Skip to main content

Pope Leo XIV: Dilexi Te Part E - Pre-Conciliar Teachings

 +

JMJ



In reading the chatGPT outputs, I noticed that, while citing the Father’s and earlier writings of the Church, earlier Church Councils etc are absent.

So I created a new prompt to investigate what the LLM (i.e. chatGPT) would produce.

Prompt

Looking at the pre 1960 documents of the Catholic Church, which ones included the care and love of the poor?

Result

That’s an excellent question — and a deeply revealing one. Long before 1960, the Catholic Church had already developed a strong tradition of teaching on the care and love of the poor, rooted in Scripture, the Fathers of the Church, and later formalized in social encyclicals and other magisterial texts.

Here’s a structured overview of key pre-1960 Church documents that explicitly emphasize love for and care of the poor, the vulnerable, and the working classes.


1. Rerum Novarum (1891) – Pope Leo XIII

Theme: The rights and duties of capital and labor.

Core message:

This encyclical is the foundation of modern Catholic social teaching. Leo XIII condemned both unrestrained capitalism and socialism, affirming the dignity of labor, the right to private property, and—centrally—the Church’s duty to protect and uplift the poor.

> “The rich must religiously refrain from cutting down the workman’s earnings, whether by force, by fraud, or by usurious dealing; and with all the greater reason because the poor man’s earnings are sacred.”

> — Rerum Novarum, §20

2. Quadragesimo Anno (1931) – Pope Pius XI

Theme: Reconstruction of the social order (issued 40 years after Rerum Novarum).

Core message:

Pius XI expanded Leo XIII’s teaching, calling for the reform of unjust economic systems and emphasizing solidarity with the poor. He highlighted subsidiarity—that social assistance should be provided at the lowest possible level while protecting the vulnerable.

> “Every effort must therefore be made that the poor and the workers be drawn closer to those who are rich.”

> — Quadragesimo Anno, §60

3. Mater et Magistra (1961) – Pope John XXIII

(Technically post-1960, but conceived in continuity with earlier documents.)

Theme: Christianity and social progress.

Core message:

John XXIII reaffirmed and updated Leo XIII and Pius XI, stressing that social development and economic justice are acts of love toward the poor.

> “The duty of every man is to consider his neighbor’s needs and rights as closely as his own.”

> — Mater et Magistra, §30

4. Summi Pontificatus (1939) – Pope Pius XII

Theme: The unity of human society.

Core message:

Issued at the start of World War II, this encyclical spoke of the moral obligation to uphold human dignity and aid those suffering from oppression, poverty, and war.

> “The nations of the earth are called to a higher justice and charity, without which peace and order cannot be restored.”

5. Deus Caritas Est (Patristic roots and continuity)

Although Deus Caritas Est itself is from 2005 (Benedict XVI), it explicitly cites the early Church practice — from Acts 2:44-45 and the writings of the Fathers — of communal sharing and love for the poor.

Before 1960, this tradition appeared in:

The Didache (1st–2nd century): “Do not turn away from one who is in need.”

St. John Chrysostom (4th century): “The property of the rich belongs to the poor.”

St. Ambrose (4th century): “You are not making a gift of your possessions to the poor person. You are handing over to him what is his.”

These ideas strongly influenced Leo XIII’s Rerum Novarum.

6. Mystici Corporis Christi (1943) – Pope Pius XII

Theme: The Church as the Mystical Body of Christ.

Core message:

By defining the Church as Christ’s living body, Pius XII grounded the duty of care for the poor in theology: to serve the poor is to serve Christ Himself.

> “Those who are most in need of comfort and assistance are the members who are the sick, the infirm, the poor.”

7. Missionary and charitable instructions

Several papal documents and Vatican directives prior to 1960 emphasized charity as an essential expression of faith:

Benedict XIV, Vix Pervenit (1745): Condemned usury and economic exploitation of the poor.

Leo XIII, Graves de Communi Re (1901): Called for Christian democracy rooted in charity and service to the poor.

Pius XII’s wartime addresses (1939–1958): Urged Catholics to rebuild society through compassion and justice.






Pre-Modern Teaching

Then chatGPT provided the following query:

Would you like me to include pre-modern sources (e.g., medieval papal bulls or conciliar decrees) that addressed poverty and charity — such as those from Gregory the Great, Innocent III, or the Council of Trent? They add important context to how the Church’s commitment to the poor developed before the industrial age.

