Skip to main content

A Look Back: What did the Archbishop think the SSPX needed in December 1987???

+
JMJ

I haven't done a 'look back' for a while, so I thought it was providential that the link below showed up in one of my robo-searches.

At once we see the intention of Archbishop Lefebvre and the original thoughts of Father (now Bishop) Williamson.

Both are worth looking at and comparing to the situation of the SSPX and Bishop Williamson today.

P^3

Source: LeoFec



Dear Friends and Benefactors,
This Christmas we are sending you a card which we hope is a little present in itself. Certainly the Novena of Masses of which it speaks is a present to you all. It is the least we could do at the Seminary in return for your gift to us of the magnificent Seminary building in Minnesota. The Novena will run from the Midnight Mass of Christmas to January 2, inclusive. It comes to you with our very best wishes for above all your spiritual health and happiness for Christmas and the New Year.
What will the New Year bring? What will it not bring? At any rate the closing of the old year brings relatively good news for the Society from Europe. Cardinal Gagnon has just terminated his one-month visit to various houses of the Society and of kindred Traditional movements in Switzerland, France and Germany, and he will no doubt be depositing by Christmas on the Holy Father's desk a report highly favourable to the Society.
Just before beginning his visit, the Cardinal excused himself from visiting any Society houses in the New World or in the United States because his time was too short. In fact, after just the first eight days of his visit, he told members of the Society that he already had enough positive elements in hand to be able to conclude his visit then and there, but he wished conscientiously to complete it as planned.
So he next set off for France, where on Sunday, November 24, he almost took an official part in the celebration of the Solemn High Mass at the famous Traditional Church of St. Nicolas du Chardonet in Paris, run by Society priests. He was only prevented from doing so by a last-minute intervention from the very highest quarters in Rome: the Holy Father and Cardinals Ratzinger and Casaroli met together and decided that it would be better to avoid such a provocation to the French bishops. So Cardinal Gagnon's place in the ceremony was taken by his colleague on this visit, Msgr. Perl, an official of the Congregation of Divine Worship. Both of them said only the Tridentine Mass in Society houses for the duration of their visit.
Proof that a different wind is blowing in Rome is offered by the fact that on that same Sunday, at the very same time, Cardinal Lustiger of Paris, normally no traditionalist, was celebrating a Tridentine Mass in another church in Paris. The battle of the Mass is virtually won? If so, that is Archbishop Lefebvre's doing.
But will the Pope be able to settle the question of the Mass and the Society as several things indicate he would like to do? The mere mention of the name of Cardinal Casaroli, arch-enemy of Sacred Tradition, and of the French bishops, arch-promoters of modernism, reminds us how fierce the opposition will be in the Roman Curia and amongst the world's bishops, to any papal approval of the Tridentine Mass or of the Society associated with it. Here is what Archbishop Lefebvre wrote to me in a letter dated November 20: "I think that as his visit continues, Cardinal Gagnon is more and more convinced that we are right to be doing what we are doing. However, if his visit is useful, it is not the answer.
"We shall have to find a form of institution to protect us from the Roman Curia and the diocesan chanceries. In Rome we shall need a secretariat or commission, composed of members agreeing with what we think and do, to help the Society set itself up with three bishops chosen from within the Society, to form like an "Armed Services' Vicariat", with all the powers necessary to continue our work, independently of all other  bishops. A way must be found for all Traditional movements and initiatives to normalize their juridical situation so that they can continue to ask for the help of our own bishops.
"The whole thing is to know whether Rome, that is to say the Pope, will have the courage, despite the howling set up by the bishops and the Roman Curia, to grant us such a degree of independence. There are several Cardinals who will support Cardinal Gagnon. But it will not be easy. Already the episcopates are getting together to prevent a solution.
"In any case, if they do not give me the authorization to consecrate bishops, 1 shall do it without authorization. This is the most practical and pressing point. Let us continue to pray, especially to Our Lady of Fatima."
The solution here envisaged by Archbishop Lefebvre, a personal prelature, like an Army Vicariat for instance, is from the point of view of Canon Law a very flexible formula and may be the best suited to the needs of the situation. Whereas a local bishop has jurisdiction over Catholics in a given locality, or geographical diocese, a personal prelate has jurisdiction by his person over Catholics in some way connected to him. Thus an Army Vicar has in person direct jurisdiction over army chaplains or priests and through them over Catholic servicemen and their families attached to that army. Thus Monsignor Lefebvre or his successor would have full powers of a diocesan bishop firstly over the Society priests and their faithful, but also over priests and faithful outside the Society who would resort to him because of their attachment to the Traditional rite of Mass. He would be in effect an alternative Ordinary or bishop for all such Traditional priests and faithful, without their necessarily having to quit the diocese to which canonically they normally belong. Such a solution has the great advantage of largely corresponding to an already existing and honest state of affairs. Will it come about? That depends upon God's grace and men's free will. It is, as always, and more than ever, a question of prayer.
A great way to pray is to do the Exercises of St. Ignatius for five days. On last month's flyer for the Exercises of December 26 to 31, we forgot to mention they are for men, age 18 and upwards. There are still vacancies. Come to the help of Mother Church by taking this major step in your own sanctification, and come to the help of the Seminary by filling out the enclosed pledge card.
And may the Child Jesus amidst all the trouble and turmoil, grant you the peace, light and joy of the Christmas crib. Do not miss the little poem on the back of the card!
Most sincerely yours in His service,
Fr. Richard Williamson

