Skip to main content

Finding A Spouse

When I was in Winona last week, I had a discusion with a bright young lady about the issues in finding 'the' spouse.

I'm writing this article so I won't forget some of the more salient points.

  1. Develop a good wide Catholic perspective by study and a strong spiritual life.  In this manner you will develop the peace of soul in order to see the path of salvation that God has laid out for you. 
    1. This may be marriage, in which case there will be a person that you will encounter on that path.
    2. This may be for a religious vocation, in which case the person is God.
  2. Be comfortable in your skin, so to speak.
    1. Being patient and open to Divine Providence is the key.
  3. Work more on 'being the right one' and not 'finding the right one'.
  4. Listen to your parents and mature friends who can provide a more objective assessment of the merits of a particular person.
  5. You aren't looking for a perfect 'match', ideally you should marry a person whose strengths make up for your weaknesses, and vice-versa. They should be able to help you work on your weaknesses as you should help them with theirs.
Ok, I think I caught the main points - #1 was new for me and popped into my head during the discussion.  #5 was also new, but I've known it intuitively for many years.

On the drive back to the camp ground, I occured to me that finding a spouse has a strong similarity to Herzberg's Hygiene theory.

This is a motivational theory that contains primarily two elements:
  • Motivators (e.g. challenging work, recognition, responsibility) that give positive satisfaction, arising from intrinsic conditions of the job itself, such as recognition, achievement, or personal growth,[4] and
  • Hygiene factors (e.g. status, job security, salary, fringe benefits, work conditions) that do not give positive satisfaction, though dissatisfaction results from their absence. These are extrinsic to the work itself, and include aspects such as company policies, supervisory practices, or wages/salary.[4][5]
Essentially, hygiene factors are needed to ensure an employee is not dissatisfied. Motivation factors are needed to motivate an employee to higher performance. Herzberg also further classified our actions and how and why we do them, for example, if you perform a work related action because you have to then that is classed as "movement", but if you perform a work related action because you want to then that is classed as "motivation".

Source

Once 'hygiene' factors are in place, they don't really motivate a person. In a similar manner, there are (or should be) basic criteria that a spouse should possess prior to even considering them as anything more than an acquaintance. If a person falls below this 'bar' they are a non-starter. Likewise, if a person just has the 'hygiene' factors in a relationship, there is no 'motivation' to grow the relationship - very dangerous ground even for a Catholic.

From a relationship point of view 'hygiene' factors can include elements such as Faith, Family background, financial situation.  These are ones that people are used to listing off when making a 'checklist' for a prospective spouse. I don't want to make it sound like this is not important, it is important as a baseline. Keep in mind that picking a person to spend the rest of your natural life with (assuming you outlive them) is a serious issue that will have a major influence on the eternal salvation of your soul.

Motivational factors in a relationship are trickier to determine. Does this person have strengths that counter balance your weaknesses? Do they want to help you save your soul? Do they have a mature spiritual life?  Are they mature?

Once you've developed this list - it would be useful to turn the microscope on yourself. How do you measure up? What should you be doing to make yourself 'the one'? 

For myself, I can look back and see the finger of God grooming me to be 'the one' for my wife. All of the important work that God undertook was interior. First he had to deepen my heart so that I could love deeply (a generic problem for men ...). Second, he providentially helped me to remove a number of barriers in my spiritual life.  Thirdly, he deepened my spiritual life.

So to sum up:

  1. Have clear ideas of the 'hygiene factors' that need to be in place before you'll consider a relationship with a prospective spouse.
  2. Have clear ideas of the 'motivational factors' that need to be present to get to the next step.
  3. Have a deep spiritual life that allows you to see the path that God has set out for you to walk on for your own salvation.
  4. Look at yourself in all humility and work on making yourself worthy of the person that God has chosen to be your help in life so that you make help them in return.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

De Veritate - St. Thomas Aquinas - What is necessary to believe explicitly?

I was recently introduced to a work of St. Thomas De Veritate ( Source ) in the course of an argument concerning the minimum content of explicit faith.  When I submitted the following quote as proof: Theological faith, that is, a supernatural faith in Revelation, is necessary, and this is an effect of grace (D 1789); nemini unquam sine ilIa contigit iustificatio (D 1793). As far as the content of this faith is concerned, according to Hebr. 11, 6, at least the existence of God and retribution in the other world must be firmly held, necessitate medii (by the necessity of means) with explicit faith. In regard to the Trinity and the Incarnation, implicit faith suffices. The supernatural faith necessary for justification is attained when God grants to the unbeliever by internal inspiration or external teaching a knowledge of the truths of Revelation, and actual grace to make the supernatural act of faith. Cf. De verite 14, I I.Ott - Fundamentals of Dogma p241 In response my opponent ...

