Skip to main content

I believe in God ...

+
JMJ

I grow increasingly disturbed by Louie Verrecchio's posts.

For example, we have his latest post on Bishop Fellay's interview here.  Aside from the obvious dissonance the arises when someone criticises an SSPX bishop (some I recognize as a cultural reaction), there is something else.



All Bishop Fellay is doing is giving Pope Francis the benefit of the doubt and trying to understand what his motivations may be - not an easy task given the eccentric warp and weft of the tangle weave the Pope Francis is creating by the minute.

How can Bishop Fellay even suggest, however obliquely, that one might see in Francis an image of the Good Shepherd – Our Blessed Lord, who upon being ridiculed for “receiving sinners and eating with them” (and let us not forget, calling them to conversion as well) delivered the parable of the lost sheep?
Well simply, Bishop Fellay can suggest it as a possible point the Pope Francis sees himself in this manner, based on his understanding of Pope Francis and the contacts that he has had with the Pope and those who surround him.

What Louie appears to have forgotten or perhaps never knew, is that people are seldom if ever all black or all white.  Mafia dons love their mothers and their families as much as anyone (white).  Anyone who crosses the line with their families will receive proof of the ardent love (black).

The point is that people are not black or white, they are speckled (poke a dot if you will). Some where between totally black and totally white is where most of us fall on the spectrum.

It would do well to not look at things  in such simple black/white terms when dealing with the person as opposed to the actions of the person.

Then we have his post titled "In search of solutions to the present crisis".

Here we have the key point, the Church is infested with bad bishops, priests, nuns, brothers, laity etc.
That is simple to see.

What is missed is that eventually this will start to turn around and just like the Arian heresy the Church will begin to emerge from the crisis.

Only, don't hope to see a return to sanity in our days. It took over a hundred years for the Church to bury that heresy.  Even after the Council of Trent there were still priests who would not leave their 'wives'.  The solution given by the Pope to a Bishop who complained was simple: replace if you can - make do if you cannot. Sorry I  can't recall the Pope - just read it somewhere.

So what are we to do?

First, be patient and maintain calm.
Second, seek to help others be patient and calm.

That is where I have issues with Louie, he isn't doing a lot of that lately.

I have seen this before:

Man converts from something to traditional Catholicism. Gets very righteous at the state of the Church, V2, Novus Ordo Missae etc and become grumpy.

Man become further and further entrenched in his position and narrows his perspective bit by bit until he can't see anything else except for what is right in front of him.

That's when it happens.

The Devil arrives and lays a 2x4 upside the head of the man.  Who caught totally unaware due to the psy blinders, is knocked off balance and falls.

This is what happened to Gerry Matatics, priests that prefer the simple answers to complex questions and I fear it is what is in store for Louie if he persists on this path.

Louie, if you read this, keep peace of soul, read this article on gratitude (link), and think carefully of how you influense your readers. You will be responsible for them.

For everyone else, be grateful that you aren't in the muck of the Novus Ordo Messy.  If you are, seek a way out, nothing less than your salvation hangs in the balance.

The leads me back to the title of this post "I believe in God ...".  I do and I thank God for answering my mother's prayer that we not be blind during the crisis that was coming.  Having our eyes opened was not pleasant as it unended my world, but I would not have it any other way - because it is the right way.

P^3

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Rome,the SSPX and this time of Crisis - Updated

+ JMJ Obviously there's lots of events right now. First we have the April 1st - I almost thought it was April Fools - meeting between Pope Francis and Bishop Fellay.  Nothing really news worthy as this is a natural progression as Rome appears to be considering fulfilling Archbishop Lefebvre's wish to 'accept us as we are'. Second we have the April 8th publication of what will be a verbose exhortation of the Synod of the Family. I'm willing to bet that the Pope will give with one hand (unilateral regularization of SSPX) and take with the other (ambiguous document that opens the flood gates of sin further). Much to pray for. P^3

The Vatican and SSPX – An Organizational Culture Perspective

Introduction The recent and continuing interactions between the Vatican and the SSPX have been a great opportunity for prayer and reflection.  The basis for the disagreement is theological and not liturgical. As noted by Dr. Lamont (2012), the SSPX theological position on the four key controversial aspects of the Second Vatican Council are base on prior theological work that resulted from relevant magisterial pronouncements.  So it is difficult to understand the apparent rejection of the theological position of the SSPX.

Rome and the SSPX - the latest

+ JMJ Bishop Fellay gave a conference late last month and provided some more insight into the situation with Rome. There are comments on Deus Ex Machina Blog  and Hilary White has now entered the fray. What is one Catholic to think about all these opinions? What a Catholic is to think: With the Church! What does the Church think about obedience?  Virtue as it is? If there is no proximate occasion of sin and the other conditions are met, then one cannot resist the command.

SSPX and the Resistance - A Comparison Of Ecclesiology

Shining the light of Church Teaching on the doctrinal positions of the SSPX and the Resistance. Principles are guides used to aid in decision making.  It stands to reason that bad principles will lead to bad decisions. The recent interactions between Rome and the SSPX has challenged a number of closely held cultural assumptions of people in both sides of the disagreement. This has resulted in cultural skirmishes in both Rome and the SSPX. Since it is the smaller of the two, the skirmishes have been more evident within the SSPX.  The cultural fault-line that Bishop Fellay crossed appears to be linked to two points of Catholic Doctrine: Ecclesiology and Obedience.  The cultural difference of view points is strong enough that it has resulted in the expulsion of a number of members.  It should also be noted that some other priests expelled since the beginning of the latest interactions (starting in 2000) held the same view points and have joined with the l...

If Pope Francis is bad - what about Pope St. John Paul II et al?

+ JMJ So here we are on the apparent cusp of yet another post conciliar Papal canonization. This time we have Pope's John-Paul I and Paul VI canonizations to 'look forward' to. This follows, obviously, on the heels of Pope St. John Paul II's canonization? So the first question that I usually encounter is: How is it possible, keeping in mind the doctrine on infallibility of canonizations (note doctrine not dogma), that Pope St. John Paul II is a Saint? First, what does it mean???  According to the doctrine of dogmatic facts - it is the universal opinion of Theologians that canonizations are infallible.  It means that they enjoy the beatific vision.  ... that's it.  That is the doctrine and it is at the level of universal opinion of theologians.  It is called a 'dogmatic fact'. That they made mistakes is obvious.  That the miracles seem to not be very miraculous is also a bit of an issue. Here's something to consider: The rush that surrou...