Skip to main content

A Look Back: What did the Archbishop think the SSPX needed in December 1987???

+
JMJ

I haven't done a 'look back' for a while, so I thought it was providential that the link below showed up in one of my robo-searches.

At once we see the intention of Archbishop Lefebvre and the original thoughts of Father (now Bishop) Williamson.

Both are worth looking at and comparing to the situation of the SSPX and Bishop Williamson today.

P^3

Source: LeoFec



Dear Friends and Benefactors,
This Christmas we are sending you a card which we hope is a little present in itself. Certainly the Novena of Masses of which it speaks is a present to you all. It is the least we could do at the Seminary in return for your gift to us of the magnificent Seminary building in Minnesota. The Novena will run from the Midnight Mass of Christmas to January 2, inclusive. It comes to you with our very best wishes for above all your spiritual health and happiness for Christmas and the New Year.
What will the New Year bring? What will it not bring? At any rate the closing of the old year brings relatively good news for the Society from Europe. Cardinal Gagnon has just terminated his one-month visit to various houses of the Society and of kindred Traditional movements in Switzerland, France and Germany, and he will no doubt be depositing by Christmas on the Holy Father's desk a report highly favourable to the Society.
Just before beginning his visit, the Cardinal excused himself from visiting any Society houses in the New World or in the United States because his time was too short. In fact, after just the first eight days of his visit, he told members of the Society that he already had enough positive elements in hand to be able to conclude his visit then and there, but he wished conscientiously to complete it as planned.
So he next set off for France, where on Sunday, November 24, he almost took an official part in the celebration of the Solemn High Mass at the famous Traditional Church of St. Nicolas du Chardonet in Paris, run by Society priests. He was only prevented from doing so by a last-minute intervention from the very highest quarters in Rome: the Holy Father and Cardinals Ratzinger and Casaroli met together and decided that it would be better to avoid such a provocation to the French bishops. So Cardinal Gagnon's place in the ceremony was taken by his colleague on this visit, Msgr. Perl, an official of the Congregation of Divine Worship. Both of them said only the Tridentine Mass in Society houses for the duration of their visit.
Proof that a different wind is blowing in Rome is offered by the fact that on that same Sunday, at the very same time, Cardinal Lustiger of Paris, normally no traditionalist, was celebrating a Tridentine Mass in another church in Paris. The battle of the Mass is virtually won? If so, that is Archbishop Lefebvre's doing.
But will the Pope be able to settle the question of the Mass and the Society as several things indicate he would like to do? The mere mention of the name of Cardinal Casaroli, arch-enemy of Sacred Tradition, and of the French bishops, arch-promoters of modernism, reminds us how fierce the opposition will be in the Roman Curia and amongst the world's bishops, to any papal approval of the Tridentine Mass or of the Society associated with it. Here is what Archbishop Lefebvre wrote to me in a letter dated November 20: "I think that as his visit continues, Cardinal Gagnon is more and more convinced that we are right to be doing what we are doing. However, if his visit is useful, it is not the answer.
"We shall have to find a form of institution to protect us from the Roman Curia and the diocesan chanceries. In Rome we shall need a secretariat or commission, composed of members agreeing with what we think and do, to help the Society set itself up with three bishops chosen from within the Society, to form like an "Armed Services' Vicariat", with all the powers necessary to continue our work, independently of all other  bishops. A way must be found for all Traditional movements and initiatives to normalize their juridical situation so that they can continue to ask for the help of our own bishops.
"The whole thing is to know whether Rome, that is to say the Pope, will have the courage, despite the howling set up by the bishops and the Roman Curia, to grant us such a degree of independence. There are several Cardinals who will support Cardinal Gagnon. But it will not be easy. Already the episcopates are getting together to prevent a solution.
"In any case, if they do not give me the authorization to consecrate bishops, 1 shall do it without authorization. This is the most practical and pressing point. Let us continue to pray, especially to Our Lady of Fatima."
The solution here envisaged by Archbishop Lefebvre, a personal prelature, like an Army Vicariat for instance, is from the point of view of Canon Law a very flexible formula and may be the best suited to the needs of the situation. Whereas a local bishop has jurisdiction over Catholics in a given locality, or geographical diocese, a personal prelate has jurisdiction by his person over Catholics in some way connected to him. Thus an Army Vicar has in person direct jurisdiction over army chaplains or priests and through them over Catholic servicemen and their families attached to that army. Thus Monsignor Lefebvre or his successor would have full powers of a diocesan bishop firstly over the Society priests and their faithful, but also over priests and faithful outside the Society who would resort to him because of their attachment to the Traditional rite of Mass. He would be in effect an alternative Ordinary or bishop for all such Traditional priests and faithful, without their necessarily having to quit the diocese to which canonically they normally belong. Such a solution has the great advantage of largely corresponding to an already existing and honest state of affairs. Will it come about? That depends upon God's grace and men's free will. It is, as always, and more than ever, a question of prayer.
A great way to pray is to do the Exercises of St. Ignatius for five days. On last month's flyer for the Exercises of December 26 to 31, we forgot to mention they are for men, age 18 and upwards. There are still vacancies. Come to the help of Mother Church by taking this major step in your own sanctification, and come to the help of the Seminary by filling out the enclosed pledge card.
And may the Child Jesus amidst all the trouble and turmoil, grant you the peace, light and joy of the Christmas crib. Do not miss the little poem on the back of the card!
Most sincerely yours in His service,
Fr. Richard Williamson

