Skip to main content

Economic Systems: Communism, Socialism, Free - Market - Part 1

Image
By

 +

JMJ

 I live in a country that some call 'socialist' ... and I recall looking up the definition once and found that the label didn't fit.

So I've decided to do a shallow dive into the different economic systems with a focus on Communism, Socialism and Market Driven.

In Socialism - the means of production are not owned by individuals, but by a collective of some sort, such as the Government.  

In Canada we have Crown Corporations that are own and managed by the Government.  So these do appear to be 'Socialist', however they are the exception not the rule and are generally focused on areas of national importance (See list at end of article).

 I've attached some excerpts below and have concluded that the Canadian Health system is not inherently socialist because the 'method of production' - meaning the hospitals - are not generally owned by the government, but privately via corporations.  What most people don't seem to know is that the Canadian Health system is a single insurer system - the insurer is the Government of Canada and, unlike most of the hospitals in the USA, it is not a for-profit system. 

However, one part does ring true with regards to the "emphasis on an equitable distribution of wealth among citizens".  This is what I call the Robin-Hood democracy, in which the Government seeks to tax the wealthy to fund social programs.  This does seem to create a problem as it is effectively punishing people for being successful by forcing them to pay higher taxes.  This disincentive will cause them to look for ways to preserve their wealth.

Keeping in mind that successful people generally employ other people. If you disincentive the creative, entrepreneurial, leaders, then you impact the economy. I foresee that the Government would just try to move more money to the rest of the economy but this will probably be a death spiral since they have cut the the productive actors within the economy who promote growth.

Conclusion

 So Canada isn't a 'Socialist' country following the basic factors I found in my research. However, the actions of the Government definitely seem to follow the Socialist principles.

P^3

 

 

So first, what are they key facets of Socialism?  The key element is focused on who owns the means of production. In this case of  'socialism' the means of production are held in common by the people.

 Socialism is a populist economic and political system based on:

  • collective, 
  • common, 
  • or public ownership of the means of production. 
  • Those means of production include the machinery, tools, and factories used to produce goods that aim to directly satisfy human needs.

In contrast to capitalism, whereby business owners control the means of production and pay wages to workers to use those means, socialism envisions shared ownership and control among the laboring class.   Source: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/socialism.asp

 

Key Takeaways

  • Communism and socialism are political and economic systems that share certain ideologies, including greater equality in the distribution of income.
  • Both are rejections of capitalism, instead giving economic power to the working class.
  • One way that communism differs from socialism historically is that the former calls for the transfer of power to the working class through revolutionary rather than gradual means.
  • Both communism and socialism advocate public control of the means of production, although socialism allows for the continued existence of capitalism in some parts of the economy.
  • In reality, communist systems have not been very successful to date.

Communism

In basic terms, communism is a philosophy based on the equitable distribution of wealth among a nation’s citizens and common ownership of all property. In particular, it calls for the control of the means of production, such as manufacturing and agriculture, by the working class, or proletariat. Its ultimate goal is to achieve a classless society, at which point the state (or government) would “wither away.”1

Contemporary communism is an offshoot of socialism and is sometimes called revolutionary socialism for advocating the takeover of governmental powers by the working class through revolution rather than incremental reform.

Socialism

Socialism encompasses a broader spectrum of political beliefs but shares communism’s emphasis on an equitable distribution of wealth among citizens, as well as public ownership of the means of production, though not necessarily all of them. In that sense, socialist programs and policies can exist alongside capitalism in a society, which is less likely in a communist system. Socialists may or may not see a communist system as their end goal.Source: Investopia: Communism vs. Socialism: What’s the Difference?


