Skip to main content

Ou S'envien Msgr Williamson et son 'Resistance'?

Image
By
+
JMJ

Originale en anglais
Je vous demande pardonne pour cette traduction de google - je n'ai pas assez de temps pour faire in traduction propre.

Pour la plupart, les associés  de la "résistance" continu ses attaques contre la direction de la FSSPX  sans resprirer.

Périodiquement ils tirer le rideau sur les principes qui guident leurs actions .



Un tel événement qui s'est passé quand Mgr Williamson était assis à son ordinateur pour écrire EC384 .

Passant au crible les différentes insinuations et tactiques de manipulation ( intentionnelle ou non ), nous trouvons l'affirmation suivante :
Ainsi, lorsque Mgr Lefebvre a vu clairement que l'Église conciliaire , en perdant les quatre marques de l'Eglise catholique ( une, sainte , catholique , apostolique ) , n'était pas l'Eglise catholique
Dans ce court recueil de mots, Mgr Williamson a exposé avec plus de clarté le principe qui est en contradiction avec ceux de la FSSPX .

L'analyse de la déclaration citée , nous constatons que:

  1. Mgr Williamson estime que Mgr Lefebvre a estimé que
  2. Le ' Église conciliaire » ,
  3. en perdant les quatre marques de l'Eglise catholique
  4. n'était pas l'Eglise catholique

Avant de poursuivre, il est important de comprendre que, selon dogme de l'Eglise , il ya une seule Eglise du Christ . Il ne peut jamais y avoir deux églises qui possèdent les quatre marques de l'Eglise Catholique .

Puisque vous ne pouvez pas perdre quelque chose que vous ne possédez pas, les affirmations faites par l'évêque Williamson ( 2 & 3 ) étayent la conclusion que, avant la perte de " tous les quatre marques de l'Eglise catholique " , "l'Eglise conciliaire » était le église du Christ .

Rejoindre ce avec sa dernière affirmation , nous arrivons à la conclusion de Mgr Williamson que l'Eglise catholique n'est plus l'Eglise du Christ .

Ce qui est malhonnête de BishopWilliamson , c'est qu'il lui attribue cette croyance à Mgr Lefebvre .

Bien sûr, ce faisant, il gagne la capitale politique parmi ses associés en réduisant la dissonance cognitive , au détriment du principe catholique truth.Once une ( vraie obéissance ) tombe , d'autres ( l'indéfectibilité de l'Église , la doctrine catholique des Quatre marques , etc ) ne manqueront pas de suivre.

Cependant , Mgr Lefebvre et la FSSPX n'ont pas dévié de leur compréhension de l'expression « Église conciliaire " , si Mgr Williamson jamais partagé cette compréhension , il est évident qu'il a quitté il .

Si Mgr Williamson de publier une correction , je serais très heureux . Cependant , il a été plus d'un an une connaissance traditionaliste transmis ma critique originale des EC281 à Son Excellence , donc je doute fort que la correction sera imminente .


P ^ 3
prière
pénitence
patience



Lectures complémentaires
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Comparision of the Tridentine, Cranmer and Novus Ordo Masses

By
+ JMJ I downloaded the comparison that was linked in the previous article on the mass (here) . ... a very good reference! P^3 From: Whispers of Restoration (available at this link) . CHARTING LITURGICAL CHANGE Comparing the 1962 Ordinary of the Roman Mass to changes made during the Anglican Schism; Compared in turn to changes adopted in the creation of Pope Paul VI’s Mass in 1969 The chart on the reverse is a concise comparison of certain ritual differences between three historical rites for the celebration of the Catholic Mass Vetus Ordo: “Old Order,” the Roman Rite of Mass as contained in the 1962 Missal, often referred to as the “Traditional Latin Mass.”The Ordinary of this Mass is that of Pope St. Pius V (1570) following the Council of Trent (1545-63), hence the occasional moniker “Tridentine Mass.” However, Trent only consolidated and codified the Roman Rite already in use at that time; its essential form dates to Pope St. Gregory the Great (+604), in whose time the R...
Post a Comment
Read more

SSPX and the Resistance - A Comparison Of Ecclesiology

By
Shining the light of Church Teaching on the doctrinal positions of the SSPX and the Resistance. Principles are guides used to aid in decision making.  It stands to reason that bad principles will lead to bad decisions. The recent interactions between Rome and the SSPX has challenged a number of closely held cultural assumptions of people in both sides of the disagreement. This has resulted in cultural skirmishes in both Rome and the SSPX. Since it is the smaller of the two, the skirmishes have been more evident within the SSPX.  The cultural fault-line that Bishop Fellay crossed appears to be linked to two points of Catholic Doctrine: Ecclesiology and Obedience.  The cultural difference of view points is strong enough that it has resulted in the expulsion of a number of members.  It should also be noted that some other priests expelled since the beginning of the latest interactions (starting in 2000) held the same view points and have joined with the l...
8 comments
Read more

If Pope Francis is bad - what about Pope St. John Paul II et al?

By
+ JMJ So here we are on the apparent cusp of yet another post conciliar Papal canonization. This time we have Pope's John-Paul I and Paul VI canonizations to 'look forward' to. This follows, obviously, on the heels of Pope St. John Paul II's canonization? So the first question that I usually encounter is: How is it possible, keeping in mind the doctrine on infallibility of canonizations (note doctrine not dogma), that Pope St. John Paul II is a Saint? First, what does it mean???  According to the doctrine of dogmatic facts - it is the universal opinion of Theologians that canonizations are infallible.  It means that they enjoy the beatific vision.  ... that's it.  That is the doctrine and it is at the level of universal opinion of theologians.  It is called a 'dogmatic fact'. That they made mistakes is obvious.  That the miracles seem to not be very miraculous is also a bit of an issue. Here's something to consider: The rush that surrou...
16 comments
Read more

Spiritual Journey Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre - Extracts

By
+ JMJ I have posted these two chapters to provide context for the quote of: It is, therefore, a strict duty for every priest wanting to remain Catholic to separate himself from this Conciliar Church for as long as it does not rediscover the Tradition of the Church and of the Catholic Faith. P^3 Courtesy of SSPX.ca Chapter II The Perfections of God We ought to remember during this entire contemplation of God that we must apply all that is said of God to Our Lord Jesus Christ, Who is God. We cannot separate Jesus Christ from God. We cannot separate the Christian religion from Jesus Christ, Who is God, and we must affirm and believe that only the Catholic religion is the Christian religion. These affirmations have, as a result, inescapable conclusions that no ecclesiastic authority can contest: outside of Jesus Christ and the Catholic religion, that is, outsi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Dogmas of the Catholic Faith (de fide) - Expanded Listing: Answer for Reader

By
 + JMJ  A reader asked the following question in the 2015 version of the article on the Dogmas of the Catholic Faith (link) : 117: "In the state of fallen nature it is morally impossible for man without Supernatural Revelation, to know easily, with absolute certainty and without admixture of error, all religious and moral truths of the natural order." Where can you find this in the documents of the Church? ( Link to comment )  Here's the reference from Ott: The citation that Ott provided was Denzinger 1786 and the source document is Dogmatic Consitution Concerning the Faith from the First Vatican Council (Papal Encyclicals - link) : Chapter 2 On Revelation, Article 3: It is indeed thanks to this divine revelation , that those matters concerning God, which are not of themselves beyond the scope of human reason, can, even in the present state of the human race, be known by everyone, without difficulty, with firm certitude and with no intermingling of error. Here's ...
Post a Comment
Read more