Skip to main content

Rome and the SSPX - Version 2026 Part 4 - The Mass (Updated with Postscript)

Image
By
+
JMJ

Introduction


"I don’t understand why they are so afraid of this Mass!!!"

A Conservative Catholic priest spoke these words to me one evening in his parich parking lot in 2011, mere days before Pope Benedict XVI issued his follow up to Summorum Pontificum (2007-07-07 Motu Proprio, Letter to Bishops, ), Universae Ecclesiae ( 2011-04-30 Motu Proprio, Note).

The people who were afraid that night were bishops. This conservative priest had started a project a year or so earlier – very simply a Perpetual Eucharistic Adoration chapel. Earlier that evening I had visited this chapel with some friends and ended up in a conversation with the priest after everyone had left. Word reached the bishops palace after the completion of the chapel and the priest received a phone call and visit from his local ordinary. My impression (this being now ~15 years ago) was that he was nervous about how the visit would proceed. The bishop came, made a visit to OLJC in the Blessed Sacrament and later made an approving statement.

It was around this nucleus of conservatism that the desire and request for a Diocesan Tridentine Mass. The request was denied and the priest was recounting his impressions about the meeting with his and one other bishop.

I think I can hazard a guess as to the source of the epsicopal fears of the Tridentine Mass: The Tridentine Mass embodies the pre-conciliar Dogmas, Doctrines and Magisterium that was rejected by the modernists after the Second Vatican Council.

Yep, there was a rupture at and definitely after V2 (Council not missile). All you have to do is compare any facet of the pre and post Vatican 2 liturgy. Liturgy embodies belief and while pre-V2 there is clear defined doctrine and liturgy, post-V2 there is ambiguity like the removal of the Filioque from the Creed.

There are a few notable exceptions, such as Pope St. John Paul II’s decision on Catholic Priestesses … for anyone who missed it … it is an impossibility.

The SSPX Angle

Initially, the SSPX was founded at the request of seminarians trying to stay Catholic in the storm that engulfed the Church after V2. Even a few years ago a seminarian wearing a black shirt was accused of being a “Lefebvrist”. After a few months of this he decided that he should go see the “Lefebvrists” to understand the accusation. I can’t remember the exact words, but he discovered that he wasn’t and neither were they … he just wanted to believe the Truths of the Catholic Faith and the “Lefebvrists” were stubbornly refusing to abandon that Faith.

In 1970’s, this adherence to the Faith coalesced around the liturgical expression of the Faith. Over the past 60 years, that adherence has been called many things, schismatic, disobedient, nostalgic. All things it isn’t. For the SSPX, the Faith they practice isn’t something in the past – it is the present. The Dogmas and Doctrines are the present and therefore the expression of these same Dogmas and Doctrines should be complete and unambiguous.

Conclusion

The completeness and clarity in the Pre-V2 liturgy and Teachings removes room to maneuver for Catholics. It is uncomfortable and I would hazard psychologically painful for them to face the Truths of the Catholic Church, Truths that are in diametrical opposition to the modern world.

That’s is why there was so much pressure to change the Mass and even the Rosary. Both are uncomfortable for Modern Catholics or at least the clergy because of what they are and what they teach.

So … that is what is at stake in the fight for the Mass, it is a fight for the Faith. In the Rosary it is a fight for the Marian Doctrines that are so disconcerting for the Modern Catholics because they offend the non-Catholics.

It is a very sad thing when human respect guides the expression of the Catholic Truths.

P^3

References

https://tradicat.blogspot.com/search/label/Series%20-%20Novus%20Ordo%20Missae

https://tradicat.blogspot.com/2021/08/reblog-comparision-of-tridentine.html

https://tradicat.blogspot.com/2021/08/fsspxnews-paul-vi-missal-part-1.html

https://tradicat.blogspot.com/2021/08/fsspxnews-paul-vi-missal-part-2.html

https://tradicat.blogspot.com/2021/07/catechism-of-council-of-trent.html

https://tradicat.blogspot.com/2024/07/new-liturgical-movement-what-does.html

https://liturgyguy.com/2017/07/23/busting-the-myth-of-the-tridentine-mass/


PostScript

I wokeup this morning with an additional thought that the fear of the Tridentine Mass is based less on what it embodies and more on its effect on the faithful and the priests saying the Mass.

I knew a young Jesuit priest (a rarity in a greying clergy) who was open to saying the Tridentine Mass (another rarity in the early 21st century). Amongst other things, this got him banned from any association with SSPX priests and faithful.

That all changed in 2011 with the promulgation of Universae Ecclesiae.

At that time this young priest was given charge of an obscure secondary church in parish and started with about 20 parishioners. From that humble start within two years the little church was packed and activities expanded outside its walls with processions and presence at a Marian conference. That was where, I understand, he made a public statement that may have signaled the beginning of the end:

“You need to worship this way.”

That seems to have been a turning point for this Jesuit and the little flock entrusted to his care. The Jesuit was removed from the position and sometime I understand transferred to a smaller city where he periodically offered the Tridentine Mass.

