Skip to main content

Rome and the SSPX - Version 2026 Part 4 - The Mass (Updated with Postscript)

+
JMJ

Introduction


"I don’t understand why they are so afraid of this Mass!!!"

A Conservative Catholic priest spoke these words to me one evening in his parich parking lot in 2011, mere days before Pope Benedict XVI issued his follow up to Summorum Pontificum (2007-07-07 Motu Proprio, Letter to Bishops, ), Universae Ecclesiae ( 2011-04-30 Motu Proprio, Note).

The people who were afraid that night were bishops. This conservative priest had started a project a year or so earlier – very simply a Perpetual Eucharistic Adoration chapel. Earlier that evening I had visited this chapel with some friends and ended up in a conversation with the priest after everyone had left. Word reached the bishops palace after the completion of the chapel and the priest received a phone call and visit from his local ordinary. My impression (this being now ~15 years ago) was that he was nervous about how the visit would proceed. The bishop came, made a visit to OLJC in the Blessed Sacrament and later made an approving statement.

It was around this nucleus of conservatism that the desire and request for a Diocesan Tridentine Mass. The request was denied and the priest was recounting his impressions about the meeting with his and one other bishop.

I think I can hazard a guess as to the source of the epsicopal fears of the Tridentine Mass: The Tridentine Mass embodies the pre-conciliar Dogmas, Doctrines and Magisterium that was rejected by the modernists after the Second Vatican Council.

Yep, there was a rupture at and definitely after V2 (Council not missile). All you have to do is compare any facet of the pre and post Vatican 2 liturgy. Liturgy embodies belief and while pre-V2 there is clear defined doctrine and liturgy, post-V2 there is ambiguity like the removal of the Filioque from the Creed.

There are a few notable exceptions, such as Pope St. John Paul II’s decision on Catholic Priestesses … for anyone who missed it … it is an impossibility.

The SSPX Angle

Initially, the SSPX was founded at the request of seminarians trying to stay Catholic in the storm that engulfed the Church after V2. Even a few years ago a seminarian wearing a black shirt was accused of being a “Lefebvrist”. After a few months of this he decided that he should go see the “Lefebvrists” to understand the accusation. I can’t remember the exact words, but he discovered that he wasn’t and neither were they … he just wanted to believe the Truths of the Catholic Faith and the “Lefebvrists” were stubbornly refusing to abandon that Faith.

In 1970’s, this adherence to the Faith coalesced around the liturgical expression of the Faith. Over the past 60 years, that adherence has been called many things, schismatic, disobedient, nostalgic. All things it isn’t. For the SSPX, the Faith they practice isn’t something in the past – it is the present. The Dogmas and Doctrines are the present and therefore the expression of these same Dogmas and Doctrines should be complete and unambiguous.

Conclusion

The completeness and clarity in the Pre-V2 liturgy and Teachings removes room to maneuver for Catholics. It is uncomfortable and I would hazard psychologically painful for them to face the Truths of the Catholic Church, Truths that are in diametrical opposition to the modern world.

That’s is why there was so much pressure to change the Mass and even the Rosary. Both are uncomfortable for Modern Catholics or at least the clergy because of what they are and what they teach.

So … that is what is at stake in the fight for the Mass, it is a fight for the Faith. In the Rosary it is a fight for the Marian Doctrines that are so disconcerting for the Modern Catholics because they offend the non-Catholics.

It is a very sad thing when human respect guides the expression of the Catholic Truths.

P^3

References

https://tradicat.blogspot.com/search/label/Series%20-%20Novus%20Ordo%20Missae

https://tradicat.blogspot.com/2021/08/reblog-comparision-of-tridentine.html

https://tradicat.blogspot.com/2021/08/fsspxnews-paul-vi-missal-part-1.html

https://tradicat.blogspot.com/2021/08/fsspxnews-paul-vi-missal-part-2.html

https://tradicat.blogspot.com/2021/07/catechism-of-council-of-trent.html

https://tradicat.blogspot.com/2024/07/new-liturgical-movement-what-does.html

https://liturgyguy.com/2017/07/23/busting-the-myth-of-the-tridentine-mass/


PostScript

I wokeup this morning with an additional thought that the fear of the Tridentine Mass is based less on what it embodies and more on its effect on the faithful and the priests saying the Mass.

I knew a young Jesuit priest (a rarity in a greying clergy) who was open to saying the Tridentine Mass (another rarity in the early 21st century). Amongst other things, this got him banned from any association with SSPX priests and faithful.

That all changed in 2011 with the promulgation of Universae Ecclesiae.

At that time this young priest was given charge of an obscure secondary church in parish and started with about 20 parishioners. From that humble start within two years the little church was packed and activities expanded outside its walls with processions and presence at a Marian conference. That was where, I understand, he made a public statement that may have signaled the beginning of the end:

“You need to worship this way.”

That seems to have been a turning point for this Jesuit and the little flock entrusted to his care. The Jesuit was removed from the position and sometime I understand transferred to a smaller city where he periodically offered the Tridentine Mass.

