Skip to main content

Ou S'envien Msgr Williamson et son 'Resistance'?

Image
By
+
JMJ

Originale en anglais
Je vous demande pardonne pour cette traduction de google - je n'ai pas assez de temps pour faire in traduction propre.

Pour la plupart, les associés  de la "résistance" continu ses attaques contre la direction de la FSSPX  sans resprirer.

Périodiquement ils tirer le rideau sur les principes qui guident leurs actions .



Un tel événement qui s'est passé quand Mgr Williamson était assis à son ordinateur pour écrire EC384 .

Passant au crible les différentes insinuations et tactiques de manipulation ( intentionnelle ou non ), nous trouvons l'affirmation suivante :
Ainsi, lorsque Mgr Lefebvre a vu clairement que l'Église conciliaire , en perdant les quatre marques de l'Eglise catholique ( une, sainte , catholique , apostolique ) , n'était pas l'Eglise catholique
Dans ce court recueil de mots, Mgr Williamson a exposé avec plus de clarté le principe qui est en contradiction avec ceux de la FSSPX .

L'analyse de la déclaration citée , nous constatons que:

  1. Mgr Williamson estime que Mgr Lefebvre a estimé que
  2. Le ' Église conciliaire » ,
  3. en perdant les quatre marques de l'Eglise catholique
  4. n'était pas l'Eglise catholique

Avant de poursuivre, il est important de comprendre que, selon dogme de l'Eglise , il ya une seule Eglise du Christ . Il ne peut jamais y avoir deux églises qui possèdent les quatre marques de l'Eglise Catholique .

Puisque vous ne pouvez pas perdre quelque chose que vous ne possédez pas, les affirmations faites par l'évêque Williamson ( 2 & 3 ) étayent la conclusion que, avant la perte de " tous les quatre marques de l'Eglise catholique " , "l'Eglise conciliaire » était le église du Christ .

Rejoindre ce avec sa dernière affirmation , nous arrivons à la conclusion de Mgr Williamson que l'Eglise catholique n'est plus l'Eglise du Christ .

Ce qui est malhonnête de BishopWilliamson , c'est qu'il lui attribue cette croyance à Mgr Lefebvre .

Bien sûr, ce faisant, il gagne la capitale politique parmi ses associés en réduisant la dissonance cognitive , au détriment du principe catholique truth.Once une ( vraie obéissance ) tombe , d'autres ( l'indéfectibilité de l'Église , la doctrine catholique des Quatre marques , etc ) ne manqueront pas de suivre.

Cependant , Mgr Lefebvre et la FSSPX n'ont pas dévié de leur compréhension de l'expression « Église conciliaire " , si Mgr Williamson jamais partagé cette compréhension , il est évident qu'il a quitté il .

Si Mgr Williamson de publier une correction , je serais très heureux . Cependant , il a été plus d'un an une connaissance traditionaliste transmis ma critique originale des EC281 à Son Excellence , donc je doute fort que la correction sera imminente .


P ^ 3
prière
pénitence
patience



Lectures complémentaires
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Theology of the Body" explained - a Traditional Catholic view - Rorate Caeli

By
+ JMJ In prep for yet another attack on Catholic Dogma, Doctrine and Morals, I'd like to point out an excellent article posted on Rorate earlier this year:  "Theology of the Body" explained - a Traditional Catholic view - Rorate Caeli . To date my only real reaction the 'Theology of the Body' has been that what little I read doesn't 'feel right'.  The more specific term for this sensation is Cognitive Dissonance or Cultural Dissonance. In short, what I read of the basic tenets of 'Theology of the Body' seemed to contradict I believed about the Catholic Church's teaching on the purpose of marriage.  The explanations that I received from 'modern' Catholics, didn't do anything to allay my concerns. This article goes to the heart of why it didn't feel right.
Post a Comment
Read more

Can Catholics Pray with Protestants??? Part 2

By
 + JMJ While I have explicit permission from the Canadian, US and FSSPX.News sites, as a follow-up to Part 1, I am going to post here an article on the FSSPX.UK website to provide a bona-fide resource for other Traditional Catholics looking for the truth as opposed to just belief on this topic. FSSPX.UK: Matters arising – May We Pray with Non-Catholics? P^3 Matters arising : May we pray with non-Catholics? Rev. Nicholas Mary, C.SS.R. Fr. Nicholas Mary answers topical questions in the light of moral theology and canon law. Public prayer As always, before we can answer a question adequately, terms must be defined and distinctions made. The general principle is clear, as Cardinal Newman writes: From time immemorial, from the earliest ages, members of the Church have been forbidden  communicatio in sacris  [i.e. participation in religious rites] with those who were external to it. This prohibition is not intended as the expression of any judgment on this...
Post a Comment
Read more

SSPX Confessions and Marriages

By
Courtesy of SSPX.org Valid: SSPX's confessions and marriages January 15, 2014  District of the US The SSPX's priests are often accused of not being able to validly hear confessions or perform marriages. But this false claim falls flat upon a close examination of Canon Law — particularly in light of the crisis in the Church. A frequent accusation made by opponents of the Society of St. Pius X is that the confessions and marriages undertaken in its chapels are invalid because its priests lack jurisdiction. This false assertion not only ignores the Church's jurisprudence on  supplied jurisdiction , but more importantly, the reality that a state of necessity  exists due to the post-conciliar crisis. On the canonical side of things, we re-present here the important and comprehensive 3-part study of Fr. Ramon Angles,  The Validity of Confessions & Marriages in the Chapels of the Society of St. Pius X  which in summary demonstrat...
Post a Comment
Read more

SSPX and the Resistance - A Comparison Of Ecclesiology

By
Shining the light of Church Teaching on the doctrinal positions of the SSPX and the Resistance. Principles are guides used to aid in decision making.  It stands to reason that bad principles will lead to bad decisions. The recent interactions between Rome and the SSPX has challenged a number of closely held cultural assumptions of people in both sides of the disagreement. This has resulted in cultural skirmishes in both Rome and the SSPX. Since it is the smaller of the two, the skirmishes have been more evident within the SSPX.  The cultural fault-line that Bishop Fellay crossed appears to be linked to two points of Catholic Doctrine: Ecclesiology and Obedience.  The cultural difference of view points is strong enough that it has resulted in the expulsion of a number of members.  It should also be noted that some other priests expelled since the beginning of the latest interactions (starting in 2000) held the same view points and have joined with the l...
8 comments
Read more