Comparision of the Tridentine, Cranmer and Novus Ordo Masses

+ JMJ I downloaded the comparison that was linked in the previous article on the mass (here) . ... a very good reference! P^3 From: Whispers of Restoration (available at this link) . CHARTING LITURGICAL CHANGE Comparing the 1962 Ordinary of the Roman Mass to changes made during the Anglican Schism; Compared in turn to changes adopted in the creation of Pope Paul VI’s Mass in 1969 The chart on the reverse is a concise comparison of certain ritual differences between three historical rites for the celebration of the Catholic Mass Vetus Ordo: “Old Order,” the Roman Rite of Mass as contained in the 1962 Missal, often referred to as the “Traditional Latin Mass.”The Ordinary of this Mass is that of Pope St. Pius V (1570) following the Council of Trent (1545-63), hence the occasional moniker “Tridentine Mass.” However, Trent only consolidated and codified the Roman Rite already in use at that time; its essential form dates to Pope St. Gregory the Great (+604), in whose time the R...

Rome and the SSPX - Version 2026 Part 5b - How Did We Get Here??? ... A Continued Anlaysis using ChatGPT.

 + JMJ Part 5b How Did We Get Here??? So in the previous ChatGPT analysis the LLM ‘concluded’ that there was continuity in doctrine. So now we’re going to explore this element. There is some repetition but I don't have time right now to do a lot of editing.  I think instead we'll have a Part 5c where I try to pull it all together with some old fashioned human sense making. At the end point, I think the LLM collects an interesting if somewhat skewed perspective: The SSPX mapping hinges on this claim: That Vatican II affirms (at least implicitly) propositions that the Syllabus of Errors explicitly condemned. The broader Church response is: The same propositions are still rejected—but Vatican II is addressing different categories (political, pastoral, anthropological) rather than reversing doctrine. While the summary of the SSPX position seems close, that of the broader Church seems to be either an outright AI hallucination or a consensus point from the literature that it used...

News Roundup: April 30, 2026

 + JMJ I just realised that I haven't posted the latest Roundup ... and there is a lot in the roundup as the media storm around the SSPX continues! I also just noticed this article: European Conservative: Why the SSPX Bishop Decision Matters Far Beyond Church Politics (link) .  P^3 === Popes Past Present and Future Papal News and Views Cardinal Fernandez maintains that Francis is not dead- metaphorically Pope Leo XIV Reopens Amoris Laetitia File | FSSPX News Pope Leo: “We Do Not Agree with the Formalized Blessing of …Homosexual Couples” - OnePeterFive RORATE CÆLI: How Pope Leo is Reshuffling the Curia: Musical Chairs and Power Games RORATE CÆLI: A Giant Leap: The meaning of Cardinal Eijk’s Pontifical High Mass and the Rebirth of Dutch Catholicism RORATE CÆLI: A Sign of Continuity with the Pre-Francis Papacy: Pope to Wash Feet of Twelve Priests RORATE CÆLI: Vatican Blocks Continuity of Procedure of Beatification and Canonization of Argentine Bishop -- no new Satanellis Pope Leo...

Rome and the SSPX - Version 2026 Part 5 - How Did We Get Here???

 + JMJ This is the fifth in this series and I think it may require a part b to show the controversial documents and teachings of the Pope post V2. P^3 Part 5 How Did We Get Here??? Introduction My family became ‘Traditional’ in early 1980’s and I didn’t realise until years later how early we entered the Fray. So the SSPX was slightly over a decade old when we started going to Mass. That is a young organization, as someone said at the consecrations “Aren’t you a little young to be a bishop?”, the response was, “That is something that time will change.” 1970: SSPX founded with diocesan approval (Abp. Marcel Lefebvre) 1974–1976: Vatican II disputes escalate; Lefebvre suspended a divinis 1988: Illicit episcopal consecrations → excommunications declared 2000: SSPX Jubilee pilgrimage to Rome (signals openness to talks) 2009: Excommunications lifted by Pope Benedict XVI 2011–2012: Doctrinal talks with CDF collapse 2015–2017: SSPX granted faculties for confessi...