Skip to main content

What can we do???

+
JMJ

So for those with eyes to see the Catholic Church is in a crisis of Faith and it began at the top (Paul VI???) and will end at the top (Pope ?????? the ??).

The question is what can / should we do?  I am of course thinking primarily of the Laity, but my thinking also applies to the professed.

What I see as a high probability is that Rome will finally drop the mantra sometime in the next 3 to 5 years.

Whether it is under Pope Francis the Last or some other Pontiff doesn't really matter.



I see it as inevitable as God is Just, that eventually the conditions will be ripe for the heresy to burn itself out and the rebuilding to begin.

The question that we need to think about now, as Traditional Catholics, is how to receive the refugees from the Church (I'm optimistic that we will see Trad Mass centres swell by 10-15%) and minimize the trauma and cultural influence that they will have on the established communities.

This is not a simple thing.

Culturally, those Catholics who will seek refuge in the SSPX and other Traditionalist communities, will have a mix of cultural elements, some aligned with Traditionalism, some that are not.

It is unavoidable that a Modern Catholic will have absorbed a number of the protestant factors that permeate the atmosphere within the 'mainstream' Church.

It is also unavoidable that some Traditional Catholics will have acquired habits and biases that are a result of having been persecuted for 40+ years.

When these two cultures are thrown together there is going to be a reaction.

For example ...

Most Modern Catholics will find the Traditional Mass, Communion on the Tongue and Kneeling, long periods of silence, uncomfortably different.

Traditional Catholics, especially the veterans, will be uncomfortable with the manner of dress of the refugees, their hair, ... basically any externals.

These are called Artifacts.


Artifact express values and values underlying assumptions.  As mentioned earlier, if an assumption is transgressed, as it is an element of the subconscious, the it will evoke an emotional response. The more firmly established an assumption, generally the stronger an emotional response.

As a result of years of persecution, in my experience, Traditionalist Catholics generally have a stronger set of assumptions than Modern Catholics.  Hence the burden will rest upon the Trads to practice patience and forbearance.

It will take time for the newcomers to adjust, in some cases it will take as long as a year for the Traditional Catholic environment to help them to adjust.

What can we do?

First, be a friend and help them understand why some things are the way they are - and if you don't know find out.

The first thing will be the modes of dress and this is more stunning for the ladies than the men.

I believe the second will be norms of behaviour during Mass etc.

Lastly, be truly charitable, grateful for what you've received and generous in sharing it.

P^3






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Look Back: Archbishop Lefebvre’s Prophetic Address to The Remnant, 1976

 + JMJ  Looking back is important to understand why we are where we are in this crisis. Courtesy of RemnantNewsPaper  P^3 FOR THE FIRST TIME ONLINE: Archbishop Lefebvre’s Prophetic Address to The Remnant, 1976 Written by  Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre Introduction by Michael J. Matt More than forty years ago—during the disastrous reign of Pope Paul VI, the latest candidate for a Vatican-issued Halo Award, by the way—my father, Walter L. Matt, organized the first large scale public reception in the U.S. for the late Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre. It was held at the Radisson South Hotel, Minneapolis, on Tuesday, May 12, 1976, and its stated purpose was to assist the Archbishop in gaining a stronger foothold for the Society of St. Pius X in the States during the unprecedented crisis Blessed Pope Paul had helped unleash on the Church. On that occasion Archbishop Lefebvre delivered ...

The myth of the Hermeneutic of Continuity - Rorate Caeli

+ JMJ Interestingly the complete acceptance of the Second Vatican Council (without reservations) is required of the SSPX. Just when people are starting to wonder how it came to this! Courtesy of Rorate Caeli P^3

"Theology of the Body" explained - a Traditional Catholic view - Rorate Caeli

+ JMJ In prep for yet another attack on Catholic Dogma, Doctrine and Morals, I'd like to point out an excellent article posted on Rorate earlier this year:  "Theology of the Body" explained - a Traditional Catholic view - Rorate Caeli . To date my only real reaction the 'Theology of the Body' has been that what little I read doesn't 'feel right'.  The more specific term for this sensation is Cognitive Dissonance or Cultural Dissonance. In short, what I read of the basic tenets of 'Theology of the Body' seemed to contradict I believed about the Catholic Church's teaching on the purpose of marriage.  The explanations that I received from 'modern' Catholics, didn't do anything to allay my concerns. This article goes to the heart of why it didn't feel right.

Canonical Mission and State of Emergency - A Response to Mr. John Salza - Part B

 +  JMJ  I was trying to think of a way to map out the time course I discussed in Part A of this article.  Early this morning it came to me that this is more about obedience and duty than canon law.  As is my wont, I mapped out my thoughts (see image) to draw linkages between the core concepts. My conclusion is that, at least subjectively, Archbishop Lefebvre had sufficient information to make good decisions concerning whether or not he was obliged to obey.  I know that the Jesuits, some Sedevacantists and the priests that left over the years will not agree with my thoughts. So be it.  The core pieces of information include: Attacks against the SSPX were launched because they kept the Tridentine Mass and the pre-conciliar understanding of the Truths of the Faith. The authorities in the Church were willing to go against the laws of the Church. The same authorities encouraged the various dangers to the Faith embedded in popular interpretations of ambiguo...

Validity of new rite of episcopal consecrations - Courtesy of SSPX.org

+ JMJ In the blogosphere there are number of responses to this crisis in the Catholic Church that lead to conclusions that run counter to Catholic Doctrine and Dogmas - if taken to their logical conclusion. The validity of the New Rite of Episcopal consecrations is one such hotspot within more extreme sections of the 'traditionalist' culture. Validity of new rite of episcopal consecrations Courtesy of SSPX.org Why the new rite of episcopal consecration is valid Introduction This comprehensive study was compiled to settle a debate that has been circulating in traditional Catholic circles. Some writers have examined the new rite of episcopal consecration and concluded that it must be invalid. Since this would cause manifest problems if it were true and due to the heightened awareness of such a theory, we present a study of this question concluding that it is valid. Following the Council, in 1968 a new rite for the ordination of bishops was promulg...