Skip to main content

Travelling, blogging and sense making

+
JMJ

I've been travelling quite a bit of late, hence the dearth of postings.

However, looking at the news streams I've picked out the following threads:



SSPX / Rome Relations

Last week reports appeared on various 'resistance' and psychotic forums that Rome had sent the SSPX an agreement of some type to review.  Gloria TV news has reported a confirmation by Fr. Schmidberger of the receipt of a proposal but that there is a lot (as usual) to clarify.

The 'resistance' forums are a flitter with speculation etc.

As usual there is a fair amount of  speculation of what Bishop Fellay will do and what is 'all means'.

Here's my take:

  1. The last chapter of the SSPX concluded with the establishment of how the final decision on a regularization offer from Rome would be made and what the conditions were for its consideration (The first three being sine qua non):
    1. The freedom to preserve, transmit and teach the sound doctrine of the constant Magisterium of the Church and of the unchangeable truth of divine Tradition; the freedom to prohibit, correct and reprove, even publicly, those who foment the errors or innovations of modernism, liberalism, the Second Vatican Council and their consequences; 
    2. The freedom to use the 1962 liturgy exclusively. To preserve the sacramental practice that we presently have (including: Holy Orders, Confirmation, Matrimony); 
    3. A guarantee of at least one bishop.
    4. Society should have its own tribunals, in the first instance,
    5. Exemption of houses of the SSPX from the diocesan bishops,
    6. A Pontifical Commission in Rome for Tradition “answering directly to the Pope, with the majority of its members and governing board in favor of Tradition.” 
    7. Note: I understand that the last three conditions had already been granted in previous offers so they were not listed as sine qua non.
  2. The SSPX is not sedevacantist and continue to believe that the Pope et al are in the positions of authority and therefore a legitimate command, following True Obedience, would necessitate compliance.
  3. Speculation remains simply a fantasy cooked up in feverish minds.  The minds of the 'resistance' have been on boil from 2000 until 2011 and high boil ever since.  Until something happens, nothing has happened. There is no 'canonical regularization' at this time. 
  4. I am not surprised at continuing to and fro for the following reasons:
    1. To break off relations is to go down the path of the 'resistance' and sedevacantists. (see #2 above).
    2. Much is happening in the Church under this pontificate, most of it appears to be bad.  Some have realized this and come to the conclusion that perhaps the position of the SSPX is actually correct.
    3. I have heard that Cardinal Mueller's opinion of the SSPX was altered by the events of last year's Synod and that the alteration has continued since then and possibly accelerated due to the events of this year's Synod.

Rise of Islam

There is an escalation of Islamic derived conflict.  In other words, look at the major conflicts and you will find that it is between an Islamic oriented group and someone else.

In short, they are the common denominator in this situation.  The West is involved in a religious war and doesn't realize it.  They are fighting an immaterial idea with material weapons.

In short - they're pooched.

Please don't assume that I believe that armed force should not be used to defend against an armed aggressor such as Daesh/ISIS.  

I just believe that bombs alone will not win this war. A war that has been simmering for decades of decades.

No, the weapon that the West is not using is the Rosary.

If the Pope really wants to end the war, then he needs to call for a Rosary Crusade for the conversion of the Muslim.

Then much will change.

Pope Francis the Pacifist


Interestingly the Pope in the face of the attacks is still calling for an end to war etc.  Using his insults as only he can (Pope Francis' Little Book of Insults), he is labeling the defense industries.  

Looking at what is happened in Asia, the Middle East, Europe, Africa, I suspect that they are going to make him eat his words. I hope he has a Pius IX moment and consecrates Russia as Our Lady asked.


Next Steps


So what is a person to do? 

Simple:



P^3

Comments

  1. "A guarantee of at least one bishop"

    I'd feel more comfortable with at least two.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Personally, given the need, I would like to see 5 more bishops - preferably younger ones!

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is it sinful to attend the Novus Ordo (New Mass) - Is it Sinful to Not Attend the Novus Ordo on Sunday?

+ JMJ A non-SSPX Catholic is upset over the SSPX statements on not attending the Novus Ordo Missae. Ladies and gentlemen, what the SSPX, or at least its website editor, is advocating is a mortal sin against the Third Commandment.  Unless the priest deviates from the language of the Sacramentary, the consecration, and thus the rest of Mass is to be considered valid.  No one may elect not to attend Mass simply because abuses are occurring therein.  Might I suggest that such absenteeism is its own abuse?  The Third Commandment binds under mortal sin.  Father So-And-So from the SSPX has no authority whatsoever to excuse attendance at Mass, be that Mass ever so unpalatable. Source:Restore DC Catholicism Well, this is interesting. First why does the SSPX issue this statement? Because it is sinful to put your faith in danger by attending a protestant service.  It is likewise dangerous to put your faith in danger by attending a protestantized mass (ie the Novus Ordo Missae

Morning and Evening and other sundry Prayers

+ JMJ Along the theme of P^3 (Prayer, Penance, Patience), and for my own reference ... here is a collection of Morning and Evening prayers from the Ideal Daily Missal along with some additional prayers. In this crisis of the Church, I do not think it is possible to do too much prayer, penance and have patience. P^3

Regarding Post: Fr. Joseph Pfeiffer no longer ... now Bishop Joseph Pfeiffer (Can't see this being a problem...)

 + JMJ   I've been watching the popularity of the post about Fr. Pfeiffer's attempted episcopal consecration and its continued top listing on the 'popular posts' list at the bottom of posts.  After some thought, I decided that I don't want to be responsible for anyone joining Fr. Pfeiffer's 'group', however unlikely that would be at this time. So I have reverted the article to the draft state. If anyone wants it reinstated, I would ask that they comment on this post with a rationale for reinstatement. P^3

Fr. Burfitt on Fr. Pfeiffer's Attempted Consecration

 + JMJ   Amidst the shadows cast by the publication of Traditionis Custodes, I am working on a map of the 'resistance' splinters to put their reaction in contrast with that of the SSPX.  In the midst of this, I just came across Fr. Burfitt letter on the attempted consecration. Breaking it down (see below)  items 2 and 3 are key.  Just as the consecrating bishop is 'doubtful', even if he hadn't muffed the first attempt, Fr. Pfeiffer remain doubtful and therefore this impacts those men is attempts to 'ordain'. There were rumours that Fr. Pfeiffer was seeking episcopal consecration for years as he cast about for various bishops (also doubtful) to help him achieve this goal. I wonder how he convinced the 'doubtful' bishop to provide (twice) the doubtful consecration. What a mess!  This creates a danger to the souls of his followers and wonder where it will end. Will he go full sede and have himself 'elected' pontiff as others have done before him

The Vatican and SSPX – An Organizational Culture Perspective

Introduction The recent and continuing interactions between the Vatican and the SSPX have been a great opportunity for prayer and reflection.  The basis for the disagreement is theological and not liturgical. As noted by Dr. Lamont (2012), the SSPX theological position on the four key controversial aspects of the Second Vatican Council are base on prior theological work that resulted from relevant magisterial pronouncements.  So it is difficult to understand the apparent rejection of the theological position of the SSPX.