Skip to main content

Synod Play By Play II

Image
By
+
JMJ

Given the response of the majority of the Bishops at the Synod it appears that, finally, some lines have been reached that people will not cross.

As an SSPX district superior recently said, perhaps they will work their way backwards and arrive at the root of the issue: Vatican II.

There has been an explosive growth in the articles on the web and I will confess to listening only to those against the proposals of Cardinal Kasper.

The best collection is, of course, from Rorate-Caeli.  Instead of linking the individual articles (all worth reading by the way!) here is a link to their tag for this event.

Of all these events the following are, I believe, significant:


  1. Cardinal Kasper's interview with Edward Pentin.  
    1. In this interview the Cardinal made some racist remarks about Africa.  
    2. Which is interesting since, from what I've read, the African Bishops actually are defending Catholic Morality.  
    3. The interview was briefly posted on Zenit, but upon Cardinal Kasper's denial of giving the interview (which was recorded), Zenit took it down.  
    4. For the record a copy is posted below. 
    5. Why is this a key element?  
      1. Because it reveals the prejudices that the Cardinal harbours against those who don't think as he does.
      2. Some more of his motivations are made explicit.
    6. I fully expect Cardinal Kasper to play the victim card next.
    7. There is a funny bit a satire here.
  2. The call for the Pope to make a statement.
    1. Up to now the Pope has been seen as 'quietly' giving support to Cardinal Kasper in the background.  While some may jump to a conclusion that the Pope actually supports Kasper in his heretical machinations, it is necessary to look at the events critically.  
      1. The only objective proof is the speech given when Cardinal Kasper first presented his views. However, the Pope didn't specifically state that he agreed with the slant, he just called it 'kneeling theology'.  Perhaps the person is begging forgiveness ...
      2. After that, all we have is Kasper's word that the Pope supports him. 
      3. Nothing from the Pope.
    2. Now I agree that the 'sense' people get is that the Pope supports Kasper, however an explicity statement will be greatly appreciated at this juncture in history.  Such as what Cardinal Burke has requested.  No more fence sitting.
  3. We have finally reached the point in this crisis of the Church another fault line has been revealed by the stress applied to the Church.
The Church has now reached, what I believe to be, its post conciliar rubicon. 

Who will cross-over with Cardinal Kasper remains to be seen.

What a mess ...

As always ...

P^3
Prayer
Penance
Patience

Additional Reading

Article Links

As with any event where there is an 'explosion' of opinion, there is an explosion in links.  Attached below is a sampling of articles that I snipped over the last couple of days. 

http://www.catholicregister.org/faith/faith-news/item/18993-family-synod-midterm-report-stirs-controversy-among-bishops

http://www.news.va/en/news/bishops-stress-mondays-synod-report-is-work-in-pro

http://www.news.va/en/news/synod-of-family-begins-small-group-discussions-car

http://www.catholicworldreport.com/Item/3434/an_extraordinary_synodin_more_ways_than_one.aspx

http://www.catholicworldreport.com/Item/3429/cardinal_burke_synods_midterm_report_lacks_a_solid_foundation_in_the_sacred_scriptures_and_the_magisterium.aspx

http://www.catholicworldreport.com/Item/3415/cardinal_burke_christs_truth_is_at_the_heart_of_marriage.aspx

http://mundabor.wordpress.com/2014/10/15/mad-monday-its-time-to-retract/

http://mundabor.wordpress.com/2014/10/15/cardinal-kasper-says-he-has-been-either-a-saint-or-a-fornicator-2/

http://mundabor.wordpress.com/2014/05/10/cardinal-kasper-says-he-has-been-either-a-saint-or-a-fornicator/

http://www.catholicworldreport.com/Item/3434/an_extraordinary_synodin_more_ways_than_one.aspx

http://www.catholicworldreport.com/Blog/3435/at_the_synod_after_the_earthquake_questions_and_clarifications.aspx

Card. Kasper Interview with Mr. Edward Pentin

Source

Mr. Pentin's comments on the interview:

I transcribed the recording of our conversation, and my iPhone on which I recorded the exchange was visible. I introduced myself as a journalist with the [National Catholic] Register, and the others also introduced themselves as journalists. I therefore figured the interview was on the record and His Eminence appeared happy to talk with us. In the end, I posted the full interview in ZENIT rather than the Register. ZENIT removed the article on Thursday in response to Cardinal Kasper’s denial.
His Eminence made no comment about not wanting his remarks published. It depends on the context, but normally in such a situation, comments are considered on the record unless otherwise requested.
The recording can be downloaded below. A couple of the questions came from the other two journalists and I included them as part of the interview. Some of the quality of the English has also been improved for publication.
If there was a misunderstanding, I apologise, but I stand by the interview that was published as a correct account of the exchange.

