Skip to main content

Michael Voris and Psychological Projection: Eternal Rome

 +
JMJ

 

 

 

"Every morning in Africa, a gazelle wakes up. It knows it must run faster than the fastest lion or it will be killed. Every morning a lion wakes up. It knows it must outrun the slowest gazelle or it will starve to death. It doesn't matter whether you're a lion or gazelle. When the sun comes up, you'd better be running." Source Business Insider

As noted earlier, Voris et al have now launched a new branch to their campaign.  Interestingly, I was at Francis Palmquist's ordination but that's not the topic of this article.  Here's where Voris' personal belief is coming through:

Their members claim to be (or reference) what they call "Eternal Rome." What they mean by that is only they have kept true to the Church, holding fast to the teachings, Liturgy and so forth. In short, the correct understanding and practice of the Deposit of Faith has been deposited in them; therefore, the society enjoys a certain type of privilege.

Wow, I wish he had provided a citation for this,because otherwise it seems to reflect more Voris' opinion about himself than that of the SSPX. More on that in  a bit.

First let's unpack the claims:


If you want to see it for yourself, google the quote and then use the cached version so Voris et al don't get the satisfaction of a click.Why? Because that's why people publicize sensational articles that hearken back to the propaganda of the  "Big Lie". They generally need the attention, either for financial gain or narcissistic reasons.

Onwards ...

So, first, the SSPX does not believe that they have only kept true to the Church.  But I am pretty confident in saying that they have kept truer to Church Teaching that Voris (see previous article).

I mean if this really was a competition between the SSPX and CMTV (ala Gazelle vs Lion), all they would have to do is be better than the slowest gazelle, while CMTV has to be better than the fastest Trad.  We wall know who eventually gets eaten - don't we?

With regards to claim 1,2 and 3.  The SSPX does not claim to be the Church. They claim that they are part of the Church. That is an objective reality which, I suppose, really gets under Voris' skin. Claim #3 is more closer to the reality, the "Eternal Rome" hearkens back to Archbishop Lefebvre and his declaration.  Written by the Archbishop in 1974 when Voris was a spry lad of 13.

With regards to the 'red flag', the SSPX doesn't claim that they're the only ones that have kept true to the Church. That's the various sedevacantist and papal claimants perspective ... I do not include Pope Francis in the list of claimant. He IS Pope, much to Michael Voris' chagrin.

Voris' conclusions are incredible..  The SSPX simply follows what the Catholic Church clearly taught. In my 30+ years as an SSPX trad, I have never once come across such an idea from the SSPX. From sedevacantists and those who have 'elected' their own popes, definitely, but not the SSPX.

I feel that his ultimate conclusion (blue question mark) is definitely more a reflection of Voris' own self proclaimed mission than that of the SSPX. 

The SSPX received its original mission from the Catholic Church.  That is a fact.  It is also a fact that Rome didn't follow its own rules in its suppression.

Michael Voris took on his mission of his own accord.Who does he report to?  Those who provide him financial support.

Voris tweeted: Who does the SSPX report to?  Well, while being in the unfortunately situation of needing to disobey illegimate commands from lawful superiors, the SSPX does report to Rome.  There are stronger ties between Rome and the SSPX than many like to admit. Hence the reason for the 'resistance'.

It would seem that Voris is projecting his shame (you can read about it elsewhere) onto the SSPX and perhaps to a larger extent on the rest of the Catholic Church.

This is his personal crusade, and I have to wonder what good has he done for the Catholic Church?

We know at least one good concerning the SSPX: Summorum Pontificum and by extension Universae Ecclesiae are a direct result the SSPX's long and arduous fight for the Truth.

Perhaps that is just too much from Voris et al, that this persecuted tenacious religious congregation could succeed where he has failed.

The End Note

Voris ends his little tirade with:

The SSPX is no more "Eternal Rome" than the Church of Nice. Obedience [Tradical: See this Series to get a Catholic understanding of Obedience] and orthodoxy are what's needed. An end to the lies, cover-up and complicity of Catholic bloggers who have a personal dog in the fight — all of this has got to go.

Well obeidience, yep, but not blind obedience to the Church of Voris.  As long as he stayed away from people and events close to me, I didn't really care to investigate. But when he crossed that line, he drew both my attention, ire and disgust.  I find such a lack of integrity repulsive.   Once again Voris goes on to lament his lonely battle, castigating Catholic bloggers (I guess myself included).  

Then Voris closes with this little ditty:

Remember, those of us whom Our Lord has blessed with a microphone have a much greater responsibility to tell the truth!

 A microphone does not invest one with either authority or responsibility beyond one's station in life.

