were attractive to countless conservative Catholics as an alternative and antidote to the ecclesiastical liberalism so prevalent in the Church. Some seminarians, faced with a choice between diocesan heterodox hellholes and seemingly orthodox formation as Legionaries, closed their eyes and took the plunge.

I know a few such souls, who sometime later returned home to their dioceses, seeking refuge from a cult. Similar stories have been told by the faithful, who once championed the Regnum Christi movement, but now disdain it as cultish. Pastors who once happily hosted Legionaries in their parishes will never again let them near their rectories or their people.

It took decades to uncover the cultish nature of these two religious groups that were fathered by Marciel Maciel, who is now known to have been a prolific biological father as well. But secrecy was the name of the game and is the custom of cults.
One former Legionary priest told me that even though he was not cloistered, he was forbidden to speak to anyone he met in public who was not a member of the Legion, to include casual greetings such as “Good morning.” How bizarre!
Secrecy is also the modus operandi of sexual predators and abusers, which terms are synonymous with Marciel Maciel.
During the course of his long life of nearly ninety years, Marciel Maciel was the subject of several investigations, to include for drug abuse, sexual abuse of minors and sexual relations with women. The first of the investigations, regarding drug abuse, occurred in the late 1950’s, during the pontificate of Pope John XXIII; allegations of sexual abuse spanned several decades, most within the pontificate of Pope John Paul II. In the words of one of several children who were fathered by the later Father Marciel Maciel, “From at least the 1950s until 2002, the Legionaries, Fr. Maciel, the presiding Pope, the Vatican, and its officials engaged in a conspiracy to conceal their knowledge of Maciel’s abuse of children.”
Among the more damning allegations of sexual abuse were those publically alleged in 1997 by a group of nine men, who credibly claimed that they had been abused by Marciel Maciel while studying under him in Spain and Rome in the 1940’s and 50’s. This respectable group included priests, professors and other professionals. They described themselves as former members of a favored group, known as the “Apostolic Schoolboys.”
They described the Maciel technique, which was to feign illness and pain in his groin, claiming that he had papal permission to receive massages from others in this area of his anatomy. Wow, talk about a papal indult! This group lodged a formal complaint with the Vatican in 1998 but was told the next year that their case had been shelved by the Vatican, apparently on orders from Pope John Paul II.
Such an order from the Pope would have been no surprise. After all, Maciel had carefully cultivated a relationship with Pope John Paul, accompanying him on papal visits to Mexico on three occasions and appearing in promotion videos with the Pope, distributed to Legion benefactors.
In 1994 Pope John Paul honored Marciel in an open letter on the occasion of the founder’s 50th anniversary as a priest, celebrating the man as “an efficacious guide to youth.” Ten years later and after more accusations against Maciel, Pope John Paul II hosted special ceremonies at the Vatican to honor his 60th anniversary.
Following that 2004 celebration, accusations against Maciel continued, including allegations that he had fathered half a dozen children by two women.
Some investigators allege that the total number of sexual abuse victims of this predator may be one hundred or more.
Pope Benedict removed Maciel from ministry in 2006, to a life of “prayer and penance.” A 2010 Vatican investigation determined that “very serious and objectively immoral acts” of the late founder, “confirmed by incontrovertible testimonies,” represent “true crimes and manifest a life without scruples or authentic religious sentiment.”
No wonder, given all the credible accusations against this predator priest and other clergy that were ignored or covered up, victims of sexual abuse have been critical of Church leadership.
No wonder so many have called into question the rush to canonize Pope John Paul II, in light of his failure to act on allegations. As one advocate for victims stated, “In his more than 25 years as the world’s most powerful religious figure, we can’t think of a single predatory priest or complicit bishop who experienced any consequences whatsoever for committing or concealing heinous child sex crimes.”
A headline from The Irish Times blames Pope John XXIII as well: “Two Popes to be canonized did nothing about Maciel allegations.” Justification offered for the canonization of Pope John Paul II in the wake of the abuse scandal is that he will be regarded a saint for his personal sanctity and not for his performance as pope. That argument is not convincing to abuse victims. A better response would be an 11th hour reprieve and reevaluation of these canonizations, allowing this crisis to pass and wounds to heal. Failing that, the enemies of the Church may soon label Pope Saint John Paul II as “Patron of Predators.”
Marciel Maciel is dead and has been judged by God. Popes John XXIII and John Paul II are dead and have been judged by the Church; judged that their souls are in Heaven and worthy of the title “Saints.” As the Church Militant continues to lower the standard for heavenly evidence that souls are within the Church Triumphant, one wonders whether canonization is now more a matter of what man himself declares and less a discernment of what God determines.
Jesus promised that what is bound on Earth is bound in Heaven but in these canonizations, might not the Church be forcing the hand of God? ■