 

 

 

Other References

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_system

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_economics

https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/100214/what-difference-between-communism-and-socialism.asp

https://www.canada.ca/en/treasury-board-secretariat/services/guidance-crown-corporations/list-crown-corporations.html

 

List of Crown Corporations

 

A
Atlantic Pilotage Authority III-I December 31 Transport
Atomic Energy of Canada Limited III-I March 31 Natural Resources
 
B
Bank of Canada Exempt December 31 Finance
Blue Water Bridge Authority III-I August 31 Transport
Business Development Bank of Canada III-I March 31 Industry
 
C
Canada Council for the Arts Exempt March 31 Canadian Heritage
Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation III-I March 31 Finance
Canada Development Investment Corporation III-II December 31 Finance
Canada Lands Company Limited III-I

March 31

Public Works and Government Services
Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation III-I December 31 Human Resources
Canada Pension Plan Investment Board Exempt March 31 Finance
Canada Post Corporation III-II December 31 Transport
Canadian Air Transport Security Authority III-I March 31 Transport
Canadian Broadcasting Corporation Exempt March 31 Canadian Heritage
Canadian Commercial Corporation III-I March 31 International Trade
Canadian Dairy Commission III-I July 31 Agriculture and Agri‑Food
Canadian Museum of Civilization III-I March 31 Canadian Heritage
Canadian Museum for Human Rights III-I March 31 Canadian Heritage
Canadian Museum of Immigration at Pier 21 III-I March 31 Canadian Heritage
Canadian Museum of Nature III-I March 31 Canadian Heritage
Canadian Race Relations Foundation Exempt (Part X) March 31 Citizenship and Immigration
Canadian Tourism Commission III-I December 31 Industry
Corporation for the Mitigation of Mackenzie Gas Project Impacts III-I March 31 Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development
 
D
Defence Construction (1951) Limited III-I March 31 Public Works and Government Services
 
E
Enterprise Cape Breton Corporation III-I March 31 Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency
Export Development Canada III-I December 31 International Trade
 
F
Farm Credit Canada III-I March 31 Agriculture and Agri‑Food
Federal Bridge Corporation Limited, The III-I March 31 Transport
Freshwater Fish Marketing Corporation III-I April 30 Fisheries and Oceans
 
G
Great Lakes Pilotage Authority III-I December 31 Transport
 
I
International Development Research Centre Exempt March 31 Foreign Affairs
 
L
Laurentian Pilotage Authority III-I December 31 Transport
 
M
Marine Atlantic Inc III-I March 31 Transport
 
N
National Arts Centre Corporation Exempt August 31 Canadian Heritage
National Capital Commission III-I March 31 Foreign Affairs
National Gallery of Canada III-I March 31 Canadian Heritage
National Museum of Science and Technology III-I March 31 Canadian Heritage
 
O
Old Port of Montreal Corporation Inc Reports as a Parent March 31 Public Works and Government Services
 
P
Pacific Pilotage Authority III-I December 31 Transport
Parc Downsview Park Inc Reports as a Parent March 31 Public Works and Government Services
Public Sector Pension Investment Board Exempt (Part X) March 31 Treasury Board
 
R
Ridley Terminals Inc III-I December 31 Transport
Royal Canadian Mint III-II December 31 Finance
 
S
Standards Council of Canada III-I March 31 Industry
 
T
Telefilm Canada Exempt March 31 Canadian Heritage
 
V
VIA Rail Canada Inc III-I December 31 Transport

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

De Veritate - St. Thomas Aquinas - What is necessary to believe explicitly?

By
I was recently introduced to a work of St. Thomas De Veritate ( Source ) in the course of an argument concerning the minimum content of explicit faith.  When I submitted the following quote as proof: Theological faith, that is, a supernatural faith in Revelation, is necessary, and this is an effect of grace (D 1789); nemini unquam sine ilIa contigit iustificatio (D 1793). As far as the content of this faith is concerned, according to Hebr. 11, 6, at least the existence of God and retribution in the other world must be firmly held, necessitate medii (by the necessity of means) with explicit faith. In regard to the Trinity and the Incarnation, implicit faith suffices. The supernatural faith necessary for justification is attained when God grants to the unbeliever by internal inspiration or external teaching a knowledge of the truths of Revelation, and actual grace to make the supernatural act of faith. Cf. De verite 14, I I.Ott - Fundamentals of Dogma p241 In response my opponent ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Comparision of the Tridentine, Cranmer and Novus Ordo Masses

