Skip to main content

Ou S'envien Msgr Williamson et son 'Resistance'?

Image
By
+
JMJ

Originale en anglais
Je vous demande pardonne pour cette traduction de google - je n'ai pas assez de temps pour faire in traduction propre.

Pour la plupart, les associés  de la "résistance" continu ses attaques contre la direction de la FSSPX  sans resprirer.

Périodiquement ils tirer le rideau sur les principes qui guident leurs actions .



Un tel événement qui s'est passé quand Mgr Williamson était assis à son ordinateur pour écrire EC384 .

Passant au crible les différentes insinuations et tactiques de manipulation ( intentionnelle ou non ), nous trouvons l'affirmation suivante :
Ainsi, lorsque Mgr Lefebvre a vu clairement que l'Église conciliaire , en perdant les quatre marques de l'Eglise catholique ( une, sainte , catholique , apostolique ) , n'était pas l'Eglise catholique
Dans ce court recueil de mots, Mgr Williamson a exposé avec plus de clarté le principe qui est en contradiction avec ceux de la FSSPX .

L'analyse de la déclaration citée , nous constatons que:

  1. Mgr Williamson estime que Mgr Lefebvre a estimé que
  2. Le ' Église conciliaire » ,
  3. en perdant les quatre marques de l'Eglise catholique
  4. n'était pas l'Eglise catholique

Avant de poursuivre, il est important de comprendre que, selon dogme de l'Eglise , il ya une seule Eglise du Christ . Il ne peut jamais y avoir deux églises qui possèdent les quatre marques de l'Eglise Catholique .

Puisque vous ne pouvez pas perdre quelque chose que vous ne possédez pas, les affirmations faites par l'évêque Williamson ( 2 & 3 ) étayent la conclusion que, avant la perte de " tous les quatre marques de l'Eglise catholique " , "l'Eglise conciliaire » était le église du Christ .

Rejoindre ce avec sa dernière affirmation , nous arrivons à la conclusion de Mgr Williamson que l'Eglise catholique n'est plus l'Eglise du Christ .

Ce qui est malhonnête de BishopWilliamson , c'est qu'il lui attribue cette croyance à Mgr Lefebvre .

Bien sûr, ce faisant, il gagne la capitale politique parmi ses associés en réduisant la dissonance cognitive , au détriment du principe catholique truth.Once une ( vraie obéissance ) tombe , d'autres ( l'indéfectibilité de l'Église , la doctrine catholique des Quatre marques , etc ) ne manqueront pas de suivre.

Cependant , Mgr Lefebvre et la FSSPX n'ont pas dévié de leur compréhension de l'expression « Église conciliaire " , si Mgr Williamson jamais partagé cette compréhension , il est évident qu'il a quitté il .

Si Mgr Williamson de publier une correction , je serais très heureux . Cependant , il a été plus d'un an une connaissance traditionaliste transmis ma critique originale des EC281 à Son Excellence , donc je doute fort que la correction sera imminente .


P ^ 3
prière
pénitence
patience



Lectures complémentaires
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Rome,the SSPX and this time of Crisis - Updated

By
+ JMJ Obviously there's lots of events right now. First we have the April 1st - I almost thought it was April Fools - meeting between Pope Francis and Bishop Fellay.  Nothing really news worthy as this is a natural progression as Rome appears to be considering fulfilling Archbishop Lefebvre's wish to 'accept us as we are'. Second we have the April 8th publication of what will be a verbose exhortation of the Synod of the Family. I'm willing to bet that the Pope will give with one hand (unilateral regularization of SSPX) and take with the other (ambiguous document that opens the flood gates of sin further). Much to pray for. P^3
30 comments
Read more

The Vatican and SSPX – An Organizational Culture Perspective

By
Introduction The recent and continuing interactions between the Vatican and the SSPX have been a great opportunity for prayer and reflection.  The basis for the disagreement is theological and not liturgical. As noted by Dr. Lamont (2012), the SSPX theological position on the four key controversial aspects of the Second Vatican Council are base on prior theological work that resulted from relevant magisterial pronouncements.  So it is difficult to understand the apparent rejection of the theological position of the SSPX.
17 comments
Read more

A Reply to Martin Blackshaw’s FLAWED Remnant article titled: FLAWED: SSPX Advice on Abortion-tainted Vaccines

By
 + JMJ    An article has appeared in the Remnant (link to article) and I am afraid that there are a number of flaws in it that need to be addressed. The author, Martin Blackshaw, believes that both the Church and the SSPX are misapplying the principle of Moral Theology called 'Cooperation In Evil'.  Unfortunately, Mr. Blackshaw rests most of his arguments on citing authors that support his position, without considering the possibility that they are wrong. This highlights a key factor in this crisis: ignorance of the faith and its application . I don't am not singling out Mr. Blackshaw for this criticism, I have observed that it applies to laity and religious, superior and subject a like.  No one seems immune in this enduring crisis, myself included.  I further believe that this ignorance is why so many Catholics, both traditional and non, rely on their gut feeling or "Catholic conscience" for charting their way through this crisis of the faith.  While...
25 comments
Read more

Battle Joy

By
+ JMJ I was listening to a Cd of John Vennari on Battle Joy ( Recapture the Flag: Dedication and Battle Joy - by John Vennari ) and it really captures a key point that Catholics (Traditional and otherwise labelled) need to adopt. We should see this conflict as a chance to prove our mettle for our King and to earn our unending reward.  As veterans we'll be able to talk about the old battles in which we fought and the honour we gained in fighting for our King! Attached is a preview of course that, although secular, contains some of the elements of Battle Joy. P^3 https://www.coursera.org/learn/war/lecture/VDwfk/the-joy-of-battle
Post a Comment
Read more

SSPX and the Resistance - A Comparison Of Ecclesiology

By
Shining the light of Church Teaching on the doctrinal positions of the SSPX and the Resistance. Principles are guides used to aid in decision making.  It stands to reason that bad principles will lead to bad decisions. The recent interactions between Rome and the SSPX has challenged a number of closely held cultural assumptions of people in both sides of the disagreement. This has resulted in cultural skirmishes in both Rome and the SSPX. Since it is the smaller of the two, the skirmishes have been more evident within the SSPX.  The cultural fault-line that Bishop Fellay crossed appears to be linked to two points of Catholic Doctrine: Ecclesiology and Obedience.  The cultural difference of view points is strong enough that it has resulted in the expulsion of a number of members.  It should also be noted that some other priests expelled since the beginning of the latest interactions (starting in 2000) held the same view points and have joined with the l...
8 comments
Read more