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Catholic Church and the Rule of Law- Part II: Dr. John Lamont

+ JMJ This is the second article from Dr. Lamont from his lecture given in May 2014. P^3 Source Part A: Society of St. Hugh of Cluny Source Part B: Society of St. Hugh of Cluny 8 May2014 The Catholic Church and the Rule of Law- Part II By John Lamont To understand how the Jesuit conception of obedience departed from earlier conceptions, it is helpful to compare it with the teaching of St. Thomas on obedience. The fundamental difference between the two is that St. Thomas considers the proper object of obedience to be the precept of the superior (2a2ae q. 104 a. 2 co., ad 3). Obedience that seeks to forestall the expressed will of the superior does not bear on what the superior wants or thinks in general, but only on what the superior intends to command. St. Ignatius’s lowest degree of obedience, which he does not consider to be virtuous, is thus what St. Thomas considers to be the only form of obedience. St. Thomas holds that St. Ignatius’s alleged higher forms of o...

Morning and Evening and other sundry Prayers

+ JMJ Along the theme of P^3 (Prayer, Penance, Patience), and for my own reference ... here is a collection of Morning and Evening prayers from the Ideal Daily Missal along with some additional prayers. In this crisis of the Church, I do not think it is possible to do too much prayer, penance and have patience. P^3

Rome and the SSPX - Version 2026 Part 6b: Principles and Rules for Surviving this Crisis of the Catholic Church (Principle 1)

 + JMJ Principle 1: Realize that something is amiss in the Catholic Church The world in which I had my Traditional Awakening, is one in which practically anything pre-Conciliar such as liturgy, doctrinc, and even dogmas are either suppressed, ignored or re-framed to be acceptable to the ‘world’. What is more, the people adhering to these pre-conciliar teachings and liturgy are persecuted by other members of the Catholic Church. The things that non-Trads say about Trads can be quite extreme. For example, accusations against Traditionalists include that they are: A revival of the Jansenists (link) , Schismatics, Heretics, Uncharitable, Lefebrists Radicals Integrists When one group of Catholics is persecuted by the others for simply wanting to live as Catholics before them did for generations … well something is wrong. Further, we need to realize that when what was previously condemned is now promoted and what was previously promoted as the trut...

News Roundup: June 13, 2026

 + JMJ So the world continues to spin and break apart - metaphorically. One item that I think I forgot to mention was that the Catholic Family News ceased publication (link) . I met John Vennari at the seminary in Winona where after some discussion he gave me permission to repost articles.  That CFN carried on for eight years after his passing is a testimony to the need for good reporting and articles. I still have over a dozen of his CDs and his ability to see the crisis for what it was and yet be grateful was an example worth following. Along this line of thinking, you'll notice a few links from articles posted on Unam Catholicam. This blog / website is run by an Philip Campbell and provides clear thinking on many topics. I respect his thoughts on the SSPX - even though I don't necessarily agree with many - I can respect his opinions on the matter. NB: This roundup contains some articles that are against Traditionalism and the SSPX. It is always good to have an idea of what...

Open Letter to Cardinal Gantin - July 6, 1988

There has been some discussion (read lots) about the term 'Conciliar Church'. I have posted this letter written by the Superior General and District Superiors of the SSPX after the 1988 Consecrations. Of particular interest is that the 'Conciliar Church' being referred to as a system. My paraphrase would be that the SSPX regards the 'conciliar Church' as an error within the Church. Source Open Letter to Cardinal Gantin Prefect of the Congregation for Bishops