By
+ JMJ I downloaded the comparison that was linked in the previous article on the mass (here) . ... a very good reference! P^3 From: Whispers of Restoration (available at this link) . CHARTING LITURGICAL CHANGE Comparing the 1962 Ordinary of the Roman Mass to changes made during the Anglican Schism; Compared in turn to changes adopted in the creation of Pope Paul VI’s Mass in 1969 The chart on the reverse is a concise comparison of certain ritual differences between three historical rites for the celebration of the Catholic Mass Vetus Ordo: “Old Order,” the Roman Rite of Mass as contained in the 1962 Missal, often referred to as the “Traditional Latin Mass.”The Ordinary of this Mass is that of Pope St. Pius V (1570) following the Council of Trent (1545-63), hence the occasional moniker “Tridentine Mass.” However, Trent only consolidated and codified the Roman Rite already in use at that time; its essential form dates to Pope St. Gregory the Great (+604), in whose time the R...
Post a Comment
Read more

Rome and the SSPX - Version 2026 Part 5b - How Did We Get Here??? ... A Continued Anlaysis using ChatGPT.

By
 + JMJ Part 5b How Did We Get Here??? So in the previous ChatGPT analysis the LLM ‘concluded’ that there was continuity in doctrine. So now we’re going to explore this element. There is some repetition but I don't have time right now to do a lot of editing.  I think instead we'll have a Part 5c where I try to pull it all together with some old fashioned human sense making. At the end point, I think the LLM collects an interesting if somewhat skewed perspective: The SSPX mapping hinges on this claim: That Vatican II affirms (at least implicitly) propositions that the Syllabus of Errors explicitly condemned. The broader Church response is: The same propositions are still rejected—but Vatican II is addressing different categories (political, pastoral, anthropological) rather than reversing doctrine. While the summary of the SSPX position seems close, that of the broader Church seems to be either an outright AI hallucination or a consensus point from the literature that it used...
Post a Comment
Read more

News Roundup: April 30, 2026

By
 + JMJ I just realised that I haven't posted the latest Roundup ... and there is a lot in the roundup as the media storm around the SSPX continues! I also just noticed this article: European Conservative: Why the SSPX Bishop Decision Matters Far Beyond Church Politics (link) .  P^3 === Popes Past Present and Future Papal News and Views Cardinal Fernandez maintains that Francis is not dead- metaphorically Pope Leo XIV Reopens Amoris Laetitia File | FSSPX News Pope Leo: “We Do Not Agree with the Formalized Blessing of …Homosexual Couples” - OnePeterFive RORATE CÆLI: How Pope Leo is Reshuffling the Curia: Musical Chairs and Power Games RORATE CÆLI: A Giant Leap: The meaning of Cardinal Eijk’s Pontifical High Mass and the Rebirth of Dutch Catholicism RORATE CÆLI: A Sign of Continuity with the Pre-Francis Papacy: Pope to Wash Feet of Twelve Priests RORATE CÆLI: Vatican Blocks Continuity of Procedure of Beatification and Canonization of Argentine Bishop -- no new Satanellis Pope Leo...
Post a Comment
Read more

Rome and the SSPX - Version 2026 Part 5 - How Did We Get Here???

By
 + JMJ This is the fifth in this series and I think it may require a part b to show the controversial documents and teachings of the Pope post V2. P^3 Part 5 How Did We Get Here??? Introduction My family became ‘Traditional’ in early 1980’s and I didn’t realise until years later how early we entered the Fray. So the SSPX was slightly over a decade old when we started going to Mass. That is a young organization, as someone said at the consecrations “Aren’t you a little young to be a bishop?”, the response was, “That is something that time will change.” 1970: SSPX founded with diocesan approval (Abp. Marcel Lefebvre) 1974–1976: Vatican II disputes escalate; Lefebvre suspended a divinis 1988: Illicit episcopal consecrations → excommunications declared 2000: SSPX Jubilee pilgrimage to Rome (signals openness to talks) 2009: Excommunications lifted by Pope Benedict XVI 2011–2012: Doctrinal talks with CDF collapse 2015–2017: SSPX granted faculties for confessi...
Post a Comment
Read more