Skip to main content

Michael Voris and Psychological Projection: Eternal Rome

 +
JMJ

 

 

 

"Every morning in Africa, a gazelle wakes up. It knows it must run faster than the fastest lion or it will be killed. Every morning a lion wakes up. It knows it must outrun the slowest gazelle or it will starve to death. It doesn't matter whether you're a lion or gazelle. When the sun comes up, you'd better be running." Source Business Insider

As noted earlier, Voris et al have now launched a new branch to their campaign.  Interestingly, I was at Francis Palmquist's ordination but that's not the topic of this article.  Here's where Voris' personal belief is coming through:

Their members claim to be (or reference) what they call "Eternal Rome." What they mean by that is only they have kept true to the Church, holding fast to the teachings, Liturgy and so forth. In short, the correct understanding and practice of the Deposit of Faith has been deposited in them; therefore, the society enjoys a certain type of privilege.

Wow, I wish he had provided a citation for this,because otherwise it seems to reflect more Voris' opinion about himself than that of the SSPX. More on that in  a bit.

First let's unpack the claims:


If you want to see it for yourself, google the quote and then use the cached version so Voris et al don't get the satisfaction of a click.Why? Because that's why people publicize sensational articles that hearken back to the propaganda of the  "Big Lie". They generally need the attention, either for financial gain or narcissistic reasons.

Onwards ...

So, first, the SSPX does not believe that they have only kept true to the Church.  But I am pretty confident in saying that they have kept truer to Church Teaching that Voris (see previous article).

I mean if this really was a competition between the SSPX and CMTV (ala Gazelle vs Lion), all they would have to do is be better than the slowest gazelle, while CMTV has to be better than the fastest Trad.  We wall know who eventually gets eaten - don't we?

With regards to claim 1,2 and 3.  The SSPX does not claim to be the Church. They claim that they are part of the Church. That is an objective reality which, I suppose, really gets under Voris' skin. Claim #3 is more closer to the reality, the "Eternal Rome" hearkens back to Archbishop Lefebvre and his declaration.  Written by the Archbishop in 1974 when Voris was a spry lad of 13.

With regards to the 'red flag', the SSPX doesn't claim that they're the only ones that have kept true to the Church. That's the various sedevacantist and papal claimants perspective ... I do not include Pope Francis in the list of claimant. He IS Pope, much to Michael Voris' chagrin.

Voris' conclusions are incredible..  The SSPX simply follows what the Catholic Church clearly taught. In my 30+ years as an SSPX trad, I have never once come across such an idea from the SSPX. From sedevacantists and those who have 'elected' their own popes, definitely, but not the SSPX.

I feel that his ultimate conclusion (blue question mark) is definitely more a reflection of Voris' own self proclaimed mission than that of the SSPX. 

The SSPX received its original mission from the Catholic Church.  That is a fact.  It is also a fact that Rome didn't follow its own rules in its suppression.

Michael Voris took on his mission of his own accord.Who does he report to?  Those who provide him financial support.

Voris tweeted: Who does the SSPX report to?  Well, while being in the unfortunately situation of needing to disobey illegimate commands from lawful superiors, the SSPX does report to Rome.  There are stronger ties between Rome and the SSPX than many like to admit. Hence the reason for the 'resistance'.

It would seem that Voris is projecting his shame (you can read about it elsewhere) onto the SSPX and perhaps to a larger extent on the rest of the Catholic Church.

This is his personal crusade, and I have to wonder what good has he done for the Catholic Church?

We know at least one good concerning the SSPX: Summorum Pontificum and by extension Universae Ecclesiae are a direct result the SSPX's long and arduous fight for the Truth.

Perhaps that is just too much from Voris et al, that this persecuted tenacious religious congregation could succeed where he has failed.

The End Note

Voris ends his little tirade with:

The SSPX is no more "Eternal Rome" than the Church of Nice. Obedience [Tradical: See this Series to get a Catholic understanding of Obedience] and orthodoxy are what's needed. An end to the lies, cover-up and complicity of Catholic bloggers who have a personal dog in the fight — all of this has got to go.

