Skip to main content

Michael Voris and Psychological Projection: Eternal Rome

 +
JMJ

 

 

 

"Every morning in Africa, a gazelle wakes up. It knows it must run faster than the fastest lion or it will be killed. Every morning a lion wakes up. It knows it must outrun the slowest gazelle or it will starve to death. It doesn't matter whether you're a lion or gazelle. When the sun comes up, you'd better be running." Source Business Insider

As noted earlier, Voris et al have now launched a new branch to their campaign.  Interestingly, I was at Francis Palmquist's ordination but that's not the topic of this article.  Here's where Voris' personal belief is coming through:

Their members claim to be (or reference) what they call "Eternal Rome." What they mean by that is only they have kept true to the Church, holding fast to the teachings, Liturgy and so forth. In short, the correct understanding and practice of the Deposit of Faith has been deposited in them; therefore, the society enjoys a certain type of privilege.

Wow, I wish he had provided a citation for this,because otherwise it seems to reflect more Voris' opinion about himself than that of the SSPX. More on that in  a bit.

First let's unpack the claims:


If you want to see it for yourself, google the quote and then use the cached version so Voris et al don't get the satisfaction of a click.Why? Because that's why people publicize sensational articles that hearken back to the propaganda of the  "Big Lie". They generally need the attention, either for financial gain or narcissistic reasons.

Onwards ...

So, first, the SSPX does not believe that they have only kept true to the Church.  But I am pretty confident in saying that they have kept truer to Church Teaching that Voris (see previous article).

I mean if this really was a competition between the SSPX and CMTV (ala Gazelle vs Lion), all they would have to do is be better than the slowest gazelle, while CMTV has to be better than the fastest Trad.  We wall know who eventually gets eaten - don't we?

With regards to claim 1,2 and 3.  The SSPX does not claim to be the Church. They claim that they are part of the Church. That is an objective reality which, I suppose, really gets under Voris' skin. Claim #3 is more closer to the reality, the "Eternal Rome" hearkens back to Archbishop Lefebvre and his declaration.  Written by the Archbishop in 1974 when Voris was a spry lad of 13.

With regards to the 'red flag', the SSPX doesn't claim that they're the only ones that have kept true to the Church. That's the various sedevacantist and papal claimants perspective ... I do not include Pope Francis in the list of claimant. He IS Pope, much to Michael Voris' chagrin.

Voris' conclusions are incredible..  The SSPX simply follows what the Catholic Church clearly taught. In my 30+ years as an SSPX trad, I have never once come across such an idea from the SSPX. From sedevacantists and those who have 'elected' their own popes, definitely, but not the SSPX.

I feel that his ultimate conclusion (blue question mark) is definitely more a reflection of Voris' own self proclaimed mission than that of the SSPX. 

The SSPX received its original mission from the Catholic Church.  That is a fact.  It is also a fact that Rome didn't follow its own rules in its suppression.

Michael Voris took on his mission of his own accord.Who does he report to?  Those who provide him financial support.

Voris tweeted: Who does the SSPX report to?  Well, while being in the unfortunately situation of needing to disobey illegimate commands from lawful superiors, the SSPX does report to Rome.  There are stronger ties between Rome and the SSPX than many like to admit. Hence the reason for the 'resistance'.

It would seem that Voris is projecting his shame (you can read about it elsewhere) onto the SSPX and perhaps to a larger extent on the rest of the Catholic Church.

This is his personal crusade, and I have to wonder what good has he done for the Catholic Church?

We know at least one good concerning the SSPX: Summorum Pontificum and by extension Universae Ecclesiae are a direct result the SSPX's long and arduous fight for the Truth.

Perhaps that is just too much from Voris et al, that this persecuted tenacious religious congregation could succeed where he has failed.

The End Note

Voris ends his little tirade with:

The SSPX is no more "Eternal Rome" than the Church of Nice. Obedience [Tradical: See this Series to get a Catholic understanding of Obedience] and orthodoxy are what's needed. An end to the lies, cover-up and complicity of Catholic bloggers who have a personal dog in the fight — all of this has got to go.

Well obeidience, yep, but not blind obedience to the Church of Voris.  As long as he stayed away from people and events close to me, I didn't really care to investigate. But when he crossed that line, he drew both my attention, ire and disgust.  I find such a lack of integrity repulsive.   Once again Voris goes on to lament his lonely battle, castigating Catholic bloggers (I guess myself included).  

