Reblog What is the 'Resistance' hiding? Review of "How to see clearly through the current situation of Tradition?" Part 3


The author of the conference makes the following claim:
The distinction between "eternal Rome" and "the Rome of Neo-Modernist and Neo-Protestant tendencies" - what was the basis of Archbishop Lefebvre's rules of engagement has been obliterated.
In my opinion this is a core aspect of the 'resistance' belief system.  The problem is that the facts belie a different story than what the author claims changed in February 2013 with Fr. Gleize's article.

The letter to Cardinal Gantin contains what is the consistent use of the term 'conciliar Church':

"... we have never wished to belong to this system which calls itself the Conciliar Church, and defines itself with the Novus Ordo Missæ, an ecumenism which leads to indifferentism and the laicization of all society. ... We ask for nothing better than to be declared out of communion with this adulterous spirit which has been blowing in the Church for the last 25 years; we ask for nothing better than to be declared outside of this impious communion of the ungodly. We believe in the One God, Our Lord Jesus Christ, with the Father and the Holy Ghost, and we will always remain faithful to His unique Spouse, the One Holy Catholic Apostolic and Roman Church..."ii

I have traced this understanding through multiple different SSPX documents 1988, 2001, 2005, 2013 and 2014.

This is not a 'new' change, it is a continuity.

contra factum non datur argumentum

Further Reading

Series - Conciliar Church

Long Island Conference 1983


Popular Posts