Skip to main content

Ou S'envien Msgr Williamson et son 'Resistance'?

Image
By
+
JMJ

Originale en anglais
Je vous demande pardonne pour cette traduction de google - je n'ai pas assez de temps pour faire in traduction propre.

Pour la plupart, les associés  de la "résistance" continu ses attaques contre la direction de la FSSPX  sans resprirer.

Périodiquement ils tirer le rideau sur les principes qui guident leurs actions .



Un tel événement qui s'est passé quand Mgr Williamson était assis à son ordinateur pour écrire EC384 .

Passant au crible les différentes insinuations et tactiques de manipulation ( intentionnelle ou non ), nous trouvons l'affirmation suivante :
Ainsi, lorsque Mgr Lefebvre a vu clairement que l'Église conciliaire , en perdant les quatre marques de l'Eglise catholique ( une, sainte , catholique , apostolique ) , n'était pas l'Eglise catholique
Dans ce court recueil de mots, Mgr Williamson a exposé avec plus de clarté le principe qui est en contradiction avec ceux de la FSSPX .

L'analyse de la déclaration citée , nous constatons que:

  1. Mgr Williamson estime que Mgr Lefebvre a estimé que
  2. Le ' Église conciliaire » ,
  3. en perdant les quatre marques de l'Eglise catholique
  4. n'était pas l'Eglise catholique

Avant de poursuivre, il est important de comprendre que, selon dogme de l'Eglise , il ya une seule Eglise du Christ . Il ne peut jamais y avoir deux églises qui possèdent les quatre marques de l'Eglise Catholique .

Puisque vous ne pouvez pas perdre quelque chose que vous ne possédez pas, les affirmations faites par l'évêque Williamson ( 2 & 3 ) étayent la conclusion que, avant la perte de " tous les quatre marques de l'Eglise catholique " , "l'Eglise conciliaire » était le église du Christ .

Rejoindre ce avec sa dernière affirmation , nous arrivons à la conclusion de Mgr Williamson que l'Eglise catholique n'est plus l'Eglise du Christ .

Ce qui est malhonnête de BishopWilliamson , c'est qu'il lui attribue cette croyance à Mgr Lefebvre .

Bien sûr, ce faisant, il gagne la capitale politique parmi ses associés en réduisant la dissonance cognitive , au détriment du principe catholique truth.Once une ( vraie obéissance ) tombe , d'autres ( l'indéfectibilité de l'Église , la doctrine catholique des Quatre marques , etc ) ne manqueront pas de suivre.

Cependant , Mgr Lefebvre et la FSSPX n'ont pas dévié de leur compréhension de l'expression « Église conciliaire " , si Mgr Williamson jamais partagé cette compréhension , il est évident qu'il a quitté il .

Si Mgr Williamson de publier une correction , je serais très heureux . Cependant , il a été plus d'un an une connaissance traditionaliste transmis ma critique originale des EC281 à Son Excellence , donc je doute fort que la correction sera imminente .


P ^ 3
prière
pénitence
patience



Lectures complémentaires
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

SSPX and the Resistance - A Comparison Of Ecclesiology

By
Shining the light of Church Teaching on the doctrinal positions of the SSPX and the Resistance. Principles are guides used to aid in decision making.  It stands to reason that bad principles will lead to bad decisions. The recent interactions between Rome and the SSPX has challenged a number of closely held cultural assumptions of people in both sides of the disagreement. This has resulted in cultural skirmishes in both Rome and the SSPX. Since it is the smaller of the two, the skirmishes have been more evident within the SSPX.  The cultural fault-line that Bishop Fellay crossed appears to be linked to two points of Catholic Doctrine: Ecclesiology and Obedience.  The cultural difference of view points is strong enough that it has resulted in the expulsion of a number of members.  It should also be noted that some other priests expelled since the beginning of the latest interactions (starting in 2000) held the same view points and have joined with the l...
8 comments
Read more

Regarding Post: Fr. Joseph Pfeiffer no longer ... now Bishop Joseph Pfeiffer (Can't see this being a problem...)

By
 + JMJ   I've been watching the popularity of the post about Fr. Pfeiffer's attempted episcopal consecration and its continued top listing on the 'popular posts' list at the bottom of posts.  After some thought, I decided that I don't want to be responsible for anyone joining Fr. Pfeiffer's 'group', however unlikely that would be at this time. So I have reverted the article to the draft state. If anyone wants it reinstated, I would ask that they comment on this post with a rationale for reinstatement. P^3
Post a Comment
Read more

Schism

By
There is some question as to whether the Pope can be in actual schism as per the Cardinal Torquemada: Citing the doctrine of Pope Innocent III, Torquemada further teaches:  "Thus it is that Pope Innocent III states [De Consuetudine] that, it is necessary to obey the Pope in all things as long as he, himself, does not go against the universal customs of the Church, but should he go against the universal customs of the Church, 'he need not be followed' . . . " [Cited from A Theological Vindication of Roman Catholic Traditionalism, Father Paul Kramer, B.Ph., S.T.D., M. Div. (2nd edition, St. Francis Press, India) p. 29. The full quotation from Cardinal Torquemada reads, "By disobedience, the Pope can separate himself from Christ despite the fact that he is head of the Church, for above all, the unity of the Church is dependent on its relationship with Christ. The Pope can separate himself from Christ either by disobeying the law of Christ, or by commanding som...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Catholic Church and the Rule of Law- Part II: Dr. John Lamont

By
+ JMJ This is the second article from Dr. Lamont from his lecture given in May 2014. P^3 Source Part A: Society of St. Hugh of Cluny Source Part B: Society of St. Hugh of Cluny 8 May2014 The Catholic Church and the Rule of Law- Part II By John Lamont To understand how the Jesuit conception of obedience departed from earlier conceptions, it is helpful to compare it with the teaching of St. Thomas on obedience. The fundamental difference between the two is that St. Thomas considers the proper object of obedience to be the precept of the superior (2a2ae q. 104 a. 2 co., ad 3). Obedience that seeks to forestall the expressed will of the superior does not bear on what the superior wants or thinks in general, but only on what the superior intends to command. St. Ignatius’s lowest degree of obedience, which he does not consider to be virtuous, is thus what St. Thomas considers to be the only form of obedience. St. Thomas holds that St. Ignatius’s alleged higher forms of o...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Episcopal Consecrations of 1988, 1991 and 2015 - Some Perspectives

By
+ JMJ In defense of the recent consecration of Fr. Faure by Bishop Williamson, some have argued that the 1991 consecration of Bishop Rangel (RIP) by the Bishops of the SSPX present an equivalent standard of action and principles.  From this they conclude that the SSPX's condemnation of Bishop Williamson's action is flawed as the principles of the 1991 consecration and that of 2015 are equivalent.
2 comments
Read more