Skip to main content

Economic Systems: Communism, Socialism, Free - Market - Part 1

Image
By

 +

JMJ

 I live in a country that some call 'socialist' ... and I recall looking up the definition once and found that the label didn't fit.

So I've decided to do a shallow dive into the different economic systems with a focus on Communism, Socialism and Market Driven.

In Socialism - the means of production are not owned by individuals, but by a collective of some sort, such as the Government.  

In Canada we have Crown Corporations that are own and managed by the Government.  So these do appear to be 'Socialist', however they are the exception not the rule and are generally focused on areas of national importance (See list at end of article).

 I've attached some excerpts below and have concluded that the Canadian Health system is not inherently socialist because the 'method of production' - meaning the hospitals - are not generally owned by the government, but privately via corporations.  What most people don't seem to know is that the Canadian Health system is a single insurer system - the insurer is the Government of Canada and, unlike most of the hospitals in the USA, it is not a for-profit system. 

However, one part does ring true with regards to the "emphasis on an equitable distribution of wealth among citizens".  This is what I call the Robin-Hood democracy, in which the Government seeks to tax the wealthy to fund social programs.  This does seem to create a problem as it is effectively punishing people for being successful by forcing them to pay higher taxes.  This disincentive will cause them to look for ways to preserve their wealth.

Keeping in mind that successful people generally employ other people. If you disincentive the creative, entrepreneurial, leaders, then you impact the economy. I foresee that the Government would just try to move more money to the rest of the economy but this will probably be a death spiral since they have cut the the productive actors within the economy who promote growth.

Conclusion

 So Canada isn't a 'Socialist' country following the basic factors I found in my research. However, the actions of the Government definitely seem to follow the Socialist principles.

P^3

 

 

So first, what are they key facets of Socialism?  The key element is focused on who owns the means of production. In this case of  'socialism' the means of production are held in common by the people.

 Socialism is a populist economic and political system based on:

  • collective, 
  • common, 
  • or public ownership of the means of production. 
  • Those means of production include the machinery, tools, and factories used to produce goods that aim to directly satisfy human needs.

In contrast to capitalism, whereby business owners control the means of production and pay wages to workers to use those means, socialism envisions shared ownership and control among the laboring class.   Source: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/socialism.asp

 

Key Takeaways

  • Communism and socialism are political and economic systems that share certain ideologies, including greater equality in the distribution of income.
  • Both are rejections of capitalism, instead giving economic power to the working class.
  • One way that communism differs from socialism historically is that the former calls for the transfer of power to the working class through revolutionary rather than gradual means.
  • Both communism and socialism advocate public control of the means of production, although socialism allows for the continued existence of capitalism in some parts of the economy.
  • In reality, communist systems have not been very successful to date.

Communism

In basic terms, communism is a philosophy based on the equitable distribution of wealth among a nation’s citizens and common ownership of all property. In particular, it calls for the control of the means of production, such as manufacturing and agriculture, by the working class, or proletariat. Its ultimate goal is to achieve a classless society, at which point the state (or government) would “wither away.”1

Contemporary communism is an offshoot of socialism and is sometimes called revolutionary socialism for advocating the takeover of governmental powers by the working class through revolution rather than incremental reform.

Socialism

Socialism encompasses a broader spectrum of political beliefs but shares communism’s emphasis on an equitable distribution of wealth among citizens, as well as public ownership of the means of production, though not necessarily all of them. In that sense, socialist programs and policies can exist alongside capitalism in a society, which is less likely in a communist system. Socialists may or may not see a communist system as their end goal.Source: Investopia: Communism vs. Socialism: What’s the Difference?


 

 

 

Other References

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_system

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_economics

https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/100214/what-difference-between-communism-and-socialism.asp

https://www.canada.ca/en/treasury-board-secretariat/services/guidance-crown-corporations/list-crown-corporations.html

 

List of Crown Corporations

 

A
Atlantic Pilotage Authority III-I December 31 Transport
Atomic Energy of Canada Limited III-I March 31 Natural Resources
 
B
Bank of Canada Exempt December 31 Finance
Blue Water Bridge Authority III-I August 31 Transport
Business Development Bank of Canada III-I March 31 Industry
 
C
Canada Council for the Arts Exempt March 31 Canadian Heritage
Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation III-I March 31 Finance
Canada Development Investment Corporation III-II December 31 Finance
Canada Lands Company Limited III-I

March 31

Public Works and Government Services
Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation III-I December 31 Human Resources
Canada Pension Plan Investment Board Exempt March 31 Finance
Canada Post Corporation III-II December 31 Transport
Canadian Air Transport Security Authority III-I March 31 Transport
Canadian Broadcasting Corporation Exempt March 31 Canadian Heritage
Canadian Commercial Corporation III-I March 31 International Trade
Canadian Dairy Commission III-I July 31 Agriculture and Agri‑Food
Canadian Museum of Civilization III-I March 31 Canadian Heritage
Canadian Museum for Human Rights III-I March 31 Canadian Heritage
Canadian Museum of Immigration at Pier 21 III-I March 31 Canadian Heritage
Canadian Museum of Nature III-I March 31 Canadian Heritage
Canadian Race Relations Foundation Exempt (Part X) March 31 Citizenship and Immigration
Canadian Tourism Commission III-I December 31 Industry
Corporation for the Mitigation of Mackenzie Gas Project Impacts III-I March 31 Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development
 
D
Defence Construction (1951) Limited III-I March 31 Public Works and Government Services
 
