Skip to main content

Economic Systems: Communism, Socialism, Free - Market - Part 1

Image
By

 +

JMJ

 I live in a country that some call 'socialist' ... and I recall looking up the definition once and found that the label didn't fit.

So I've decided to do a shallow dive into the different economic systems with a focus on Communism, Socialism and Market Driven.

In Socialism - the means of production are not owned by individuals, but by a collective of some sort, such as the Government.  

In Canada we have Crown Corporations that are own and managed by the Government.  So these do appear to be 'Socialist', however they are the exception not the rule and are generally focused on areas of national importance (See list at end of article).

 I've attached some excerpts below and have concluded that the Canadian Health system is not inherently socialist because the 'method of production' - meaning the hospitals - are not generally owned by the government, but privately via corporations.  What most people don't seem to know is that the Canadian Health system is a single insurer system - the insurer is the Government of Canada and, unlike most of the hospitals in the USA, it is not a for-profit system. 

However, one part does ring true with regards to the "emphasis on an equitable distribution of wealth among citizens".  This is what I call the Robin-Hood democracy, in which the Government seeks to tax the wealthy to fund social programs.  This does seem to create a problem as it is effectively punishing people for being successful by forcing them to pay higher taxes.  This disincentive will cause them to look for ways to preserve their wealth.

Keeping in mind that successful people generally employ other people. If you disincentive the creative, entrepreneurial, leaders, then you impact the economy. I foresee that the Government would just try to move more money to the rest of the economy but this will probably be a death spiral since they have cut the the productive actors within the economy who promote growth.

Conclusion

 So Canada isn't a 'Socialist' country following the basic factors I found in my research. However, the actions of the Government definitely seem to follow the Socialist principles.

P^3

 

 

So first, what are they key facets of Socialism?  The key element is focused on who owns the means of production. In this case of  'socialism' the means of production are held in common by the people.

 Socialism is a populist economic and political system based on:

  • collective, 
  • common, 
  • or public ownership of the means of production. 
  • Those means of production include the machinery, tools, and factories used to produce goods that aim to directly satisfy human needs.

In contrast to capitalism, whereby business owners control the means of production and pay wages to workers to use those means, socialism envisions shared ownership and control among the laboring class.   Source: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/socialism.asp

 

Key Takeaways

  • Communism and socialism are political and economic systems that share certain ideologies, including greater equality in the distribution of income.
  • Both are rejections of capitalism, instead giving economic power to the working class.
  • One way that communism differs from socialism historically is that the former calls for the transfer of power to the working class through revolutionary rather than gradual means.
  • Both communism and socialism advocate public control of the means of production, although socialism allows for the continued existence of capitalism in some parts of the economy.
  • In reality, communist systems have not been very successful to date.

Communism

In basic terms, communism is a philosophy based on the equitable distribution of wealth among a nation’s citizens and common ownership of all property. In particular, it calls for the control of the means of production, such as manufacturing and agriculture, by the working class, or proletariat. Its ultimate goal is to achieve a classless society, at which point the state (or government) would “wither away.”1

Contemporary communism is an offshoot of socialism and is sometimes called revolutionary socialism for advocating the takeover of governmental powers by the working class through revolution rather than incremental reform.

Socialism

Socialism encompasses a broader spectrum of political beliefs but shares communism’s emphasis on an equitable distribution of wealth among citizens, as well as public ownership of the means of production, though not necessarily all of them. In that sense, socialist programs and policies can exist alongside capitalism in a society, which is less likely in a communist system. Socialists may or may not see a communist system as their end goal.Source: Investopia: Communism vs. Socialism: What’s the Difference?


 

 

 

Other References

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_system

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_economics

https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/100214/what-difference-between-communism-and-socialism.asp

https://www.canada.ca/en/treasury-board-secretariat/services/guidance-crown-corporations/list-crown-corporations.html

 

List of Crown Corporations

 

A
Atlantic Pilotage Authority III-I December 31 Transport
Atomic Energy of Canada Limited III-I March 31 Natural Resources
 
B
Bank of Canada Exempt December 31 Finance
Blue Water Bridge Authority III-I August 31 Transport
Business Development Bank of Canada III-I March 31 Industry
 
C
Canada Council for the Arts Exempt March 31 Canadian Heritage
Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation III-I March 31 Finance
Canada Development Investment Corporation III-II December 31 Finance
Canada Lands Company Limited III-I

March 31

Public Works and Government Services
Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation III-I December 31 Human Resources
Canada Pension Plan Investment Board Exempt March 31 Finance
Canada Post Corporation III-II December 31 Transport
Canadian Air Transport Security Authority III-I March 31 Transport
Canadian Broadcasting Corporation Exempt March 31 Canadian Heritage
Canadian Commercial Corporation III-I March 31 International Trade
Canadian Dairy Commission III-I July 31 Agriculture and Agri‑Food
Canadian Museum of Civilization III-I March 31 Canadian Heritage
Canadian Museum for Human Rights III-I March 31 Canadian Heritage
Canadian Museum of Immigration at Pier 21 III-I March 31 Canadian Heritage
Canadian Museum of Nature III-I March 31 Canadian Heritage
Canadian Race Relations Foundation Exempt (Part X) March 31 Citizenship and Immigration
Canadian Tourism Commission III-I December 31 Industry
Corporation for the Mitigation of Mackenzie Gas Project Impacts III-I March 31 Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development
 
D
Defence Construction (1951) Limited III-I March 31 Public Works and Government Services
 
E
Enterprise Cape Breton Corporation III-I March 31 Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency
Export Development Canada III-I December 31 International Trade
 
