Skip to main content

Reblog: SSPX and the Resistance - A Comparison Of Ecclesiology: Answers to Common Objections - Part 2 of 2

Image
By
+
JMJ



Based on previous discussions, I am confident that a number of people would present objections to some of the statements that I made in this article.

Here are the ones that I have anticipated and my repsonse.

Part 1

P^3



Some Common Objections

The following objections are ones that I have encountered over a number of years. Attached below are some of my thoughts / responses.

"Modern Catholics don't profess the same faith"

First,  while obscured by a lack of preaching, the de fide teachings of the Church remain unchanged by the Magisterium. So my answer to this objection is: Do you know and explicitly profess all 230+ de fide teachings of the Catholic Church?  Yes, that is correct there are only between 230 and 240 de fide teachings of the Church. If a Traditional Catholic does not explicitly know and profess submission to these truths of the faith, are they still Catholic?  Providing they have not committed the sin of schism, the answer is yes.  Because, as noted above, as long as the person implicitly believes and outwardly confesses this belief in all that the Church proposes as de fide - then they profess the faith of the Catholic Church. The same leeway is provided to "Modern Catholics".

"Modern Catholics profess heresy"

This is a variant of the first objection as it is true that some modern Catholics are material heretics as are some traditional Catholics. However, because they are baptized Catholics the Church does not consider them as outside the Church as it is assumed that they will submit to the Church when corrected. The same assumption is not valid for baptized non-Catholics.

Further on the presumption of the sin of heresy in another person:
... a person is not to be called a heretic as soon as he shall have offended in matters of faith; but he is a heretic who, having disregarded the authority of the Church, maintains impious opinions with pertinacity.

"The Hierarchy is full of Modernists, Masons and Homosexuals"

There are two ways to identify a person as a manifest heretic. The first way is by the person explicitly denying a truth of the faith and separating themselves from the Church (for example joining a protestant sect).  Anything less than a direct denial of a de fide teaching would require a  a judgement to be made on the matter of the heresy.  Only a person or persons in authority can make such a judgement.

This means that again the words of the Catechism of Trent apply:
Hence there are but three classes of persons excluded from the Church's pale: infidels, heretics and schismatics,and excommunicated persons.
Infidels are outside the Church because they never belonged to, and never knew the Church, and were never made partakers of any of her Sacraments.
Heretics and schismatics are excluded from the Church, because they have separated from her and belong to her only as deserters belong to the army from which they have deserted. It is not, however, to be denied that they are still subject to the jurisdiction of the Church, inasmuch as they may be called before her tribunals, punished and anathematised.
Finally, excommunicated persons are not members of the Church, because they have been cut off by her sentence from the number of her children and belong not to her communion until they repent. 
But with regard to the rest, however wicked and evil they may be, it is certain that they still belong to the Church: Of this the faithful are frequently to be reminded, in order to be convinced that, were even the lives of her ministers debased by crime, they are still within the Church, and therefore lose nothing of their power.
The last paragraph is most pertinent to this objection for those who would believe that traditional Catholics are the remnant of the Church and that the rest have committed apostasy in the canonical sense.

"The Conciliar Church does not have the Four Marks"

If by 'Conciliar Church" a person means that the Church united to the Pope (Francis in case there is any confusion on that point), is no longer the Church then there are serious issues.

They need to reconcile their thesis with the:
  1. Indefectibility of the Church.
  2. Teaching of the First Vatican Council concerning the role of the Vicar of Christ in establishing and maintaining the Unity of the Church.
  3. Church teachings concerning the Marks, Indefectibility and Visibility as described above.
Lastly, they need to answer this question: Where is the Church of Christ? Certainly not with any of the Sedevacantist 'Popes' (13+).

"There is no Pope because he's a heretic"

This one phrase sums up a portion of people that have been scandalized by the events in the Church since the Second Vatican Council.

There is a large spectrum of belief amongst the sedevacantists, however ultimately they come down to the thesis stated above. They believe that the Pope was a heretic either before or after he was elected.