E
Enterprise Cape Breton Corporation III-I March 31 Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency
Export Development Canada III-I December 31 International Trade
 
F
Farm Credit Canada III-I March 31 Agriculture and Agri‑Food
Federal Bridge Corporation Limited, The III-I March 31 Transport
Freshwater Fish Marketing Corporation III-I April 30 Fisheries and Oceans
 
G
Great Lakes Pilotage Authority III-I December 31 Transport
 
I
International Development Research Centre Exempt March 31 Foreign Affairs
 
L
Laurentian Pilotage Authority III-I December 31 Transport
 
M
Marine Atlantic Inc III-I March 31 Transport
 
N
National Arts Centre Corporation Exempt August 31 Canadian Heritage
National Capital Commission III-I March 31 Foreign Affairs
National Gallery of Canada III-I March 31 Canadian Heritage
National Museum of Science and Technology III-I March 31 Canadian Heritage
 
O
Old Port of Montreal Corporation Inc Reports as a Parent March 31 Public Works and Government Services
 
P
Pacific Pilotage Authority III-I December 31 Transport
Parc Downsview Park Inc Reports as a Parent March 31 Public Works and Government Services
Public Sector Pension Investment Board Exempt (Part X) March 31 Treasury Board
 
R
Ridley Terminals Inc III-I December 31 Transport
Royal Canadian Mint III-II December 31 Finance
 
S
Standards Council of Canada III-I March 31 Industry
 
T
Telefilm Canada Exempt March 31 Canadian Heritage
 
V
VIA Rail Canada Inc III-I December 31 Transport

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

SSPX and the Resistance - A Comparison Of Ecclesiology

By
Shining the light of Church Teaching on the doctrinal positions of the SSPX and the Resistance. Principles are guides used to aid in decision making.  It stands to reason that bad principles will lead to bad decisions. The recent interactions between Rome and the SSPX has challenged a number of closely held cultural assumptions of people in both sides of the disagreement. This has resulted in cultural skirmishes in both Rome and the SSPX. Since it is the smaller of the two, the skirmishes have been more evident within the SSPX.  The cultural fault-line that Bishop Fellay crossed appears to be linked to two points of Catholic Doctrine: Ecclesiology and Obedience.  The cultural difference of view points is strong enough that it has resulted in the expulsion of a number of members.  It should also be noted that some other priests expelled since the beginning of the latest interactions (starting in 2000) held the same view points and have joined with the l...
8 comments
Read more

Morning and Evening and other sundry Prayers

By
+ JMJ Along the theme of P^3 (Prayer, Penance, Patience), and for my own reference ... here is a collection of Morning and Evening prayers from the Ideal Daily Missal along with some additional prayers. In this crisis of the Church, I do not think it is possible to do too much prayer, penance and have patience. P^3
Post a Comment
Read more

Church Militant TV and the SSPX - Again

By
+ JMJ The old narrative used to be that the SSPX was 'schismatic' and 'excommunicated'. Now the excommunication has been lifted for a number of years and the only ones who think it still has effect are the 'resistors'. That leaves the other opponents of the SSPX with the label 'schismatic'. Make it clear, the conservative Catholics have issues with the SSPX probably because they violate some of their assumptions about the Faith and this crisis of the Church. Church Militant TV is one of these the exists along the Catholic thought spectrum. They like the Traditional Mass but must ensure that they don't get tarred with the same 'schismatic' brush that the liberals use against the SSPX.  So what do they do, they use the same brush against the SSPX. The funny thing is that even when the Church does speak, they don't want to listen and persist in calling the SSPX 'schismatic'. Here's a transcript of the latest s...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Curious Case of Steve Skojec and the Dangers of Deep Diving into the Crisis Sub-Titled: The Failings of Others

By
 + JMJ It's been a while now since Steve Skojec sold 1P5 and abandoned the Catholic Faith. I've been a 'Trad' since 1982 and in those 40+ years I seen this death-spiral before with a similar end point. It seems that anyone who jumps into the fray unprepared for the enormous task of righting wrongs will, eventually, become discouraged by not the task but the people who surround them.   I remember when Skojec complained of the treatment his family received from a traditional priest.  This seems to have been the start of the end for him. So what can we learn from the likes of Steve Skojec, Michael Voris (maybe?), Louie Verrecchio, Gerry Matatix and other celebrity Catholics? Probably quite a lot about what not to do. First, don't burn out on the crisis?  When you burn out, on work or anything else, little things assume a more greater importance than they are due.   This is one of my 'canary in the coal mine' signals that I've been stretching myself too th...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Position of the SSPX on Canonizations by the Saint Factory

By
+ JMJ I have sometimes been criticized for including 'St' as a title for Pope John Paul II et al. I've given my reasons here  in a discussion with Alex Long. The question is one of prudence in discussions with ntCatholics and in some cases with tCatholics. In discussions with:  ntCatholics, I will use the title in order to continue the discussion and help them arrive at a realistic understanding of the crisis of the Church. tCatholics, I will use the title in order to broaden their perspective on the doctrine of dogmatic facts. This broader perspective is, in my opinion, essential maintaining a realistic understanding of the crisis of the Church. So from a doctrinal position, I have written the article Dogmatic Fact of Fancy  and includes a reference on canonizations. Now, I know the position of the SSPX is that the canonizations are doubtful (see references below) and I also know of at least one non-SSPX theologian who agrees with the level of doubt du...
Post a Comment
Read more