Voris is right about only one thing in this entire tirade: We all have a responsibility to principle of Catholic Truth. Bounded by Catholic moral teaching.

We already know that Voris et al have a wee bit of a problem telling the truth - just look through the recent articles with this tag. 

P^3

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is Tradition?

 + JMJ What Is Tradition? The basic premise, from my perspective, is that what was taught before cannot be contradicted by the 'present' magisterium, only deepened and expanded upon. I recall the Roman theologians called the SSPX protestants while the SSPX called them modernists.  I believe this was all surrounding the concept of Traditon. SSPX's Understanding of Tradition One accusation made against the SSPX is that they don't have a correct understanding of 'Tradition'.  This is how the SSPX understands Tradition: I finally profess that Tradition is not a dead memory, but the living transmission of the doctrine received from the Apostles. It remains living, in distinction to Revelation, which is closed. It is so both in the activity of the Magisterium of the Teaching Church and in the profession of Faith of the Church Taught, of which the sentire cum Ecclesia is the result of the teaching of the Magisterium. Tradition may be called ‘living’, not in the sense t...

SSPX.ca: What is the position of the SSPX on Vatican II???

 + JMJ With all the mis-information about the SSPX rejecting the Second Vatican Council, I thought it would be useful to publish an article that focuses on the real issues that the SSPX has identified. Update: Why Did the SSPX Consecrate Bishops? ( Neither Schismatic, Nor Disobedient link ) In the linked document the SSPX outlined the key motivation and core issues with Vatican II and the post-conciliar magisterium (see above link for full document): 4. The Society Acted Precisely Because of the State of Necessity in Which the Faith Finds Itself  In the present situation of the Church, if the Society of Saint Pius X had not carried out the consecrations of July 1st, it would have found itself facing an inevitable alternative: either to disappear gradually, or to accept, at least in fact, the new liturgy as well as the false doctrines of Vatican II and the post-council. Without the consecrations of July 1st, the Fraternity would have found itself, in a few years, without bishop...

Thoughts on: Finding Common Ground Between Rome and the SSPX

 + JMJ In the ramp up to the consecrations the noise floor in the intergnat grew to a constant din.  This was one of the few the peeped its signal over the noise. https://crisismagazine.com/opinion/finding-common-ground-between-rome-and-the-sspx The key issue is contained in this paragraph: In the lead-up to the planned July 1, 2026, episcopal consecrations,  the SSPX rejected Rome’s offer  of doctrinal dialogue on the grounds that “we both know in advance that we cannot agree doctrinally, particularly regarding the fundamental orientations adopted since the Second Vatican Council.” Fr. Pagliarani also said that his previous attempt at dialogue in 2019 was shut down by Rome because of an assumed irreconcilability. It seems that, from the Society’s perspective, and perhaps from Rome’s too, their positions are incompatible. If memory serves, Rome killed any opportunity for an open discussion by stating that Vatican II was not up for debate. So it was a still-birth and ...

The News is an Addiction ...

 + JMJ People seem to be mesmerised by train wrecks.   They just can't turn away as the disaster creeps forward along train tracks towards the crossing where a car, truck, bus, trailer awaits its destruction. Trads have been watching the train wreck that is this crisis of the Catholic Church for decades. The trade war between the Canada and the US has reminded me that the news is addictive.   The first time I was addicted what from 2009 to  2014 when I was closely following the Rome / SSPX discussions.  I was at work watching a live-stream as Bishop Fellay disappeared into the Vatican. The lead-up to this moment had been intense as the 'resistance' got freaked out and the cultural cracks between doctrine and conspiracy theory widened. In the decade since then other things have emerged, wars, rumours of wars, conspiracies, celebrity Catholics etc. Now we have a new addiction and its name is Trump. Lately, no matter how much I try, I find myself wonderin...

Thoughts on the Thoughts of a former SSPX priest

 + JMJ Well Gary Campbell, former SSPX Priest and now laicised has posted a new article on WherePeterIs. https://wherepeteris.com/thoughts-of-a-former-sspx-priest-on-the-july-1-consecrations/ These words stuck out: Heck, they have built a five-star hotel, wine bar, and Walmart on the opposite bank of the Rubicon! They are not in danger of entering a state of schism, for they are  already  in a state of schism. I believe he doth protest too much. All the actual facts indicate that the SSPX was not in a state of schism before July 1st and an examination of the decree of excommunication highlights the either ineptitude of those in charge or a desire to leave the barn door open. The chasm between an act of disobedience and act of schism remains just what is has always been - an inconvenient barrier that person(s) in Rome seek to bridge but appear incapable of succeeding. The SSPX re-stated that they recognize the Pope as the Vicar of Christ and feel obliged by conscience...