This was not to be the end of the story and I think it exposes the real reason for the fear of the Neo-Modernists et al who are still trying to pull the Catholic Church off its foundations. This same Jesuit, I have been informed, has been made a Jesuit Provincial. Granted it has been years, maybe a decade in the making, but here we have a nightmare for modernists: A Jesuit rediscovers the Tridentine Mass, says it for a few years and is forever changed.

The collapse of the clergy forces the young priest up the Jesuit hierarchy. While I don’t know if the change in the Jesuit priest was lasting, I see it as a prototype of what may happen in the future. The young priests open to Tradition will largely do two things: Stay in the priesthood, climb the hierarchy. Time is on their side and while the Neo-Modernists et al panic as they try to snuff out the Tridentine Mass and remaining Traditional Orders (SSPX, FSSP).

I think that Cardinal Fernandez’ “no negotiation and change to Vatican II” response to the SSPX is a reflection of this panic.

I think that they are right to be afraid and their fear is our hope. Eventually, the Neo-Modernists will again be censured. I don’t know if I’ll see the day, but I am confident that it will happen. Just like Summorum Pontificum’s vindication of the persecution endured by faithful Priests post-V2, that day will be a vindication of all those who held on to what the Church Teaches.

P^3


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Catholic Church and the Rule of Law – Part I: Dr. John Lamont

By
+ JMJ Is a Traditional Catholic who abandons the doctrine of the Catholic Church - are they truly worthy of the name of Catholic? This is why it is important to understand Catholic Doctrine so we don't knowingly abandon it! This is a lecture provided by Dr. Lamont that touches on the topic of obedience. Obedience is one key to emerging from this crisis. P^3 Source Part A: Society of St. Hugh of Cluny Source Part B: Society of St. Hugh of Cluny 8 May 2014 The Catholic Church and the Rule of Law – Part I By John Lamont (Lecture given in New York on Friday, April 4, 2014)
Post a Comment
Read more

Schism

By
There is some question as to whether the Pope can be in actual schism as per the Cardinal Torquemada: Citing the doctrine of Pope Innocent III, Torquemada further teaches:  "Thus it is that Pope Innocent III states [De Consuetudine] that, it is necessary to obey the Pope in all things as long as he, himself, does not go against the universal customs of the Church, but should he go against the universal customs of the Church, 'he need not be followed' . . . " [Cited from A Theological Vindication of Roman Catholic Traditionalism, Father Paul Kramer, B.Ph., S.T.D., M. Div. (2nd edition, St. Francis Press, India) p. 29. The full quotation from Cardinal Torquemada reads, "By disobedience, the Pope can separate himself from Christ despite the fact that he is head of the Church, for above all, the unity of the Church is dependent on its relationship with Christ. The Pope can separate himself from Christ either by disobeying the law of Christ, or by commanding som...
Post a Comment
Read more

SSPX and the Resistance - A Comparison Of Ecclesiology

By
Shining the light of Church Teaching on the doctrinal positions of the SSPX and the Resistance. Principles are guides used to aid in decision making.  It stands to reason that bad principles will lead to bad decisions. The recent interactions between Rome and the SSPX has challenged a number of closely held cultural assumptions of people in both sides of the disagreement. This has resulted in cultural skirmishes in both Rome and the SSPX. Since it is the smaller of the two, the skirmishes have been more evident within the SSPX.  The cultural fault-line that Bishop Fellay crossed appears to be linked to two points of Catholic Doctrine: Ecclesiology and Obedience.  The cultural difference of view points is strong enough that it has resulted in the expulsion of a number of members.  It should also be noted that some other priests expelled since the beginning of the latest interactions (starting in 2000) held the same view points and have joined with the l...
8 comments
Read more

Morning and Evening and other sundry Prayers

By
+ JMJ Along the theme of P^3 (Prayer, Penance, Patience), and for my own reference ... here is a collection of Morning and Evening prayers from the Ideal Daily Missal along with some additional prayers. In this crisis of the Church, I do not think it is possible to do too much prayer, penance and have patience. P^3
Post a Comment
Read more

The Catholic Church and the Rule of Law- Part II: Dr. John Lamont

By
+ JMJ This is the second article from Dr. Lamont from his lecture given in May 2014. P^3 Source Part A: Society of St. Hugh of Cluny Source Part B: Society of St. Hugh of Cluny 8 May2014 The Catholic Church and the Rule of Law- Part II By John Lamont To understand how the Jesuit conception of obedience departed from earlier conceptions, it is helpful to compare it with the teaching of St. Thomas on obedience. The fundamental difference between the two is that St. Thomas considers the proper object of obedience to be the precept of the superior (2a2ae q. 104 a. 2 co., ad 3). Obedience that seeks to forestall the expressed will of the superior does not bear on what the superior wants or thinks in general, but only on what the superior intends to command. St. Ignatius’s lowest degree of obedience, which he does not consider to be virtuous, is thus what St. Thomas considers to be the only form of obedience. St. Thomas holds that St. Ignatius’s alleged higher forms of o...
Post a Comment
Read more