INTERVIEW TRANSCRIPT
Your Eminence, how is everything going in the Synod? 
Everything is very quiet now. This morning it was on fire a little bit but of course that’s because of you – the newspapers! 
Yesterday we were told the “Spirit of Vatican II” was in the synod. Do you agree with this? 
This is the spirit of the Council – this is very true. 
Have you seen some movement on the divorce and “remarriage” issue?
I hoped there would be some opening and I think the majority is in favor. That is the impression I have, but there is no vote. But I think some opening would be left [to happen]. Perhaps it would also be left to the next part of the synod. 
Have you seen opposition growing to your proposals in the last few days? 
No. In the first phase of the synod I saw a growing majority in favor of an opening. I saw it – but it’s more of a feeling. There was no vote. There will be a vote but not yet. 
Do you know how the Holy Father is viewing the synod and how it’s going so far? 
He has not said – he’s been silent, he has listened very carefully but it’s clearly what he wants and that’s evident. He wants a major part of the episcopacy with him and he needs it. He cannot do it against the majority of the episcopacy. 
Is there any sense that he’s trying to push things in that direction? 
He does not push. His first speech was freedom: freedom of speech, everyone should say what he thinks and what he has on his mind and this was very positive. Nobody is asking: what would the Holy Father think about this? What things can I say? This freedom of speech has been very alive here in this synod, more than in others. 
It has been said that he added five special rapporteurs on Friday to help the general rapporteur, Cardinal Peter Erdo. Is that because he’s trying to push things through according to his wishes? 
I do not see this going on in the Pope’s head. But I think the majority of these five people are open people who want to go on with this. The problem, as well, is that there are different problems of different continents and different cultures. Africa is totally different from the West. Also Asian and Muslim countries, they’re very different, especially about gays. You can’t speak about this with Africans and people of Muslim countries. It’s not possible. It’s a taboo. For us, we say we ought not to discriminate, we don’t want to discriminate in certain respects. 
But are African participants listened to in this regard? 
No, the majority of them [who hold these views won’t speak about them]. 
They’re not listened to? 
In Africa of course [their views are listened to], where it’s a taboo. 
What has changed for you, regarding the methodology of this synod? [question from French journalist] 
I think in the end there must be a general line in the Church, general criteria, but then the questions of Africa we cannot solve. There must be space also for the local bishops’ conferences to solve their problems but I’d say with Africa it’s impossible [for us to solve]. But they should not tell us too much what we have to do. 
There is a lot of concern about your proposal. 
Yes, yes, there’s a lot. 
People are saying that it is causing a lot of confusion among the faithful, and people are worried about. What do you say to that? 
I can only speak of Germany where the great majority wants an opening about divorce and remarriage. It’s the same in Great Britain, it’s everywhere. When I speak to laypeople, also old people who are married for 50, 60 years, they never thought of divorce but they see a problem with their culture and so every family has a problem nowadays. The Pope also told me that [such problems exist] also in his family, and he has looked at the laity and seen the great majority are for a reasonable, responsible opening. 
But people feel the Church’s teaching is going to be undermined by your proposal if it passes, that it’s undoing 2,000 years of Church teaching. What is your view on this? 
Well nobody is putting into question the indissolubility of marriage. I think it wouldn’t be a help for people, but if you look to this word of Jesus, there are different synoptic gospels in different places, in different contexts. It’s different in the Judeo-Christian context and in the Hellenistic context. Mark and Matthew are different. There was already a problem in the apostolic age. The Word of Jesus is clear, but how to apply it in complex, different situations? It’s a problem to do with the application of these words. 
The teaching does not change? 
The teaching does not change but it can be made more profound, it can be different. There is also a certain growth in the understanding of the Gospel and the doctrine, a development. Our famous Cardinal Newman had spoken on the development of doctrine. This is also not a change but a development on the same line. Of course, the Pope wants it and the world needs it. We live in a globalized world and you cannot govern everything from the Curia. There must be a common faith, a common discipline but a different application.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is it sinful to attend the Novus Ordo (New Mass) - Is it Sinful to Not Attend the Novus Ordo on Sunday?

