Skip to main content

Economic Systems: Communism, Socialism, Free - Market - Part 1

Image
By

 +

JMJ

 I live in a country that some call 'socialist' ... and I recall looking up the definition once and found that the label didn't fit.

So I've decided to do a shallow dive into the different economic systems with a focus on Communism, Socialism and Market Driven.

In Socialism - the means of production are not owned by individuals, but by a collective of some sort, such as the Government.  

In Canada we have Crown Corporations that are own and managed by the Government.  So these do appear to be 'Socialist', however they are the exception not the rule and are generally focused on areas of national importance (See list at end of article).

 I've attached some excerpts below and have concluded that the Canadian Health system is not inherently socialist because the 'method of production' - meaning the hospitals - are not generally owned by the government, but privately via corporations.  What most people don't seem to know is that the Canadian Health system is a single insurer system - the insurer is the Government of Canada and, unlike most of the hospitals in the USA, it is not a for-profit system. 

However, one part does ring true with regards to the "emphasis on an equitable distribution of wealth among citizens".  This is what I call the Robin-Hood democracy, in which the Government seeks to tax the wealthy to fund social programs.  This does seem to create a problem as it is effectively punishing people for being successful by forcing them to pay higher taxes.  This disincentive will cause them to look for ways to preserve their wealth.

Keeping in mind that successful people generally employ other people. If you disincentive the creative, entrepreneurial, leaders, then you impact the economy. I foresee that the Government would just try to move more money to the rest of the economy but this will probably be a death spiral since they have cut the the productive actors within the economy who promote growth.

Conclusion

 So Canada isn't a 'Socialist' country following the basic factors I found in my research. However, the actions of the Government definitely seem to follow the Socialist principles.

P^3

 

 

So first, what are they key facets of Socialism?  The key element is focused on who owns the means of production. In this case of  'socialism' the means of production are held in common by the people.

 Socialism is a populist economic and political system based on:

  • collective, 
  • common, 
  • or public ownership of the means of production. 
  • Those means of production include the machinery, tools, and factories used to produce goods that aim to directly satisfy human needs.

In contrast to capitalism, whereby business owners control the means of production and pay wages to workers to use those means, socialism envisions shared ownership and control among the laboring class.   Source: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/socialism.asp

 

Key Takeaways

  • Communism and socialism are political and economic systems that share certain ideologies, including greater equality in the distribution of income.
  • Both are rejections of capitalism, instead giving economic power to the working class.
  • One way that communism differs from socialism historically is that the former calls for the transfer of power to the working class through revolutionary rather than gradual means.
  • Both communism and socialism advocate public control of the means of production, although socialism allows for the continued existence of capitalism in some parts of the economy.
  • In reality, communist systems have not been very successful to date.

Communism

In basic terms, communism is a philosophy based on the equitable distribution of wealth among a nation’s citizens and common ownership of all property. In particular, it calls for the control of the means of production, such as manufacturing and agriculture, by the working class, or proletariat. Its ultimate goal is to achieve a classless society, at which point the state (or government) would “wither away.”1

Contemporary communism is an offshoot of socialism and is sometimes called revolutionary socialism for advocating the takeover of governmental powers by the working class through revolution rather than incremental reform.

Socialism

Socialism encompasses a broader spectrum of political beliefs but shares communism’s emphasis on an equitable distribution of wealth among citizens, as well as public ownership of the means of production, though not necessarily all of them. In that sense, socialist programs and policies can exist alongside capitalism in a society, which is less likely in a communist system. Socialists may or may not see a communist system as their end goal.Source: Investopia: Communism vs. Socialism: What’s the Difference?


 

 

 

Other References

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_system

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_economics

https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/100214/what-difference-between-communism-and-socialism.asp

https://www.canada.ca/en/treasury-board-secretariat/services/guidance-crown-corporations/list-crown-corporations.html

 

List of Crown Corporations

 

A
Atlantic Pilotage Authority III-I December 31 Transport
Atomic Energy of Canada Limited III-I March 31 Natural Resources
 
B
Bank of Canada Exempt December 31 Finance
Blue Water Bridge Authority III-I August 31 Transport
Business Development Bank of Canada III-I March 31 Industry
 
C
Canada Council for the Arts Exempt March 31 Canadian Heritage
Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation III-I March 31 Finance
Canada Development Investment Corporation III-II December 31 Finance
Canada Lands Company Limited III-I

March 31

Public Works and Government Services
Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation III-I December 31 Human Resources
Canada Pension Plan Investment Board Exempt March 31 Finance
Canada Post Corporation III-II December 31 Transport
Canadian Air Transport Security Authority III-I March 31 Transport
Canadian Broadcasting Corporation Exempt March 31 Canadian Heritage
Canadian Commercial Corporation III-I March 31 International Trade
Canadian Dairy Commission III-I July 31 Agriculture and Agri‑Food
Canadian Museum of Civilization III-I March 31 Canadian Heritage
Canadian Museum for Human Rights III-I March 31 Canadian Heritage
Canadian Museum of Immigration at Pier 21 III-I March 31 Canadian Heritage
Canadian Museum of Nature III-I March 31 Canadian Heritage
Canadian Race Relations Foundation Exempt (Part X) March 31 Citizenship and Immigration
Canadian Tourism Commission III-I December 31 Industry
Corporation for the Mitigation of Mackenzie Gas Project Impacts III-I March 31 Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development
 
D
Defence Construction (1951) Limited III-I March 31 Public Works and Government Services
 