Well obeidience, yep, but not blind obedience to the Church of Voris.  As long as he stayed away from people and events close to me, I didn't really care to investigate. But when he crossed that line, he drew both my attention, ire and disgust.  I find such a lack of integrity repulsive.   Once again Voris goes on to lament his lonely battle, castigating Catholic bloggers (I guess myself included).  

Then Voris closes with this little ditty:

Remember, those of us whom Our Lord has blessed with a microphone have a much greater responsibility to tell the truth!

 A microphone does not invest one with either authority or responsibility beyond one's station in life.

Voris is right about only one thing in this entire tirade: We all have a responsibility to principle of Catholic Truth. Bounded by Catholic moral teaching.

We already know that Voris et al have a wee bit of a problem telling the truth - just look through the recent articles with this tag. 

P^3

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Rome,the SSPX and this time of Crisis - Updated

+ JMJ Obviously there's lots of events right now. First we have the April 1st - I almost thought it was April Fools - meeting between Pope Francis and Bishop Fellay.  Nothing really news worthy as this is a natural progression as Rome appears to be considering fulfilling Archbishop Lefebvre's wish to 'accept us as we are'. Second we have the April 8th publication of what will be a verbose exhortation of the Synod of the Family. I'm willing to bet that the Pope will give with one hand (unilateral regularization of SSPX) and take with the other (ambiguous document that opens the flood gates of sin further). Much to pray for. P^3

The Vatican and SSPX – An Organizational Culture Perspective

Introduction The recent and continuing interactions between the Vatican and the SSPX have been a great opportunity for prayer and reflection.  The basis for the disagreement is theological and not liturgical. As noted by Dr. Lamont (2012), the SSPX theological position on the four key controversial aspects of the Second Vatican Council are base on prior theological work that resulted from relevant magisterial pronouncements.  So it is difficult to understand the apparent rejection of the theological position of the SSPX.

Rome and the SSPX - the latest

+ JMJ Bishop Fellay gave a conference late last month and provided some more insight into the situation with Rome. There are comments on Deus Ex Machina Blog  and Hilary White has now entered the fray. What is one Catholic to think about all these opinions? What a Catholic is to think: With the Church! What does the Church think about obedience?  Virtue as it is? If there is no proximate occasion of sin and the other conditions are met, then one cannot resist the command.

SSPX and the Resistance - A Comparison Of Ecclesiology

Shining the light of Church Teaching on the doctrinal positions of the SSPX and the Resistance. Principles are guides used to aid in decision making.  It stands to reason that bad principles will lead to bad decisions. The recent interactions between Rome and the SSPX has challenged a number of closely held cultural assumptions of people in both sides of the disagreement. This has resulted in cultural skirmishes in both Rome and the SSPX. Since it is the smaller of the two, the skirmishes have been more evident within the SSPX.  The cultural fault-line that Bishop Fellay crossed appears to be linked to two points of Catholic Doctrine: Ecclesiology and Obedience.  The cultural difference of view points is strong enough that it has resulted in the expulsion of a number of members.  It should also be noted that some other priests expelled since the beginning of the latest interactions (starting in 2000) held the same view points and have joined with the l...

If Pope Francis is bad - what about Pope St. John Paul II et al?

+ JMJ So here we are on the apparent cusp of yet another post conciliar Papal canonization. This time we have Pope's John-Paul I and Paul VI canonizations to 'look forward' to. This follows, obviously, on the heels of Pope St. John Paul II's canonization? So the first question that I usually encounter is: How is it possible, keeping in mind the doctrine on infallibility of canonizations (note doctrine not dogma), that Pope St. John Paul II is a Saint? First, what does it mean???  According to the doctrine of dogmatic facts - it is the universal opinion of Theologians that canonizations are infallible.  It means that they enjoy the beatific vision.  ... that's it.  That is the doctrine and it is at the level of universal opinion of theologians.  It is called a 'dogmatic fact'. That they made mistakes is obvious.  That the miracles seem to not be very miraculous is also a bit of an issue. Here's something to consider: The rush that surrou...