By
+ JMJ A non-SSPX Catholic is upset over the SSPX statements on not attending the Novus Ordo Missae. Ladies and gentlemen, what the SSPX, or at least its website editor, is advocating is a mortal sin against the Third Commandment.  Unless the priest deviates from the language of the Sacramentary, the consecration, and thus the rest of Mass is to be considered valid.  No one may elect not to attend Mass simply because abuses are occurring therein.  Might I suggest that such absenteeism is its own abuse?  The Third Commandment binds under mortal sin.  Father So-And-So from the SSPX has no authority whatsoever to excuse attendance at Mass, be that Mass ever so unpalatable. Source:Restore DC Catholicism Well, this is interesting. First why does the SSPX issue this statement? Because it is sinful to put your faith in danger by attending a protestant service.  It is likewise dangerous to put your faith in danger by attending a protestantized mass (ie the Novus Ordo Missae
Post a Comment
Read more

Fr. Burfitt on Fr. Pfeiffer's Attempted Consecration

By
 + JMJ   Amidst the shadows cast by the publication of Traditionis Custodes, I am working on a map of the 'resistance' splinters to put their reaction in contrast with that of the SSPX.  In the midst of this, I just came across Fr. Burfitt letter on the attempted consecration. Breaking it down (see below)  items 2 and 3 are key.  Just as the consecrating bishop is 'doubtful', even if he hadn't muffed the first attempt, Fr. Pfeiffer remain doubtful and therefore this impacts those men is attempts to 'ordain'. There were rumours that Fr. Pfeiffer was seeking episcopal consecration for years as he cast about for various bishops (also doubtful) to help him achieve this goal. I wonder how he convinced the 'doubtful' bishop to provide (twice) the doubtful consecration. What a mess!  This creates a danger to the souls of his followers and wonder where it will end. Will he go full sede and have himself 'elected' pontiff as others have done before him
Post a Comment
Read more

War: Civil Society

By
 + JMJ  Society seems to be ripping itself apart, both morally and socially.  Morally, the world continues its steady decline.  Israel vs Hamas The confusion over the morality of the Israel vs Hamas War is one example. It is a war and, this time, in response to the October 7th attack.  I've noticed two perspectives emerge from the two combatants.  For the Israeli, it is that they are the only Nation that is not allowed to win a war.  Public opinion is always at play in wars, but in the case of Israel against anyone in the area, public opinion quickly becomes a factor.  For Hamas and its supporters it is embodied in the phrase:  From the River to the Sea, Palestine will be Free.  This is the goal of Hamas, the elimination of the Jewish state of Israel according to its 2017 Charter (link) .  I understand that their original charter was more explicit.  Tied to this is that Hamas obviously, prioritizes its goal over the Gazans that they govern.  For this I recommend a read of Son of H
Post a Comment
Read more

What the heck is a congregation of "Pontifical Right"

By
+ JMJ In a discussion with a friend the question occurred to me that I didn't actually know was is involved in being a religious order of 'pontifical right'. I had a vague notion that this meant they reported to Rome as opposed to the local diocese. I'm also aware that, according to the accounts I have heard, the Archbishop received 'praise' and the written direction to incardinate priests directly into the SSPX.  This is interesting because it implies that the SSPX priests were no longer required to incardinate in the local diocese but in the SSPX. This is something that belongs to an order of 'pontifical right'. Anyway here's some definitions: Di diritto pontificio is the Italian term for “of pontifical right” . It is given to the ecclesiastical institutions (the religious and secular institutes, societies of apostolic life) either created by the Holy See or approved by it with the formal decree, known by its Latin name, Decretu
Post a Comment
Read more

CMTV's Latest Attempt to Slag the SSPX

By
 + JMJ   It has been a couple of months since the last significant attempt to slag the SSPX and I was beginning to wonder if the clicks were subsiding.   ... then another article popped up this week.   I was wondering if it would contain a new case or simply repeat old allegations and FUD and Ms. Niles did not disappoint.  A technique that I learned in dealing with negotiations and conflicts is to review the correspondence with a critical eye and black out all irrelevant contents. This helps to remove all the distracting attacks, innuendos, assumptions, and FUD from view so a person can focus on the important aspects ... like the facts. How much of Ms.Niles text survived my review? About 17.5% or 347 words out of ~1983. The rest was either repeated information or opinion as opposed to fact.  Just in case you are curious as to what that looks like, I have attached the blacked out document at the end of this post. Now on to a review of the words that actually bore on the case at hand ...
Post a Comment
Read more