Tradicat

 + JMJ On July 14 the SSPX published a timeline describing communications with Rome leading up to the Episcopal consecrations. This timeline includes contacts that were new to me.  One thing that is of interest are recent claims made by ++Pozzo that the SSPX broke off relations in 2018 (link)  which is the reason for the timeline. P^3 Courtesy of SSPX.org Despite widespread reporting in Catholic and secular sources concerning the July 1, 2026, episcopal consecrations, many news outlets, bloggers, and “social media personalities” continue to distort the timeline leading up to this momentous event. The claim that the Society of Saint Pius X never attempted to engage Rome prior to the consecrations is patently false. Further, little attention has been paid to the reality that Rome continues to demand full-throated acceptance of the Second Vatican Council as the conditio sine qua non for not just canonical regularization, but membership in the Catholic Church. November 22, 20...

 + JMJ A letter from the SSPX Superiour General was read from the pulpit this morning and the french version can be found here: La Port Latine  and the english version here: FSSPX.News . For the record (because of link rot) I have reproduced both versions below. P^3 French Bien chers fidèles, Quelques jours après la cérémonie du 1er juillet, je tiens à vous adresser ces quelques mots. Je souhaite tout d’abord vous remercier. Depuis plusieurs années, je priais la très sainte Vierge afin qu’elle prépare les cœurs à cet événement historique. J’avoue avoir été profondément touché de voir comment, tous, vous avez accompagné les sacres épiscopaux par votre prière et votre gratitude envers la divine Providence. Le 1er juillet, de nombreux fidèles du monde entier étaient présents à Écône, et ils vous représentaient tous. Ce fut une immense joie de les voir si nombreux et si fervents. Comme vous le savez certainement, un orage s’est produit pendant la cérémonie : « Devant l’éclat de s...

 + JMJ There is a feeling that before the Second Vatican Council, the Catholic Church had a solid understanding of its place in the world, its mission and its identity. Then we had the Second Vatican Council and in the turmoil that followed practically everything was subject to explosive decompression.  Muchw as thrown out the window opened by Pope John XXIII, followed by the Smoke of Satan entering the vacuum left behind as per Pope Paul VI. Now it seems that there is only one thing that cannot be tolerated in the Catholic Church, anything that reminds Catholics of the Catholic Church as it existed pre-council.  As some have labelled it, the pre-conciliar Church. Even Pope Benedict XVI experienced this rabid reaction ( see Rorate-Caeli for full text ).  At times one gets the impression that our society needs to have at least one group to which no tolerance may be shown; which one can easily attack and hate. And should someone dare to approach them – in this case the...

 + JMJ Lots happening this month ... so instead of just the list of articles that popped above the noise, I have includes some commentary on two of the articles, the regular news list and a chatGPT summary on the validity of Orthodox Sacraments. P^3 Commentary on Articles of Note As to be expected, there has been a veritable media storm preceding and following the SSPX consecration of four bishops. Everyone seems to have an opinion, some factual, some not so much. Two that caught my attention were the: Chancellor for canonical affairs in the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis (link)   Susan Mulheron: “What they were doing was not just refusing the liturgical adaptations that had been made, but they were refusing the whole teaching authority of that council,”  Tradicat: As usual there are distinctions that are not being made.  The first the teaching authority of the Second Vatican Council was defined at the end of the council (link)   (Fisheater link2) ...

 + JMJ A little late getting this one out. P^3 Sources https://onepeterfive.com/review-of-bishop-athanasius-schneiders-core-question-regarding-sspx/ https://dianemontagna.substack.com/p/exclusive-bishop-schneider-sets-out Introduction EXCLUSIVE: Bishop Schneider Sets Out “Core Question” in SSPX Episcopal Consecration Debate “At its core, the conflict revolves around the question of truth.” DIANE MONTAGNA JUN 04, 2026 (Photo credit: Voice of the Family) ROME, 4 June 2026 — With the Society of St. Pius X set to proceed with episcopal consecrations on July 1, Bishop Athanasius Schneider has published a new statement arguing that the controversy extends beyond questions of ecclesiastical discipline and reflects doctrinal and liturgical disputes that have persisted in the Catholic Church since the Second Vatican Council. Titled The Core Question Regarding the Priestly Society of Saint Pius X and published in full below, the document is structured around five principal arguments and asks...

 + JMJ Introduction In Part 1, after reviewing sources and historical documents, I concluded that disobedience to a direct order from the Pope is not, in and of itself, a schismatic act.  More is needed: In this case the person is guilty of disobedience, but not of schism, even though he persists in his refusal; for he rejects a commandment of the Church, not the head of the Church. The SSPX has manifestly not rejected the head of the Church, see  FSSPX.news: Letter to the Holy Father regarding the Decree of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith . ... What the Society of Saint Pius X has done, and will continue to do, is nothing other than an extraordinary initiative for the salvation of souls, amidst the doctrinal and moral confusion into which the Church is plunged. We in no way claim to substitute ourselves for the Church, and we have no ambition other than to remain faithful to her. ...  In conscience, we did not believe we could evade the moral duty we ow...

 + JMJ With the new consecrations, old news and half truths are flooding the internet. How about we look at some of them: Vatican recognition of Orthodox sacraments (New) Orthodox Churches Are Not in Formal Schism — While not in full communion with Rome, ...  Tradicat: I guess they didn't ask if the Orthodox accept Pope Leo XIV as the Vicar of Christ etc. Also I'm not certain if it is all the various branches or just one or two. https://www.ncregister.com/cna/why-does-the-vatican-recognize-orthodox-marriages-but-not-those-of-the-sspx https://www.eurasiareview.com/10072026-vatican-recognition-of-orthodox-marriages-vs-sspx-whats-the-difference-analysis/ The SSPX is in schism (Old News) Given how the Vatican backed off on the schism accusation over the years following the 1988 consecrations My own evidence of 'Not in Full Communion' status  The Orthodox are no longer Schismatics but 'Not in Full Communion' (see above)  'Not in Full Communion' being used as ...