My response:

Yes include pre-modern source

The Result



Excellent — that deepens the picture considerably.

When we widen the lens to include pre-modern (pre-19th-century) sources, we find that the care and love of the poor is not a late development but one of the most continuous and characteristic elements of Catholic doctrine.

Below is a chronological overview of key pre-1960 sources — now including patristic, medieval, and early-modern foundations — showing how the theme of charity toward the poor evolved from Gospel roots into formal Church teaching.

I. Scriptural and Patristic Roots (1st–6th centuries)

The biblical mandate — “Whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers of mine, you did for me” (Mt 25:40) — lies at the core of all later documents.

1. The Didache (c. A.D. 100)

> “Do not turn away from him who is in need; share all things with your brother.”

> Early Christian manual prescribing almsgiving as a moral duty.

2. The Apostolic Constitutions (4th cent.)

Regulations for bishops:

> “Let the bishop care for all, especially the poor, the widows, and the orphans.”

3. Church Fathers

St. Basil the Great, Homily to the Rich (4th cent.): “The bread you keep belongs to the hungry.”

St. John Chrysostom: “Not to share our wealth with the poor is to steal from them.”

St. Ambrose: Linked almsgiving with justice, not optional mercy.

St. Augustine: Developed the theology of the common use of goods (usus communis).

These Fathers shaped all subsequent papal and conciliar reflection on poverty and property.

🏛️ II. Early Medieval Teaching (6th–11th centuries)

4. Pope Gregory the Great, Regula Pastoralis (c. 590 A.D.)

Pastoral guide emphasizing bishops’ duty to use Church property for the poor:

> “Let him regard the riches of the Church as the patrimony of the poor.”

5. Monastic Rules

Rule of St. Benedict (6th cent.) ordered hospitality and almsgiving as expressions of humility and communal charity.

These rules institutionalized care of the poor in monasteries across Europe.

III. High and Late Middle Ages (12th–15th centuries)

6. Fourth Lateran Council (1215) – Innocent III

Mandated clerics to live modestly and use ecclesiastical revenues for the needy.

Canon 25: bishops must ensure support for the poor from cathedral funds.

7. Papal Bulls on Charity and the Poor

Innocent III, Cum inter nonnullos (1213): urged bishops to provide hospitals and hospices.

Gregory IX, Quo elongati (1230): confirmed Franciscan poverty ideal.

Nicholas III, Exiit qui seminat (1279): clarified that Franciscan renunciation served evangelical witness to the poor.

8. Scholastic Theology

St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiae II-II q. 32–66:

Almsgiving is a work of justice as well as mercy.

The poor have a right of necessity to what is superfluous to the rich.

These principles became the backbone of later social encyclicals.

IV. Early-Modern Era (16th–18th centuries)

9. Council of Trent (1545–1563)

Reaffirmed corporal works of mercy and required bishops to found seminaries and hospices; charity seen as essential to pastoral life.

Decree on Reformation (Sess. XXII, c. 1): Church revenues are to aid the poor before any luxury.

10. Papal and Post-Tridentine Actions

St. Pius V (1566–1572): enforced poor relief and hospital visitation by clergy.

Urban VIII, In eminenti (1622): supported missionary congregations providing education and care to the destitute.

Benedict XIV, Vix Pervenit (1745): condemned usury as exploitation of the poor — a decisive economic application of charity.

V. Nineteenth-Century Transition to Modern Social Teaching

11. Gregory XVI, Mirari Vos (1832) and Singulari Nos (1834)

While primarily doctrinal, they defended Christian charity as the moral counterweight to revolutionary violence.

12. Pius IX, Qui pluribus (1846) and Syllabus Errorum (1864)

Condemned materialism and indifferentism that ignored the poor; foreshadowed a social response later articulated by Leo XIII.



Progression of Church’s Teaching

As is usual chatGPT provided me with a next step:

Would you like me to present this as a **timeline or chart (2–3 pages)** showing how the Church’s teaching on the poor developed from *Acts of the Apostles* to *Mater et Magistra*? It would clearly trace the doctrinal continuity and main turning points.