Taking the first instance, of pre-election heresy.  The recognition of the man elected by the College of Cardinals as Pope by the Bishops in union with Rome establishes an infallible dogmatic fact that he is Pope.  ( http://tradicat.blogspot.ca/2013/05/everything-you-wanted-to-know.html )

This soundly eliminates the objections put forth of a defect in the election of a Pope due to this cause.

Taking the second instance of post-election heresy.  The first item to establish is that there is no one on earth person or institution who can render a valid judgement on a reigning Pope.

This leads to the conclusion that in order for the sedevacantist to invoke the theory of St. Robert Bellarmine, they need to demonstrate that the Pope has explicitly denied a de-fide dogma of the Church.

One caveat-emptor for would-be judges of the occupant of the Holy See, there a number of phrases that circulate in speculative theology, as well as in regular terms that may sound heretical, but are not.

Translation: Don't jump to conclusions, there is a risk that in addition to jumping to the wrong conclusion that the jumper may be jumping out of the Church at the same time as a schismatic.

P^3
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Curious Case of Steve Skojec and the Dangers of Deep Diving into the Crisis Sub-Titled: The Failings of Others

By
 + JMJ It's been a while now since Steve Skojec sold 1P5 and abandoned the Catholic Faith. I've been a 'Trad' since 1982 and in those 40+ years I seen this death-spiral before with a similar end point. It seems that anyone who jumps into the fray unprepared for the enormous task of righting wrongs will, eventually, become discouraged by not the task but the people who surround them.   I remember when Skojec complained of the treatment his family received from a traditional priest.  This seems to have been the start of the end for him. So what can we learn from the likes of Steve Skojec, Michael Voris (maybe?), Louie Verrecchio, Gerry Matatix and other celebrity Catholics? Probably quite a lot about what not to do. First, don't burn out on the crisis?  When you burn out, on work or anything else, little things assume a more greater importance than they are due.   This is one of my 'canary in the coal mine' signals that I've been stretching myself too thin
Post a Comment
Read more

Morning and Evening and other sundry Prayers

By
+ JMJ Along the theme of P^3 (Prayer, Penance, Patience), and for my own reference ... here is a collection of Morning and Evening prayers from the Ideal Daily Missal along with some additional prayers. In this crisis of the Church, I do not think it is possible to do too much prayer, penance and have patience. P^3
Post a Comment
Read more

What the heck is a congregation of "Pontifical Right"

By
+ JMJ In a discussion with a friend the question occurred to me that I didn't actually know was is involved in being a religious order of 'pontifical right'. I had a vague notion that this meant they reported to Rome as opposed to the local diocese. I'm also aware that, according to the accounts I have heard, the Archbishop received 'praise' and the written direction to incardinate priests directly into the SSPX.  This is interesting because it implies that the SSPX priests were no longer required to incardinate in the local diocese but in the SSPX. This is something that belongs to an order of 'pontifical right'. Anyway here's some definitions: Di diritto pontificio is the Italian term for “of pontifical right” . It is given to the ecclesiastical institutions (the religious and secular institutes, societies of apostolic life) either created by the Holy See or approved by it with the formal decree, known by its Latin name, Decretu
Post a Comment
Read more

Comparision of the Tridentine, Cranmer and Novus Ordo Masses

By
+ JMJ I downloaded the comparison that was linked in the previous article on the mass (here) . ... a very good reference! P^3 From: Whispers of Restoration (available at this link) . CHARTING LITURGICAL CHANGE Comparing the 1962 Ordinary of the Roman Mass to changes made during the Anglican Schism; Compared in turn to changes adopted in the creation of Pope Paul VI’s Mass in 1969 The chart on the reverse is a concise comparison of certain ritual differences between three historical rites for the celebration of the Catholic Mass Vetus Ordo: “Old Order,” the Roman Rite of Mass as contained in the 1962 Missal, often referred to as the “Traditional Latin Mass.”The Ordinary of this Mass is that of Pope St. Pius V (1570) following the Council of Trent (1545-63), hence the occasional moniker “Tridentine Mass.” However, Trent only consolidated and codified the Roman Rite already in use at that time; its essential form dates to Pope St. Gregory the Great (+604), in whose time the R
Post a Comment
Read more