Skip to main content

I believe in God ...

+
JMJ

I grow increasingly disturbed by Louie Verrecchio's posts.

For example, we have his latest post on Bishop Fellay's interview here.  Aside from the obvious dissonance the arises when someone criticises an SSPX bishop (some I recognize as a cultural reaction), there is something else.



All Bishop Fellay is doing is giving Pope Francis the benefit of the doubt and trying to understand what his motivations may be - not an easy task given the eccentric warp and weft of the tangle weave the Pope Francis is creating by the minute.

How can Bishop Fellay even suggest, however obliquely, that one might see in Francis an image of the Good Shepherd – Our Blessed Lord, who upon being ridiculed for “receiving sinners and eating with them” (and let us not forget, calling them to conversion as well) delivered the parable of the lost sheep?
Well simply, Bishop Fellay can suggest it as a possible point the Pope Francis sees himself in this manner, based on his understanding of Pope Francis and the contacts that he has had with the Pope and those who surround him.

What Louie appears to have forgotten or perhaps never knew, is that people are seldom if ever all black or all white.  Mafia dons love their mothers and their families as much as anyone (white).  Anyone who crosses the line with their families will receive proof of the ardent love (black).

The point is that people are not black or white, they are speckled (poke a dot if you will). Some where between totally black and totally white is where most of us fall on the spectrum.

It would do well to not look at things  in such simple black/white terms when dealing with the person as opposed to the actions of the person.

Then we have his post titled "In search of solutions to the present crisis".

Here we have the key point, the Church is infested with bad bishops, priests, nuns, brothers, laity etc.
That is simple to see.

What is missed is that eventually this will start to turn around and just like the Arian heresy the Church will begin to emerge from the crisis.

Only, don't hope to see a return to sanity in our days. It took over a hundred years for the Church to bury that heresy.  Even after the Council of Trent there were still priests who would not leave their 'wives'.  The solution given by the Pope to a Bishop who complained was simple: replace if you can - make do if you cannot. Sorry I  can't recall the Pope - just read it somewhere.

So what are we to do?

First, be patient and maintain calm.
Second, seek to help others be patient and calm.

That is where I have issues with Louie, he isn't doing a lot of that lately.

I have seen this before:

Man converts from something to traditional Catholicism. Gets very righteous at the state of the Church, V2, Novus Ordo Missae etc and become grumpy.

Man become further and further entrenched in his position and narrows his perspective bit by bit until he can't see anything else except for what is right in front of him.

That's when it happens.

The Devil arrives and lays a 2x4 upside the head of the man.  Who caught totally unaware due to the psy blinders, is knocked off balance and falls.

This is what happened to Gerry Matatics, priests that prefer the simple answers to complex questions and I fear it is what is in store for Louie if he persists on this path.

Louie, if you read this, keep peace of soul, read this article on gratitude (link), and think carefully of how you influense your readers. You will be responsible for them.

For everyone else, be grateful that you aren't in the muck of the Novus Ordo Messy.  If you are, seek a way out, nothing less than your salvation hangs in the balance.

The leads me back to the title of this post "I believe in God ...".  I do and I thank God for answering my mother's prayer that we not be blind during the crisis that was coming.  Having our eyes opened was not pleasant as it unended my world, but I would not have it any other way - because it is the right way.

P^3

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is Tradition?

 + JMJ What Is Tradition? The basic premise, from my perspective, is that what was taught before cannot be contradicted by the 'present' magisterium, only deepened and expanded upon. I recall the Roman theologians called the SSPX protestants while the SSPX called them modernists.  I believe this was all surrounding the concept of Traditon. SSPX's Understanding of Tradition One accusation made against the SSPX is that they don't have a correct understanding of 'Tradition'.  This is how the SSPX understands Tradition: I finally profess that Tradition is not a dead memory, but the living transmission of the doctrine received from the Apostles. It remains living, in distinction to Revelation, which is closed. It is so both in the activity of the Magisterium of the Teaching Church and in the profession of Faith of the Church Taught, of which the sentire cum Ecclesia is the result of the teaching of the Magisterium. Tradition may be called ‘living’, not in the sense t...

