+ JMJ The situation of the SSPX is still in flux and one thing that comes up is the status of the SSPX tribunals. Interestingly, Bishop Fellay was made the head of one of them by Rome a while back - so it is isn't as black and white as some would have you believe. P^3 Courtesy of SSPX.org: https://sspx.org/en/legitimacy-and-status-our-tribunals-30939 Legitimacy and status of our tribunals A lecture given on August 25, 1998 by Bishop Tissier de Mallerais given at the Canon Law Seminar on Marriage Cases at Econe, Switzerland The legitimacy and status of our tribunals Status quaestionis The declarations of nullity given by post-conciliar ecclesiastical tribunals are often doubtful. Do we have the right to supply for this deficiency, by the means of tribunals functioning within the Society of St. Pius X? Archbishop Lefebvre foresaw the necessity of creating a Canonical Commission, in particular in order to resolve marriage cases after an initial judgment by the di
+ JMJ There remain within the SSPX two bishops of the four consecrated 36 years ago on June 30, 1988. Bishop Williamson who was expelled in August 2012 near the end of the crisis that resulted in the expunging of the 'resistance' from the SSPX with Williamson going on to consecrate a number of bishops for their 'survival'. Now Bishop Tissier de Mallerais (RIP) has passed way. With two bishops to bear the burden of providing, worldwide, the sacraments of Confirmation, Ordinations the workload is significant and increases the risk of loss of another bishop due to a variety of factors. Because at least one bishop is needed to consecrate more bishops and the Church's normal protocol is for there to be at least two consecrating bishops, the risk to the very existence of the SSPX is now moderate to high. With the loss of another bishop, it would be high. This presupposes that the SSPX would not be able to obtain the assistance of other legitimate bishops such as Card