Then Voris closes with this little ditty:

Remember, those of us whom Our Lord has blessed with a microphone have a much greater responsibility to tell the truth!

 A microphone does not invest one with either authority or responsibility beyond one's station in life.

Voris is right about only one thing in this entire tirade: We all have a responsibility to principle of Catholic Truth. Bounded by Catholic moral teaching.

We already know that Voris et al have a wee bit of a problem telling the truth - just look through the recent articles with this tag. 

P^3

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Rome and SSPX - Version 2026 Part 2

 + JMJ Part 2 Detailed Synopsis and Timeline (ChatGPT) At this point, I took the shortcut of uploading all of my previous links and the latest SSPX and Rome links to ChatGPT. This way we’ll see how ChatGPT interprets the world as presented on the internet. P^3 Briefing Memo Subject: Rome–SSPX Relations and Planned Episcopal Consecrations (July 1, 2026) Prepared for: Ecclesial / Academic / Media Briefing Date: February 2026 Issue Overview The Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) has announced its intention to consecrate new bishops on July 1, 2026 , potentially without a papal mandate . The Holy See has acknowledged ongoing talks with the SSPX and stated its desire to avoid rupture, but has not granted approval nor outlined canonical consequences. The situation revives unresolved tensions dating to 1988 and raises questions about schism, authority, and doctrinal continuity. Background Founded in 1970 by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, the SSPX seeks to preserve pre-Vat...

Schism

There is some question as to whether the Pope can be in actual schism as per the Cardinal Torquemada: Citing the doctrine of Pope Innocent III, Torquemada further teaches:  "Thus it is that Pope Innocent III states [De Consuetudine] that, it is necessary to obey the Pope in all things as long as he, himself, does not go against the universal customs of the Church, but should he go against the universal customs of the Church, 'he need not be followed' . . . " [Cited from A Theological Vindication of Roman Catholic Traditionalism, Father Paul Kramer, B.Ph., S.T.D., M. Div. (2nd edition, St. Francis Press, India) p. 29. The full quotation from Cardinal Torquemada reads, "By disobedience, the Pope can separate himself from Christ despite the fact that he is head of the Church, for above all, the unity of the Church is dependent on its relationship with Christ. The Pope can separate himself from Christ either by disobeying the law of Christ, or by commanding som...

SSPX / DICI: Communiqué of the General House of the Society of St. Pius X concerning the episcopal consecration of Fr. Jean-Michel Faure.

+ JMJ The following is the communiqué of the SSPX regarding the Bishop Williamson's consecration of Fr. Faure. As a follow-up to this article ,  I would like to highlight the rationale for denouncing the consecration. Communiqué of the General House of the Society of St. Pius X concerning the episcopal consecration of Fr. Jean-Michel Faure. On March 19, 2015, Bishop Richard Williamson performed the episcopal consecration of Fr. Jean-Michel Faure at the Benedictine Monastery of the Holy Cross in Nova Friburgo, Brazil. Bishop Williamson and Fr. Faure have not been members of the Society of St. Pius X since 2012 and 2014, respectively, because of their violent criticisms of any relations with the Roman authorities. According to them, such contacts were incompatible with the apostolic work of Archbishop Lefebvre.(1) The Society of St. Pius X regrets sincerely that this spirit of opposition has led to an episcopal consecration. In 1988 Archbishop Lefebvre had c...

Bishop Huonder, SSPX in Schism? - Nope, Consecration of Holy Oils - Update 1

 + JMJ  So Bishop Huonder is in the news for two reasons.  First, his 'Testimony' concerning Pope Francis etc. This was received as a nice reinforcement by Trads (SSPX and others).  Of course, there are those that now are demanding an apostolic investigation.  Yawn, been here before.  This was predictable as other bishops who have followed the same path came to the same conclusions.  It is the way. Second, he celebrated the Chrism Mass and blessed the Holy Oils for use in the SSPX's European chapels and ceremonies.  This caused a stir amongst some Trads who are locked in one or the other statements made by either Archbishop Lefebvre or others. I received two versions of a question regarding this event: Hi Tradical Do you have any comments about doubtful oils in SSPX europe by +Huonder (NO Bishop not conditionally consecrated)? God Bless Hi Tradical Any thoughts on Huonder oil, not conditionally ordained and consecrated by SSPX bishops? God Bless M...