Skip to main content

Economic Systems: Communism, Socialism, Free - Market - Part 2

 +

JMJ

 Following up on my first article I did a quick review of the Catholic Encyclopedia (links below).

First the idea of the economy is to manage the resources of an organization. That can be a person, family, company, country or even world.

The term socialism (quoted below) definitely seems to apply today over a hundred years later.

A system of social and economic organization that would substitute state monopoly for private ownership of the sources of production and means of distribution, and would concentrate under the control of the secular governing authority the chief activities of human life. 

This is where I see socialism leading to a police state as described in 1984.  There are a number of current movements that seek to limit the action of religion and the majority in favour of minorities. Something to research further.

Communism seems to be a flavour of Socialism with all property being removed from the control of the individuals.

In its more general signification communism refers to any social system in which all property, or at least all productive property, is owned by the group, or community, instead of by individuals. Thus understood it comprises communistic anarchism, socialism, and communism in the strict sense.

I'm not clear on where Collectivism lands in the spectrum.  However, the 'Tragedy of the Commons' (link: Tragedy of the Commons)  is a useful idea to review:

 The tragedy of the commons is an economic theory that states that individuals use up resources shared by many to benefit themselves. The reality is often that because individuals tend to act in a selfish way, using resources shared by a group, everyone ends up suffering in the end.

This is why it is false that the developing economies will sacrifice their growth in order to at least slow global warming that is driving climate change.  We all partake in the commons of the environment, but the impacts are in the future, so these economies won't sacrifice their people.

This something I may look at later as I was surprised to see that Canada actually was twelfth on theWiki list with GHG contributions of 1.41%.

P^3

 

References

https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/economics/economic-system/

https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/12213b.htm

https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14062a.htm

https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/04179a.htm

https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/04106a.htm

https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/06058c.htm

https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/01226a.htm

https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14385b.htm

https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/climate-change/greenhouse-gas-emissions/sources-sinks-executive-summary-2023.html 

https://www.wri.org/insights/interactive-chart-shows-changes-worlds-top-10-emitters

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_greenhouse_gas_emissions

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Curious Case of Steve Skojec and the Dangers of Deep Diving into the Crisis Sub-Titled: The Failings of Others

 + JMJ It's been a while now since Steve Skojec sold 1P5 and abandoned the Catholic Faith. I've been a 'Trad' since 1982 and in those 40+ years I seen this death-spiral before with a similar end point. It seems that anyone who jumps into the fray unprepared for the enormous task of righting wrongs will, eventually, become discouraged by not the task but the people who surround them.   I remember when Skojec complained of the treatment his family received from a traditional priest.  This seems to have been the start of the end for him. So what can we learn from the likes of Steve Skojec, Michael Voris (maybe?), Louie Verrecchio, Gerry Matatix and other celebrity Catholics? Probably quite a lot about what not to do. First, don't burn out on the crisis?  When you burn out, on work or anything else, little things assume a more greater importance than they are due.   This is one of my 'canary in the coal mine' signals that I've been stretching myself too thin

Cathinfo and the 'resistance' perspective

+ JMJ Matthew, the owner of Cathinfo - a resistance forum has posted a response to a person that indicated his reasons for continuing to go to the SSPX.

"Catholic" Charismatic Renewal - Culture Shock

+ JMJ     If there is one phenomenon (read: Virus) within the Mystical Body of Christ that causes cultural shock to Traditionalists it is the "Catholic" Charismatic Renewal. I can think of no better source than John Vennari for information on this movement within the Church of Christ. In addition to the link below, here's another article worthy of consideration as well as one from the SSPX (Charismatic Renewal - Is It Catholic?) . P^3 Source A "Catholic" Charismatic Extravaganza "To speak in tongues you had never learned was, and is, a recognized symptom in alleged cases of diabolic possession." Msgr. Ronald Knox -- Enthusiasm by John Vennari (RIP)   It arrived on my desk a few months ago as yet another unsolicited piece of bulk mail.  The brochure from the Franciscan University at Steubenville, announced that "Catholic" Charismatics were about to celebrate their 30th Anniversary bash in Pittsburgh "where

Communique about Avrille Dominicans - SSPX.org

+ JMJ Having completed the review of the 'Avrille' perspective, this communique from the French District Superior is perfectly timed. I believe that the 'resistance' has lost rationality and further argumentation simply results in their holding on to their false ideal all the more firmly. Pray much ... First, for them to acquiesce to the grace of humility in order to obtain a clear perspective on the principles involved. Second, that we may remain faithful to the Church, and Her Dogmas, Doctrines and Principles. Lest we become that which against we strove ... P^3 Courtesy of SSPX.org

What the heck is a congregation of "Pontifical Right"

+ JMJ In a discussion with a friend the question occurred to me that I didn't actually know was is involved in being a religious order of 'pontifical right'. I had a vague notion that this meant they reported to Rome as opposed to the local diocese. I'm also aware that, according to the accounts I have heard, the Archbishop received 'praise' and the written direction to incardinate priests directly into the SSPX.  This is interesting because it implies that the SSPX priests were no longer required to incardinate in the local diocese but in the SSPX. This is something that belongs to an order of 'pontifical right'. Anyway here's some definitions: Di diritto pontificio is the Italian term for “of pontifical right” . It is given to the ecclesiastical institutions (the religious and secular institutes, societies of apostolic life) either created by the Holy See or approved by it with the formal decree, known by its Latin name, Decretu