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Comparision of the Tridentine, Cranmer and Novus Ordo Masses

+ JMJ I downloaded the comparison that was linked in the previous article on the mass (here) . ... a very good reference! P^3 From: Whispers of Restoration (available at this link) . CHARTING LITURGICAL CHANGE Comparing the 1962 Ordinary of the Roman Mass to changes made during the Anglican Schism; Compared in turn to changes adopted in the creation of Pope Paul VI’s Mass in 1969 The chart on the reverse is a concise comparison of certain ritual differences between three historical rites for the celebration of the Catholic Mass Vetus Ordo: “Old Order,” the Roman Rite of Mass as contained in the 1962 Missal, often referred to as the “Traditional Latin Mass.”The Ordinary of this Mass is that of Pope St. Pius V (1570) following the Council of Trent (1545-63), hence the occasional moniker “Tridentine Mass.” However, Trent only consolidated and codified the Roman Rite already in use at that time; its essential form dates to Pope St. Gregory the Great (+604), in whose time the R...

SSPX and the Resistance - A Comparison Of Ecclesiology

Shining the light of Church Teaching on the doctrinal positions of the SSPX and the Resistance. Principles are guides used to aid in decision making.  It stands to reason that bad principles will lead to bad decisions. The recent interactions between Rome and the SSPX has challenged a number of closely held cultural assumptions of people in both sides of the disagreement. This has resulted in cultural skirmishes in both Rome and the SSPX. Since it is the smaller of the two, the skirmishes have been more evident within the SSPX.  The cultural fault-line that Bishop Fellay crossed appears to be linked to two points of Catholic Doctrine: Ecclesiology and Obedience.  The cultural difference of view points is strong enough that it has resulted in the expulsion of a number of members.  It should also be noted that some other priests expelled since the beginning of the latest interactions (starting in 2000) held the same view points and have joined with the l...

If Pope Francis is bad - what about Pope St. John Paul II et al?

+ JMJ So here we are on the apparent cusp of yet another post conciliar Papal canonization. This time we have Pope's John-Paul I and Paul VI canonizations to 'look forward' to. This follows, obviously, on the heels of Pope St. John Paul II's canonization? So the first question that I usually encounter is: How is it possible, keeping in mind the doctrine on infallibility of canonizations (note doctrine not dogma), that Pope St. John Paul II is a Saint? First, what does it mean???  According to the doctrine of dogmatic facts - it is the universal opinion of Theologians that canonizations are infallible.  It means that they enjoy the beatific vision.  ... that's it.  That is the doctrine and it is at the level of universal opinion of theologians.  It is called a 'dogmatic fact'. That they made mistakes is obvious.  That the miracles seem to not be very miraculous is also a bit of an issue. Here's something to consider: The rush that surrou...

Spiritual Journey Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre - Extracts

+ JMJ I have posted these two chapters to provide context for the quote of: It is, therefore, a strict duty for every priest wanting to remain Catholic to separate himself from this Conciliar Church for as long as it does not rediscover the Tradition of the Church and of the Catholic Faith. P^3 Courtesy of SSPX.ca Chapter II The Perfections of God We ought to remember during this entire contemplation of God that we must apply all that is said of God to Our Lord Jesus Christ, Who is God. We cannot separate Jesus Christ from God. We cannot separate the Christian religion from Jesus Christ, Who is God, and we must affirm and believe that only the Catholic religion is the Christian religion. These affirmations have, as a result, inescapable conclusions that no ecclesiastic authority can contest: outside of Jesus Christ and the Catholic religion, that is, outsi...

Dogmas of the Catholic Faith (de fide) - Expanded Listing: Answer for Reader

 + JMJ  A reader asked the following question in the 2015 version of the article on the Dogmas of the Catholic Faith (link) : 117: "In the state of fallen nature it is morally impossible for man without Supernatural Revelation, to know easily, with absolute certainty and without admixture of error, all religious and moral truths of the natural order." Where can you find this in the documents of the Church? ( Link to comment )  Here's the reference from Ott: The citation that Ott provided was Denzinger 1786 and the source document is Dogmatic Consitution Concerning the Faith from the First Vatican Council (Papal Encyclicals - link) : Chapter 2 On Revelation, Article 3: It is indeed thanks to this divine revelation , that those matters concerning God, which are not of themselves beyond the scope of human reason, can, even in the present state of the human race, be known by everyone, without difficulty, with firm certitude and with no intermingling of error. Here's ...