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Father, Should I Attend That Mass?" Advice on Attending Non-SSPX Latin Masses

 + JMJ I see that the 'resistors' are in a tizzy because Fr. Robinson used them as an example instead of the sedevacantists. What is interesting is that you can apply the exact same reasons against going to a sede mass as that of the 'resistors'. Namely: On the other extreme are those situations where an SSPX priest knows that a certain non-SSPX traditionalist venue is a grave danger to the faith . Frankly, most, if not all, of the Resistance Masses would fall into this category. In many cases, the behavior of these priests has been and continues to be scandalous, by their (A) spirit, their (B) preaching, and their indiscriminate conferral of the (C) priesthood and (D) episcopacy. To attend a Mass with such ongoing scandals poses a serious danger to the souls of the faithful. Yep, looking at A,B,C and D the shoe fits. On this basis the "resistors" = "sedevacantists". P^3 Courtesy of SSPX.org   A companion article to a recent "Questions with ...

Correcting Caricatures of the SSPX

 + JMJ Introduction First, a little background on the FSSP St. John Vianney Chapel in Mission Hill Kansas.  After the 1988 consecrations and the foundation of the FSSP there was a consistent trend of Dioceses allowing the SSPX to run chapels and churches near SSPX locations. As with any 'organizational change' there were those who didn't agree with the change and no longer sought the sacraments from the SSPX. I heard from friends that in that era there was a lot of anger and tension (on both sides) between the St. Mary's SSPX and Mission Hill FSSP.  Second, there have been caricatures of the SSPX position (some are evident below) in which personal opinions of SSPX priests and laity are taken as the official position or conflated with those of sedevacantists or 'resistance'. Recent Perspectives of the SSPX Position In the shadow of the consecrations a fever pitch accusations and opinions how surfaced - many of which include caricatures of the SSPX positions, of w...

SSPX: Why Is the SSPX So Criticized?

 + JMJ As long as you are ok with what happens in other Catholic Churches, Traditional Catholics will be left 'alone'.  This is a paraphrase of words spoken by an Archbishop to Traditional Catholics (with a sprinkling of SSPX) who had requested the Traditional Latin Mass under Summorum Pontificum. This reflects that attitude of the Church towards anyone who takes issue with some of the ambiguities of Vatican II and the post-conciliar magisterium.  If you reject the papacy but are ok with V2, the New Mass, and what Rome has stated since 1965 - then you are welcome. Question some of the more abiguous statements and ask for Rome to realise that a circle is not a square - then you are in for a world of hurt. This is where the SSPX exists and has existed from almost its very first moments. Pointing out contradictions with previous magisterium is not acceptable - under any condition. Why? Because it will cause the whole V2 house of cards to fall. I guess only when the contradic...

Stories: Early Days of Tradition Part 8 - Convention Centre Chapel

 + JMJ I came to Tradition a few years after they had bought a chapel. My wife told me of the earlier years when Fr. Normandin would come to town and Mass would be held in a room at the convention centre.  He'd start by blessing the room and then proceed with Mass. This went on for a while before the one of the faithful found a small hall that would suit just fine. They pooled their money and bought the building.  Then came the work as the retiree's refinished the floor, setup the sactuary. Oh, did I mention that I heard that the hall had been used by a motorcycle gang? The floor needed a lot of work.  I remember seeing pictures of the founders working to make the hall into a fitting place for the Sacrifice of the Mass. That little chapel would be a refuge like many others serviced by Fr. Normandin.  From Thunderbay, Ontrario to Nanaimo, British Columbia - the SSPX chapels are all the results of Fr. Normandin's missionary work in those desperate times. Without h...

How many more must die for the throne? or How to combat FUD!

 + JMJ How many more must die for the throne? (Movie Quote: Prince Caspian) The Spread of Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt I've seen a lot of FUD spreading across the intergnat on various stats etc.   So let's put this in context ... especially the perspective of those people in positions of authority who need to make decisions to protect the lives of their citizens. Yep, this is going to be that type of post.  Like it or not the leaders of our governments have their authority from God.  So, as Catholics should know, you need to have a very good reason to deliberately disobey the orders of their superiors. This is basic St. Thomas Aquinas ... so don't blame me for discussing things from a Catholic perspective. The leaders of our countries have taken action to protect the vulnerable of our countries.   As much as the young and not-so-young may whine and complain - I have to ask how many more of our elderly have to die? What the armchair virologists and ec...