Skip to main content

Rome and the SSPX - Version 2026 Part 4 - The Mass (Updated with Postscript)

+
JMJ

Introduction


"I don’t understand why they are so afraid of this Mass!!!"

A Conservative Catholic priest spoke these words to me one evening in his parich parking lot in 2011, mere days before Pope Benedict XVI issued his follow up to Summorum Pontificum (2007-07-07 Motu Proprio, Letter to Bishops, ), Universae Ecclesiae ( 2011-04-30 Motu Proprio, Note).

The people who were afraid that night were bishops. This conservative priest had started a project a year or so earlier – very simply a Perpetual Eucharistic Adoration chapel. Earlier that evening I had visited this chapel with some friends and ended up in a conversation with the priest after everyone had left. Word reached the bishops palace after the completion of the chapel and the priest received a phone call and visit from his local ordinary. My impression (this being now ~15 years ago) was that he was nervous about how the visit would proceed. The bishop came, made a visit to OLJC in the Blessed Sacrament and later made an approving statement.

It was around this nucleus of conservatism that the desire and request for a Diocesan Tridentine Mass. The request was denied and the priest was recounting his impressions about the meeting with his and one other bishop.

I think I can hazard a guess as to the source of the epsicopal fears of the Tridentine Mass: The Tridentine Mass embodies the pre-conciliar Dogmas, Doctrines and Magisterium that was rejected by the modernists after the Second Vatican Council.

Yep, there was a rupture at and definitely after V2 (Council not missile). All you have to do is compare any facet of the pre and post Vatican 2 liturgy. Liturgy embodies belief and while pre-V2 there is clear defined doctrine and liturgy, post-V2 there is ambiguity like the removal of the Filioque from the Creed.

There are a few notable exceptions, such as Pope St. John Paul II’s decision on Catholic Priestesses … for anyone who missed it … it is an impossibility.

The SSPX Angle

Initially, the SSPX was founded at the request of seminarians trying to stay Catholic in the storm that engulfed the Church after V2. Even a few years ago a seminarian wearing a black shirt was accused of being a “Lefebvrist”. After a few months of this he decided that he should go see the “Lefebvrists” to understand the accusation. I can’t remember the exact words, but he discovered that he wasn’t and neither were they … he just wanted to believe the Truths of the Catholic Faith and the “Lefebvrists” were stubbornly refusing to abandon that Faith.

In 1970’s, this adherence to the Faith coalesced around the liturgical expression of the Faith. Over the past 60 years, that adherence has been called many things, schismatic, disobedient, nostalgic. All things it isn’t. For the SSPX, the Faith they practice isn’t something in the past – it is the present. The Dogmas and Doctrines are the present and therefore the expression of these same Dogmas and Doctrines should be complete and unambiguous.

Conclusion

The completeness and clarity in the Pre-V2 liturgy and Teachings removes room to maneuver for Catholics. It is uncomfortable and I would hazard psychologically painful for them to face the Truths of the Catholic Church, Truths that are in diametrical opposition to the modern world.

That’s is why there was so much pressure to change the Mass and even the Rosary. Both are uncomfortable for Modern Catholics or at least the clergy because of what they are and what they teach.

So … that is what is at stake in the fight for the Mass, it is a fight for the Faith. In the Rosary it is a fight for the Marian Doctrines that are so disconcerting for the Modern Catholics because they offend the non-Catholics.

It is a very sad thing when human respect guides the expression of the Catholic Truths.

P^3

References

https://tradicat.blogspot.com/search/label/Series%20-%20Novus%20Ordo%20Missae

https://tradicat.blogspot.com/2021/08/reblog-comparision-of-tridentine.html

https://tradicat.blogspot.com/2021/08/fsspxnews-paul-vi-missal-part-1.html

https://tradicat.blogspot.com/2021/08/fsspxnews-paul-vi-missal-part-2.html

https://tradicat.blogspot.com/2021/07/catechism-of-council-of-trent.html

https://tradicat.blogspot.com/2024/07/new-liturgical-movement-what-does.html

https://liturgyguy.com/2017/07/23/busting-the-myth-of-the-tridentine-mass/


PostScript

I wokeup this morning with an additional thought that the fear of the Tridentine Mass is based less on what it embodies and more on its effect on the faithful and the priests saying the Mass.

I knew a young Jesuit priest (a rarity in a greying clergy) who was open to saying the Tridentine Mass (another rarity in the early 21st century). Amongst other things, this got him banned from any association with SSPX priests and faithful.

That all changed in 2011 with the promulgation of Universae Ecclesiae.

At that time this young priest was given charge of an obscure secondary church in parish and started with about 20 parishioners. From that humble start within two years the little church was packed and activities expanded outside its walls with processions and presence at a Marian conference. That was where, I understand, he made a public statement that may have signaled the beginning of the end:

“You need to worship this way.”

That seems to have been a turning point for this Jesuit and the little flock entrusted to his care. The Jesuit was removed from the position and sometime I understand transferred to a smaller city where he periodically offered the Tridentine Mass.