The result
















Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Comparision of the Tridentine, Cranmer and Novus Ordo Masses

+ JMJ I downloaded the comparison that was linked in the previous article on the mass (here) . ... a very good reference! P^3 From: Whispers of Restoration (available at this link) . CHARTING LITURGICAL CHANGE Comparing the 1962 Ordinary of the Roman Mass to changes made during the Anglican Schism; Compared in turn to changes adopted in the creation of Pope Paul VI’s Mass in 1969 The chart on the reverse is a concise comparison of certain ritual differences between three historical rites for the celebration of the Catholic Mass Vetus Ordo: “Old Order,” the Roman Rite of Mass as contained in the 1962 Missal, often referred to as the “Traditional Latin Mass.”The Ordinary of this Mass is that of Pope St. Pius V (1570) following the Council of Trent (1545-63), hence the occasional moniker “Tridentine Mass.” However, Trent only consolidated and codified the Roman Rite already in use at that time; its essential form dates to Pope St. Gregory the Great (+604), in whose time the R...

SSPX and the Resistance - A Comparison Of Ecclesiology

Shining the light of Church Teaching on the doctrinal positions of the SSPX and the Resistance. Principles are guides used to aid in decision making.  It stands to reason that bad principles will lead to bad decisions. The recent interactions between Rome and the SSPX has challenged a number of closely held cultural assumptions of people in both sides of the disagreement. This has resulted in cultural skirmishes in both Rome and the SSPX. Since it is the smaller of the two, the skirmishes have been more evident within the SSPX.  The cultural fault-line that Bishop Fellay crossed appears to be linked to two points of Catholic Doctrine: Ecclesiology and Obedience.  The cultural difference of view points is strong enough that it has resulted in the expulsion of a number of members.  It should also be noted that some other priests expelled since the beginning of the latest interactions (starting in 2000) held the same view points and have joined with the l...

If Pope Francis is bad - what about Pope St. John Paul II et al?

+ JMJ So here we are on the apparent cusp of yet another post conciliar Papal canonization. This time we have Pope's John-Paul I and Paul VI canonizations to 'look forward' to. This follows, obviously, on the heels of Pope St. John Paul II's canonization? So the first question that I usually encounter is: How is it possible, keeping in mind the doctrine on infallibility of canonizations (note doctrine not dogma), that Pope St. John Paul II is a Saint? First, what does it mean???  According to the doctrine of dogmatic facts - it is the universal opinion of Theologians that canonizations are infallible.  It means that they enjoy the beatific vision.  ... that's it.  That is the doctrine and it is at the level of universal opinion of theologians.  It is called a 'dogmatic fact'. That they made mistakes is obvious.  That the miracles seem to not be very miraculous is also a bit of an issue. Here's something to consider: The rush that surrou...

Spiritual Journey Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre - Extracts

+ JMJ I have posted these two chapters to provide context for the quote of: It is, therefore, a strict duty for every priest wanting to remain Catholic to separate himself from this Conciliar Church for as long as it does not rediscover the Tradition of the Church and of the Catholic Faith. P^3 Courtesy of SSPX.ca Chapter II The Perfections of God We ought to remember during this entire contemplation of God that we must apply all that is said of God to Our Lord Jesus Christ, Who is God. We cannot separate Jesus Christ from God. We cannot separate the Christian religion from Jesus Christ, Who is God, and we must affirm and believe that only the Catholic religion is the Christian religion. These affirmations have, as a result, inescapable conclusions that no ecclesiastic authority can contest: outside of Jesus Christ and the Catholic religion, that is, outsi...

Dogmas of the Catholic Faith (de fide) - Expanded Listing: Answer for Reader

 + JMJ  A reader asked the following question in the 2015 version of the article on the Dogmas of the Catholic Faith (link) : 117: "In the state of fallen nature it is morally impossible for man without Supernatural Revelation, to know easily, with absolute certainty and without admixture of error, all religious and moral truths of the natural order." Where can you find this in the documents of the Church? ( Link to comment )  Here's the reference from Ott: The citation that Ott provided was Denzinger 1786 and the source document is Dogmatic Consitution Concerning the Faith from the First Vatican Council (Papal Encyclicals - link) : Chapter 2 On Revelation, Article 3: It is indeed thanks to this divine revelation , that those matters concerning God, which are not of themselves beyond the scope of human reason, can, even in the present state of the human race, be known by everyone, without difficulty, with firm certitude and with no intermingling of error. Here's ...