Skip to main content

Skojec and Dogma - Part 2 The Issue

Image
By

  +

JMJ


The Issue

Recently, he got triggering into an argument on Dogma and this I think is the first time I’ve seen him discuss and grapple with the real reasons he left the Faith.

So … on X somebody espoused an opinion supporting the declaration of the “Fifth Marian Dogma”. Which is the theological theory that the Blessed Virgin Mary acts as Co-Redemptrix and Mediatrix of All Graces (link – EWTN). I had always believed these to be two separate doctrines, so I did a quick check in Ott’s “Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma”.

Under Chapter 2 The Privileges of the Mother of God, we find the dogmas (ie De Fide teachings):

  1. Mary is truly the Mother of God

  2. Mary was conceived without stain of original sin (Pius IX 1854)

  3. Mary conceived by the Holy Ghost without the co-operation of man.

  4. Mary bore her Son without any violation of her virginal integrity.

  5. Also after the Birth of Jesus, Mary remained a Virgin

  6. Mary was assumed body and soul into Heaven (Pius XII 1950)

So … there are already 6 dogmas regarding Our Lady … so this with be the seventh not fifth.

Ott goes on to explain that “Mary is designated mediatrix of all graces in a double sense”:

  • Mary gave the Redeemer, the Source of all graces, to the world, and in this way she is the channel of all graces. (Sent Certa)

  • Since Mary’s Assumption into Heaven no grace is conferred on man without her actual intercessory co-operation (Sent. Pio et probabilis)

Recently a document from the Dicastery of the Doctrine of the Faith casts some criticism on these two latter theological points.

22. Given the necessity of explaining Mary’s subordinate role to Christ in the work of Redemption, it would not be appropriate to use the title “Co-redemptrix” to define Mary’s cooperation. This title risks obscuring Christ’s unique salvific mediation and can therefore create confusion and an imbalance in the harmony of the truths of the Christian faith, for “there is salvation in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved” (Acts 4:12). When an expression requires many, repeated explanations to prevent it from straying from a correct meaning, it does not serve the faith of the People of God and becomes unhelpful. In this case, the expression “Co-redemptrix” does not help extol Mary as the first and foremost collaborator in the work of Redemption and grace, for it carries the risk of eclipsing the exclusive role of Jesus Christ — the Son of God made man for our salvation, who was the only one capable of offering the Father a sacrifice of infinite value — which would not be a true honor to his Mother. Indeed, as the “handmaid of the Lord” (Lk 1:38), Mary directs us to Christ and asks us to “do whatever he tells you” (Jn 2:5). (Link: Mater Populi Fidelis)

Interestingly, Rorate added the following note to this post:

The papal approval is at the end of the document, right before the endnotes. Interesting that Leo XIV approved the note, but not “in forma specifica” — which would make it an actual papal teaching demanding high assent of the faithful.

So, if this is correct, the question is not settled and remains open for discussion and pius belief. Even if it was set aside for ecumenical reasons:

The Second Vatican Council refrained from using the title for dogmatic, pastoral, and ecumenical reasons.
P^3

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Rome,the SSPX and this time of Crisis - Updated

By
+ JMJ Obviously there's lots of events right now. First we have the April 1st - I almost thought it was April Fools - meeting between Pope Francis and Bishop Fellay.  Nothing really news worthy as this is a natural progression as Rome appears to be considering fulfilling Archbishop Lefebvre's wish to 'accept us as we are'. Second we have the April 8th publication of what will be a verbose exhortation of the Synod of the Family. I'm willing to bet that the Pope will give with one hand (unilateral regularization of SSPX) and take with the other (ambiguous document that opens the flood gates of sin further). Much to pray for. P^3
30 comments
Read more

SSPX and the Resistance - A Comparison Of Ecclesiology

By
Shining the light of Church Teaching on the doctrinal positions of the SSPX and the Resistance. Principles are guides used to aid in decision making.  It stands to reason that bad principles will lead to bad decisions. The recent interactions between Rome and the SSPX has challenged a number of closely held cultural assumptions of people in both sides of the disagreement. This has resulted in cultural skirmishes in both Rome and the SSPX. Since it is the smaller of the two, the skirmishes have been more evident within the SSPX.  The cultural fault-line that Bishop Fellay crossed appears to be linked to two points of Catholic Doctrine: Ecclesiology and Obedience.  The cultural difference of view points is strong enough that it has resulted in the expulsion of a number of members.  It should also be noted that some other priests expelled since the beginning of the latest interactions (starting in 2000) held the same view points and have joined with the l...
8 comments
Read more

Validity of new rite of episcopal consecrations - Courtesy of SSPX.org

By
+ JMJ In the blogosphere there are number of responses to this crisis in the Catholic Church that lead to conclusions that run counter to Catholic Doctrine and Dogmas - if taken to their logical conclusion. The validity of the New Rite of Episcopal consecrations is one such hotspot within more extreme sections of the 'traditionalist' culture. Validity of new rite of episcopal consecrations Courtesy of SSPX.org Why the new rite of episcopal consecration is valid Introduction This comprehensive study was compiled to settle a debate that has been circulating in traditional Catholic circles. Some writers have examined the new rite of episcopal consecration and concluded that it must be invalid. Since this would cause manifest problems if it were true and due to the heightened awareness of such a theory, we present a study of this question concluding that it is valid. Following the Council, in 1968 a new rite for the ordination of bishops was promulg...
1 comment
Read more

Comparision of the Tridentine, Cranmer and Novus Ordo Masses

By
+ JMJ I downloaded the comparison that was linked in the previous article on the mass (here) . ... a very good reference! P^3 From: Whispers of Restoration (available at this link) . CHARTING LITURGICAL CHANGE Comparing the 1962 Ordinary of the Roman Mass to changes made during the Anglican Schism; Compared in turn to changes adopted in the creation of Pope Paul VI’s Mass in 1969 The chart on the reverse is a concise comparison of certain ritual differences between three historical rites for the celebration of the Catholic Mass Vetus Ordo: “Old Order,” the Roman Rite of Mass as contained in the 1962 Missal, often referred to as the “Traditional Latin Mass.”The Ordinary of this Mass is that of Pope St. Pius V (1570) following the Council of Trent (1545-63), hence the occasional moniker “Tridentine Mass.” However, Trent only consolidated and codified the Roman Rite already in use at that time; its essential form dates to Pope St. Gregory the Great (+604), in whose time the R...
Post a Comment
Read more