This was not to be the end of the story and I think it exposes the real reason for the fear of the Neo-Modernists et al who are still trying to pull the Catholic Church off its foundations. This same Jesuit, I have been informed, has been made a Jesuit Provincial. Granted it has been years, maybe a decade in the making, but here we have a nightmare for modernists: A Jesuit rediscovers the Tridentine Mass, says it for a few years and is forever changed.

The collapse of the clergy forces the young priest up the Jesuit hierarchy. While I don’t know if the change in the Jesuit priest was lasting, I see it as a prototype of what may happen in the future. The young priests open to Tradition will largely do two things: Stay in the priesthood, climb the hierarchy. Time is on their side and while the Neo-Modernists et al panic as they try to snuff out the Tridentine Mass and remaining Traditional Orders (SSPX, FSSP).

I think that Cardinal Fernandez’ “no negotiation and change to Vatican II” response to the SSPX is a reflection of this panic.

I think that they are right to be afraid and their fear is our hope. Eventually, the Neo-Modernists will again be censured. I don’t know if I’ll see the day, but I am confident that it will happen. Just like Summorum Pontificum’s vindication of the persecution endured by faithful Priests post-V2, that day will be a vindication of all those who held on to what the Church Teaches.

P^3


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Validity of new rite of episcopal consecrations - Courtesy of SSPX.org

+ JMJ In the blogosphere there are number of responses to this crisis in the Catholic Church that lead to conclusions that run counter to Catholic Doctrine and Dogmas - if taken to their logical conclusion. The validity of the New Rite of Episcopal consecrations is one such hotspot within more extreme sections of the 'traditionalist' culture. Validity of new rite of episcopal consecrations Courtesy of SSPX.org Why the new rite of episcopal consecration is valid Introduction This comprehensive study was compiled to settle a debate that has been circulating in traditional Catholic circles. Some writers have examined the new rite of episcopal consecration and concluded that it must be invalid. Since this would cause manifest problems if it were true and due to the heightened awareness of such a theory, we present a study of this question concluding that it is valid. Following the Council, in 1968 a new rite for the ordination of bishops was promulg...

The Curious Case of Steve Skojec and the Dangers of Deep Diving into the Crisis Sub-Titled: The Failings of Others

 + JMJ It's been a while now since Steve Skojec sold 1P5 and abandoned the Catholic Faith. I've been a 'Trad' since 1982 and in those 40+ years I seen this death-spiral before with a similar end point. It seems that anyone who jumps into the fray unprepared for the enormous task of righting wrongs will, eventually, become discouraged by not the task but the people who surround them.   I remember when Skojec complained of the treatment his family received from a traditional priest.  This seems to have been the start of the end for him. So what can we learn from the likes of Steve Skojec, Michael Voris (maybe?), Louie Verrecchio, Gerry Matatix and other celebrity Catholics? Probably quite a lot about what not to do. First, don't burn out on the crisis?  When you burn out, on work or anything else, little things assume a more greater importance than they are due.   This is one of my 'canary in the coal mine' signals that I've been stretching myself too th...

Fr. Burfitt on Fr. Pfeiffer's Attempted Consecration

 + JMJ   Amidst the shadows cast by the publication of Traditionis Custodes, I am working on a map of the 'resistance' splinters to put their reaction in contrast with that of the SSPX.  In the midst of this, I just came across Fr. Burfitt letter on the attempted consecration. Breaking it down (see below)  items 2 and 3 are key.  Just as the consecrating bishop is 'doubtful', even if he hadn't muffed the first attempt, Fr. Pfeiffer remain doubtful and therefore this impacts those men is attempts to 'ordain'. There were rumours that Fr. Pfeiffer was seeking episcopal consecration for years as he cast about for various bishops (also doubtful) to help him achieve this goal. I wonder how he convinced the 'doubtful' bishop to provide (twice) the doubtful consecration. What a mess!  This creates a danger to the souls of his followers and wonder where it will end. Will he go full sede and have himself 'elected' pontiff as others have done before him...

A Reply to Martin Blackshaw’s FLAWED Remnant article titled: FLAWED: SSPX Advice on Abortion-tainted Vaccines

 + JMJ    An article has appeared in the Remnant (link to article) and I am afraid that there are a number of flaws in it that need to be addressed. The author, Martin Blackshaw, believes that both the Church and the SSPX are misapplying the principle of Moral Theology called 'Cooperation In Evil'.  Unfortunately, Mr. Blackshaw rests most of his arguments on citing authors that support his position, without considering the possibility that they are wrong. This highlights a key factor in this crisis: ignorance of the faith and its application . I don't am not singling out Mr. Blackshaw for this criticism, I have observed that it applies to laity and religious, superior and subject a like.  No one seems immune in this enduring crisis, myself included.  I further believe that this ignorance is why so many Catholics, both traditional and non, rely on their gut feeling or "Catholic conscience" for charting their way through this crisis of the faith.  While...