F
Farm Credit Canada III-I March 31 Agriculture and Agri‑Food
Federal Bridge Corporation Limited, The III-I March 31 Transport
Freshwater Fish Marketing Corporation III-I April 30 Fisheries and Oceans
 
G
Great Lakes Pilotage Authority III-I December 31 Transport
 
I
International Development Research Centre Exempt March 31 Foreign Affairs
 
L
Laurentian Pilotage Authority III-I December 31 Transport
 
M
Marine Atlantic Inc III-I March 31 Transport
 
N
National Arts Centre Corporation Exempt August 31 Canadian Heritage
National Capital Commission III-I March 31 Foreign Affairs
National Gallery of Canada III-I March 31 Canadian Heritage
National Museum of Science and Technology III-I March 31 Canadian Heritage
 
O
Old Port of Montreal Corporation Inc Reports as a Parent March 31 Public Works and Government Services
 
P
Pacific Pilotage Authority III-I December 31 Transport
Parc Downsview Park Inc Reports as a Parent March 31 Public Works and Government Services
Public Sector Pension Investment Board Exempt (Part X) March 31 Treasury Board
 
R
Ridley Terminals Inc III-I December 31 Transport
Royal Canadian Mint III-II December 31 Finance
 
S
Standards Council of Canada III-I March 31 Industry
 
T
Telefilm Canada Exempt March 31 Canadian Heritage
 
V
VIA Rail Canada Inc III-I December 31 Transport

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Count Capponi - RIP

By
+ JMJ I had heard of Count Capponi over the years and was happy to hear a voice crying in the wilderness. I suspect that his conscience was clearer than many. This part of the article caught my attention: Capponi defended the right of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre to continue his work without the label “schismatic,” which term Capponi rejected, saying: “You cannot apply the standards of the new code of canon law and the mentality of the old code. According to the new code, Lefebvre could do what he did with a Catholic intention, and he did what he did in ‘sincerity’ and invoked the ‘state of emergency’ argument, which the new code permits. You might not like the new code, but it’s what governs the Church.” I know a few people who tried to stir up a fuss when the SSPX cited the New Code in one of the documents with Rome.  Yet, the truth is what it is --- the New Code was promulgated by a reigning Pope and flawed as it is ... there are some benefits to its liberality. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is it sinful to attend the Novus Ordo (New Mass) - Is it Sinful to Not Attend the Novus Ordo on Sunday?

By
+ JMJ A non-SSPX Catholic is upset over the SSPX statements on not attending the Novus Ordo Missae. Ladies and gentlemen, what the SSPX, or at least its website editor, is advocating is a mortal sin against the Third Commandment.  Unless the priest deviates from the language of the Sacramentary, the consecration, and thus the rest of Mass is to be considered valid.  No one may elect not to attend Mass simply because abuses are occurring therein.  Might I suggest that such absenteeism is its own abuse?  The Third Commandment binds under mortal sin.  Father So-And-So from the SSPX has no authority whatsoever to excuse attendance at Mass, be that Mass ever so unpalatable. Source:Restore DC Catholicism Well, this is interesting. First why does the SSPX issue this statement? Because it is sinful to put your faith in danger by attending a protestant service.  It is likewise dangerous to put your faith in danger by attending a protestantized ma...
Post a Comment
Read more

Those who return to the past are not outside the Church - Rorate Caeli

By
+ JMJ I had been thinking about putting together a post explaining some of the history of how the SSPX has arrived at its current position. Now I see that Rorate has posted a translated editorial that shows the roots of the SSPX principles. In reading these words, I see patterns and themes that were put forward by Archbishop Lefebvre decades ago. Perhaps his sight was clearer than most. P^3
Post a Comment
Read more

Fr. Burfitt on Fr. Pfeiffer's Attempted Consecration

By
 + JMJ   Amidst the shadows cast by the publication of Traditionis Custodes, I am working on a map of the 'resistance' splinters to put their reaction in contrast with that of the SSPX.  In the midst of this, I just came across Fr. Burfitt letter on the attempted consecration. Breaking it down (see below)  items 2 and 3 are key.  Just as the consecrating bishop is 'doubtful', even if he hadn't muffed the first attempt, Fr. Pfeiffer remain doubtful and therefore this impacts those men is attempts to 'ordain'. There were rumours that Fr. Pfeiffer was seeking episcopal consecration for years as he cast about for various bishops (also doubtful) to help him achieve this goal. I wonder how he convinced the 'doubtful' bishop to provide (twice) the doubtful consecration. What a mess!  This creates a danger to the souls of his followers and wonder where it will end. Will he go full sede and have himself 'elected' pontiff as others have done before him...
Post a Comment
Read more

SSPX Transfers

By
+ JMJ Eponymous flow posted the following list of transfers etc. Source: http://eponymousflower.blogspot.com/2020/04/castling-of-leadership-at-sspx.html The departures Bishop Bernard Fellay, the third Superior General until 2018, leaves the General House in Menzingen and moves to the Seminary of St. Thomas Aquinas in the USA. Bishop Bernard Tissier de Mallerais, suffering from ill health, is being referred to the Seminary of St. Pius X in Ecene as a retreat. Fr. Christian Thouvenot, until now Secretary General of the General House, becomes a professor at the seminary in Ecene. Fr. Franz Schmidberger, until now Rector at the Seminary of the Heart of Jesus in Zaitzkofen, moves to the district of Germany. Fr. Jürgen Wegner, until now district superior of the DISTRICT USA, moves to the district of Austria. Fr. Philippe Brunet, until now Superior of the Autonomous House of Spain-Portugal, becomes professor at the Seminary U.L.F. and co-saviour of La Reja in...
2 comments
Read more