SSPX.ca: What is the position of the SSPX on Vatican II???

 + JMJ With all the mis-information about the SSPX rejecting the Second Vatican Council, I thought it would be useful to publish an article that focuses on the real issues that the SSPX has identified. Update: Why Did the SSPX Consecrate Bishops? ( Neither Schismatic, Nor Disobedient link ) In the linked document the SSPX outlined the key motivation and core issues with Vatican II and the post-conciliar magisterium (see above link for full document): 4. The Society Acted Precisely Because of the State of Necessity in Which the Faith Finds Itself  In the present situation of the Church, if the Society of Saint Pius X had not carried out the consecrations of July 1st, it would have found itself facing an inevitable alternative: either to disappear gradually, or to accept, at least in fact, the new liturgy as well as the false doctrines of Vatican II and the post-council. Without the consecrations of July 1st, the Fraternity would have found itself, in a few years, without bishop...

Thoughts on: Finding Common Ground Between Rome and the SSPX

 + JMJ In the ramp up to the consecrations the noise floor in the intergnat grew to a constant din.  This was one of the few the peeped its signal over the noise. https://crisismagazine.com/opinion/finding-common-ground-between-rome-and-the-sspx The key issue is contained in this paragraph: In the lead-up to the planned July 1, 2026, episcopal consecrations,  the SSPX rejected Rome’s offer  of doctrinal dialogue on the grounds that “we both know in advance that we cannot agree doctrinally, particularly regarding the fundamental orientations adopted since the Second Vatican Council.” Fr. Pagliarani also said that his previous attempt at dialogue in 2019 was shut down by Rome because of an assumed irreconcilability. It seems that, from the Society’s perspective, and perhaps from Rome’s too, their positions are incompatible. If memory serves, Rome killed any opportunity for an open discussion by stating that Vatican II was not up for debate. So it was a still-birth and ...

The News is an Addiction ...

 + JMJ People seem to be mesmerised by train wrecks.   They just can't turn away as the disaster creeps forward along train tracks towards the crossing where a car, truck, bus, trailer awaits its destruction. Trads have been watching the train wreck that is this crisis of the Catholic Church for decades. The trade war between the Canada and the US has reminded me that the news is addictive.   The first time I was addicted what from 2009 to  2014 when I was closely following the Rome / SSPX discussions.  I was at work watching a live-stream as Bishop Fellay disappeared into the Vatican. The lead-up to this moment had been intense as the 'resistance' got freaked out and the cultural cracks between doctrine and conspiracy theory widened. In the decade since then other things have emerged, wars, rumours of wars, conspiracies, celebrity Catholics etc. Now we have a new addiction and its name is Trump. Lately, no matter how much I try, I find myself wonderin...

Thoughts on the Thoughts of a former SSPX priest

 + JMJ Well Gary Campbell, former SSPX Priest and now laicised has posted a new article on WherePeterIs. https://wherepeteris.com/thoughts-of-a-former-sspx-priest-on-the-july-1-consecrations/ These words stuck out: Heck, they have built a five-star hotel, wine bar, and Walmart on the opposite bank of the Rubicon! They are not in danger of entering a state of schism, for they are  already  in a state of schism. I believe he doth protest too much. All the actual facts indicate that the SSPX was not in a state of schism before July 1st and an examination of the decree of excommunication highlights the either ineptitude of those in charge or a desire to leave the barn door open. The chasm between an act of disobedience and act of schism remains just what is has always been - an inconvenient barrier that person(s) in Rome seek to bridge but appear incapable of succeeding. The SSPX re-stated that they recognize the Pope as the Vicar of Christ and feel obliged by conscience...