E
Enterprise Cape Breton Corporation III-I March 31 Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency
Export Development Canada III-I December 31 International Trade
 
F
Farm Credit Canada III-I March 31 Agriculture and Agri‑Food
Federal Bridge Corporation Limited, The III-I March 31 Transport
Freshwater Fish Marketing Corporation III-I April 30 Fisheries and Oceans
 
G
Great Lakes Pilotage Authority III-I December 31 Transport
 
I
International Development Research Centre Exempt March 31 Foreign Affairs
 
L
Laurentian Pilotage Authority III-I December 31 Transport
 
M
Marine Atlantic Inc III-I March 31 Transport
 
N
National Arts Centre Corporation Exempt August 31 Canadian Heritage
National Capital Commission III-I March 31 Foreign Affairs
National Gallery of Canada III-I March 31 Canadian Heritage
National Museum of Science and Technology III-I March 31 Canadian Heritage
 
O
Old Port of Montreal Corporation Inc Reports as a Parent March 31 Public Works and Government Services
 
P
Pacific Pilotage Authority III-I December 31 Transport
Parc Downsview Park Inc Reports as a Parent March 31 Public Works and Government Services
Public Sector Pension Investment Board Exempt (Part X) March 31 Treasury Board
 
R
Ridley Terminals Inc III-I December 31 Transport
Royal Canadian Mint III-II December 31 Finance
 
S
Standards Council of Canada III-I March 31 Industry
 
T
Telefilm Canada Exempt March 31 Canadian Heritage
 
V
VIA Rail Canada Inc III-I December 31 Transport

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The myth of the Hermeneutic of Continuity - Rorate Caeli

By
+ JMJ Interestingly the complete acceptance of the Second Vatican Council (without reservations) is required of the SSPX. Just when people are starting to wonder how it came to this! Courtesy of Rorate Caeli P^3
Post a Comment
Read more

A Look Back: Archbishop Lefebvre’s Prophetic Address to The Remnant, 1976

By
 + JMJ  Looking back is important to understand why we are where we are in this crisis. Courtesy of RemnantNewsPaper  P^3 FOR THE FIRST TIME ONLINE: Archbishop Lefebvre’s Prophetic Address to The Remnant, 1976 Written by  Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre Introduction by Michael J. Matt More than forty years ago—during the disastrous reign of Pope Paul VI, the latest candidate for a Vatican-issued Halo Award, by the way—my father, Walter L. Matt, organized the first large scale public reception in the U.S. for the late Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre. It was held at the Radisson South Hotel, Minneapolis, on Tuesday, May 12, 1976, and its stated purpose was to assist the Archbishop in gaining a stronger foothold for the Society of St. Pius X in the States during the unprecedented crisis Blessed Pope Paul had helped unleash on the Church. On that occasion Archbishop Lefebvre delivered ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Of the Church and the Pope - Fr. Calmel O.P.

By
+ JMJ Once again, looking back to see if the 'Traditional Catholics' in the early days of this crisis of the Church had a sufficient view to realize the roots of the crisis. The root: The Pope Hence when the Pope is 'righted' the Church will be 'righted'. P^3 Courtesy of SSPXasia Fr. Roger Calmel, O.P. This essay by Fr. Roger Calmel, O.P. (1914-75) helps us in these difficult times to preserve our love of the Church. More than 30 years after its first publication, this article retains all its relevance, so much so that it even seems to have been written for our time, in which the crisis in the Church deepens at an unprecedented pace. This essay will help the reader to think clearly, keep the Faith, and maintain serenity in the troubled times we are navigating. “My country has hurt m e,”wrote a young poet in 1944 during the purge 1 when the head of state [Charles De Gaulle] implacably pursued the sinister job that had been in the wo...
Post a Comment
Read more

Canonical Mission and State of Emergency - A Response to Mr. John Salza - Part B

By
 +  JMJ  I was trying to think of a way to map out the time course I discussed in Part A of this article.  Early this morning it came to me that this is more about obedience and duty than canon law.  As is my wont, I mapped out my thoughts (see image) to draw linkages between the core concepts. My conclusion is that, at least subjectively, Archbishop Lefebvre had sufficient information to make good decisions concerning whether or not he was obliged to obey.  I know that the Jesuits, some Sedevacantists and the priests that left over the years will not agree with my thoughts. So be it.  The core pieces of information include: Attacks against the SSPX were launched because they kept the Tridentine Mass and the pre-conciliar understanding of the Truths of the Faith. The authorities in the Church were willing to go against the laws of the Church. The same authorities encouraged the various dangers to the Faith embedded in popular interpretations of ambiguo...
Post a Comment
Read more

Validity of new rite of episcopal consecrations - Courtesy of SSPX.org

By
+ JMJ In the blogosphere there are number of responses to this crisis in the Catholic Church that lead to conclusions that run counter to Catholic Doctrine and Dogmas - if taken to their logical conclusion. The validity of the New Rite of Episcopal consecrations is one such hotspot within more extreme sections of the 'traditionalist' culture. Validity of new rite of episcopal consecrations Courtesy of SSPX.org Why the new rite of episcopal consecration is valid Introduction This comprehensive study was compiled to settle a debate that has been circulating in traditional Catholic circles. Some writers have examined the new rite of episcopal consecration and concluded that it must be invalid. Since this would cause manifest problems if it were true and due to the heightened awareness of such a theory, we present a study of this question concluding that it is valid. Following the Council, in 1968 a new rite for the ordination of bishops was promulg...
1 comment
Read more