This was not to be the end of the story and I think it exposes the real reason for the fear of the Neo-Modernists et al who are still trying to pull the Catholic Church off its foundations. This same Jesuit, I have been informed, has been made a Jesuit Provincial. Granted it has been years, maybe a decade in the making, but here we have a nightmare for modernists: A Jesuit rediscovers the Tridentine Mass, says it for a few years and is forever changed.

The collapse of the clergy forces the young priest up the Jesuit hierarchy. While I don’t know if the change in the Jesuit priest was lasting, I see it as a prototype of what may happen in the future. The young priests open to Tradition will largely do two things: Stay in the priesthood, climb the hierarchy. Time is on their side and while the Neo-Modernists et al panic as they try to snuff out the Tridentine Mass and remaining Traditional Orders (SSPX, FSSP).

I think that Cardinal Fernandez’ “no negotiation and change to Vatican II” response to the SSPX is a reflection of this panic.

I think that they are right to be afraid and their fear is our hope. Eventually, the Neo-Modernists will again be censured. I don’t know if I’ll see the day, but I am confident that it will happen. Just like Summorum Pontificum’s vindication of the persecution endured by faithful Priests post-V2, that day will be a vindication of all those who held on to what the Church Teaches.

P^3


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Episcopal Consecrations of 1988, 1991 and 2015 - Some Perspectives

+ JMJ In defense of the recent consecration of Fr. Faure by Bishop Williamson, some have argued that the 1991 consecration of Bishop Rangel (RIP) by the Bishops of the SSPX present an equivalent standard of action and principles.  From this they conclude that the SSPX's condemnation of Bishop Williamson's action is flawed as the principles of the 1991 consecration and that of 2015 are equivalent.

SSPX and the Resistance - A Comparison Of Ecclesiology

Shining the light of Church Teaching on the doctrinal positions of the SSPX and the Resistance. Principles are guides used to aid in decision making.  It stands to reason that bad principles will lead to bad decisions. The recent interactions between Rome and the SSPX has challenged a number of closely held cultural assumptions of people in both sides of the disagreement. This has resulted in cultural skirmishes in both Rome and the SSPX. Since it is the smaller of the two, the skirmishes have been more evident within the SSPX.  The cultural fault-line that Bishop Fellay crossed appears to be linked to two points of Catholic Doctrine: Ecclesiology and Obedience.  The cultural difference of view points is strong enough that it has resulted in the expulsion of a number of members.  It should also be noted that some other priests expelled since the beginning of the latest interactions (starting in 2000) held the same view points and have joined with the l...

America Magazine: Why liturgy is not a space for self-expression

 + JMJ Introduction I subscribed to Jesuit Review America Magazine in order to improve my perspective on the crisis of the Church. At first, I found that I had a hard time reading through the articles that caught my attention.  Actually, at best, I didn't get further than a few sentences.  Mostly due to demands on what time I have left on this Good Earth. Then a title caught my eye in a latest article ... someone is saying that the Liturgy is not a space for self-expression.  Then there's the Performative Piety?  What does this mean? What is Performative Piety? I had a sense that "Performative Piety" is the practice of making external acts of piety to be seen by others and Matthew 6:1 (link) confirms this thought. Let's break down the Knox translation: Be sure you do not perform your acts of piety before men ,  for them to watch ;  if you do that,  you have no title to a reward from your Father who is in heaven. If you stopped after the first ph...

Canonical Mission and State of Emergency - A Response to Mr. John Salza - Part B

 +  JMJ  I was trying to think of a way to map out the time course I discussed in Part A of this article.  Early this morning it came to me that this is more about obedience and duty than canon law.  As is my wont, I mapped out my thoughts (see image) to draw linkages between the core concepts. My conclusion is that, at least subjectively, Archbishop Lefebvre had sufficient information to make good decisions concerning whether or not he was obliged to obey.  I know that the Jesuits, some Sedevacantists and the priests that left over the years will not agree with my thoughts. So be it.  The core pieces of information include: Attacks against the SSPX were launched because they kept the Tridentine Mass and the pre-conciliar understanding of the Truths of the Faith. The authorities in the Church were willing to go against the laws of the Church. The same authorities encouraged the various dangers to the Faith embedded in popular interpretations of ambiguo...

Rome and SSPX - Version 2026 Part 2

 + JMJ Part 2 Detailed Synopsis and Timeline (ChatGPT) At this point, I took the shortcut of uploading all of my previous links and the latest SSPX and Rome links to ChatGPT. This way we’ll see how ChatGPT interprets the world as presented on the internet. P^3 Briefing Memo Subject: Rome–SSPX Relations and Planned Episcopal Consecrations (July 1, 2026) Prepared for: Ecclesial / Academic / Media Briefing Date: February 2026 Issue Overview The Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) has announced its intention to consecrate new bishops on July 1, 2026 , potentially without a papal mandate . The Holy See has acknowledged ongoing talks with the SSPX and stated its desire to avoid rupture, but has not granted approval nor outlined canonical consequences. The situation revives unresolved tensions dating to 1988 and raises questions about schism, authority, and doctrinal continuity. Background Founded in 1970 by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, the SSPX seeks to preserve pre-Vat...