Skip to main content

I believe in God ...

+
JMJ

I grow increasingly disturbed by Louie Verrecchio's posts.

For example, we have his latest post on Bishop Fellay's interview here.  Aside from the obvious dissonance the arises when someone criticises an SSPX bishop (some I recognize as a cultural reaction), there is something else.



All Bishop Fellay is doing is giving Pope Francis the benefit of the doubt and trying to understand what his motivations may be - not an easy task given the eccentric warp and weft of the tangle weave the Pope Francis is creating by the minute.

How can Bishop Fellay even suggest, however obliquely, that one might see in Francis an image of the Good Shepherd – Our Blessed Lord, who upon being ridiculed for “receiving sinners and eating with them” (and let us not forget, calling them to conversion as well) delivered the parable of the lost sheep?
Well simply, Bishop Fellay can suggest it as a possible point the Pope Francis sees himself in this manner, based on his understanding of Pope Francis and the contacts that he has had with the Pope and those who surround him.

What Louie appears to have forgotten or perhaps never knew, is that people are seldom if ever all black or all white.  Mafia dons love their mothers and their families as much as anyone (white).  Anyone who crosses the line with their families will receive proof of the ardent love (black).

The point is that people are not black or white, they are speckled (poke a dot if you will). Some where between totally black and totally white is where most of us fall on the spectrum.

It would do well to not look at things  in such simple black/white terms when dealing with the person as opposed to the actions of the person.

Then we have his post titled "In search of solutions to the present crisis".

Here we have the key point, the Church is infested with bad bishops, priests, nuns, brothers, laity etc.
That is simple to see.

What is missed is that eventually this will start to turn around and just like the Arian heresy the Church will begin to emerge from the crisis.

Only, don't hope to see a return to sanity in our days. It took over a hundred years for the Church to bury that heresy.  Even after the Council of Trent there were still priests who would not leave their 'wives'.  The solution given by the Pope to a Bishop who complained was simple: replace if you can - make do if you cannot. Sorry I  can't recall the Pope - just read it somewhere.

So what are we to do?

First, be patient and maintain calm.
Second, seek to help others be patient and calm.

That is where I have issues with Louie, he isn't doing a lot of that lately.

I have seen this before:

Man converts from something to traditional Catholicism. Gets very righteous at the state of the Church, V2, Novus Ordo Missae etc and become grumpy.

Man become further and further entrenched in his position and narrows his perspective bit by bit until he can't see anything else except for what is right in front of him.

That's when it happens.

The Devil arrives and lays a 2x4 upside the head of the man.  Who caught totally unaware due to the psy blinders, is knocked off balance and falls.

This is what happened to Gerry Matatics, priests that prefer the simple answers to complex questions and I fear it is what is in store for Louie if he persists on this path.

Louie, if you read this, keep peace of soul, read this article on gratitude (link), and think carefully of how you influense your readers. You will be responsible for them.

For everyone else, be grateful that you aren't in the muck of the Novus Ordo Messy.  If you are, seek a way out, nothing less than your salvation hangs in the balance.

The leads me back to the title of this post "I believe in God ...".  I do and I thank God for answering my mother's prayer that we not be blind during the crisis that was coming.  Having our eyes opened was not pleasant as it unended my world, but I would not have it any other way - because it is the right way.

P^3

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Catholic Church and the Rule of Law- Part II: Dr. John Lamont

+ JMJ This is the second article from Dr. Lamont from his lecture given in May 2014. P^3 Source Part A: Society of St. Hugh of Cluny Source Part B: Society of St. Hugh of Cluny 8 May2014 The Catholic Church and the Rule of Law- Part II By John Lamont To understand how the Jesuit conception of obedience departed from earlier conceptions, it is helpful to compare it with the teaching of St. Thomas on obedience. The fundamental difference between the two is that St. Thomas considers the proper object of obedience to be the precept of the superior (2a2ae q. 104 a. 2 co., ad 3). Obedience that seeks to forestall the expressed will of the superior does not bear on what the superior wants or thinks in general, but only on what the superior intends to command. St. Ignatius’s lowest degree of obedience, which he does not consider to be virtuous, is thus what St. Thomas considers to be the only form of obedience. St. Thomas holds that St. Ignatius’s alleged higher forms of o...

Morning and Evening and other sundry Prayers

+ JMJ Along the theme of P^3 (Prayer, Penance, Patience), and for my own reference ... here is a collection of Morning and Evening prayers from the Ideal Daily Missal along with some additional prayers. In this crisis of the Church, I do not think it is possible to do too much prayer, penance and have patience. P^3

News Roundup February 17, 2024

 + JMJ    First wishing you a Holy Lent! As usual for this series, attached below are articles that caught my eye since the last 'Roundup'. Catholic Church In CRISIS Looking at the response to MAiD, there is a bright spot amongst all the misc issues within the Church. It is a little disheartening that only the huge issues where the world is bumping up against Church Doctrine are addressed.   The elephant in the room remains - the current and previous half dozen pontiffs have led us to this point. The academic discussion between theologians is, believe it or not, a healthy thing for the Church.  Hopefully it will gain momentum and follow the general rules academic argumentation and not devolve into name calling (as it has previously). Rome - Fiducia Supplicans The storm created by FS continues. People are starting to talk about the next conclave Hopefully this pontificate will do three things: Wake up the faithful clergy to false obedience Spawn a clarific...

Rome and the SSPX - Version 2026 Part 6c: Principles and Rules for Surviving this Crisis of the Catholic Church (Principle 2)

 + JMJ Principle 2: Know the Faith as the Catholic Church Teaches or Taught it. A knowledge of the Faith and familiarity with the history of the Catholic Church for at least the past 200 years provides a good foundation for weathering this storm. Bias, Opinions and Misbeliefs One landmine that undermines principle #2 is the mixing of personal opinion with doctrine. These opinions, beliefs by another name, are sometimes held in a death grip. In some cases they are just prejudices against various real groups such as immigrants, Jews, communists, masons etc. In some cases it extends to conspiracy theories such as sedevacantism. These firmly held beliefs prevent people from both understanding Doctrine as Taught by the Church and making the necessary distinctions. For example, which religions offer worship to the True God? Catholics, Orthodox, Protestants, Jews and Muslims. Some people suck in their breath through their teeth creating an noticeable hiss at the above statement....

The Episcopal Consecrations of 1988, 1991 and 2015 - Some Perspectives

+ JMJ In defense of the recent consecration of Fr. Faure by Bishop Williamson, some have argued that the 1991 consecration of Bishop Rangel (RIP) by the Bishops of the SSPX present an equivalent standard of action and principles.  From this they conclude that the SSPX's condemnation of Bishop Williamson's action is flawed as the principles of the 1991 consecration and that of 2015 are equivalent.